{"id":233520,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-06-12T16:05:38","modified_gmt":"2018-06-12T10:35:38","slug":"gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm' ore' KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD \nDATED THIS THE 25% DAY OF NOVE\u00a79iB9ER-,._j:1_3\ufb011):8\u00ab _\nBEFORE H H M   F\" % '  _ V\nTHE HON'BLE MR Jusrgcs  _A'N3I'\u00ab.1f-;u5A.'.j',.  \u00ab\nCRL.P.NOs.'7407I2008. '2*4o3J_2'ods. g\n7348} 2003. 744oIgt3__n\u00a73. 744,1i2oo3,%744.2_zgoo8,  \u00bb\n7443I20O8_.f;13gi 744412033 \nCRL.P.---N\u00a7r.\"74~!}7[--_gOG8':\u00bb  _\n\nGadi1i:3ga;.:pa;':fiSl oi ' '\n\n a_bo'uii 32 _ _'\n\nOcc: Ag1ic13Ii*ef1i*i$tT\u00bb,,  \" __\n\nR\/o.\u00a7,u<.,,Ha1,,viuage"  "\n\nTq. & D._isi. Bel_Iary{  .. PETITIONER\n\n, '_    Advocate)\n\nA  P. 81... Moka Police Station\n.. Rep. "a~y"'State Public Prosecutor\n\nHigh Court Circuit Bench Building\nDhaiwad. .. RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
 ‘ .  “my Sri N.Dim:sh Rae, GA 85 Spl.P.P and
\n% ” Sri P.H.(}otkhindi, HCGP)<\/p>\n
This petition is \ufb01led under Section 439 Cir.P. C. praying
\nto enlarge the petitioner on bail in respect of Crime
\nNo.108\/2007 registered in MOKA Police Station, MOKA,
\nBellary Taiuk and District for the o\ufb01ences p\/11\/Ss. L143, 14?,
\n148, 324, 325, 326, 448, 452, 114, l20~E , 307, 302 I’\/W.
\n149 of IPC by allowing this c\ufb01minai peti\ufb01on.<\/p>\n
CRL. P. 110.7408] 2008:\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Gadilingappa, S\/o.Parasappa   <\/p>\n
Aged about 32 years I ‘<\/p>\n
Occ:Ag:ricu!turist<\/p>\n
R\/o.K.K.Ha1 Village T.    _ V’ ‘
\nTq. 85 Dist. Bcllaly. ” _    PEFQTFEQNER<\/p>\n
(By Sri S.S.Yadrami, A_dvocatc_)_ :
\nAND: V  \u00e9 1. %
\nThe State of Karnataka..~-   V _ <\/p>\n
By P.S.I. Moka’I?\u00a3)1ice\u20ac3tat:iQ}\u00a7  ‘   1
\nRep. by State  Prosecutor  ‘ <\/p>\n
High Cou3:\u00b0t”C\u00a7:*\u00a2f:1ii*a’!t.3_eI1)<\/p>\n
 ‘ms pm-\u00a2g is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying<\/p>\n
.   \u00e9niarge A. the petitioner on bail in respect of Crime
\n. ‘mro.197;.:aao’zV Iegstered in MOKA Police Station, MOKA,<\/p>\n
 _ “B\u00a2IiaI’y-Tal\ufb01lx agd District for the o\ufb01bnoes p\/11\/Ss.143, 147,<\/p>\n
” ._1″=:L3%,’ 324;.._3;2$,’A 325, 443, 452, 11.4, 120~B, 307, 302 r\/W.<\/p>\n
149 ofI_PC*?{;y”a11owing this criminal petition.<\/p>\n
cRL.p.No.7o9ygoo3;\n<\/p>\n
% 5]” iB E’rwEEN:\n<\/p>\n
 ”  S\/o.KaIe Sunkanna
\n‘ =  –Aged about 35 years<\/p>\n
Doc: Agnbulmre,
\nR\/o.K.I<LHa1 Village
\nTq. as Dist. Bellaxy. .. PETITIGNER<\/p>\n
(By Sri S.S.Yadrami, Advocate)\u00bb<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
The State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
By Moka Police Station  \u00bb’  .\n<\/p>\n
Bellary. T c \u00a7”R’ESVE’–Q\u00a3~E<\/p>\n
(By Sri N.Di11csh Rao, GA & Sp}. RP and .%   ‘
\nSri P.H.Gotk1n’ndi, Heep).\n<\/p>\n
This petition is \ufb02ied under  J<\/p>\n
to enlarge the pctitiometj on  in  v1V*r:spVect ” of ” Crime
\nNo.10?\/2007 Iegistcred as;  No.55;  on the
\n\ufb01le ofPr1. Sessions Judge,  ‘  — ” <\/p>\n
Marcmxa, S16;\n<\/p>\n
Agcdhbout 33 years
\nR\/o.K.K.IfIa1
\nV, _;Tq. as Dist .. PETITIONER<\/p>\n
 \u00ab .    S~.._S.Yadrami, Advocate)<\/p>\n
 The state of Karnataka
\nBy Esfioka Police Station. .. RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
‘A ‘T my Sri N.Dinesh Rao, GA 85 SpLP.P and
\n‘ Sri P.E~I.Gotkhin\u00a2ii, HCGP)<\/p>\n
This petition is \ufb01led under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying
\nto enlarge the petitioner on bail in respect of Crime
\nNo.1OB\/2007 mgstemd as S.C. No.56] 2008, pending on the
\n\ufb01le of Pd. Sessicns Judge, Bellary.<\/p>\n
cRL.P.No.7440i20o8;\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1. Kadappa,S\/ojwlanumappa
\nAged about 50 years   ‘
\nOoc:Agri., R] o.K.K.Hal
\nTq. 85 Dist. Be]hary~583 19;.’ _<\/p>\n
2. Somalinga, SI
\nAged about 22  *   A} ”    _
\n0cc:Agri., R\/o.K.K.Ha}   ..\n<\/p>\n
Tq. 85 Dist  1.01;.’ ‘<\/p>\n
3. Durg,ap\ufb01;I_Sjo;Ka}1appa_”
\nAged ah.-‘mt 52   * V<\/p>\n
 Tq. &  \u00a5:”3c\ufb02a1*3=’;583 101.\n<\/p>\n
4- Tayappaa SI Hamim\ufb01ppa
\n aboiit 65 yaai”3
\n ,V R! o. K.K;Ha1 Village
\n‘ “Tq. 85 Iiistf\ufb02eliz\u00e9xy-583 101. .. PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
% – .\u00a7}.So\ufb02%;1H’m.ath & L.V. K. Advocates)<\/p>\n
X ‘—.4ThCvS1\u20ac;ifE2 bf Karnataka<\/p>\n
By Moka Police Station.\n<\/p>\n
Relay by High Court<\/p>\n
.. A’ ‘State Pubiic Pmsccutor
\n”   District~583 101. .. RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
{By Sri l’3.Di;nt:sh Rm, GA &. Sp]. RP and
\nSri P.H.Gotkhindi, HCGP)<\/p>\n
This petition is \ufb01led under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying
\nto yam: bail to the petitioners with conditions in<\/p>\n
CR.No. 107\/2007 of MOKA Police Station.<\/p>\n
CRL. P. NQ744 I I 2008:\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1. Iranna, S\/o.Kasdappa
\nAged about 20 years<\/p>\n
Occ: Agri., R[o.K.K.Ha11I\ufb01hge
\nTq. as Dist.   .\n<\/p>\n
2. Mailaiah, s\/o.Ha%;;uma_\u00a7pg  ~
\nAged about 38  ‘      ,
\nOcc:Agri., R]o.K.\u00a7{.VH&lVV\ufb02_1age *  1 .,
\nTq. as Dgsgagna-;’y.    – ~ .. PETYFIONERS<\/p>\n
(By Sri   \ufb01\u00e9vocates)<\/p>\n
‘I’h:\u00e9 Sta1.e fo:[:<a mf .. % %
\nBy Make. Police S~tatio_1r_1;~,
\nBenarypistact,  %  .. RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
gay Sri n.nm\u00a2gh Rae, GA 85 Sp}. mo and<\/p>\n
 ;_Sri P:H.Gof;k'uit1di, HCGP)<\/p>\n
V    T.  is \ufb01lcd under Section 439 Cr.P. C. praying
\n._    to the petitioners with conditions in
\nA ?1cR.N_g.';t:_7T]2oo7 of MOKA Pbiice Station.<\/p>\n
CR\u00a7_4. P. No. 744%OO8:\n<\/p>\n
x ‘ _zgE’r{vEEN:\n<\/p>\n
b’ Ifanna, S] o.Thayappa<\/p>\n
Aged about 35 years<\/p>\n
Occ: Agri.,R[o.K.K.Ha1 Village<\/p>\n
Tq. as Dist. Be-llaxy. .. PETITIONER<\/p>\n
(By Sri S.G.SoI1apurmath 8:\u00bb L.V.K. Advocates)<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
The Stats of Karnataka
\nBy Moka Pblicc Station.\n<\/p>\n
Bcllary District. ;’\u00a7:_RE$E\u00a7\u20ac}\u00a7iD;\u00a7\u00a7N’f’ <\/p>\n
(By Sri Nmnesh Rao, GA 81. S}:}i.iPV.I7″:1I&1(i’.” L: % M  }
\nSri P.H.Gotkhx’ndi, HCGP)  ‘  ‘<\/p>\n
This petition is  ‘s\u00e9\ufb01dcr  prayiiig
\nto grant bail to the ptzzi\ufb01oners ”  cgondi\ufb01ons in
\nCR.N0. 10772007 of  S-‘5’L\u00a3_iti0I1. ‘  ‘V<\/p>\n
c\u00a7\u00a7;,\u00a7’P.\n<\/p>\n
% <\/p>\n
1- IAMIH-A   Sl\u00a7L”45 a3*\u00e9\ufb01:>\u00a7’
\nAged.’ gabout 35′ years
\n% -vOcc:A%1’i-Q1?\/o.K.K.HaI Village<\/p>\n
\u00bb  2.  S\/’o\ufb01anumappa<\/p>\n
‘  &i3.O’_\u00a3it 52 years
\n‘  AVg:ti,R\/0.K.K.Ha1 Village
\nTq, _&;E,)ist. Bellary.\n<\/p>\n
3.”  S\/o.Kaddappa<\/p>\n
 about 20 years<\/p>\n
V  Gee: Agi, R]o.K.K.HaI Village<\/p>\n
A Tq. as Dist. Bellazy.\n<\/p>\n
4. Maliaiah, S\/o\ufb02anamapgm
\nAged about 38 years
\nOcc: Agxi, R\/o.K.K.Ha1 Village
\nTq. 85 Dist. Bellary.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5. Somalinga, S] o.Moka Pampanna
\nAged about 22 years
\nO<:c:Agriculturist
\nR\/o.K.K.Ha1 Village<\/p>\n
Tq. 85 Dist.Be1laIy.   \u00e9  jP:\u00e9f4r:9fiC):~zE:2s j\u00ab <\/p>\n
(By Sri S.G.S0}lapurmath -Ba    \u00ab. ":
\nAN D:\n<\/p>\n
The State of    V
\nBy Moka Police Statigli.  vv ‘ -‘
\nBellary Distzficig. ‘ ” ‘ V .. RESPONDENT
\n(By s;i.’r:’iajn\u00a7;\u00a7:-.  %c:\u00bba. av.\u00bb s;p1,’1=-j?” ‘And<\/p>\n
Sri P.Ij.Cotkhi:;&i;’jvVHCGjP)  <\/p>\n
   tinder Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying
\nto  $9 ” petitioners with conditions in
\nCR. No;~1_O8.[ 2007* 9f  Police Station.<\/p>\n
  A <\/p>\n
A   S\/o.Ka11appa<\/p>\n
“Ag\u00e9ti about 52 years
\n” .VC)\u00a5cc: Agxi, R\/o.K.K.HaI Village
\nTq. 35 Dist. Bellary-583 101.<\/p>\n
  Tayappa, S\/o\ufb01anamappa<\/p>\n
Age\u00e9 about 66 years
\nOcc: Agri., R\/o.K.K.Ha1 Village
\nTq. & Dist. Bellaxy-583 101. .. PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
(By Sri S.G.Sol}apurrnat.h & L.V.K. Advocates)<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
The State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
ByMoka Police Station. I \u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
Bcllary District.  fl <\/p>\n
(By Sri N.Dinesh Rae, GA as 5131. P\u00ab.’P_z’a’\ufb01d  A. V’ ”
\nSri P.H.Gotkhindi, Hosp} ” . V %<\/p>\n
This petition  \ufb01nciger  43\u00a7Ci;.P.C. praying
\nto grant bail to   Vwith conditions in
\nCR.No. 10312907 of MQK5  Statitggx, <\/p>\n
These ‘   \u00abV orders this day, the
\nCourt m__r-mic _f{.)l1o\\a_vi;1’g.;..   ‘<\/p>\n
%  QRBER<\/p>\n
 aln   V. petitions, petitioners are seeking bail<\/p>\n
‘( M _   439 Cr.P.C. These petitions have arisen out of<\/p>\n
V 2007 and crime N0.108\/2007 zegistexed by<\/p>\n
“-Moira  Bcllaxy District.\n<\/p>\n
” 2. The petitiancr in Cr1.P.No.7407\/2008 and<\/p>\n
‘Cir1.P.No.7408\/ 2008 namely Gadilingappa Sfo Parasappa is<\/p>\n
arrayed as accused No.18 in crime No.1{)8\/\u20ac200? and<\/p>\n
accused No.1 1 in crime No.10?’\/2007. E
\nm. wiww   W .\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
The petitionexs in Cr1.P.No.7444\/ <\/p>\n
Durgappa, S\/0 Kallappa and Thayappa S]  <\/p>\n
arrayed as accused Nos. 1 and 7   Np.    _ <\/p>\n
As per the case of 1V()3:x\u00a7’
\nstanding enimity   to
\nLingayath  of K. K. Hal
\nVillage situate Aomoka Police Station.<\/p>\n
The    out of sha\ufb01ng of<\/p>\n
watei; of  one year prior to date of
\noccufiepce,  to Nayaka community<\/p>\n
was  pzfsoiis iielonging to Lingayath community of<\/p>\n
   was long standing enimity between<\/p>\n
V    A\ufb01er the death of Sunkanna’, the persons<\/p>\n
.’   were Waiting to take vengeance<\/p>\n
again_et'[. persons of Lingayath community. The pmsecution<\/p>\n
A “:. ‘  alleged that there was a criminal conspiracy between the<\/p>\n
 ;accused arrayed in crime No.10?\/2007 and Crime<\/p>\n
No.108\/2007, to eliminate the deceased persons, at this<\/p>\n
stage of the proceedings, I do not \ufb01nd any material to accept<\/p>\n
the same. In any event, the same being made on the basis of<\/p>\n
statements given by accused during  of <\/p>\n
investigation, cannot be oonsidezfcd.’  A <\/p>\n
3. It is the case of tizc\u00e9k
\nabout 7.45 p.1:a., pc\ufb01tionerddvdvniddmed    other
\naccused in crime Nio;V.1O7,i 108\/2007′
\narmed with deadly ‘choppers, sicklcs,
\nclubs ctc.,    with the common
\nobject  his younger
\nbmtigilcr  f one Nagarajagouda. It is
\n   that in furtherance of common<\/p>\n
objccf _ of  dssombly, the petitioners named above<\/p>\n
.   oigiaci’ ~aocus\u00a7v:ud””&t1’cspassed Athc house of the deceased-<\/p>\n
Y.\/”\n<\/p>\n
    assaulted him with deadly weapons and<\/p>\n
 5fi.n3ta11tanoous death. When the wife of the<\/p>\n
  Ramanagouda came to rescue her husband, she<\/p>\n
  also assaulted. Thereafter, the accused an: alleged to<\/p>\n
d  Hhavc dxaggcd deceased  uda to the house of<\/p>\n
Ramaouda and assaulted him with choppers, sicklcs,<\/p>\n
clubs and caused his death. Thexea\ufb02cr the accused
\nin .\n<\/p>\n
txespasscdf the house of Nagaxajagouda and assaulted him
\n‘i<\/p>\n
with deadly weapons and causedmhis    <\/p>\n
M-3\u20acu.\u20ac.\u00bb<\/p>\n
Radhamma came to\ufb01her husban\ufb01, she by <\/p>\n
\u00a7_\/* . .\n<\/p>\n
accused. ‘Thus, the accuseti-are  <\/p>\n
three muxtiers in a row.\n<\/p>\n
murders of    and\nNagarajagoudg are anggag    their family\nmembcifw     '\n\n     Sushcelamma W\/O\n  was mgstcmd by Moka\n<\/pre>\n
Po1ic:1s\u00abff11*  under Sections 143, 147, 148,<\/p>\n
324, 323;”~3<1*i, #?i{48A,"v3(V)f1'\u00a7.Vr\/W 149 we.<\/p>\n
   a complaint made by Radhamma, WI 0 deceased<\/p>\n
 _  crime No.108\/2007 was registered for<\/p>\n
a\ufb01engxes-;5umshab1e under Section 143, 147, 143, 324, 325,<\/p>\n
 .. ,3HO7,V"~4\u00a248, 302 r\/W 149 [PC by Moka Police. T1118 above<\/p>\n
A'  'eshaplaints were registered against persons named therein<\/p>\n
 for having committed o\ufb01bnces during the course of same<\/p>\n
transaction, which resulted in death of three persons<\/p>\n
namely, Ramanagaouda, S agouda and<\/p>\n
Nagarajagouda and injuries to their \ufb01amily IIkC1'."I1b\u20ac'\ufb01':"ThE <\/p>\n
~\u00a7\\\u00a71 C<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
facts narrated in the complaints given by  <\/p>\n
Ratihamxaa are rather over}appi;:g’;”  A
\nThe copy of __   ‘V
\ndeceased Nagarajagowda,    es
\nmany as 23 injuries;  \ufb01ecmms and
\nalso amputation of  the injuries are
\ndescribed ae   ‘ x V
\n  ” examination report of deceased
\n  that he had su\ufb01ered as many as
\n14    cut into pieces, skull and CI’3333.it1JJ),<\/p>\n
g-.555}  .  of the injuries found on his person<\/p>\n
\u00bb ;”*\u00a2%Iere.V_Cut\u00ab.;i 1i;\u00a71;I’ies. The cause of death is shown as due to<\/p>\n
 =  Viaeemonhage as a result of multiple injuries. The<\/p>\n
 examination report of deceased<\/p>\n
 ” ve gouda would reveal, he had su\ufb01ered 5 injuries<\/p>\n
  the cause of death is shown as due to shock and<\/p>\n
 hamorrhage as a result multiple injuries.<\/p>\n
\\
\n\u00a7<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
I’VvC’\/<\/p>\n
“‘–…_.”an<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
6. The injury certi\ufb01cates ntlating to <\/p>\n
Radhamma and Paiakshagouda would    _ <\/p>\n
su\ufb01emd mul\ufb01plc grievous injuz’ies:.  <\/p>\n
suffered fracture of right  _<\/p>\n
At this stage of”the   Ijsasons to
\nsuspect the contents  which would
\nShow that dcathsof    ”  uda and
\n  They had su\ufb01hred.\n<\/p>\n
  and their death was
\ninstanta’i1e(a:t1s.v    ihcm are no reasons to suspect<\/p>\n
the  of certi\ufb01cates relating to Sushiias,<\/p>\n
  avgd Palav “” k ” ‘shagouda.\n<\/p>\n
 the complaint and furthcr statements of<\/p>\n
 and Radhamma, the death of R uda<\/p>\n
 : ‘an5;i_. I:1:.is””t:amther  ouda had occurred near the<\/p>\n
   of R uda and the death of Nagarajagoucia had I<\/p>\n
 in his house. When Sushilamma, W\/0<\/p>\n
Ramanagouda went to zescue her husband, she was<\/p>\n
assaulted and suffered injuries. Similarly, when Radhamma,<\/p>\n
W] 0 of Nagarajagowda went to rescue her husbanc\ufb01
\nalso assaulted and su\ufb01bred injuries. ‘ . A<\/p>\n
At this stage of the case,  V
\nplace of occurmnce and presence Bf <\/p>\n
place OfOCC1lI’I’6I1Cc, cannot ‘ . 1<\/p>\n
~ 3. 1 have heani ‘: ieaxne’ci  p\u00e9\ufb01ti\u00e9acrs and
\nlearned Special Pubhc  <\/p>\n
,9’; W’Vi’I”1e:  for petitioners in
\nCr1.P.~\u00a7rl.P.No.7408\/2008 has made<\/p>\n
   The;  petiiionexs in Cr1.P.No.7407_[2008 and
\nA No.7408\/ 2008 namely Gadilingappa, S\/0<\/p>\n
  has been falsely implicated in funhcr
\n. ‘Statement made by Sushjlamma.<\/p>\n
‘IL : In tlact, the accused namely Sadakali S\/0
\nLingappa against whom similar allegahions are
\nmade has been yantcd bail by this Court in
\nCr}. P. No.2422\/ 2008 and Crl. P. No. 247 1\/ 2008.
\nTherefore, on the gmund of parity, petitioner in
\nCrI.P.N0.’?407\/2068 and (3r1.P.N0.7408]20{}8 is<\/p>\n
entitled to be released on bail.  f\ufb01wc\u00e9f
\nN ‘  ” \\ t<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
In order to appreciate these subm\u00a3s\u00e9\u00a7i\u00a75i1\u00a7;  <\/p>\n
nccessaxy to consider the contents gfpcompiainiijaaii\ufb01tad  ‘V . <\/p>\n
Sus  and further statcmen\ufb01    4′   } ~ A’<\/p>\n
As per the  by  on
\n9.11.2007 at about 7.45  \ufb01saciixdiag the
\npetitioner in CrI.P.No.9’7ii;i)_.’?]’i2()(\u00a7”i\u00bb\u00a3V:i’:  P.No.7408\/ 2008
\nnamely Gadi\ufb01ngappa, ‘Sjo   with deadly
\nweapons    of the deceased
\n ,  _ ‘ ‘ \u00abv..;5\u00a7”c%<:;1sx:tI~Chandm assaulted the
\ndeccas\u00e9ii  So also other accused<\/p>\n
assguitagi   'With deadly weapons. When she<\/p>\n
 "  '~3_1_1c  also assguitcd by the accused and<\/p>\n
   The compiaint narrated by Sush1ia' mma,<\/p>\n
Wi\ufb01zpf  who was admittedly present in the place of<\/p>\n
  makes it ckear that, the petitioner namely<\/p>\n
 _Gad:i:2ingappa, S\/o Parasappa, being a member of unlawful<\/p>\n
Wa\u00e9sscmbly had tnespassw into thc house of the deceased<\/p>\n
Ramanagaouda. After the deceased was done to death, he
\nleft that place along with other accused and all of them<\/p>\n
trespassed into the house of  agouda. Therefore,<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
by the mere fact that the complainant hat} not  ae}’ _<\/p>\n
overacts to petitioner, it is not possible to is .. <\/p>\n
ne prilnafacie case against    X<\/p>\n
Pmsecution cannot invoke ”  I.P,\u00a7. the’ ;
\naccused. ‘ ‘V V_ V. .’  V
\nThe occurrence   ~-.i,asid’e At1ie house of
\nthe deceased Ramanageegiee  pei’ petitioner along
\nwith other    Weapons, would<\/p>\n
p1’i:11a–faci3?:’   was one of the members<\/p>\n
of    furtherance of the common
\nobject of   the deceased Ramanagouda<\/p>\n
was\ufb02dene to  _<\/p>\n
‘A    eixbeaission of learned Ceuneei for petitioner that<\/p>\n
   to bail on the ground of parity cannet be<\/p>\n
aeeepte\ufb01l -A “for this Court while granting _bail in<\/p>\n
   .er1__. P. M2422; 2003 and 2471\/2003, has not considered the<\/p>\n
‘% ‘that the prosecution has invoked Section 149 me. This<\/p>\n
 =  has not noticed the exhortation attx\ufb01uted to the<\/p>\n
petitioner. Thezefore, the petitioner cannot be released on<\/p>\n
bail on the ground of parity. N\u00bb  CL <\/p>\n
10. The petitioner in cr1.P.No.7o\u00a7:;\u00a7\/2:308
\nCr1.P.No.’?348\/ 2008 namely Max:\u00e91ii1\u00e9i,’\u00abS\/’*9   ‘ AV
\narrayed as accused No.5 is <\/p>\n
the house ofthc deceased  V    <\/p>\n
The learned coi\ufb01\ufb01scl  wou\ufb01i Qubmjt that
\nhis name is nofg   narrated by
\nSushilammaf  submit that he has
\nbeen   made by the
\ncompj;\u00e9iiiiai1’L;.. fFhVeJ him is that he had
\n   Thexeforc, there is no prima-
\nfacig   <\/p>\n
”  _Fg.:.1_ cmier tci ‘appreciate this submission, it is neccssaxy<\/p>\n
 V    the prosecution case, that was spate of<\/p>\n
 accused had tresspasscd into the house of<\/p>\n
 the”  Ramanagouda. After killing him, they<\/p>\n
x V’ \u00bb  into the house of Nagaxajagowda. When the Wives<\/p>\n
 qf”t1″1\u00a2 deceased Ramangouda and Nagarajagouda intervened<\/p>\n
  rescue their husbands, they were also assaulted and<\/p>\n
 TU –  V” “x,<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
It is true, in the complaint,   ‘ L. <\/p>\n
the names of all the accused. S\ufb01e l:i?\u00a7_is’~  <\/p>\n
this petitioner and other  in”~her .\ufb011ithe?.fj’s*.atement. ‘<\/p>\n
The complaint was Ieeonrled ::)_1_;:\u00a7.~1_1’;v200’3.?. whee S\ufb01ishilamma
\nwas being treated   at Bellazy. Her<\/p>\n
further statement was  9:;\n<\/p>\n
I 1.   suffered by SushJ1a:n:una’
\nand  ‘\ufb01xer   to name the I accused
\nin v_eo’ns11dered as a circumstance in
\nfavour of   so, mentioning of name of this<\/p>\n
   statement, cannot be considered as<\/p>\n
\u00bb _Vj1n.provet:ie11t at this stage. The prosecution has invoked<\/p>\n
  13.0., the mere feet that no overtact is<\/p>\n
  this petitioner, is not a su\ufb01ciaent ground to<\/p>\n
V.   ‘g;.*a;1t  According to the case of the prosecution, the
\n belongng to opposite community, had trespassed<\/p>\n
 V’   the house of deceased Ramanagouda and committed his<\/p>\n
murder. Therefoxe, the wife of deceased Ramanagouda
\nnamely Sushilannna who had witnessed the brats} killing of<\/p>\n
her husband, must have been stunned and shocked. She<\/p>\n
I’D’ \u00a312\u00bb 1?’\/W3 A ,<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
was also assaulted in the same course of tz~a11sa<:\u20ac.1Zo;3,'__ 5'ETv_.eix.if<\/p>\n
them are omissions in the complaint .bj}5.5.:he_r, 3tii.<'-it <\/p>\n
would not belie the contents  "_1ier,   it<\/p>\n
Therefore, at this stage, it _is    B0131;<\/p>\n
petitioner was deliberately  furthef<\/p>\n
statement ofcompiai:\u00a7a~.1_1t <\/p>\n
12. The, petitioneif  %’\u00a7:;1;img.’*z34s\/2093 namely
\nMaxenna,   S1″-m\u00e9 E3 533%  as accused No.5 in
\ncrime   stage, it is relevant to state that
\nthe  VNo.1O8\/2007 was narrated by<\/p>\n
Ra(i}’.a_mm\u00a7i, V\/o’1of Nagaxajagouda at 11.45 pm.<\/p>\n
. ‘,     . . . . . .4<\/p>\n
*  submitted by Earned Counsel for petitioner<\/p>\n
mat,  from giving the name of this petitioner, no<\/p>\n
 Q ~ mzgzta\u00e9t is attributed to this petitioner.<\/p>\n
As per the complaint nanated by Radhamma, W\/o<\/p>\n
Nagarajcgowda, that at about 7.45 13.31., this petitioner along<\/p>\n
with other accused armed with deadly Weapons tmspassed<\/p>\n
into the house of Nagarajagoada<\/p>\n
W. V”\n<\/p>\n
and agsaulteeil<\/p>\n
‘\\ .\n<\/p>\n
Nagarajagouda, who at the Ieievant  <\/p>\n
television. The presence of   b 7. <\/p>\n
deceased Nagarajagouda at xcgf <\/p>\n
particularly when there  <\/p>\n
prima-facic establish,  AtV,1:1:.~ui\u00a7):uc’.~t:i’ti:*;.11c1″‘  aviizxxcmber of<\/p>\n
unlawful assembly,    “to commit murder
\nOH Nagarajagowd\ufb01; 1:};ert::fB1*e; iigt   to hold, them is<\/p>\n
Iio pximagfairiga  agaj\ufb01st the <\/p>\n
  ix{“‘t:r1.P.No.7441\/2008 namely
\nImn\ufb01\u00e9a, ‘S16  Mallaiah S\/o Hamzmappa are<\/p>\n
 a4S’~Va\u00a7:ca1Sed ‘9  12 in crime No.107[2007 which<\/p>\n
 =   xggistgmd }m=1–thc complaint narrated by Sushilamma,<\/p>\n
 9    ‘ o1.1da. The learned Counsel for petitioners<\/p>\n
 ‘9sfd\u00e9i1d  that in the complaint narrated by Sushiiamtna<\/p>\n
on’9… 1\u00ab:_.20{)’i”, there is no reference to these petitioners and<\/p>\n
” ~  \ufb01ave been imylicatcd in the further statement of<\/p>\n
 rccordcd on 12.11.2007.\n<\/p>\n
in the discussion made supra, I have given the reasons<\/p>\n
for rejecting the similar submissions made on behalf if
\n . ‘\/-N->\u00bb-=-“2<\/p>\n
22<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioners in Cr1.P.No.7092.\/2008 ‘and (‘,_1jl_,<\/p>\n
The same reason holds good fa};  the of <\/p>\n
Icarned Counsel for petitioners I  ‘V L\n<\/p>\n
15. The pe\ufb01tioncr 3″,’:Vitv.,:._V'{‘2rl_.P.i’*V1’o.77’\ufb024\u00a23′:f3Z\/ ions namely
\niranna, S\/o Thayap3}4a..,is a $0.6 in crime’
\nNo.10′?\/2007 negistereti   narrated biz
\nSushi1amma,”\u00a3\u00a7(:[o \u00abcontended by learned
\n \ufb01bm mentioning the name
\nin tfie  _t;isVzWattIibutcd to the petitioner.
\n A.t th.c ‘risk\ufb01r  it is necessary to state that<\/p>\n
c4I;’mc,..No..V107[:’2{)07V’ was rcgistczed for o\ufb01enccs punishable<\/p>\n
 . 1′:nd\u00e9:~j’\u00a2,’s\u00e9c:ipns 14$, 14:7, 143, 324, 326, 352, 114, 397, 448<\/p>\n
  3  no 149 i.P.C. The death of Ramanagouda had<\/p>\n
A  in his house. The petitioner and other accused<\/p>\n
 AA Ttxcopag\u00e9scd into the house of Ramanagouda and caused his<\/p>\n
V’ ” .doath. If no overtact is attributed to this petimrner, that<\/p>\n
 would not absokvc the vicarious liability of petitioners under<\/p>\n
Section 149 1.110. Therefore, this submission cannot be<\/p>\n
 p,,.,,,,.,6,.,…,.\n<\/p>\n
acceptzd. IUC, ‘<\/p>\n
23<\/span><\/p>\n
16. The petitioner in Cr}..P.No.744B,3f\u00a70(\u00a78ff:.<\/p>\n
Iranna S\/o Tayappa, petitionczfg Din  <\/p>\n
Kadappa Sfo Hanamappa,  ,_-Sf?)   <\/p>\n
S\/0 Hanamappa and SoI:\u00a3a3.7111gai\u00a7,f’d
\narrayed as accused Nos.  _v16,  ‘m crime
\nNo.108\/2007   S\u00e9ctions 143,
\n147, 143, 3251, 325,AVV_3{\u00a7’.??,   149 1.13.0. on a<\/p>\n
complaint by:  is the Wife of<\/p>\n
 A’
\n It  “<\u00a7o11tcnts of complaint narrated by
\nRadhai)im_g.a,.,  "N%:gax'ajagouda, the complaint was<\/p>\n
 atV.'ab<111j;_'41.1.4S p.m. on 9.11.2097 v\u00a7rm1e she was<\/p>\n
.A  hospital at Bellary. Her further statement<\/p>\n
 ._  12.11.2007. In the complaint given by her,<\/p>\n
 from giving the names of 8 accused, she has<\/p>\n
 AA  other accused armed with deadly weapons trespassed
\n'   her house and committed the murder of her husband.<\/p>\n
: in her further statement, she has given the names of these<\/p>\n
petitioners as mcmbers of unlawfui assembly. These<\/p>\n
peti\ufb01oners armed with deadly weapons had trespassed into<\/p>\n
f\\\/'…e\u00a3v—\u00abC3~s.\u00bb–~<\/p>\n
1.5,..- ,<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
the house of Nagarajagowda and committee
\npxesence of these petitioners a}.c;1’1\u00a7 with  {mo 1 V
\nwere armed with deadly I
\nNagarajagouda with tabesehvh  1o1’1Vg
\nstanding enimity,     they were
\nmembers of   etage of the case,
\nthey cannot vasfciiel’ “\ufb01nder Section 149<\/p>\n
 of learned Counsel for<\/p>\n
petiiizgnexs    to bail, cannot be accepted.<\/p>\n
_ 17;L””‘~3’1;’e.p’g–=:tiAi:i;3rieie. in Crl.P.No.’7444\/2008 nameiy<\/p>\n
 ‘~  A S\/on  and Thayappa, S\/o Hanamappa are<\/p>\n
‘   Nos. 1 and 7 in crime No. 108\/ 2007<\/p>\n
 e\ufb01ences punishabie under Sections 143, 147,<\/p>\n
32;}, r\/W. 149 LP. C. on the complaint narrated by<\/p>\n
 V.  W10 deceased Nagarajagouda. The complaint<\/p>\n
AA’w\u00bba’.eA1eoorded at about 11.45 pm. on 9.11.1997 when she<\/p>\n
V’  treated in VIMS hospitai at Bellamy. In the complaint,<\/p>\n
she has gven the names of petitioners 1 and 2 as members<\/p>\n
of unlawful assembly, who had txespassed into her hguse. I<\/p>\n
t I
\niv <\/p>\n
-….c’<\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
is stated that petitioner No.1-Durgappa had assai11iec1″‘~1;cr<\/p>\n
with a chopper. It is also stated that <\/p>\n
Thayappa, S\/o Hanamappa had a\u00a7;s.au,Itcd_~6ii ‘ b <\/p>\n
back and neck of deceased “g:tag\u00e9;VT%jit<\/p>\n
cannot be disputed that Nagmngjag\u00e9ud\u00e9 \u00ab1iea,[\u00a7::v1Va%V%;;cgmt% of *<\/p>\n
multiple injuries su\ufb01hmd    Wjo
\nD\u00e9agarajagouda,   in the course
\nof the same  ;sta;jc,  are no reasons<\/p>\n
to disbe~}isvi\u00e9’ ti”1’c. E,\u00a3:n.teB:.fs=._Gf <\/p>\n
.18,’ The   for petitioners has contended<\/p>\n
that, in  < 70f '- gmnted by this Court in<\/p>\n
 &C1\u00a7;..f'.F\u00a7o.72\u00a70\/2\u00a3)'O'8""V and Cr1.P.No.7261]2008 to<\/p>\n
   No.1 in crime No. 108\/ 2007, these'<\/p>\n
';3'~2,ft4'1"Vfio1:tvr:.19s5: as accused in Crime No.1(}8\/2607 are<\/p>\n
 entitlegiio bail on the gound of parity.<\/p>\n
  On careful consideration of the order made by this<\/p>\n
  in Crl,P.No.726{}\/2008 and Cr1.P.No.7261\/2008 , I<\/p>\n
\ufb01nd, this Court has not eonsidemd the plight cf the<\/p>\n
complainant when her statement was recorded. At the risk of<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
repetition, it is necessary to state, as per  1’31\u00a2
\npmsecution, the complainants namely
\nRadhamma had witnessed the; 1A$’i’iit\u00a3*.1_v  \u00bbf’
\nhusbands in their houaea A. ‘wezee
\ninjured. The statements  ‘VVh<);apita1';
\nBellary. Therefore, oz21.i\u00a7sio1;e.e"ttxq:A.a..t.'1:1e nainea\ufb02of all the
\naccused in the    to grant bail.\n<\/p>\n
It is needlesa f2i:”state,;:’f1’ie’   the be and end of<\/p>\n
the  “”‘i’il*_a._\u00bb:=;V   complainants were
\nmconied  Therefore, the ground of<\/p>\n
parity is”n.pt  H  \ufb01efitionezs.<\/p>\n
  Ac  seen from the records, there was long<\/p>\n
    between party of the petitioners and the<\/p>\n
 o f  As already stated, one Sunkanna, who<\/p>\n
 belcngie-d  the party of the deceased was kzilked one year<\/p>\n
” xpiicr to the date of occurmnce. if the accused are released<\/p>\n
‘Ken Hbail, the possibility of the party men of the deceased<\/p>\n
V H “reacting in a retaha’ tory Mmegm , cannot ht-‘oo1np};e’\u00a3ely'[:\u00a7i1]ed<\/p>\n
out In View of existence of prima-cfacie ease and also having<\/p>\n
regard to the nature of o\ufb01ences alleged against the accuseti,<\/p>\n
N 1\/ween’<\/p>\n
I am of the 0pm’ ion that it would not be  “of ., <\/p>\n
justice ti} giant baii to pe\ufb01\ufb010mm;;’;Pcf_i\u00e9\ufb01:):;\u20ac1$   <\/p>\n
bail, are likely to tamper  pm\u00e9uaciition  <\/p>\n
are also lilmly ta-\ufb02ee away <\/p>\n
For these    <\/p>\n
 j 1
\n ,.\n<\/p>\n
mag:\n<\/p>\n
Ets* <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH comm’ ore’ KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25% DAY OF NOVE\u00a79iB9ER-,._j:1_3\ufb011):8\u00ab _ BEFORE H H M F” % ‘ _ V THE HON’BLE MR Jusrgcs _A’N3I’\u00ab.1f-;u5A.’.j’,. \u00ab CRL.P.NOs.’7407I2008. ‘2*4o3J_2’ods. g […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-12T10:35:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gadilingappa S\\\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-12T10:35:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":3583,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Gadilingappa S\\\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-12T10:35:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gadilingappa S\\\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-12T10:35:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-12T10:35:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":3583,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008","name":"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-12T10:35:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gadilingappa-so-parasappa-vs-p-s-i-moka-police-station-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gadilingappa S\/O Parasappa vs P S I Moka Police Station on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}