{"id":233659,"date":"2008-04-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008"},"modified":"2017-11-04T11:10:03","modified_gmt":"2017-11-04T05:40:03","slug":"mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALDRE\nA DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF APRIL;V~2--Q(3u3__\"__::  I \nBEFORE 0' sd\"\"e\u00b0t\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. .1Us*I*IeE    d to\n\nCRIMINAL REVISION PE_1I'I'iON'_'Ia'(\u00a7*I. 3190 emoe  \n\nSri. Mohammad Irstqad \nS_\/o. Abdul Rehaman T\"iI'u(:hi3I1[;fI.E)ai}.i_;..,  _\nAged about 29 years. '     ' --.\n\nR\/0. D.No. l1'?,.'!'aklya-~St!reet,'-   '\n\nBhatkal. I : Petitioner\n\n(By Sri.      \n\nAND: \n\nThe state or I  I\n\nBy   ' l\u00a7'o1i.ee. Sf\ufb02ti _ I1,\n\nUttaIja.I<\ufb01Imta:J\"t}1dgment of' conviction passed by the trial Court only in\n\n soi far as it relates to oifence punishable U\/S. 504 IPC.\n\nll However, the conviction and sentence imposed upon the\n\n\/Z_D,Lv\\r.u>:\\L.__\n\n\n\naccused-fnetitioner for an offence punishable U\/' 353 is\n\ncon\ufb01rmed.\n\n2. The brief facts of the mprosec_:'utior:i'_'v ease' .are \"as \n\nfollows: A _ A _\nThat on 07.08.1999 atebout 3.30 p,1I1; 9,e\"vd1r\u00e9cted=l3y\n\nthe higher authorities, the G 1,7 9.1..11.g win.\n\nPW.-s.5, 6 & 7 '\"==-re \"t*\"~i1d'91g in the \ufb01eiephone\nlines at Shadlee:Sh'eet+'AIwe; S_trc\u00a7e1;by the side of and on. the\ntelephone pole  thelllouse of the accused, the\n\naccuse-,petiti;orle1?'l~::9:   ll  abused the lnjured..\n\n\"Suiemagaiml \"1?:oIi111aA'g9.n.\"', when the complainant got down\n\n * \u00ab..fT013C{ pole,' AA  eaccused pulled him holding his shirt,\n\n  right cheek and back. Thus, he has been\n\n  for lhc aforesaid otfences.\n\n .. a3.  s The prosecution in support of its case has\n\n\"  also got mar\"ed lvio. 1. Th uourte below, on\n\n\n\nappreciation of the oral and documentary evidencepeonxricted\nthe accused-petitioner and sentenced him asA4..?e'_i4\ufb02teti'wVheIfeix1\n\nbefore.\n\n4. Of the witnesses    ':\n\ncomplainant. He in his evidence hae  on \n\ndate of :,-_:_e\u00a2:- t, when he  dis_.h roi.1jg.h_i\u00a7_:__:L_1..__1 \u00ab.1.\n\nV T\" . -':\"-a---\n\n;.1_ .._L .'_'\n\nthe accused Cu1.u\"\" um' * 'eused. 1' ' iangnage \n\nderogative Wopde' like   when the\n\ncomplainant\"   telephone pole, the\naccused\"   his\"  Slapped on his right\n\ncheek and f'1s.ed en me heck. \"is 9\" Hence * enwnbemted\n\nby the evidence  'co-workers (We. 5 to '7') who were\n\n '~    1v---atethe time of incident.\n\nii'   . careful scrutiny of the mate\ufb01el on record, it is\n\ntesuxu 1y' of the injured-\n\n   (PW. 1) which is corroborated by the evidence of\nK  _poti1er eyewitnesses (PWs. 5, 6 85 7) coupled with the medical\n\n evidence in the form of PW.9 amply prove that the accused-\n\n\/iQmq.\u20ac4x_\n\n\n\nu ' o\n9 ~ _ 41 A\nn.I'1L?.iI1t-'E.\"..h\"i ....1s i'mr.l.y anu\n\npe\"\"'\"*r \" 'rein is  of the charges levelled against him\n\nand the prosecution has proyed its case.__\";heyond\u00ab V. all\n\nreasonable doubt. Both the Courts below,  \n\nof the material on record in proper\"pers1i~ective_\"i1ave\"@1reri.__ \n\na. a ught concussion that oeti\ufb01oners \".\"\u20ac :g.:ii:ii;3;\" oi'; i**'v*in-\ncommitted the offences punisiiaflsley ll\/SQ   do not\nfind any error in   by the\ufb02wcourt below\nand there is absolutely\"  interfere with the\n\nJudgment of  &paLc;'ed;'   = \n\n6.. ~~~~  lie.w.ever;..'a.s' the sentence, it is\n\nthe incident question\u00ab...iiad occurred in the year 1999 and\n\n -  iregets' for the unsavory incident that had\n\n jietitioner is the \ufb01rst offender and he is the\n\nsoie__\"\"bmad'vie:eainer in the family has the _respons_,-Lity to\n\n'53\n\nhe were to 1*:-\"t behind bars,\n\n   and his family members will be put to untold\n9.   and hardship and therefore, a lenient vievtr should be\n\n taken while imposing sentence of imprisonment.\n\n\/{Bu\/w-u:LL__.\n\n\n\n7. It is noticed that the incident has  the\n\nyear 1999 and the petitioner is *1\" firt o.iei\"ider',w\u00bbV_'fcher'-e_ ere\n\nIsl In L\\l.I- L [air I\n\nno criminal antecedents and therefore, tI1_e\"petitioner' being\" ad'\n\n\ufb02rst offender he is entitled to \n\nbene\ufb01t of provisions of Prohatien of \nthe olfence U\/S. 353 pu,i1i4sheihie_vL' .1'\n'\"im fi\ufb02\" \"r  V the 'n\"fn'ssions\nmade by the learned    and looking to\nthe totalityi-of?'  of the case, this\nCourt is~of   sentehce imposed by the Courts\n\n*rIn1'1 urn-'I +1-In\n\n   E1  Il'l\\JV\\.4\\.I- III-all'-I lp.Il.\\.a\n\nii\" In';\nvu -..r nu.-nu: .. ummni  z:n.,a\\\/\\:\"._.ra.v r\n\nsame is iis.'cie to heA':ooiii\ufb01ed. Hence, the foilowing order is\n\n       \n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
  Th.e’v’i:”I.je\u00a7rision petition is allowed in part. The<\/p>\n
   the accused–petitioner herein for the offence<\/p>\n
” ,.._\ufb02_1_Ji_’.inishabIe U\/S. 353 IPC., is confirmed. However, the<\/p>\n
 sentence of imprisonment for three months and \ufb01ne imposed<\/p>\n
\/I Jlu\/\\ceCiL__.\n<\/p>\n
1-\n<\/p>\n
upon the petitioner for an offence punishable ‘U\/’ 8. 35-3 I’1=C.,
\nis set aside and in modi\ufb01cation of the sentence: jjiiposed
\nupon the petitioner, he is directed to be released’  <\/p>\n
L e ben 11: of t. .2 provisions of Probation at aofrenaerss Act. is<\/p>\n
Petitioner-accused s Lu  A a ‘  ‘of<\/p>\n
GI
\n‘CI\n<\/p>\n
– C
\nF”\n<\/p>\n
9!<\/p>\n
Rs.10,000\/- with one surety
\nkeep good behaviour  :.yeai.;  F\ufb01jrthcr, the
\naccused–petitioner_is    of Rs. 10,000\/–
\nnamely, Sri:  ‘The compensation
\namount    bevdeposited within a period of
\ntwo  the accused–petiticner fail to<\/p>\n
_ deposit “ihe compensation amount, the same shall be<\/p>\n
   Sdl’1___<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALDRE A DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF APRIL;V~2–Q(3u3__”__:: I BEFORE 0′ sd””e\u00b0t THE HON’BLE MR. .1Us*I*IeE d to CRIMINAL REVISION PE_1I’I’iON’_’Ia'(\u00a7*I. 3190 emoe Sri. Mohammad Irstqad S_\/o. Abdul Rehaman […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-04T05:40:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-04T05:40:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":165,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-04T05:40:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-04T05:40:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-04T05:40:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008"},"wordCount":165,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008","name":"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-04T05:40:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammad-irshad-magic-pille-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohammad Irshad @ Magic Pille vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}