{"id":233955,"date":"2010-09-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-12-22T08:39:02","modified_gmt":"2016-12-22T03:09:02","slug":"g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
_ Kurng\ufb01l \u00e9istriatf Andhra ?r3dash.<\/p>\n
Ii TX! 3133 C\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 0? xanaamaxa 5? E\ufb01lG\ufb01LO8S_<\/p>\n
nawma THIS was 21″‘nAx ow savwauaga 261$ z a<\/p>\n
EEFGRE<\/p>\n
wan aonvsna HR.J\ufb02BTIcE A.8.EAc\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01?\ufb01$Eb <\/p>\n
uazw vnwxwxaa ao.14a3?!2o$& a.\ufb02\u00a71r72\u00a7\u00a7:w:es. C.C
\n\u00a7\u00a2a.9125–9i2$ 2\u00a2a9*u+cPcg -_%._ _” vu”<\/p>\n
BETIIEEE I<\/p>\n
G.Prabhakar sic G.Venkate3halu,_*
\nAged a\ufb01aut 32 y\u00a7ars,’>, 9′ –  V’;<\/p>\n
\ufb01negyiayed, E\/0 Fatna%$\u00a3tty \u00e9tr\u00e9et\ufb02’.
\nGr$ham Raa\ufb01, Eellary\u00ab5831\ufb013;’: __’xj,’;<\/p>\n
V v~” “- = *  ‘;;;P\u00a3TIT:D\ufb02\u00a3Wi ;\n<\/p>\n
,”,?h\u00e93%;\u00a5\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9@ are filed ma\ufb01a: Articles 226 and
\n22? af \ufb01\u00a7a_\u00a2bnstitution sf India graying tn quash<\/p>\n
  _ c9mmen~\u00a7rGer dt.\ufb01.11.EGO$ made on I.A.\ufb01es.3 to 5
\n‘”‘;n”&;\u00a7.\u00a7\u00e9.5s!2es\u00a7 passed by the E A\u00a7dl.Civil Judge
\n:K(\u00a3\ufb01;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7, Eellary.\n<\/p>\n
Th\u00e9ae \u00a5.?s. taming an .far Preliminary<\/p>\n
uA*ufHearing ‘a’ grasp this \ufb02ay; tha ccurt. made the<\/p>\n
f\u00a2ll$wing:w<\/p>\n
9 8.3 I R<\/p>\n
These getitiens have baen filed c\u00a7%1l%$\u00a7\u00a3\ufb01%E’
\nthe crders passed an I.A.Ncs.$ tv 5 t\u00a7H%\u00a7\u00a2%;i \u00a7\u00a7\\W
\n1, ta submit tha list of witn\u00a7as\u00e9\u00e9”%a ha $%a\u00a7i\u00a7a$ :
\nan bahalf 9f the gatiti\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9gx a\ufb02\ufb01 :ta \u00a7%\u00a2\u00a7an..\ufb01ha
\ncage cf the patitiangr.  \u00bb b AT  V<\/p>\n
2, Whe facts uQ\ufb02\u00a7&$H_i\u00a7 \ufb01%\u00e9;\u00a7?\u00e9nt far the
\ngurgasa af tha3\u00a7.\u00a7at\u00a7Ei\u00e9\ufb01% \u00a7r\u00a7 \u00a7\u00e9 u$\u00e9$E:-<\/p>\n
Tha ?\u00a7t\u00a3\ufb01i$\u00a7\u00a7;”\u00a7\u00a7%\u00a5in;i\u00e9 \u00a3$\u00a7W\u00a7usband Qf the
\nre3p\u00a2n\u00ae\u00e9nt.T\ufb01JT\u00a3\u00e9ir ‘u@ax\ufb01i\u00e9ga  tack ylase an
\n:2s.2.2\u00a7a_:;..’* __’2’c:a2, \u00a33 mala child was<\/p>\n
bark amt %$ th\u00a7 #\u20ac\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7k an\ufb01 thereafter 3 famale<\/p>\n
_  chil\u00a3\u00a7uLFaw V\ufb01anthav after, the wife left the<\/p>\n
 *_matr;m\u00a2\ufb01ialr*heuse. It is atate\ufb01 that tha<\/p>\n
\u00a7eti;i\u00e9\ufb01#\u00a3._ \u00a7\u00e9e sub\ufb01ected ta cruelty an\ufb01<\/p>\n
‘_ har\u00e9ssma\ufb01tg’ In the circumataacesg he filed a<\/p>\n
 w:\u00a7atiticn ‘ in M.c,No.5Sfa$ seating dacrae cf<\/p>\n
4″_diver:a reaalving tha xaxriaga an the graun\u00e9 af<\/p>\n
 “*u$r\u00a7elty and \ufb01eaarticn. Pfter the aygearance cf<\/p>\n
 ‘the respendent bafere the cvurt belaw, statements<\/p>\n
sf cbjactiens were file\ufb01 and the matter wa$
\nyoatad for evi\ufb01enca. ?he avidanca af tha<\/p>\n
agglicant was racorda\u00e9 as PW-1 and after thi\ufb01ln<\/p>\n
closure cf his evi\ufb01ence, the rasyuncent “was<\/p>\n
axamina\ufb01 as RK~1 ana in her crass-axaminatiang<\/p>\n
the daaumants \ufb01nnaxuxa~\ufb01, the \ufb01aa\u00e9 af_\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3titi\u00a7\ufb01, _<\/p>\n
ipalugatti\ufb01, A\ufb01nexurews, the \u00a39t%i\u00a7t :aadL *<\/p>\n
Annexure~F, the regiatered ya:ti\ufb01ie\u00a7;{\u00a7\u00a7&d 5wgfg <\/p>\n
centradicted. Rwul, the .wife Hh\u00e93 a\ufb01mitt\u00e9\ufb01 ‘Eek<\/p>\n
sigmatura on all these da\u00e9u\ufb01ents 5ut”d\u00e9niad the
\ncantant\ufb01. in th\u00e9> ci\u00a7\u00e9\ufb01$s\u00a7g$&a3, \ufb01ft\u00e9r the
\nclasure af the avidenc\u00e9:\u00e9\u00a3;\ufb01Ns1} \u00a7\ufb01\u00a7 petitianar<\/p>\n
file\ufb01 the5e  three iI5$L’sg\u00e9%ing”Ep\u00e9rmissien ta<\/p>\n
recall.?\u00a5+”;fre\u00e9\u00a7gnin\u00a7=the”evi\ufb01ence an\u00e9 ta germit
\nhim ?.’.:*3 *3.aa*.:3  \ufb01\u00e9 prmra tha contents af<\/p>\n
thasa \u00a7a&&m\u00e9nt\u00a7;_  T\ufb01ial caurt hear\u00e9 both the<\/p>\n
__ C\u00a2un5\u00a7i an t\ufb01\u00a7,\u00a7\u00a7plicatians and has rejected tha<\/p>\n
 \u00bb_%ame1a\u00a7\ufb01 ag\u00a7\u00a3ieved by the said crder, the Qresent<\/p>\n
\ufb01atigiang g&\u00a7 been filed.\n<\/p>\n
 V3. f h\u00e9ve hear\ufb01 the learnea Caunsel fox the<\/p>\n
. ” \u00a7etiti9\ufb01\u00a7r. The respcndent thqugh served, has<\/p>\n
“\ufb01.rsmai\ufb01e\u00a7 absent.\n<\/p>\n
i; As csul\ufb01 be seen fxom the cantenta af the<\/p>\n
\u00ab affi\ufb01avit filed 3;: augpart a\ufb01’ the agplicaticna,<\/p>\n
Annexura-B was cmntradictad and marked as \u00a3x.P5,<\/p>\n
whexaas tbs receipt; Annexnrew\ufb01i was aantradicte\ufb01<\/p>\n
and marked as $4.96 and the yartitim: deed gas
\nmsrka\u00e9 as Ex.P7. RV-1 hag a\u00e9mitted hex sig\ufb012t$\u00a7\u00a7
\nQa all these \ufb01scuments. Tha dacuma\ufb01t a\ufb01g\u00a7$\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7\u00a5\ufb01L .
\n:13 ciated 8.11.299″: and the regzmgg ::i_%:;:\u00a5\u00e9$”‘:;\u00a5_\u00a2iiV”‘:;2:V\u20ac;-3:.\/:V’:
\nany date, whereas th\ufb01 regist%re\ufb01’\u00a7aQtit\ufb01d$”\u00a7a\u00a7\ufb01
\nis dated 5.7.2$G\u00e9. The tiigl \ufb01u%\u00a7tVrej\u00a7;\u00a7$\u00a7H%h%
\napplications salsiy on the \u00a7%\u00a2ugdV\u00a3h\u00e9\u00a3 \u00a7h\u00a7ze was<\/p>\n
ma plaading ix th\u00e9t gati$i\u00a7$ ,\u00a7%r.’di\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7 with
\nrefara\ufb01ca ta th\ufb01se dg\u00a2gm\u00a7n\u00a7\u00a7 \ufb01xwi\u00a7\u00a7 %\u00e9en exacuted<\/p>\n
and in thesa\u00a5\u00a2i\u00a7\u00a2mmStanca\u00e9g”a$TthgfQatitianer di\ufb01<\/p>\n
net re\u00a7$f”t@\ufb02th\u00e9$e \ufb01a\u00a2ume\ufb01t3~in his evidence and
\nca\ufb01tradictad’th\u00e9j\ufb01cc\ufb01a\u00e9\ufb01ta in the axaminatian at<\/p>\n
&w~1\u00a7 it a\ufb01\u00e9ld .\ufb01\ufb01;t. the patitianer aannat be<\/p>\n
,_ perm\ufb01\ufb01t\u00e9d to yragpenv his evidence aha in .recall<\/p>\n
  P\u00a3w1_ag\u00a7xgx\u00e9mine the witneasaa.<\/p>\n
 ‘ 5.  L\u00e9Q\u00a7%a\u00e9 Caunael ‘far tha g\u00e9titianer has<\/p>\n
.&\u00a3%li\u00a7d \ufb01\u00a7\u00a7B the deciaien ef ahis Caurt reporte\ufb01<\/p>\n
vA;ii\ufb01V V,1\u00a7\u00a77\u00a73} Kar.&.J.\u00e9?\u00e9 \u20acK.\ufb01arayanagpa v.<\/p>\n
‘1’SgA\u00a7\u00a7amcder\u00a7 wherein, this \ufb01ourt tack inta<\/p>\n
V:”\u00a2\u00e9nsi\ufb01eratian aha gr\ufb01visians Q Order 18 R3135 1?<\/p>\n
& 1?~R sf CPC and it was hel\u00e9;\n<\/p>\n
” In any’ praceadings avidence 13
\nimpartant and nabady shmuld be shut eff
\ner’ pravante\ufb01 fram pzc\u00e9ucing \ufb01acu&ants ‘{<\/p>\n
at his camman\u00e9. it is ayen t\u00a2 th\u00a7\u00bbfa =
\nether \u00a7arty ts cr03s~axamine and p:Gv\u00e9g J5
\nthat the evi\ufb02ence adduced 13  \ufb01\u00a2\u00a7\u00bb “R
\nbaliavabla an\u00e9 not ra;iahla; H “:?\ufb01 ‘4
\nrespect 9f the ducumen\ufb01\ufb01 :ai\u00e9e a\u00a7\ufb01 ‘iguV,V\u00bb-
\nagan ta the athar party t\u00a7g\u00a7\u00a7esti\u00a7n th\u00e9 n.
\ngenuinanaas and V\ufb01\u00a7li\ufb01itf’_ a\u00a7:  \ufb01\u00a7\u00e9~V”
\ndocumenta and their _%e\u00a7ev\u00a7ncy”at\u00a7. t\ufb01e
\nissua invclvad@ x?h\u00a7 \u00a7$r\ufb01i\u00a7\u00e9,;ann@\u00a3 he
\npravented er t\ufb01eir’;re\ufb01\u00a7\u00e9s\u00a7x1t\u00a7’\u00abpraduce
\ndacmments–cannat”ha:nip\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2’i\ufb01Afh\u00e9\ufb01bud”.<\/p>\n
6. Sa, av\ufb01\ufb01 if thg gg\ufb01iti\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9i is permitted<\/p>\n
ta reg\u00e9en as; e\ufb01id\u00e9\ufb01c\u00e9 an\ufb01w\ufb01s recalled far the
\ngurgca\u00e9 mf.:ef\u00a2\u00a7#i\u00a7g tag documents by examining<\/p>\n
the witne$$e3;V;h\u00e9V%ez\u00a7ondent has the liberty ta<\/p>\n
“*,;ra3\u00a7+ax\u00a7m;ne \u00e9wag and 313$ the witnesses ta be<\/p>\n
 ,\u00e9x\u00e9min@\u00a7 ta \ufb02isprcve the centants. She is alsa<\/p>\n
atA\ufb02lib\u00e9r\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7Vt#’ lead\u00bb her awn evidance after the<\/p>\n
*vcle\u00e9&\u00a7\u00e9 a\u00a2fV ths evidence cf ?\u00a5~1. As tha<\/p>\n
v i\u00bb\u00a7\u00a2cuae\ufb01\u00a3s have been cantradicte\ufb01 in the crass\u00bb<\/p>\n
:j_\u00e9x\u00e9mihatian af Rw~1, it cannut be sai\u00e9 that these<\/p>\n
‘”~\u00a3\u00e9cumant3 wara supprasaad. It cannat ha alga<\/p>\n
Vsaid that tha patitinnar is filling up the iacuna<\/p>\n
in the evidence as the signature an these
\n\ufb01ccumentg hava been. admitted by ‘the. resgondent.<\/p>\n
SQ, Wh\u00e9\ufb01 the r\u00e9agondant has an apyartunity tag<\/p>\n
‘ ‘”3et\u00a2\u00e9$i\ufb01e.*z<\/p>\n
crass-examine an\ufb01 disgrcvw the contenta cf “the<\/p>\n
\u00e9scwmaata Exs.?5 ta 9?, I aw mat thing.\u00a7\u00a7a\ufb01f\u00a3h\u00e9, _<\/p>\n
cr\u00e9ers gasgad. by the caurt b\u00a71sw’ &\u00a7\u00e9~:ju$?E and; v<\/p>\n
prapar.\n<\/p>\n
?. Tha cnly qQ\u00e93ti\u00a7\ufb01nxi% %;th2 #\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7fd.\u00a3t$
\ndelay, as the matte; has ;\u00a7fg@’bac\u00a7 ta \ufb01\ufb01g staga
\naf the eviaenee cf “#\u00a7eA \u00a7\u00a7\ufb01i%\u00a3c\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a5 and in these
\ncircumstances, s.rveas\/\\<\/p>\n
pay cssta er \u00a7~is.10,9GQ{- and it a::a13.\u00bb._f;:~\u00a7~= <\/p>\n
dapasita\u00e9 hef\u00e9ra the trial caurt within_\u00a7y\u00a7\u00a7Eia\ufb02 z }<\/p>\n
af 15 days Exam the data of comggnicatisn hf t\ufb01i\ufb01 ;u<\/p>\n
crdar ts the trial caurt.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 Author: A.S.Pachhapure _ Kurng\ufb01l \u00e9istriatf Andhra ?r3dash. Ii TX! 3133 C\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 0? xanaamaxa 5? E\ufb01lG\ufb01LO8S_ nawma THIS was 21″‘nAx ow savwauaga 261$ z a EEFGRE wan aonvsna HR.J\ufb02BTIcE A.8.EAc\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01?\ufb01$Eb uazw vnwxwxaa ao.14a3?!2o$& a.\ufb02\u00a71r72\u00a7\u00a7:w:es. C.C \u00a7\u00a2a.9125–9i2$ 2\u00a2a9*u+cPcg -_%._ _” vu” BETIIEEE I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nG Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-22T03:09:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-22T03:09:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1118,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\",\"name\":\"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-22T03:09:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-22T03:09:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-22T03:09:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010"},"wordCount":1118,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010","name":"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-22T03:09:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-prabhakar-vs-smt-nagamani-sudhamani-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G Prabhakar vs Smt Nagamani @ Sudhamani on 21 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233955"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233955\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}