{"id":234022,"date":"2008-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-01T23:58:50","modified_gmt":"2017-05-01T18:28:50","slug":"revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Rahim<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nan puma ur KAKNAEAKA HIGH LUU--!!.\u00a7 or KAKNAEAKA I-stun Lguuxn or KARNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH -\u00ab\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\n1:&gt;AT1\u00ab:9 THIS THE 11m DAY 01? N0vEMBE;\u00a7*\u00e9c5aT[%,\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTI\u00a73E\"AJ1'1'  kk\n\nTHE HOWBLE MR. JUSTI_CE JAwA\u00a7 R;i:11'M \nM.F.A. No.2{;o::%;i%2oo5(M'v;% \n\nBetween:\n\nRevanasidda,     _  - \nS\/O.IvIa1}ik3Ijun%,:  1 .      \n\nKalashetfys         .\n\nAge: 30 years,   ;_   ..\n\nOcc: At pr&lt;:&#039;s&#039;eI2\u00a7Ni1, *2;   \n\nR\/().Tidagi1I\u00a7_di, &#039; :     . _&#039;\n\nTq. &amp; Dist&quot;:   B\ufb02apm&#039;;  =      ...APPELLANT\n\n(By sm\u00a3.%Rg:naV sr::v}ay:$gm1a:n, Adv. for\n &quot;Evil.\/S.S1&#039;1ix{;ayogi:nath Associates, Advs.)\n\nThe.  Cb\ufb01troller,\n\n   Mswc&#039; central \u00ab&#039;;}\ufb02&#039;1c\u20acr,\n\nf\ufb01ear Bits Stand, Soiapur. ...RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>&#8221; j &#8221;   ~ {By S&#8217;\ufb01 M.A.I{ak1&#8243;;andki and<\/p>\n<p>u   Sri.Shivakuma.r H.Mannur, Advs.)<\/p>\n<p>   This M.F.A. is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act<br \/>\n&#8220;~&#8230;aga,irxst the judgment. and award dated 22.09.2004<\/p>\n<p>passed in MVC N(&gt;.879\/O1 on the 1116 of the Member,<br \/>\nMAC&#8217;I&#8217;~&#8211;V1I, Principa} Civii Judge (Sr.Dim.) 825 GEM,<br \/>\nBijapur, partly allowing the ciaim petition for<\/p>\n<p>UH LUUK! OI-&#8216; KARNATAKA HIGH  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIS!-{Cl<\/p>\n<p>.4-\n<\/p>\n<p>EXP78. A perusal of Ex.P78 wouid diseiose that the<\/p>\n<p>salary ef the claimant was Rs.6,000\/&#8211;. Indeed a.f&#8217;:{eeble<\/p>\n<p>attempt is made by the ieamed counsel  <\/p>\n<p>the respondent to establish that any   <\/p>\n<p>has not spoken to about EX.P7  <\/p>\n<p>accept the said sL1b_missio:1&#8243;w- inaemileh  O&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>notwithstanding the fact  &#8216;i.e&amp;_&#8221;11ot .&#8217;i&#8217;;~;:.sued by<br \/>\nthe Owner] PI'{)pI&#8217;i\u20ac3t0if..&#8221;&#8216;;)f    someone<\/p>\n<p>responsibie has _ sp0ker1._to&#8217;-aieouit :i%;x  ~ V  ; ~ <\/p>\n<p>4. \u00a31s:f:o Indeed having<br \/>\nregard &#8216;to&#8217;   \ufb01ractieally a permanent<br \/>\ndisabiliity&#8217; \u00a30&#8242; _.90% of the entire body, we<\/p>\n<p>take the  .of.t1;1e\u00bb&#8217;C1\u00e9\u00a7imant at Rs.6,000\/- per month<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  _ ar\ufb01-,:,hg\u00a7\ufb011g  his age at 28 years, the proper<\/p>\n<p>   to us would be 16. &#8216;Thus towards<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01cmre earning, we deem it appropriate to<\/p>\n<p> aww\ufb01\ufb01sum of Rs.11,:&#8217;32,00{)\/{Rupees Eieven Lakhs 82,<\/p>\n<p>,, , . &#8220;Two thousand).\n<\/p>\n<p>5. &#8216;This takes us to the next issue regarding<\/p>\n<p>compensation \u00e9etetmined under the various heads. In<\/p>\n<p>w\\\\\\\\ <\/p>\n<p>~<\/p>\n<p>so far as the pain and suffering, the learried member of<br \/>\nthe Tribunal has awarded oniy Rs.7,0{)0\/-, Vwhieh<\/p>\n<p>accordilig to us is on the lower si\u00e9e, having <\/p>\n<p>the nature ef the injuries suffered by    <\/p>\n<p>i\ufb01deed a sufferer would ceItaif.:iij\u00a75 &#8220;knee;<br \/>\nsuffering, which he has te\u00bbV1;nc3efge:<br \/>\nIn the case on hand,   theiii<br \/>\nclaimant is fracture   fiecture of<br \/>\nFemur. Having regargt   and aiso the<br \/>\npain and   has undergone,<br \/>\nwe are of   erehancement. It is no<br \/>\ndoubtgtttiie  cannot be quanti\ufb01ed<\/p>\n<p>but however,&#8221; eoviezf   of time, the same is<\/p>\n<p>dCtCI&#8217;II1:I}t&#8217;3d_ 133\u00a37i1&#8243;]g! regaid to the nature of the injuries<\/p>\n<p>    Having regard to the nature of the<\/p>\n<p>inj&#8221;m&#8217;i(&#8216;%:s,.ii&#8221;the Vi6W that the elaimantwappellaxit<\/p>\n<p> is eiiiiitjeciiifaif a sum of Rs.:&#8217;30,0{){)\/&#8211;(Rupees Fifty<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;tinder the heading of pain and su\ufb01ering. II}<\/p>\n<p>_V .$ij0  &#8216;es towards fooci, nourishment, hospitaiisation,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8211;\u00abiesS&#8217;iof earraing durizig hospitalization an\u00e9 other varicms<\/p>\n<p>miniscuie heads illeluding medical expenses, we are of<\/p>\n<p>5H COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COQRI OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CO<\/p>\n<p>can COURT op KARNATAKA HIGH cover or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH cc<\/p>\n<p>6:-\n<\/p>\n<p>the View that a sum of Rs.15,(}OO\/&#8212;(R&#8217;12peeS Fifteen<\/p>\n<p>thousand) would be }&#8217;us1: and reasonable.<\/p>\n<p>6. This takes us to the East head i.e.,   _<br \/>\namenities. indeed future amenities e.2:*e&#8211;  ~ V.<br \/>\nthe ciaimant is unable to carry  It-ie&#8217;e.tiau\u00a7I..to.&#8217;d&#8217;a4$;&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>This being classi\ufb01ed as loss of ta#I1e:&#8217;1it:iee&#8221;  aeeit\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>enjoyment of life  moreott:ee.,:_&#8217;it.. t_  noticed<br \/>\nthat the claimant-atipeilent. ,t_e be dependent<br \/>\non others for    it is noticed<br \/>\nthat mg    or treateti<br \/>\nas a parepie.#ie;;&#8217;1-I  mean that he<br \/>\nis    Bed. In this regard, the<\/p>\n<p>compensation V&#8221;aWe;~c\u00a5e:_\u00a3:1&#8242; by the Tribune} requires<\/p>\n<p> V.   etifxexgeexnezlt. We deem it proper to award<\/p>\n<p> .A &#8216;_&#8217;I\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;5_0,000\/~{Rupees Fifty thousazld) towards<br \/>\n   Thus, the total compensation<\/p>\n<p>   awereeme to the claimant-appeliant towards injuries<br \/>\n  geiferee is Rs.12,67,0(){)\/-{Rupees Twelve lakhs e Sixty<\/p>\n<p>Seven thousand) as against Rs.2,12,7\u20ac30\/~&#8211;. Needless to<\/p>\n<p>the rate of 6% from the date of claim petition.<\/p>\n<p>.z<br \/>\n..-&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>.\/<br \/>\n_\/<\/p>\n<p>. c&#8217;:w&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>say the enhanced eompensation shall carry interest at<\/p>\n<p>*  eeee <\/p>\n<p>r l&#8217;\\.P\\l\\I&#8217;I}-Ill-\\l\\l-\\ nlurl ;.u;..m_u Ur KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 6? EARNATAKA HIGH cc<\/p>\n<p>7. Indeed in this regard, we are requjied to make<\/p>\n<p>an order in respect of the amount to be disbutts-ed in<\/p>\n<p>favour of the claimant-appellant. Having  <\/p>\n<p>status of the claimant-appellant inasmnehu V    <\/p>\n<p>con\ufb01ned to bed\/wheel chair  deem 5:;  A<\/p>\n<p>sum of Rs. 10,00,000] -(Ru_pees&#8221;._V_;1&#8242;&#8221;&#8216;en  of <\/p>\n<p>enhanced amount shall    in a<br \/>\nNationalised Bank&#8217;  interest. The<br \/>\nclaimant-appellant    the interest<br \/>\naccrued  amount shall be<br \/>\ndisbursed       <\/p>\n<p>  to the extent indicated<br \/>\naboven 4&#8242; i it it   <\/p>\n<p>Vt  &#8216;VParties'&#8221;at&#8217;e\u00e9 directed to bear their own costs.<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 Author: Ajit J Rahim an puma ur KAKNAEAKA HIGH LUU&#8211;!!.\u00a7 or KAKNAEAKA I-stun Lguuxn or KARNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH -\u00ab IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA 1:&gt;AT1\u00ab:9 THIS THE 11m [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun ... vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun ... vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-01T18:28:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Revanasidda S\\\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-01T18:28:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":763,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Revanasidda S\\\/O Mallikarjun ... vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-01T18:28:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Revanasidda S\\\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun ... vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun ... vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-01T18:28:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-01T18:28:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008"},"wordCount":763,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008","name":"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun ... vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-01T18:28:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/revanasidda-so-mallikarjun-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Revanasidda S\/O Mallikarjun &#8230; vs The Divisional Controller on 11 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}