{"id":234173,"date":"2009-02-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-22T19:15:21","modified_gmt":"2017-01-22T13:45:21","slug":"g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH coma\": OF KARNATAKA AT BANGgg;xf):=iigkT[  \n\nDATED mxs THE 27\"' DAY 01? FEBR13;ARY1 ii)0\u00a3\u00a7A\u00ab T; \" 5   ' \u00ab\n\nBEFORE \n\nTHE HUMBLE.MRJUSTICESiaAB})\ufb01?\ufb01.  % \n\n \n\nWRIT PETITI0NN0.m3}43a005    \n\nBetween:\n\nSri G.S. Basavarajaiah,\n\nSEO Shivanna, _ \"   \"\nAged about 55  , g \nmo No.I029,.5'\"Maii51,.';'. % *\n\n3*\" Block, 3\"13tag\u00a2;  V\n\n     \n33113335?\" ' 5_53 9.;79..-  ,  _  Petitioner.\n\n(By Sri 13;i2,,_  ;\u00ab'\u00a55i\\r.)\n\nAnd 4:; ' ~\n\n  A 1* F!9or;C42uver\u00a7,r Bhavzm,\n 11.6.'  Bangalore --- 9.\n\n    rhechainmnandmscip1nmy.4umomy,\n\n. ,   Water Supply and Sewerage Board,\n_  1\" Floor, Cauvety Bhavan,\n'  l&lt;..(}. Road, Bangalore -- 9.  Respondents.<\/pre>\n<p>M  (By Sri MS. Narayana, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>invited of\ufb01ions   holding ciiffe-rent designations<\/p>\n<p>     posts for \ufb01tment into regular<\/p>\n<p>   eeglaeleel aga,\u00a3n.~1n posts of Meter Readers, Second Division<br \/>\n:eleeeeeele.,e;, the extent of availability of the said posts. The<\/p>\n<p> employees were to be alloww to work against the<\/p>\n<p>This Writ Petitionis\ufb01led under Articles 226     K 2<br \/>\nConstitution, praying to quashthe otler dated 29,}; ll f<br \/>\nbytlae respondents, etc.   A&#8217;  _ l  , &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>This Writ Petition coming on fegeeeieel  deg, the<br \/>\nCourt made the following:  &#8211;.\n<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner&#8217;  in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1969 by  end Sewerage Board,<\/p>\n<p>Bangaloxe   the year 1972, he was<\/p>\n<p>regularised as e_ xareeeteeleeey e..eil~ee:ar dated 3.3.1930, the Board<\/p>\n<p>  as had passed SSLC were to be<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;IE<br \/>\nH}.\n<\/p>\n<p>1%<\/p>\n<p>we<\/p>\n<p>supemomerary posts till such time the permanent staffing pattern<\/p>\n<p>was finalised. The petitioner exencised his option to be adjustedVcee&#8217;i&#8217;c._V_<\/p>\n<p>3 Meter Reader. However, the petitioner was adjusted    <\/p>\n<p>Division Cierk though he did not opt for the seine. It.is&#8221;the:ceS&#8217;e:of,V  it  <\/p>\n<p>the petitioner that he was not well conxiersagtte   <\/p>\n<p>which included additions   he  a<br \/>\nrepresentation to the Board either   Reader or<br \/>\nto continue as a.    earlier. As the<br \/>\nBoard did nottaice.  he approached<br \/>\nthis Court   writ petition was disposed<\/p>\n<p>of by this  on .21 a direction to the Board to<\/p>\n<p>   accordance with law. However, the<\/p>\n<p>  of the petitioner. It is contended<\/p>\n<p>that  difficulties while working as a Second<\/p>\n<p> as he is not good at Mathematics. Thereafter,<\/p>\n<p>  posted as a Cash Clerk at H T Counter, Vijayanagar<\/p>\n<p>  &#8212;- ll. The nature of the job involved is receiving the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;   consumers at the {ash counter. He was postedto as a<\/p>\n<p>cash clerk on 25.7.2000 and he has worked as such till 22.53%-){0I<\/p>\n<p>(ie. for a period of 305 days). While he was  ~ u<\/p>\n<p>post, he was kept under suspension as per the  <\/p>\n<p>25.4.2001 (Annexure &#8216;G&#8217;). The diseip1i\u00a3iery\u00ab <\/p>\n<p>Show cause notice as per Armexure &#8216;J&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>that he has misappropriated a<br \/>\nrespectively. The peii\ufb01oneriilias    &#8216;K&#8217; to<br \/>\nthe said notice denying   him. The<br \/>\ndisciplinary   to hold an<br \/>\nenquiry in   Vagainst the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>Two     of the management<br \/>\nin the   has cross-examined the said<\/p>\n<p>witnessesi._   &#8220;the material on record, the enquiry<\/p>\n<p>l l  eegeeeeieieieee a  Qumexure &#8216;Q&#8217;) holding that the charges<\/p>\n<p> .l-&#8216;The disciplinary authority has issued a second<\/p>\n<p>l  _   dated 20.1.2003. Petitioner has sent a reply to<\/p>\n<p>  Jfl:.e said.  cause notice as per Annexure &#8216;R&#8217;. On consideration<\/p>\n<p> .llof;the&#8217;:lnaterial on record, the disciplinary authority has passed an<\/p>\n<p>ll<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>order as per Annexure &#8216;S&#8217; dismissing the petitioner \ufb01&#8217;om <\/p>\n<p>The petitioner has called in questiim the said order iIt_\u00a7ti&#8217;ti*.~t t <\/p>\n<p>petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Sri rm. Rajashekhafavva,   <\/p>\n<p>the pen] &#8216;one! has made two fold,   it  it<\/p>\n<p>contended that though petitioner  deposit<br \/>\nday today basis, it was   It is<br \/>\nargued that first of an, ;&#8217;3etitione_r_i:e<br \/>\nHe wanted changeoi&#8217;  to by the<br \/>\nBoard. The  in the short claim<br \/>\nregister   _ iproceedings. Whenever<\/p>\n<p>there are sho:.t_   of the Board is to issue<\/p>\n<p>notice to the   to make good the same. The<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; \u00abioyees  short rem2ttanc&#8217; es at a later stage. Ihat<\/p>\n<p>isi&#8217;how__a.1n&#8221;ctieei_ wits.-issued to the petitioner as per Armexure &#8216;C&#8217;<\/p>\n<p> and the&#8221;&#8211;pet\u00e9itioxtef  deposited the said amount within two days.<\/p>\n<p>__ a iiotice 31 Annexure &#8216;E&#8217; was issued claiming short<\/p>\n<p>remittances and petitioner has deposited the amount partiaii\ufb01w<\/p>\n<p>could not deposit the balance of Rs.l,O00f- because    <\/p>\n<p>proceedings were initiated by then. It    ii<\/p>\n<p>enquiry o\ufb01ioer was not justified in ixoadiiigiihe eseergee <\/p>\n<p>been proved. The second limb of is<br \/>\ncharges are held to be provecj,   the<br \/>\npetitioner is highly    in identicai<br \/>\nset of facts, in    authority<br \/>\nhas passed 3:5    punishment of<br \/>\n  on R.Srinivas is<br \/>\nin  wen Er ine State Govermnent dated<\/p>\n<p>14.9.2001, Iheiefeg~e,. ,diem1esei &#8220;er the petitioner \ufb01om service is<\/p>\n<p>    use connection, he has relied on the<\/p>\n<p>  Court in V1sHu:4NAm ms&#8217;. UNION or<\/p>\n<p>i   11v2:i1;4}.e 03t?I$R;St&#8211;2oo7 (3) SUPREME 331.<\/p>\n<p>3.  other hand, Sri M.S. Narayana, learned Counsel<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab   iiappeari.&#8217;-gg e the Board has sought to justify the impugned meet. 1:<\/p>\n<p>me<\/p>\n<p>is argued that the misconduct cormni\ufb01ed by the petitioner is <\/p>\n<p>in nature. Despite issuance of notice at Annexure &#8216;C&#8217;,   A4 <\/p>\n<p>him the shod remitiances for 3 period \ufb01em  3<\/p>\n<p>17.11.2000, he has not corsected his ibrced&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Board to issue another notice at Annexsere &#8216;E&#8217;    3<\/p>\n<p>argued that the enquiry o\ufb02ieer on     on<br \/>\nrecerd has held that the   Coessdming<br \/>\nthe report of the enquiry of\ufb01cee, &#8221; has<br \/>\nrightly passed at}      the service of<\/p>\n<p>thegoa,-d_ V &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>4. I  the arguments made by the<\/p>\n<p>4._,Vl.ea1I1ed,.\u00a7&#8217;:.&#8221;\u00ab:$\u00a5um:el   perused the materials placed on<\/p>\n<p> If:  dispute that petitioner was working as a Junior<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  wiiix the Board and as per the order at Azmexure &#8216;B&#8217;, be<\/p>\n<p>%   )1 as a Cash Clenk W.e.f. 25.7.2000 for the first time. The<\/p>\n<p>Km.\n<\/p>\n<p>first notice issued by the Board is at Annexure &#8216;C&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>22.10.2000, which disclose that petitioner has deposited&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;shQgfi.i__j:ii.l&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>remittances, which has been deposited within two &#8216;lief  Z T<\/p>\n<p>receipt. Again, a notice at Annexure &#8216;E&#8217; was ismeii   eh<\/p>\n<p>claiming short remittances. Petitioner &#8216; did not ciisimte   ii<\/p>\n<p>enquiry o\ufb02icer the contents of the  it<br \/>\nhe was not good at Mathematics  his posting<br \/>\nhas not been changed  thatvvefiaiwcaeh  ti$i&#8217;*.\u00a3ii2&#8217;it of Meter<\/p>\n<p>Reader. On behelfi\u00ab&#8230;.of:{i:he  i  ;e$wib;eeees have been<\/p>\n<p>examined.   elieited in the cross-\n<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner is that it is<\/p>\n<p>common for a  to  remittances because of the<\/p>\n<p>giifrieeitieeei  eaeb&#8217;  Tbe practice ofthe Board has been<\/p>\n<p>to_   _ remittances in the shed claim register<\/p>\n<p> _  and to issue notice at a iater stage to the<\/p>\n<p>    make good the short remittances. The fact<\/p>\n<p>   has faii\ufb01 to remit the cash received at the<\/p>\n<p> cash  en a day today basis. The domestic enquiry as been<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>K&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>conducted by observing the principles of natural justice. -The<\/p>\n<p>enquiry report reveals that it has comprehensively touched on aI1fr&#8217;\u00bbt.<\/p>\n<p>the aspects of the matter. In my view, the enquiry   it <\/p>\n<p>justified in holding that the charges have been proved. _. ..   V<\/p>\n<p>6. In so far as the award of\u00bbpit_iiishxIieriti&#8221; is   3<\/p>\n<p>punishment to be imposed must be<br \/>\nof the misconduct.   kviolative of<br \/>\nArticle 14 of the Coristituticn.    of<br \/>\npunishment is     of the<br \/>\nauthorities, yet_     should not be<br \/>\nvindictive or   to the offence as<br \/>\nto shock the cotizisciencev    to conclusive evidence<br \/>\nofhias. &#8220;well Aiiwhere the punishment shocks the<\/p>\n<p>cc)n_scie:e&lt;ceV of &#039;{:&#039;(\ufb01)&#039;\ufb01\u00bb&#039;a\u00bb.&quot;&#039;,t&#039;.iI1 judicial review, they can net only direct<\/p>\n<p>  the  to the punishment but might themselves,<\/p>\n<p>to,*shortenii4&quot; 1m.pos&#039; e apipropriate punishment with cogent<\/p>\n<p>.1 areasens  thereof. i\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Annexure-E because of disciplinary proceedings initiated by <\/p>\n<p>Board. In an identical ease of a cash clerk (R.Sri:1iy;a&#8217;s&#8217;},&#8217;  A&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>disciplinary authority has passed an order of  3 T<\/p>\n<p>under Rule am) of the Karnataka Civil  i(C\u00a3:z3\u00a7Q)&#8217;\u00ab&#8211;:{u!es,:_&#8217;_V is T 7<\/p>\n<p>1957, which is clear from the copy of proziooed   3<\/p>\n<p>application I.A.1f2008. The  xto&#8217;  ernoioyee<br \/>\ntherein is in conformity with  the Goireriunent<br \/>\ndated 14.9.2001 wherein  case of<br \/>\n     ix Ito&#8221;: be awarded is<br \/>\n   been issued to<br \/>\nmaintain   However, in the<\/p>\n<p>case of the peiitioner, the  authority has passed an order<\/p>\n<p>__.of dismis{saiI.e*.In W3?! TH&#8217;s case (supra), the Apex Court<\/p>\n<p>ywas  -eeses of two persons involved in a scu\ufb01le. Both of<\/p>\n<p>  rm  The disciplinary amhority awarded<\/p>\n<p>    of increment for a period of two years<\/p>\n<p>  ciuzrxuleiive e\ufb01eot in so far as one of the employee was<\/p>\n<p> _  and the other employee was removed from service. The<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">13<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent-Board is substituted by the order cmnpuisorily  A&#8217;<br \/>\nhim \ufb01&#8217;om the service ofthe Board. &#8216;   H  &#8216; &#8216;%<\/p>\n<p>(iii) In View of substitution ofthe \ufb01fe.<br \/>\nabove, the petitioner is entitled for 2:11  <\/p>\n<p>BMMx&#8217;2822009 g   %<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH coma&#8221;: OF KARNATAKA AT BANGgg;xf):=iigkT[ DATED mxs THE 27&#8243;&#8216; DAY 01? FEBR13;ARY1 ii)0\u00a3\u00a7A\u00ab T; &#8221; 5 &#8216; \u00ab BEFORE THE HUMBLE.MRJUSTICESiaAB})\ufb01?\ufb01. % WRIT PETITI0NN0.m3}43a005 Between: Sri G.S. Basavarajaiah, SEO Shivanna, _ &#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And ... on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And ... on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-22T13:45:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-22T13:45:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1302,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\",\"name\":\"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And ... on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-22T13:45:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And ... on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And ... on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-22T13:45:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-22T13:45:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009"},"wordCount":1302,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009","name":"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And ... on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-22T13:45:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-s-basavarajaiah-vs-the-bangalore-water-supply-and-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G S Basavarajaiah vs The Bangalore Water Supply And &#8230; on 27 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234173\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}