{"id":234378,"date":"2008-02-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008"},"modified":"2015-07-22T17:32:36","modified_gmt":"2015-07-22T12:02:36","slug":"v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008","title":{"rendered":"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl Rev Pet No. 434 of 2008()\n\n\n1. V.RAJAN, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. T.K.SUBRAMANYAN, S\/O.T.RAGHAVAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC\n\n                For Petitioner  :SMT.T.SUDHAMANI\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR\n\n Dated :14\/02\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                              V.RAMKUMAR, J.\n\n                     .................................................\n\n                          Crl.R.P. No.  434 of 2008\n\n                     ................................................\n\n                Dated, this the 14th day of February, 2008.\n\n\n                                      O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>          In this  Revision filed under Section 397 read with Sec. 401<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C. the petitioner who was the accused in C.C No. 469\/2005<\/p>\n<p>on   the   file   of   the   Judicial   First   Class   Magistrrate-I,   Hosdurg<\/p>\n<p>challenges     the   conviction     entered   and   the   sentence   passed<\/p>\n<p>against     him   for   an   offence   punishable   under     Sec.   138   of   the<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;the<\/p>\n<p>Act&#8217;).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          2.      I heard the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>and   the   learned   Public   Prosecutor   and   also   the   learned   counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the complainant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          3.      The   learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   Revision<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner re-iterated the contentions in support of the Revision.<\/p>\n<p>The   courts   below   have   concurrently   held   that   the   cheque   in<\/p>\n<p>question   was   drawn   by   the   petitioner     in   favour   of   the<\/p>\n<p>complainant   on   the   drawee   bank,   that   the   cheque   was   validly<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.NO. 434\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>presented to the bank, that it was dishonoured for reasons which<\/p>\n<p>fall under Section 138 of the Act, that the   complainant made a<\/p>\n<p>demand   for   payment   by   a   notice   in   time   in   accordance   with<\/p>\n<p>clause (b) of the proviso to Section 138 of the Act  and that the<\/p>\n<p>Revision   Petitioner\/accused   failed   to   make   the   payment     within<\/p>\n<p>15 days of receipt of the statutory notice.    Both the courts have<\/p>\n<p>considered   and   rejected   the   defence   set   up   by   the   revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner while  entering the above finding.   The said finding has<\/p>\n<p>been   recorded   on   an   appreciation   of   the   oral   and   documentary<\/p>\n<p>evidence.  I do  not find any error, illegality or impropriety in the<\/p>\n<p>finding   so   recorded   concurrently   by   the   courts   below.     The<\/p>\n<p>conviction was thus rightly entered against  the  petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>      4.        What now survives for consideration is the question<\/p>\n<p>as   to   whether     what   should   be   the     proper   sentence   to   be<\/p>\n<p>imposed   on   the   revision   petitioner.     Having   regard   to   the   facts<\/p>\n<p>and   circumstances   of   the   case,   I   am   inclined   to   modify   the<\/p>\n<p>sentence imposed on the revision petitioner.   In the light of the<\/p>\n<p>recent   decision   of   the   Supreme   Court   in               Ettappadan<\/p>\n<p>Ahammedkutty  v. E.P. Abdullakoya   rendered  on 3-8-2007<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.NO. 434\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in  Crl.Appeal   1013   of   2007,   default   sentence   cannot   be<\/p>\n<p>imposed for the enforcement of an order for compensation under<\/p>\n<p>Sec.   357   (3)   Cr.P.C.     Accordingly,   for   the   conviction   under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the Act the revision petitioner is sentenced to pay<\/p>\n<p>a fine of Rs.36,000\/- (Rupees thirty six thousand only).  The said<\/p>\n<p>fine shall be paid as compensation under Section 357 (1) Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p>The revision petitioner is permitted  either to deposit the said fine<\/p>\n<p>amount before the Court below  or directly pay the compensation<\/p>\n<p>to the complainant within three months from today and produce<\/p>\n<p>a   memo   to   that   effect   before   the   trial   Court   in   case   of   direct<\/p>\n<p>payment.   If he fails to   deposit or pay the said   amount within<\/p>\n<p>the aforementioned period   he shall suffer   simple imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>for three months by way of default sentence.<\/p>\n<p>       In   the   result,   this   Revision   is   disposed   of   confirming   the<\/p>\n<p>conviction   entered but modifying the sentence   imposed on the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                 V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nrv<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.NO. 434\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                        -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl Rev Pet No. 434 of 2008() 1. V.RAJAN, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. T.K.SUBRAMANYAN, S\/O.T.RAGHAVAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC For Petitioner :SMT.T.SUDHAMANI For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-22T12:02:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T12:02:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\"},\"wordCount\":514,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\",\"name\":\"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T12:02:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-22T12:02:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008","datePublished":"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T12:02:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008"},"wordCount":514,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008","name":"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T12:02:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-rajan-vs-t-k-subramanyan-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.Rajan vs T.K.Subramanyan on 14 February, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}