{"id":234423,"date":"2009-02-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-09-02T02:39:58","modified_gmt":"2016-09-01T21:09:58","slug":"state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                            LPA No.239 of 2008                           -1-\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                          CASE NO.: LPA No.239 of 2008\n\n                                  DATE OF DECISION: February 26, 2009\n\n\nSTATE OF HARYANA &amp; OTHERS                                ...APPELLANTS\n\n                                  VERSUS\n\nDARYA RAM                                                ...RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA.\n<\/p>\n<p>       HON&#8217;BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nPRESENT: MR. GAGANDEEP WASU, ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANTS.\n<\/p>\n<p>         MR. SANJAY VIJ, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>            The State of Haryana is aggrieved by the judgement dated<\/p>\n<p>13.2.2008, passed by the learned Single Judge whereby directions have been<\/p>\n<p>issued to them to grant the respondent step-up of Rs.75\/- per month w.e.f.<\/p>\n<p>1.2.1981 and Rs.151\/- per month w.e.f. 1.1.1986 upto 30.11.1996. The<\/p>\n<p>arrears have been confined to a period of three years.<\/p>\n<p>            The respondent Darya Ram joined the services as Clerk in the<\/p>\n<p>Department of Industries, Haryana on 12.12.1961 and was promoted to the<\/p>\n<p>next higher post of Assistant in January, 1968. He was given the promotion<\/p>\n<p>to the post of Legal Assistant on 31.1.1981 and he continued to work on the<\/p>\n<p>said post till he was given promotion on regular basis on 20.10.1986, in the<\/p>\n<p>pay scale of Rs.700-1250\/-. Thereafter he was allocated to the Department<\/p>\n<p>of Mines and Geology on 1.11.1989.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Earlier in the State of Haryana there was a difference in the pay<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             LPA No.239 of 2008                            -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>scales of Legal Assistants in different Departments viz. Rs.225-500, 300-<\/p>\n<p>600 and Rs.350-650\/- . In order to bring uniformity in the pay scales, the<\/p>\n<p>State of Haryana decided that a unified pay scale of Rs.700-1250\/- to the<\/p>\n<p>Legal Assistants in all the Departments in the State be given. Thereafter<\/p>\n<p>vide Instructions dated 30.3.1982, the State of Haryana allowed special pay<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.75\/- per month to those Legal Assistants who were working in the<\/p>\n<p>unified pay scale of Rs.700-1250\/-.      The unified pay scale was to be<\/p>\n<p>admissible with retrospective effect, i.e. w.e.f. 1.2.1981 and after the<\/p>\n<p>revision of pay scales they were entitled to a special pay of Rs.150\/- per<\/p>\n<p>month.    In pursuance to the aforementioned instructions, three Legal<\/p>\n<p>Assistants working the Department of Industries, Haryana, namely, S\/Shri<\/p>\n<p>S.P. Kaushal, Sudesh Kumar and Jawahar Lal who were on regular basis<\/p>\n<p>were allowed special pay.      However, the benefit of special pay was<\/p>\n<p>withdrawn w.e.f. 1.6.1982, which was challenged by the aforementioned<\/p>\n<p>persons by filing a civil suit which was decreed in their favour vide<\/p>\n<p>judgement dated 30.5.1987, passed by Sub Judge Ist Class, Chandigarh.<\/p>\n<p>This judgement was challenged by the State of Haryana by filing an appeal<\/p>\n<p>before the District Judge, Chandigarh, however, the same was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, the State of Haryana filed RSA No.269 of 1992 which was also<\/p>\n<p>dismissed by the High Court. No SLP was preferred against the judgement<\/p>\n<p>of the High Court and hence the judgement attained finality.<\/p>\n<p>            The net result of the dismissal of RSA was that the<\/p>\n<p>aforementioned three persons who were working as Legal Assistants were<\/p>\n<p>held entitled to a special pay of Rs.75\/- per month w.e.f. 1.2.1981 and<\/p>\n<p>special pay of Rs.150\/- per month w.e.f. 1.1.1986. The respondent filed<\/p>\n<p>several representations to the petitioners to grant him the same relief as has<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                            LPA No.239 of 2008                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>been granted to S\/Shri S.P. Kaushal, Sudesh Kumar and Jawahar Lal, but to<\/p>\n<p>no avail. Thereafter the respondent filed CWP No.4288 of 1995, which has<\/p>\n<p>been allowed while the impugned judgement dated 13.2.2008.<\/p>\n<p>            Counsel for the appellant-State has contended that as per the<\/p>\n<p>Circular dated 30.3.1982, special pay was admissible only to those Legal<\/p>\n<p>Assistants who were in the pay scale of Rs.300-600\/- and 350-650\/- in the<\/p>\n<p>pre-revised pay scale. However, as the respondent was in the pre-revised<\/p>\n<p>pay scale of Rs.225-500\/-, hence the Circular dated 30.3.1982, was not<\/p>\n<p>applicable in his case. Learned counsel has further argued that the learned<\/p>\n<p>Single Judge has erred in relying upon the judgement of RSA and the Civil<\/p>\n<p>Courts while deciding the case of the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>            A perusal of the aforementioned facts shows that in order to<\/p>\n<p>bring uniformity in the pay scales of Legal Assistants, all Legal Assistants<\/p>\n<p>who were working in any Department of the State would be entitled to the<\/p>\n<p>pay scale of Rs.700-1250\/-. Thus, all the Legal Assistants started getting<\/p>\n<p>the aforementioned pay scale. The benefits of the Circular dated 30.3.1982,<\/p>\n<p>vide which special pay of Rs.75\/- per month was given to the Legal<\/p>\n<p>Assistants w.e.f. 1.2.1981 and subsequently Rs.150\/- per month w.e.f.<\/p>\n<p>1.1.1986, was also given to the three Legal Assistants working in the<\/p>\n<p>Department of Industries, Haryana, namely, S\/Shri S.P. Kaushal, Sudesh<\/p>\n<p>Kumar and Jawahar Lal. As the said benefit of special pay was withdrawn<\/p>\n<p>w.e.f. 1.6.1982, therefore, they filed civil suit which was decreed. The<\/p>\n<p>subsequent appeal before the District Judge as well as the RSA before the<\/p>\n<p>High Court filed by the State of Haryana were also dismissed. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the Legal Assistants were held entitled to the special pay.         As the<\/p>\n<p>respondent was discriminated against and was not given the special pay of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                            LPA No.239 of 2008                           -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rs.75\/- per month and Rs.150\/- per month w.e.f. 1.2.1981 and 1.1.1986,<\/p>\n<p>respectively, therefore, he challenged the action of the State by filing the<\/p>\n<p>writ petition which has been allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In our considered opinion the respondent who was also<\/p>\n<p>working as Legal Assistant in the Department of Industries was entitled to<\/p>\n<p>the benefits of the Circular dated 30.3.1982. His case was at part with<\/p>\n<p>S\/Shri S.P. Kaushal, Sudesh Kumar and Jawahar Lal who were also working<\/p>\n<p>as Legal Assistants in the Department of Industries. There was no reason to<\/p>\n<p>deny the respondent the special pay.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the above, we find no infirmity in the judgement of<\/p>\n<p>Learned Single Judge granting benefit of special pay of Rs.75\/- per month<\/p>\n<p>w.e.f 1.2.1981 and Rs.150\/- per month w.e.f. 1.1.1986, upto 30.11.1996 to<\/p>\n<p>the respondent The Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n                                        (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)\n                                              JUDGE\n\n\n\nFebruary 26, 2009                         (NIRMALJIT KAUR)\nGulati                                        JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 LPA No.239 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: LPA No.239 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: February 26, 2009 STATE OF HARYANA &amp; OTHERS &#8230;APPELLANTS VERSUS DARYA RAM &#8230;RESPONDENT CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-01T21:09:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-01T21:09:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":982,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-01T21:09:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-01T21:09:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-01T21:09:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009"},"wordCount":982,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009","name":"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-01T21:09:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-others-vs-darya-ram-on-26-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana &amp; Others vs Darya Ram on 26 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234423"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234423\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}