{"id":234761,"date":"2010-12-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010"},"modified":"2016-02-21T22:54:42","modified_gmt":"2016-02-21T17:24:42","slug":"h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
WP 39706\/2010\n1\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 16'??? DAY OF' DECEMBER, 2010 \nBEFORE T T\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE B.S.PATILL* \n\nW.P.No.39706\/2010 (KL:.I.=e\u00abRR\/stxiij \" \" 5   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nI.\n\nH.SadashiVaiah,\n\nS\/0 late Honnappa,\nAged about 67 years,\nN0.737. 5*\" Cross,\n\nVI Block, Rajajinagar,\nBanga10re~\u00ab560 10.\n\nH.Panchaksha:raf3:pa. @ \n\nH.Panchanna,?._ 5 \n\nS\/0 lagfe  '\nAged a\"o0u.tt';'-5 yer\u00e9ir.s,'e _ \"\n\nN 0.737; '.511' 'Cross, \"Jf  \u00ab 4' \nRaj aj inag\u00e9ui_,_ Bang'a_101*e~\u00bb--} \n\nH .  u1<1dappV'a-, V V\n\n 'A    ..... 14 \\\\\n , Aged ab0ut.6Q. years,\n _ Re,\/o"M\u00e91i1athahai--1i,\n" Ye:i.1*;w\u00e9Ix":i.'p.u rd' H"()b1i.\n\nBa.'_r1'ga10;':\u00e9"N'iQr'if.h Taluk.\n\nH.Sh1%Ja{ga\ufb01gaiah,\n\n' S\/0 Iat'e--~Honr1appa.\n" Age'-d\u00a2ab0'L1t 58 years,\nA4'-Block. A2, University Quar'i.e1's.\n\n19;?\u00bb Jnanabharathi, Banga.1ore\u00ab56.\n\n' H . Rer1L1.kappa,\n\nS\/0 late leiolanappa,\nAged about 56 years.\nNo.5. Nag\u00a7ar21bhavi Main Road.\n\n\n\nVVP 39706\/2010\n\nMoodalaalya,\nBar1gal0re--'?2.\n\n6. Chandrashekara 13..\n8\/0 late H.Basappa.\nAged about 42 years,\n\n7. Siddalingappa B..\n8\/0 late I~l'.Basappa.\nAged about 38 years.\n\n6 & 7 are residing at No.11, V _\n\nShlvananda Nllaya, 2"" Cross,  \n\nNew Guddadahalli, Mysore R0ad",z._   * -- ' \nBar1ga1ore~26.     PETITIONERS\n\n[By Sri C.M.Nagabushan,  _ 7\n\nAND:   '\n\n1. The Talfrsildard'   _  _\nBangalore  Tai1ul:_,_ \nBangalpre, ~ " ~ *  d\n\n2. The Assistant Coinn\ufb01ssiohfrer,\nBangalore N;)1'tl1 S{;_b~D_iVl~~s"i0n,\nBangalore. "\n\nV.  "Spe:f'1al'D.eputy Conlmissioner,\n\n V Ba'r1galorerDviat'2'ict,\n*- :Bar1gaiv0re.~_09e..l' - . V \n\nl  4. Srn1.__.H0_rn*ba,%r1rna,\n\nD\/0 late Rtidrappa,\n\n '   Aged ab._.0"ui'. 65 years.\n\nd   '.AASr:nt.:\u00a7\/enkatalakshmamma.\n\nD\/0 late Rudrappa.\n\n   Since deceased by her L.Rs.\n\n(a) B.'I'.Ramesh.\nS\/0 late Venkal:alaksh.ma1'I1ma,\nAged about 42 years.\n\n\n\n(b) B .T. Shivashankar,\n\nS \/ 0 late Venkatalakshmamma,\n\nAged about 40 years.\n\n. Smt..Saroj amma,\n\nD\/o late Rudrappa.\nAged about 52 years,\n\n. Srr1t..Pad:ma.\n\nD \/ 0 late Rudrappa,\nAged about 48 years.\n\n. Smt. Swarn alatha,\n\nD\/o late Rudrappa,\nAged about 45 years,\n\n. Smt.Rukmar1i,\n\nD \/ 0 late Rudrap_p'a,_.\nAged about 43" \n\n10.Purush.otharf1,_V"' fl\n\n8 \/ o late Rudi\ufb01ppa\ufb01 '\nAged a"oou.t'38 yoaro,"  \n\n4 to 10 a1'el4relsidi}';g.'at \/1,\n5"' JV Streetfelogupalyav, "\nHalasuro. Bang'a.laore~()8.\n\n. a  A' ' ~.. V\n _ 53\/ o"la1:'e.Rud'rVaia.h @ Rudrappa,\n" Aged . about_  years,\n\nR\/yoVi\\\/IallafhIa1'i'a1li, Kengtlrxte.\n\n_ Ward  Rajarajeshwarinagar,\n Bangalore North Taluk.\n\n'  .Pdttarud1'aiah,\n\/G ~Ka.laia.h.\n\nEdged about 82 years,\n\n   R\/o Mallathahalli, Kengume,\nWard No. 10, Rajarajeshwarinagar.\n\nBar1ga1o1'e North Taluk.\n\n"W'39706\/2010\n\nu.RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
we 39706\/2010
\n4<\/span><\/p>\n
(By Sri R.Omkumar. AGA, for R1-3.\n<\/p>\n
Sri Padmanabha Mahalae Sr.Counse1
\nFor Sri S.Raju, Adv. for C\/R4, 5(1)). 6, 7&0)<\/p>\n
This writ petition is fiied under Articles 226 8: <\/p>\n
Constitution of India, praying to quash the orders ai;”Aniie.X:ure–
\nN passed by the R3 dated 28.6.10 in Rexrisidiiv..1?e’titi0n: V’<\/p>\n
No.13\/O6~07 and etc.<\/p>\n
This petition coming on for Prelimiiiaryjjflearingi <\/p>\n
the Court made the following:\n<\/p>\n
0RDt.\u00a7;’_<\/p>\n
1. In the revision petition filed””byn_respo.ndentNosil1 8: 12
\nherein before the SpecialllIl3__epnty.:V1″f3ornn\ufb01issio.ner, Bangalore<\/p>\n
Urban District, Bangaloreiwhereinsthe-legality and correctness<\/p>\n
of the c,i9\u00a7ja\u00a5  by the Tahsildar.\n<\/p>\n
Bangalorevvll\ufb02iorthl  affirmed by the Assistant
\nCornrn’issiVoner,l””B_ar1ga’lorel l\\iorth Sub-Division, Bangalore, in
\n‘RA.Naiioe-,%05~pos ll\u00a711″”‘s\u00a7.’.03.2oo6, is questioned, petitioners<\/p>\n
he_rein ” ‘filledlla,r1..,.Va=ppiicatioi1 seeking their irnpleadrnent as<\/p>\n
l   resplonde11t_N’os.._1f} to .17′. The application was allowed.<\/p>\n
 It  contended by the respondents herein that they<\/p>\n
  have _pud’;rehased the land measuring 30 guntas from its original<\/p>\n
 –djown\ufb01cr one I-Ianuma and by mistake, in the sale deed instead of<\/p>\n
 fneiitioiiing the survey number as 3\/9, the same was<\/p>\n
  _tior1ed as Sy. N03\/4. and therefore. the entries in the<\/p>\n
wp 39706\/20:0
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
revenue records were required to be corrected based on the<\/p>\n
rectification deed that. t.he petitioners had obtained from the<\/p>\n
legal representatives of the original owners. They also<\/p>\n
that respondent. Nos.4 to 10 herein did not he1ve.–A4’a’11y.:right  ‘<\/p>\n
have their names entered in respect oiIthe..said”.lSHyl it u<\/p>\n
due to the collusion between respondent  to’~.12 <\/p>\n
said entries had been recorded and”~the same  set = L’<\/p>\n
aside.\n<\/p>\n
3. The Deputy Commlissdioner ivlh;1s””~lrejleeted the revision<\/p>\n
petition filed holdingtl1a{_.~~21fter’& several years, the<\/p>\n
grievancegrnadle’ It is also found by the
\nDeputy CormnissionerA:jthat..__the entries in the revenue records<\/p>\n
were ordered to”b_e rec’o1’dved\u00b0’t)ased on the registered sale deeds<\/p>\n
 and tn..ere{e,re.=. the enti’-‘ies made did not call for interference.<\/p>\n
l’l’h_l_e”‘i)Te’p11ty_:Colitnniiyssioner has taken care to observe that the<\/p>\n
  aggrieved pa’rti.es’: were at libert.y to seek redressal of their<\/p>\n
 grievance  approaching the Civil Court and that the entries<\/p>\n
 _ inade by the revenue authorities are subject to the decision of<\/p>\n
 ___”the Civil Court.\n<\/p>\n
 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners<\/p>\n
claims right in respect. oi’ Sy. No.3\/9 based on the rectiticatio’n<\/p>\n
er”\n<\/p>\n
WP 39706\/2010
\n6<\/span>
\ndeed and the entire extent of land is 2 acres 26 guntas, whereas<\/p>\n
the petitioners are interested only to an extent of 30 gunte;s__, He<\/p>\n
further submits that a representation is made bejtbrepi’-stile<\/p>\n
Tahsildar in this regard based on the 1’ectit’iCation-‘deed. V’<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner ought to have .di1’eeted.’_’the” to<\/p>\n
Consider the 1’eprese::1t.ation while tdisipissing. the p1’e\\fis.ior-i<\/p>\n
petition filed by respondent Nos.h1ti 12.\n<\/p>\n
5. If the petitioners have 1*epresent\u00e9ttion ..bei’0re the
\nTahsildar, it is open to hintto”*p_d’\u00a7=\u00a7\u00a7vueV”tf1ey:hmatter before the<\/p>\n
Tahsildar who shall V_aftet”V”hearing petitioners and other<\/p>\n
interested perso’:i;s., pziss orders in accordazice with law. The
\ndismissal of the rev_isio:11_p’e.titi0i’i by the Deputy Commissioner<\/p>\n
for the reasollsu’s&tteC1,t.’he1*E3tt\u00a7.’;. does not call for interference.<\/p>\n
 & ”ii\\\/.\u00a3\u20acaI\u00a7i’i1g”i’iL&Cleetrv\ufb02thtdt the Tahsildar shall pass orders on<\/p>\n
the’V’re_preseritatie.n”made, on the merits of the application and<\/p>\n
after’ hearinghttfiettlparties without referring to the order passed<\/p>\n
 .  by the Deputy C01’i’ilI1iSSiOE.’}\u20ac1′, this writ. petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-73
\nEEFBGE<\/p>\n
, .KK<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 Author: B.S.Patil WP 39706\/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16′??? DAY OF’ DECEMBER, 2010 BEFORE T T THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE B.S.PATILL* W.P.No.39706\/2010 (KL:.I.=e\u00abRR\/stxiij ” ” 5 BETWEEN: I. H.SadashiVaiah, S\/0 late Honnappa, Aged about 67 years, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nH Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-21T17:24:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-21T17:24:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":628,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\",\"name\":\"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-21T17:24:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-21T17:24:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-21T17:24:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010"},"wordCount":628,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010","name":"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-21T17:24:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-sadashivaiah-vs-tha-tahsildar-on-16-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"H Sadashivaiah vs Tha Tahsildar on 16 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234761\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}