{"id":235172,"date":"2002-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002"},"modified":"2016-10-23T07:34:16","modified_gmt":"2016-10-23T02:04:16","slug":"ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002","title":{"rendered":"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: AIR 2003 Delhi 103, 101 (2002) DLT 229<\/div>\n
Author: Anil Dev Singh<\/div>\n
Bench: A D Singh, M Mudgal<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
 Anil Dev Singh, J: <\/p>\n
 1. By this public interest writ petitioner seeks: (i) a direction to
\nthe respondents to protect the rights of innocent conscientious consumers who object
\nto the use of animals in whole or in part or their derivatives in food, cosmetics and
\ndrugs, etc., by making the manufacturers and packers thereof to disclose the
\ningredients of the aforesaid products so that they make an informed choice with
\nregard to their consumption; (ii) a direction to the manufacturers and packers of
\ncosmetics, drugs and articles of food for complete and full disclosure of the
\ningredients of their products being sold to consumers; (iii) a declaration that the
\nconsumers have a right of making an informed choice between the products made or
\nderived from animal and non-animal ingredients; and (iv) a direction to the
\nmanufacturers and packers of food, cosmetic and drugs that the products made from
\nanimals should bear an easily identifiable symbol conveying that it has an animal
\ningredient. The petitioner seeks the directions and declaration keeping in view the
\nfact that about 60% of the people of this country are vegetarians so that they can
\nmake an informed choice of products as per their beliefs and opinions.\n<\/p>\n
 2. The petitioner claims to be an animal welfare volunteer and a member of
\nseveral animal welfare organisations. He is also stated to be a conscientious objector
\nto be consumption and use of animals and their derivatives for food, cosmetics and
\ndrugs. It has been highlighted in the petition that more than 60% of the people of
\nthis country are vegetarians and over 50% of them are illiterate and large number of
\nthem cannot read or write English. It is urged by the learned counsel for the
\npetitioner that there should be complete disclosure of constituents of cosmetics and
\nfood products and that such products should bear an easily recognisable symbol
\nconveying the origin or ingredients of the products, whether vegetarian or non-vegetarian,
\nso that both literate or illiterate consumers can make an informed choice
\nbefore selecting the products. He pleads that Articles 19(1)(a), 21, 25 of the
\nConstitution as also the Preamble to the Constitution mandates disclosure of
\ninformation.\n<\/p>\n
 3. The questions for our determination in this petition are: (i) whether or
\nnot in this country a consumer of cosmetics, drugs and articles of food has a
\nconstitutionally guaranteed right to full disclosure of the ingredients thereof
\nclearly specified on the product or its label or wrapper by means of a writing; (ii)
\nwhether or not packages of non-vegetarian products should bear a symbol giving
\ntheir non-vegetarian origin; and (iii) whether or not a package of vegetarian product
\nshould also bear a symbol?\n<\/p>\n
 4. In short the main question which requires our consideration is: Whether
\nthe Constitution mandates disclosure of information? The answer to the other two
\nquestions will depend on answer to the main question. It seems to us that answer to
\nthe main question lies in Article 19(1)(a), 21 and 25 of the Constitution and preamble
\nthereto. To answer the question, it will also be necessary to keep in view some of the
\nArticles of European Convention on Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil
\n& Political Rights and the judgments on the subject.\n<\/p>\n
  Consideration of the question with reference to Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution
\nread with Preamble thereto:\n<\/p>\n
 5. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees to all citizens freedom of
\nspeech and expression. At the same time, Article 19(2) permits the State to make
\nany law in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the
\nrights conferred by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution in the interest of the
\nsovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with
\nforeign States, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation and
\nincitement to an offence.\n<\/p>\n
 6. In  State of U.P. v. Raj Narayan and Ors.,<\/a> , the
\nSupreme Court, while interpreting Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, held that a
\ncitizen has a right to receive information and that right is derived from the concept of
\nfreedom of speech and expression comprised in the said Article. Similarly, in
\n Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India and Ors. v.
\nCricket Association of Bengal and Ors.<\/a> , the Supreme Court
\nreiterated that the freedom of speech and expression includes right to acquire
\ninformation. In  His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and Anr.,<\/a> , and P.V. Narsimha Rao v. State (CBI\/SPE),<\/a> , it was held that fundamental right to receive information
\nflows from the right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in Article
\n19(1)(a) of the Constitution.\n<\/p>\n
 7. In  Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India and Anr.,
\n2001 I AD (Delhi) 253, a Division Bench of this Court held that it is imperative for
\nthe State to ensure the availability of the right to a citizen to receive the information.
\nThough this was said in the context of the elections, the principle will apply with
\nequal force to the instant case. For making a right choice of food, cosmetics and
\ndrugs it is essential that the consumer should be apprised of the ingredients of such
\nproducts and he should not be kept in dark as non-availability of information would
\nlead to violation of his right to freedom of expression comprised in Article 19(1)(a) of
\nthe Constitution.\n<\/p>\n
 8. The Supreme Court in  Union of India v. Association for Democratic
\nReforms, 2002 (4) SCALE 297, while upholding the decision of this Court in
\nAssociation for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (supra), held that the right to
\nreceive information in democracy is recognised all throughout and it is the natural
\nright flowing from the concept of democracy. It was also held that right to freedom
\nof speech and expression also includes the right to educate, to inform and to entertain
\nand also the right to be educated, informed and entertained.\n<\/p>\n
 9. In  Ramesh Thapar v. State of Madras, , the Supreme
\nCourt inter alia held that all members of the society should be able to form their own
\nbeliefs and communicate the same freely to others.\n<\/p>\n
 10. It seems to us that to enable a person to practise the beliefs and opinions
\nwhich he holds, in a meaningful manner, it is essential for him to receive the relevant
\ninformation, otherwise he may be prevented from acting in consonance with his
\nbeliefs and and opinions. In case a vegetarian consumer does not know the
\ningredients of cosmetics, drugs or food products which he\/she wishes to buy, it will
\nbe difficult for him or her to practise vegetarianism. In the aforesaid context, freedom
\nof expression enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) can serve two broad purposes – (1) it can
\nhelp the consumer to discover the truth about the composition of the products,
\nwhether made of animals including birds and fresh water or marine animals or eggs,
\nand (2) it can help him to fulfilll his belief or opinion in vegetarianism.\n<\/p>\n
 11. World has moved towards universalisation of right to freedom of
\nexpression. In this context we may refer to Article 10 of the European Convention
\non Human Rights. Article 10 of the Convention provides that every one has a right
\nto freedom of expression and this right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to
\nreceive information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless
\nof frontiers.\n<\/p>\n
12. Again, Article 19(1) and 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil
\nand Political Rights declares that every one shall have the right to hold opinions
\nwithout interference, and every one shall have the right to freedom of expression, and
\nthis right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information of ideas of all
\nkinds regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or
\nthrough any other media of his choice. It needs to be noted that India is a signatory
\nto the aforesaid convention.\n<\/p>\n
 13. It is well settled by several judgment of the Supreme Court that while
\ninterpreting constitutional provisions dealing with fundamental rights the courts must
\nnot forget principles embodied in the international conventions and instruments and
\nas far as possible the courts must give effect to the principles contained in those
\ninstruments. In  Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra,<\/a> 2000 (1) All
\nIndia Service Law Journal 65, the Supreme Court went to the extent of holding that
\nthe courts are under an obligation to give due regard to the international conventions
\nand norms while construing domestic laws, more so when there is no inconsistency
\nbetween them and the domestic laws. To the same effect is an earlier decision of the
\nSupreme Court in  Vishakha and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. .\n<\/p>\n
 14. Right to hold opinions and to receive information and ideas without
\ninterference embodied in the Covenant is concomitant to the right to freedom of
\nspeech and expression which includes right to free flow of information. Since
\nancient times we have allowed noble thoughts to come from all sides [Rig Veda].
\nThis has helped in forming, building, strengthening, nurturing, replenishing and
\nrecreating opinions and beliefs of an individual.\n<\/p>\n
 15. Drawing from the aforesaid decisions, effect must be given to the
\nCovenant. Reading Article 19(1)(a) along with the Covenant, it must be recognised
\nthat right to freedom of speech and expression includes freedom to seek, receive and
\nimpart information of ideas. It seems to us that freedom to hold opinions, ideas,
\nbeliefs and freedom of thought, etc., which is also enshrined in Preamble to the
\nConstitution, is part of freedom of speech and expression.\n<\/p>\n
 Consideration of the question with reference to Article 21 of the Constitution:\n<\/p>\n
 16. Article 21 enshrines right to life and personal liberty. Expression ‘right
\nto life and personal liberty’ and compendious terms which includes with themselves
\nvariety of rights and attributes. Some of them are also found in Article 19 and thus
\nhave two sources at the same time (see  Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.,<\/a> ). In  R.P. Limited v. Proprietors, Indian Express Newspapers, Bombay, Pvt.
\nLtd. (1988) 4 S.C. 592 (at page 613), the Supreme Court read into Article 21 the
\nright to know. The Supreme Court held that right of know is a necessary ingredient of
\nparticipatory democracy. In view of transactional developments when distances are
\nshrinking, international communities are coming together for cooperation in various
\nspheres and they are moving towards global perspectives in various fields including
\nhuman rights, the expression “liberty” must receive an expanded meaning. The
\nexpression cannot be cribbed or confined to mere freedom from bodily restraint. It is
\nwide enough to expand to full range of rights including right to hold a particular
\nopinion and right to sustain and nurture that opinion. For sustaining and nurturing
\nthat opinion it becomes necessary to receive information. In this view of the matter,
\nwe have no hesitation in holding that Article 21 grants freedom to an individual to
\nfollow and to stick to his opinions, and for pursuing such a course he has right to
\nreceive information and also a right to know the ingredients or the constituent of
\ncosmetics, drugs and food products.\n<\/p>\n
  Consideration of the question with reference to Article 25 of the Constitution:\n<\/p>\n
 17. We now refer to Article 25 of the Constitution. Article 25, inter alia,
\ndeals with freedom of conscience. In  Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. State of Bombay,<\/a>
\n, it was held that freedom of conscience connotes a person’s right to
\nentertain beliefs and doctrine concerning matters, which are regarded by him to be
\nconducive to his spiritual well-being.\n<\/p>\n
 18. In  Bijoe Emmanuel and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Ors.,<\/a> , the Supreme Court while dealing with the challenge to the expulsion of three
\nchildren from the school because of their not joining the singing of the national
\nanthem in the morning assembly in keeping with their religious faith, held that the
\nexpulsion was in violation of their fundamental right to freedom of conscience.\n<\/p>\n
 19. In  United States v. Daniel Andrew Seeger, 380 US 163, 13 Led 2d 733,
\n85 S Ct 850, it was held that any person opposed to war on the basis of sincere belief
\nwhich in his life fills the same place as the belief in God fills in the life of an orthodox
\nreligionist, is entitled to exemption from statutory combatant training and service in
\nthe armed forces of the United States on the ground of freedom of conscience which
\nimplies respect for an innate conviction based on belief.\n<\/p>\n
 20. It appears to us that where packages of food products, drugs and
\ncosmetics do not disclose any information in writing and by an appropriate symbol
\nabout the composition of the products contained therein, right to freedom of
\nconscience of the consumers is violated as they may be unconsciously consuming a
\nproduct against their faiths, beliefs and opinions.\n<\/p>\n
 21. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we are of the view that it is the
\nfundamental right of the consumers to know whether the food products, cosmetics
\nand drugs of non-vegetarian or vegetarian origin, as otherwise it will violate their
\nfundamental rights under Article 19(1)(a), 21 and 25 of the Constitution.
\nAccordingly, we answer the main question in the affirmative. Since there is a
\nconstitutionally guaranteed right of the consumers to the full disclosure of the
\ningredients of cosmetics, drugs and articles of food, answers to remaining questions\n<\/p>\n
(ii) and (iii) necessarily are required to be answered in the affirmative. We,
\naccordingly, answer the questions (ii) and (iii) also in the affirmative.\n<\/p>\n
 22. It seems that the Parliament Realizing that the consumers have a
\nfundamental right to be apprised of the fact whether or not a food article contains
\nwhole or part of any animal including birds, fresh water or marine animals or eggs or
\nproducts of animal origin, brought about necessary changes in the Prevention of Food
\nAdulteration Act, 1954. At this stage it will be apposite to quote the relevant
\nprovisions:-\n<\/p>\n
   “xx    xx    xx   xx<\/p>\n
PART VII – PACKING AND LABELLING OF FOODS  <\/p>\n
 32.  Package of food to carry a label – Every package of food carry a
\nlabel and unless otherwise provided in the rules, there shall be specified
\non every label:-\n<\/p>\n
 (a) the name trade name or description of food contained in the
\npackage;\n<\/p>\n
 Provided that the name, trade name of the description of
\nfood  gain on the package of food shall not include the name
\nof any food or ingredient prefixed or suffixed to it, if such
\nfood ingredient is not the main ingredient of the final food
\nproduct.\n<\/p>\n
 (b) the names of ingredients used in the product in descending
\norder of their composition by weight or volume as the case
\nmay be.\n<\/p>\n
 Provided that in the case of artificial flavouring substance, the
\nlabel may not declare the Chemical names of the flavours, but in the case
\nof natural flavouring substances or nature-identical flavouring
\nsubstance, the common name of flavours shall be mentioned on the
\nlabel.\n<\/p>\n
 Provided also that whenever Gelatine is used as an ingredient, a
\ndeclaration to this effect shall be made on the label by inserting the word
\n“Gelatine-Animal Origin.”\n<\/p>\n
 *[Provided also that when any article of food contains whole or
\npart of any animal including birds, fresh water or marine animals or eggs
\nor product of any animal origin, but not including milk or milk products,
\nas an ingredient,-\n<\/p>\n
 (a) a declaration to this effect shall be made by a symbol and colour
\ncode so stipulated for this purpose to indicate that the produce is
\nNon-Vegetarian. The symbol shall consist of a brown colour
\nfilled circle having a diameter not less than the minimum size
\nspecified in the Table given below, inside the square with brown
\noutline having side double the diameter of the circle, as indicated
\nin Clause 16) of Sub-rule (ZZZ) of Rule 42;\n<\/p>\n
  TABLE<\/p>\n
  S. No.
\n  Area of principal display panel
\n  Minimum size of diameter in mm.\n<\/p>\n
  1.
\n  up to 100 cms square
\n  3<\/span><\/p>\n
  2.
\n  Above 100 cms square up to 500 cms square
\n  4<\/span><\/p>\n
  3.
\n  Above 500 cms square up to 2500 cms square
\n  6<\/span><\/p>\n
  4.
\n  Above 2500 cms square
\n  8<\/span><\/p>\n
 (b) the symbol shall be prominently displayed,-\n<\/p>\n
 (i) on the package having contrast background on
\nprincipal display panel;\n<\/p>\n
 (ii) just close in proximity to the name or brand name of
\nthe product, and  <\/p>\n
 (iii) one the labels, containers, pamphlets, leaflets,
\nadvertisements in any media;\n<\/p>\n
 Provided also that where any article of food contains egg
\nonly as Non-Vegetarian ingredient, the manufacturer, or packer or seller
\nmay give declaration to this effect in addition to the said to the said
\nsymbol.\n<\/p>\n
 Provided further that the provisions of these rules shall not
\napply in respect of any Non-vegetarian Food which is manufactured and
\npacked without the symbol before the Commencement of the Prevention
\nof Food Adulteration (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2001] <\/p>\n
 [*Ins. By GSR 245 (E), dt. 4.4.2001, w.e.f. 4.10.2001] <\/p>\n
 xx    xx    xx<\/p>\n
 #[Provided also that for all Vegetarian Food,-\n<\/p>\n
 (a) a declaration to this effect shall be made by a symbol and
\ncolour code so stipulated for this purpose to indicate that
\nthe product is Vegetarian Food. The symbol shall consist
\nof a green colour filled circle, having a diameter not less
\nthan the minimum size in the Table given below, inside the
\nsquare with green outline having side double the diameter
\nof the circle, as indicated in Clause (17) of Sub-rule (ZZZ)
\nof Rule 42;\n<\/p>\n
TABLE <\/p>\n
 S.No.\n<\/p>\n
 Area of principal display panel<\/p>\n
 Minimum size of diameter in mm.\n<\/p>\n
 (1)<\/span><\/p>\n
 (2)<\/span><\/p>\n
 (3)<\/span><\/p>\n
 1.<\/p>\n
 up to 100 cms square<\/p>\n
 3<\/span><\/p>\n
 2.<\/p>\n
 Above 100 cms square up to 500 cms square<\/p>\n
 4<\/span><\/p>\n
 3.<\/p>\n
 Above 500 cms square 2500 cms square<\/p>\n
 6<\/span><\/p>\n
 4.<\/p>\n
 Above 2500 cms square<\/p>\n
 8<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
 (b) the symbol shall be prominently displayed,-\n<\/p>\n
 (i) on the package having contrast background on
\nprincipal display panel; (ii) just close in proximity to
\nthe name or brand name of the product, and (iii) one
\nthe labels, containers, pamphlets, leaflets,
\nadvertisements in any media;\n<\/p>\n
 Provided further that the provisions of these rule shall not
\napply in respect of any Vegetarian Food which is
\nmanufactured and packed without the symbol before the
\ncommencement of the Prevention of Food Adulteration (9th
\nAmendment) Rules, 2001:\n<\/p>\n
 Provided also that the provisions of these rules shall not
\napply in respect of mineral water or packaged drinking
\nwater or carbonated water or liquid and powdered milk.] <\/p>\n
 #(Ins. By GSR 908(E), dt. 20.12.2001, w.e.f. 20.5.2002] <\/p>\n
 xx   xx   xx <\/p>\n
+[Explanation IX – “Non-Vegetarian Food” means an
\narticle of food which contains whole or part of any animal including
\nbirds, fresh water or marine animals or eggs or products of any animal
\norigin, but not including milk or milk products, as an ingredient.] <\/p>\n
 +[Subs. by GSR 245(E), dt. 4.4.2001, w.e.f. 4.10.2001, for
\n“Explanation IX – “Non-Vegetarian Food” means an article
\nof food which contains whole or part of any animal
\nincluding birds, fresh water or marine animals or eggs as an
\ningredient.” Prev. ins. by GSR 463(E), dt. 17.5.2000, w.e.f.
\n17.11.2000] <\/p>\n
 @[Explanation X – “Vegetarian Food” means by article of
\nFood other than the Non-Vegetarian Food as defined in Explanation IX
\nof this rule;] <\/p>\n
 @[Ins. By GSR 908(E), dt. 20.12.2001, w.e.f. 20.5.2002] <\/p>\n
 xx    xx   xx<\/p>\n
 $[(ZZZ) (16) Every package of Non-Vegetarian Food shall
\nbear the following symbol on the principal display panel just close in
\nproximity to the name or brand name of food, namely:-\n<\/p>\n
 $[Ins. By GSR 245(E), dt. 4.4.2001, w.e.f. 4.10.2001] <\/p>\n
 %[(ZZZ) (17) Every package of Vegetarian Food shall bear
\nthe following symbol in green colour on the principal display panel just
\nclose in proximity to name or brand name of the Food, namely:-\n<\/p>\n
 %[Ins. By GSR 908(E), dt. 20.12.2001, w.e.f. 20.5.2002] <\/p>\n
 xx   xx    xx”\n<\/p>\n
 23. In so far as food products are concerned, adequate provisions have been
\nmade for informing the consumers as to whether or not the article of food is
\nvegetarian or non-vegetarian. As regards drugs and cosmetics, necessary
\namendments have not been made in the relevant statutes. In so far as a life saving
\ndrug is concerned, there is a view point that the information: whether or not it is
\nderived or manufactured, wholly or partly, from an animal, should not be disclosed
\nsince it is meant to fight disease and save life. In other words, a patient, who is
\nsuffering from serious ailment, which can be fatal if a life saving drug is not
\nadministered to him, need not be informed in his own interest as to whether or not
\nthe drug contains part of any animal as it is conducive to preservation of life and,
\ntherefore, in tune with Article 21 of the Constitution. this also means that he should
\nnot have a choice in the matter of administering life saving drug to him. In many
\ncases patients are unconscious and they have to be put on life saving drugs. In any
\nevent they cannot exercise an informed choice in the matter of selection of such
\ndrugs. In the circumstances, therefore, the aforesaid view must prevail in case of life
\nsaving drugs. This limited exception will apply only to life saving drugs. It needs to
\nbe clarified that all drugs do not qualify for being treated as life saving drugs. Drugs
\nwhich are not life saving drugs must stand at part with the food products and in case
\nthey are derived from animals, whether in whole or in part, the consumers must be
\ninformed.\n<\/p>\n
 24. In so far as cosmetics are concerned, the same must be treated at par
\nwith articles\/packages of food for the purposes of disclosure of their ingredients.\n<\/p>\n
 25. Till such time the requisite amendments are carried out, we direct as
\nunder:-\n<\/p>\n
 (1) Where a cosmetic or a drug other than life saving drug, as the case
\nmay be, contains ingredients of non-vegetarian origin, the package
\nshall carry label bearing the following symbol in red colour on the
\nprincipal display panel just close in proximity to name or brand
\nname of the drug or cosmetic :-\n<\/p>\n
 (2) Where a cosmetic or a drug other than life saving drug, as the case
\nmay be, contains ingredients wholly of vegetarian origin, the
\npackage shall bear the following symbol in green colour on the
\nprincipal display panel just close in proximity to name or brand
\nname of the drug or cosmetic:-\n<\/p>\n
 (3) Where a cosmetic or a drug other than life saving drug has
\ningredients of vegetarian or non-vegetarian origin, a declaration
\nshall be made in writing on the package indicating the nature of the
\norigin of the product.\n<\/p>\n
 (4) The Director General of Health Services\/Drugs Controller General,
\nGovt. of India, shall issue a list of Life Saving Drugs within a period
\nof two months.\n<\/p>\n
 26. With the above directions and observations, the writ petition is disposed of.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002 Equivalent citations: AIR 2003 Delhi 103, 101 (2002) DLT 229 Author: Anil Dev Singh Bench: A D Singh, M Mudgal JUDGMENT Anil Dev Singh, J: 1. By this public interest writ petitioner seeks: (i) a direction to the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nOzair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 13 November, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 13 November, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2002-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-23T02:04:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002\",\"datePublished\":\"2002-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-23T02:04:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\"},\"wordCount\":3723,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\",\"name\":\"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 13 November, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2002-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-23T02:04:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 13 November, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 13 November, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2002-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-23T02:04:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002","datePublished":"2002-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-23T02:04:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002"},"wordCount":3723,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002","name":"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 13 November, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2002-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-23T02:04:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ozair-husain-vs-union-of-india-uoi-through-the-on-13-november-2002#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ozair Husain vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The … on 13 November, 2002"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}