{"id":235575,"date":"2008-05-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008"},"modified":"2015-12-17T14:12:01","modified_gmt":"2015-12-17T08:42:01","slug":"shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>T  was sitting En fmnt of the shop of one Bomgowda,<\/p>\n<p>&lt;34.<\/p>\n<p>JUDG-\ufb01ll?\n<\/p>\n<p>The appellant has cheged hm eomiic\ufb01ern&#8221; ._<br \/>\nsentence for the offence under Section 302 [PC  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>by the Scssimxs court. B\ufb02llgakxre Ruza1.a3\u00abiactiF&gt;t.  M &#8221;  e  <\/p>\n<p>2. The facts relevant for    &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>under: V&#8217; i<\/p>\n<p>The complainant    thesgcusaa<br \/>\n(the cousin brother of the   sisier of the<br \/>\naccused was    cxzmphmazh 1;.\n<\/p>\n<p>About three    the son of the<br \/>\ncomplainant  kiiled and the elder<br \/>\nbmther  &#8216;t}:_1e&#8217;   \u00e9\ufb02cuscd wen: mid to be<\/p>\n<p>responsibh:  was a trial&#8217; pend1ng&#8217; slam&#8217; at<\/p>\n<p>them itz&#8217; (hart It is the case of the pmsecuulon<br \/>\n  to the vengeance about his<br \/>\n V  in the murder of the elm.-2.06<\/p>\n<p> had an eye on the complainant mad the<\/p>\n<p> om-3 family and on 8.7.2003 at about 3.00 pm&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>  deem S , the elder hmther of the<\/p>\n<p>the \ufb01ume\ufb01.jnves\ufb01ge\ufb01\u00a72e the inquest on the dead body<\/p>\n<p> o_thers   &#8216;the statements of the witnesses. He went<\/p>\n<p>  and in the presence of P&#8221;W.9 and<\/p>\n<p>  3 stained and unstained soil. He mew the<br \/>\n9f .t.he;seene of oifence as per Ex.P.7 md arrested the<br \/>\n  On interrogation, he recorded the veaemexy<br \/>\n Ietatexzixent and the eeeueea led the Po\ufb01oe and the attes\ufb01ng<\/p>\n<p>Cri. A.HQ.;16;[&amp;. 5<\/p>\n<p>the vengeance has caused injuries to Shivaiine <\/p>\n<p>chopper and set the criminal law in motion.<\/p>\n<p>The Head Constable (PW.1G) &#8216;-ithef&#8217;<br \/>\ncomplaint in Crime No. 1481112003 for<br \/>\n307 [PC and sent the complaint (E)_c.P.  the  &#8216;V<br \/>\nto the Magistrate thmugh  J1-4).<br \/>\nDuring the night of that &#8216;cia y,   PW.1O<br \/>\nreceived an information    to the<br \/>\ninjuries on the    to alter and<br \/>\ninclude the   &#8216; {PC and sent the<\/p>\n<p>iaformation&#8212;-\u00a3*}x._E&#8217;:&#8217;:}&#8217;2.vV&#8217;te*3;e. Iv2a&#8217;t\u00bbg:2&#8242;&#8211;&#8216;sv cm (PW. 15) took out<\/p>\n<p>of the  in the presence of PW.1l mid<\/p>\n<p>other   the mahawr Ex.P.3 and at that time<\/p>\n<p>M&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p> _ V.  {Via  appellant for the o\ufb01ience tmdcr<\/p>\n<p> i;-3.  and unacceptable. So also, ii is<br \/>\n  complainant taking disadvantage of the motive<\/p>\n<p>i   iialsely implicated the mcusod and the evidence of<br \/>\nF&#8221;   Lfela\ufb01ves of the deceased being interested cannot be<\/p>\n<p> in law. In the cimmtnsiances, he has sought RM&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>302 1190 and W-shaved by the conviction and  _<br \/>\nappealhas been prefened. _  _  L. A 3 T\n<\/p>\n<p>3. We have heard the Learned  the<br \/>\nand also the State Public Pxosecntagf.   &#8216;V<br \/>\nour consideration are: &#8216;  &#8216; V &#8221; V.<br \/>\n(1) Whether the jndggncm ap\ufb01\ufb01<br \/>\nand sentence on<br \/>\nmld\ufb01l&#8217;     and<\/p>\n<p>(2 *3:   %<\/p>\n<p>4. It is_ the  learned cmmsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellanf\u00e9&#8217; mat  t1;sV~.h  adduced during the trial is<\/p>\n<p>  he submits that the evkictnm of the eye<\/p>\n<p>&lt;sZ\\<\/p>\n<p>&#039;P&#039; an teInp0!*a1 bones and the skull<\/p>\n<p>&#039; Vv   was due to shock and haemorrhg as 3<br \/>\n of  injuries to the skull and bram tissue. These<br \/>\n gun enumerated in the Postmortem report (Ex.P.13)<\/p>\n<p>_   (&quot;the Doctor (PW. 12) opines that such  can M<br \/>\n&#039;V   by the chopper (MO. 1). His opinion is at Ex.P.14. The<\/p>\n<p> evidence reveals that the deceased after susta1n1n&#039; &#039; g the injuries<\/p>\n<p>-7&#8211; .&#8217;<br \/>\nsetting aside the conviction. The State Public   _<br \/>\nsupported the \ufb01ndings and submits that the   .,<br \/>\nis su\ufb01eient to &#8216;prove the guilt of the    <\/p>\n<p>all masonable doubt.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. So \ufb01ar as the hom;&#8217;ciial   cross<br \/>\nexamination of PW.12  eer\ufb01aus dispute<br \/>\nin this xegard.    many as &#8216;7<br \/>\nincised injuries. qr:   of the head,<br \/>\nover the   smulder and the<br \/>\nskuli was  and the blood clots were<br \/>\nswn  b  &#8220;injuries on the hem were of<\/p>\n<p>about 3; ems.    was comzninuted \ufb01acture of<\/p>\n<p>   ml. of blood clots and the Doctor ms<\/p>\n<p>o\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n<p>Cr}. 5.NO.;,1_61(2QQ5<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-10-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>8. The prosecution relies upon the evidence of Pws-.11.,\u00bb 2,<\/p>\n<p>4, 6 and 7 the eye witnesses to the incident. PWJ7 V<\/p>\n<p>host\ufb02c. So, it is the evidence of PWS. 1, 2, &#8216;4 and 6  M<\/p>\n<p>be looked into. It is the consistent version-of   {in me&amp; V<\/p>\n<p>date of the incident, at about 3.00 <\/p>\n<p>was sitting in \ufb01ont of the  of Ir3o;&#8217;as  fgae<br \/>\n\ufb01rontyaxti of his house    on a<br \/>\nbicycle with a chopper   the deceased<br \/>\non the head and      have any<br \/>\nheirs of the   uediizphint, he spews<br \/>\nof his pzescnc&#8217;:&#8221;c.1    ercsencc of his sister-<\/p>\n<p>in-law suj\u00e9ya (was). Both P&#8217;Ws.4 mi 5<\/p>\n<p>support the ver s2ion&#8217;  PW.5 has not seen the<\/p>\n<p>incident pf&#8211;va;3sa1&#8217;1 it,V..l;1e&#8221;s1tates 55 his evidence that he was inside<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;H'(.V&#8217;t\ufb01.&#8217;f1  the tea and heard the galata and<\/p>\n<p> , the deceased and the people shoutglng<\/p>\n<p>L    S . He states that by the<br \/>\n he  out, the accused had fled away from the spot.<\/p>\n<p>   is not an eye WitI18$S, his evxi&#8217; ence would be<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221;  .:._\u00a7{&gt;hsi\ufb01Zexed as the evidence of res gestac. His presence near the<\/p>\n<p>q\/<\/p>\n<p>Qg. A.\u00a7O. _1_ \u00a361 [\u00a333<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-11-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>spot \ufb01nds place in the complaint Ex.P.1. His house injjlgnst<\/p>\n<p>opposite to the bunk shop of Borcgowda. Them  .,<\/p>\n<p>unnatural in the cvidmoe of P&#8217;W.5 about what   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>before the Court. His evidence is  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>of PWs.1 and 2. It is relevant to not;\u00e9\u00ab&#8217;th\u00e9_it<\/p>\n<p>evidence states that when he<br \/>\nthe lands and when he    the<br \/>\naccused alighting \ufb01om   and then<br \/>\nsuddenly assaulting 31\u00a2  on the head<br \/>\nand neck. Thgqgi.&#8217;    to tm deceased,<br \/>\nrest of the    except that<br \/>\nthey are    1)\u00a2;:;sons who weave passing<br \/>\nthrough mgA35,\u00a2n\u00a2 at the time of am incident.<\/p>\n<p>The scm:t*2:1yAof&#8221;4{ia\u00a7VAA\u00a2vi.dc:\ufb01\u00a3\u00a3:c .\u00a7.)f Pws.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 reveals<\/p>\n<p> thi\u00a7\u00a3.1:cifiaieti9\u00a2 is  as neganis the part played by<\/p>\n<p>tlii-3  the assault and running away from the<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;    incident. There is not};n:ng&#8217; to d1sbe&#8217; iicvc the<\/p>\n<p>s\ufb02vidcnce (&#8220;if  1-these: witnesses and looking to theiw mm<\/p>\n<p>  except suggesting that they are dcposing falsely,<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;   ngmenax is elicited to discard the cvidmcc of these<\/p>\n<p>%\/\\<\/p>\n<p>Cri. A.NO. 116112005\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 12 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>witnesses. Except that PW}? has turned hostile  the<br \/>\npmsecution, we are of the consiciexed opinion that<br \/>\nof these eye witnesses and that of P&#8217;W.5 is aocept\ufb01nb1e,e:VV\u00a7\u00a7-e   <\/p>\n<p>consistent and cogent.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. The spot mahazar<br \/>\nof occurrence is near to the  of  and V<br \/>\nP&#8217;W.4. Furthermore, MOe;2A_   the spot<br \/>\nand the FSL   stains in the<br \/>\nsari}. The cho3)i&gt;eej&#8217;&#8212;  V the Police under the<br \/>\nmaham-Ve;;x;p., &#8220;of&#8221;t1;e accused. Though this<\/p>\n<p>itself is 7._not 2-auj\ufb01t  &#8221; :su..sta1n&#8217; the conviction, the<\/p>\n<p>circumstances,  version of the prosecution and<\/p>\n<p>, .t}:1e  ot&#8217;t11ne&#8221;ej;&#8217;:eV__wfi.1;:1essee. The pxese-nee of blood stains<br \/>\n e1oTt3t:es\u00abvt11e accused and that of the deceased reveal<br \/>\n  Oligill. The recovery of the shjxt at<\/p>\n<p>V Vt the ine&#8217;ianeeV.of:tI1e accused has been proved satisfactorily \ufb01nm<\/p>\n<p>H  on  of the Investigating Ot\ufb01cer. 80 taking into<br \/>\n4&#8243;&#8216;_ee:eeitieretion the circumstances stated above and the<br \/>\n lqevitience of eye Witnesses and that of PW.E$, there is ample<\/p>\n<p>  inaterial on record to prove that the aeeuseci with an intention<\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>Section  IPC. V &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Crl. M10. 1161gm\u00a7<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-13-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>to cause the death of the deceasad   <\/p>\n<p>choppcr(MO.1) and that uitimatcly,  demj\ufb01sccl&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>to the said injuries on the same   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>intention of the accuseci is<br \/>\nsustained by the deoeasgd o\ufb01&#8221;   v\u00a7i\u00a7a1  The<br \/>\nappcnantf accused has notu\ufb02  to waxrant<br \/>\nthe interference. V  &#8220;we answer the<br \/>\nPoint No.1 in tyne   the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>The &#8211;con&#8221;\ufb011mmg&#8217; the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence     Court for the offence under<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-Z\u00bb<br \/>\nIudg\u00e9<br \/>\nSd\/-5<br \/>\nJada?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao A.S.Pachhapure T was sitting En fmnt of the shop of one Bomgowda, &lt;34. JUDG-\ufb01ll? The appellant has cheged hm eomiic\ufb01ern&#8221; ._ sentence for the offence under Section 302 [PC &#8216; by the Scssimxs court. B\ufb02llgakxre Ruza1.a3\u00abiactiF&gt;t. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-17T08:42:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shankara S\\\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-17T08:42:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1237,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Shankara S\\\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-17T08:42:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shankara S\\\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-17T08:42:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-17T08:42:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008"},"wordCount":1237,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008","name":"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-17T08:42:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankara-so-thamme-gowda-vs-state-by-akkur-police-on-30-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shankara S\/O Thamme Gowda vs State By Akkur Police on 30 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}