{"id":235582,"date":"2010-03-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-21T13:25:59","modified_gmt":"2017-11-21T07:55:59","slug":"dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n
Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010<\/div>\n
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI.\n\n                                               Cr. Rev. No. 97 of 2009\n\n               1.<\/pre>\n
Tilak Yadav\n<\/p>\n
               2.Biru Yadav\n<\/p>\n
               3.Krishna Yadav\n<\/p>\n
               4.Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao@Yogendra Prasad Sahu
\n                                   …………………………                  Petitioners<\/p>\n
                                        Versus
\n               The State of Jharkhand ……………………………………. Opp. Party<\/p>\n
               Coram :- Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Sinha<\/p>\n
                       For the Petitioners      :- Mr. Jitendra . S. Singh
\n                                                   Mr. A.K. Pandey
\n                       For the State            :- Mrs. Neetu Singh A.P.P.\n<\/p>\n
                C.A.V. On 19.1.2010                     Delivered on     30-3-2010\n\n                                             ORDER\n\n8- 30-3-2010                  The instant Criminal Revision is directed against the\n<\/pre>\n
               order impugned dated 27.11.2008 passed by the learned Sessions
\n               Judge, Latehar in S.T. No. 122 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No.
\n               89 of 2006 arising out of Chandwa P.S. Case No. 23 of 2006 by
\n               which     the petition filed on behalf of the petitioners for their
\n               discharge under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was
\n               dismissed. The name of petitioner         Dhananjay Nath Sahi was
\n               deleted by the order of this Court dated 25.8.2009 on his death.\n<\/p>\n
               2.             The prosecution story in short was that                the
\n               informant-Officer-in-charge of Chandwa police station recorded his
\n               self statement on 26.2.2006 at about 17.30 hours narrating inter
\n               alia that on telephonic message received that some extremists had
\n               been assaulting the pilgrims who had arrived at ‘ Nagar temple,’ he
\n               with the police party rushed there and enquired from the
\n               shopkeepers about the occurrence and only from whom he could
\n               gather that the extremists      had taken away about 8\/10 pilgrims
\n               including one Lakhan Prasad Jaiswal with them to unknown place.
\n               On such information the police party proceeded tracking the retreat
\n               of the extremists but finding and spotting the police coming
\n               towards them, the extremists resorted firing which was retaliated
\n               by the police. Realizing the pressure of the police the extremists
\n               escaped after releasing the persons who were abducted by them.
\n               The police party intercepted various incriminating articles including
\n               literatures, posters, hand bills and note books at some distance
\n               besides utensils     and empty cartridges to which seizure list was
\n                             2<\/span><\/p>\n
prepared in presence of the witnesses. The statement of the victim
\nLakhan Prasad Jaiswal was recorded who narrated that he and
\nother 8\/10 pilgrims were abducted from near the temple by the
\nextremists on the gun point and they alleged            against Lakhan
\nPrasad Jaiswal that he was the spy of the police and that he was
\nbrutally assaulted by them. He further apprised that Biru Yadav,
\nKrishna Yadav and Tilak Yadav had made arrangement of
\nbreakfast and meal for the extremists and that they had been
\nsupplying food to them. In the meantime, extremists escaped after
\ngun battle with the police party. He disclosed the complicity of
\nseveral accused persons as extremists, engaged in criminal
\nactivities of abduction and other crimes, and also implicated the
\npetitioners Tilak Yadav,Biru Yadav, Krishna Yadav etc.\n<\/p>\n
3.            Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, the learned counsel for the
\npetitioners submitted that the petitioners were innocent and were
\nnot at all concerned with the alleged offence. The counsel added
\nthat the statements of several witnesses were recorded in
\nparagraph 99 of the case diary who were consistent that Lakhan
\nPrasad Jaiswal was on inimical term with the petitioners on the
\nground   of   land    disputes,    that   apart,   disputes   related    to
\nmanagement of        ‘Nagar Temple’. The management of the said
\ntemple was ultimately transferred in the name of deity with the
\nconstitution of the trustee committee who looked after the interest
\nof the properties which were assigned in the name of deity. Mr.
\nSingh explained that the other victims, who were abducted, such
\nas Mohat Khan and Chandra Shekhar Pandey and other were also
\nexamined and     their statements were recorded as contained in
\nparagraphs 13,14 and 15 of the case diary, who were consistent
\nby not implicating the petitioners in any manner for their abduction
\nor otherwise also. However, the allegation that was left out against
\nthe petitioners was that        they had been supplying food to the
\nextremists (MC.C.) outlaws. As regards the complicity of                the
\npetitioner Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao @ Yogendra Prasad Sahu
\nwas concerned, there was no material at all against him except
\nhis name was found mention in the note books which were
\nrecovered by the police in course of investigation that          he had
\ngiven certain amount to the extremists (M.C.C.) and for that the
\npetitioners cannot be held criminally liable for hatching a criminal
\nconspiracy against the Union of India. A person cannot be held
\naccused only on the ground that his name was mentioned in the
\n                             3<\/span><\/p>\n
note book of the extremists as donor without any corroborative
\nevidence that he was seen by some witnesses delivering certain
\namount to the M.C.C. people or their agent and therefore, criminal
\nprosecution of the petitioner Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao @
\nYogendra Prasad Sahu would tantamount to misuse of the process
\nof the court.\n<\/p>\n
4.              Finally Mr Singh submitted with reference to the
\nFamous ‘Hawala Case’ reported in       1998(2) Eastern Criminal
\nCases 196(SC). The Apex Court in                 Central Bureau of
\nInvestigation Versus V.C. Shukla and others held :-\n<\/p>\n
                      “Even if the entry becomes admissible as
\n                      relevant evidence, still the statement
\n                      made therein shall not alone be sufficient
\n                      evidence to charge any person with
\n                      liability unless their trustworthiness is
\n                      corroborated by independent evidence.
\n                      Entries are not “admissions” to attract
\n                      Section 21 of Evidence Act.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
5.              The learned A.P.P. opposed the contention as raised
\non behalf of the petitioners     on the point of discharge for the
\nalleged offence proposed under sections 364\/120B of the Indian
\nPenal Code and Section 17 of CLA Act.\n<\/p>\n
6.              Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
\ncase, I find that the allegation against the petitioners Tilak Yadav,
\nBiru Yadav and Krishna Yadav was of providing food to the
\nextremists (M.C.C) outlaws whereas the allegation against the
\npetitioner Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao @ Yogendra Prasad Sahu
\nwas that his name was found mentioned in the note book which
\nwas recovered from the hide-out of the extremists containing that
\nhe was donor and had donated Rs.50,000\/- to them. The learned
\nA.P.P. failed to point out any other material against the petitioners
\nin the entire case diary and therefore, on the face value of the
\nallegation I find that offence as alleged under section 364 read with
\nsection 120B of the Indian Penal Code is not attracted against the
\npetitioners Tilak Yadav, Biru Yadav and Krishna Yadav. However, in
\nthe facts and circumstances of the case I find that there is prima
\nfacie allegation against the petitioners under section 17 of the CLA
\nAct which is triable by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class. Similarly,
\nno prima facie offence is made out against the petitioner Jago Sao
\n@ Jageshwar Sao @ Yogendra Prasad Sahu for the said offence
\nonly because his name was found mentioned in the note book of
\nthe Naxalities (M.C.C.) out laws as profounded by the Supreme
\n                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n
     Court of India in Famous ‘ Hawala Case’ referred to herein before.
\n     In the facts and circumstances, the criminal prosecution of the
\n     petitioner Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao @ Yogendra Prasad Sahu,to
\n     that I subscribe the submission of the counsel, would tantamount
\n     to misuse of the process of the court as the entry of the name of
\n     the petitioner Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao @ Yogendra Prasad Sahu
\n     made in the note book is not admissible under the Evidence Act.
\n     Accordingly, the petitioner Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao @ Yogendra
\n     Prasad Sahu       is discharged from his criminal liability in Chandwa
\n     P.S. Case No.       23 of 2006 corresponding to G.R. No.        89 of
\n     2006(S.T. No.      122 of 2008) pending in the court of Sessions
\n     Judge, Latehar .For the reasons stated above, I find that prima
\n     facie offence is made out under sections 17 of the CLA Act against
\n     the petitioners     Tilak Yadav,Biru Yadav and Krishna Yadav and
\n     accordingly they are directed to be proceeded under such section
\n     which is triable by the Judicial Magistrate of Ist Class.\n<\/p>\n
     7.            With this observation this Criminal Revision is allowed
\n     in part in the manner indicated above and accordingly, the learned
\n     Sessions Judge, Latehar is directed to proceed under the provision
\n     of Section 228(1)(a) Cr.P.C. by transferring the case records of
\n     concerned to the court of CJM, Latehar.\n<\/p>\n
                                                          (D.K. Sinha, J)<\/p>\n
SD\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI. Cr. Rev. No. 97 of 2009 1. Tilak Yadav 2.Biru Yadav 3.Krishna Yadav 4.Jago Sao @ Jageshwar Sao@Yogendra Prasad Sahu ………………………… Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ……………………………………. Opp. Party Coram :- […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-21T07:55:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-21T07:55:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1332,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-21T07:55:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-21T07:55:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-21T07:55:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010"},"wordCount":1332,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010","name":"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-21T07:55:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dhananjay-nath-sahi-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dhananjay Nath Sahi & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand on 30 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235582"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235582\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}