{"id":235659,"date":"2010-04-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-14T07:17:07","modified_gmt":"2018-01-14T01:47:07","slug":"mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010<\/div>\n
                              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n                          File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000785\u00a0&\u00a01064\u00a0\n                   Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n\n\n                                                                       Dated:\u00a029\u00a0April\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0                  :    Shri\u00a0J\u00a0K\u00a0Sharma\n                                             189,\u00a0Adarsh\u00a0Nagar,\n                                             Near\u00a0Hanuman\u00a0Mandir,\n                                             Roorkee\u00a0-\u00a0247\u00a0667.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0          :    CPIO,\u00a0State\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0Bikaner\u00a0&\u00a0Jaipur,\n                                             Tilak\u00a0Marg,\u00a0Post\u00a0Box\u00a0No.\u00a0154,\n                                             Jaipur.\n\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0person.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.\u00a0K.\u00a0Aggarwal\u00a0was\u00a0present.<\/pre>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0filed\u00a0two\u00a0separate\u00a0appeals\u00a0which\u00a0we\u00a0have\u00a0clubbed\u00a0<\/p>\n
together\u00a0for\u00a0hearing.\u00a0The\u00a0brief\u00a0facts\u00a0are\u00a0as\u00a0under.<\/p>\n
3.      In\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0number\u00a0000785,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a0<\/p>\n
30 \u00a0 August \u00a0 2008, \u00a0 requested \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 for \u00a0 a \u00a0 few \u00a0 details \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 both \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
amount\u00a0of\u00a0pension\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Department\u00a0against\u00a0PPO\u00a08609\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
date \u00a0 and\u00a0 the \u00a0 amount\u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 bank\u00a0 drafts\/cheques\u00a0 issued\u00a0 for\u00a0 the\u00a0 purpose\u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n
recovery\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0loan\u00a0instalments.\u00a0In\u00a0his\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a03\u00a0 September\u00a0 2008,\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Manager\u00a0Accounts\u00a0provided\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0while\u00a0advising\u00a0him\u00a0<\/p>\n
to\u00a0approach\u00a0the\u00a0Hissar\u00a0Branch\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0remaining\u00a0information.\u00a0After\u00a0repeated\u00a0<\/p>\n
correspondence,\u00a0however,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0get\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
has\u00a0eventually\u00a0come\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0in\u00a0second\u00a0appeal.\n<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000785\u00a0&\u00a01064\n<\/p>\n
 4.      In\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0number\u00a0001064,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a04\u00a0<\/p>\n
February\u00a02009,\u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0clarify\u00a0why\u00a0extra\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0money\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n
demanded\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0loan\u00a0account\u00a0was\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0closed\u00a0finally.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
details\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0incidental\u00a0charges\u00a0as\u00a0well\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0slip\u00a0through\u00a0which\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
certain\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0money\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0deposited.\u00a0Since\u00a0he\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0receive\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n
response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0period,\u00a0he\u00a0preferred\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
7 \u00a0 March\u00a0 2009\u00a0 which\u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate\u00a0 Authority\u00a0 decided\u00a0 in \u00a0 his\u00a0 order\u00a0 dated\u00a0 30\u00a0<\/p>\n
March\u00a02009\u00a0by\u00a0giving\u00a0direction\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0information.\u00a0In\u00a0<\/p>\n
his \u00a0 reply \u00a0 dated \u00a0 28 \u00a0 April \u00a0 2009, \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 provided \u00a0 the \u00a0 desired \u00a0 information.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Nevertheless,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0approached\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0in\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0alleging\u00a0<\/p>\n
that\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0receive\u00a0the\u00a0correct\u00a0and\u00a0complete\u00a0information.<\/p>\n
5.      We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 through \u00a0 videoconferencing. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n
present \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 Haridwar \u00a0 studio \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 NIC \u00a0 whereas\u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents\u00a0 were\u00a0<\/p>\n
present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Jaipur\u00a0studio.\u00a0We\u00a0heard\u00a0their\u00a0submissions.\u00a0It\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0form\u00a0of\u00a0various\u00a0statements\u00a0of\u00a0accounts\u00a0<\/p>\n
containing\u00a0the\u00a0answers\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0queries\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0enough\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 to \u00a0 make \u00a0 sense \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 is \u00a0 why \u00a0 he \u00a0 has \u00a0 come \u00a0 to \u00a0 us. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n
Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0whether\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0monthly\u00a0pension\u00a0<\/p>\n
or\u00a0 loan\u00a0 installment,\u00a0in\u00a0either\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0account\u00a0statements,\u00a0already\u00a0<\/p>\n
sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0would\u00a0contain\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0details.\u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0submitted\u00a0<\/p>\n
that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0being\u00a0maintained\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0manner\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0it\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n
been\u00a0sought.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.      Keeping\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0parties\u00a0in\u00a0mind,\u00a0we\u00a0think\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0<\/p>\n
would\u00a0be\u00a0appropriate\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0arrange\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0Branch\u00a0Manager\u00a0of\u00a0their\u00a0<\/p>\n
Haridwar\u00a0 Branch\u00a0 to \u00a0 explain\u00a0 the \u00a0 contents\u00a0 of\u00a0 the \u00a0 various\u00a0 account\u00a0 statements\u00a0<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000785\u00a0&\u00a01064
\n already\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0clarify\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0specific\u00a0details\u00a0he\u00a0wants\u00a0<\/p>\n
to\u00a0know.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0is,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0invite\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0<\/p>\n
Branch\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0within\u00a020\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0<\/p>\n
of\u00a0 this\u00a0 order\u00a0 and\u00a0 to \u00a0 arrange\u00a0 for \u00a0 explaining\u00a0 and\u00a0 clarifying\u00a0 the \u00a0 statements\u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n
accounts\u00a0 provided\u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 to \u00a0 remove\u00a0 his\u00a0 doubts\u00a0 about\u00a0 the\u00a0 regular\u00a0<\/p>\n
payment\u00a0of\u00a0pension\u00a0and\u00a0crediting\u00a0of\u00a0installments\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0loan\u00a0account\u00a0before\u00a0it\u00a0<\/p>\n
was\u00a0finally\u00a0settled.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0<\/p>\n
relevant\u00a0documents\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard,\u00a0as\u00a0available.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.      Both\u00a0the\u00a0appeals\u00a0are,\u00a0thus,\u00a0disposed\u00a0off.\n<\/p>\n
8.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n
                                                                 (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)
\n                                                         Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n
        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0
\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0
\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                            (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)
\n                                                                     Assistant\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000785\u00a0&\u00a01064\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000785\u00a0&\u00a01064\u00a0 Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Dated:\u00a029\u00a0April\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0J\u00a0K\u00a0Sharma 189,\u00a0Adarsh\u00a0Nagar, Near\u00a0Hanuman\u00a0Mandir, Roorkee\u00a0–\u00a0247\u00a0667. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0State\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0Bikaner\u00a0&\u00a0Jaipur, Tilak\u00a0Marg,\u00a0Post\u00a0Box\u00a0No.\u00a0154, Jaipur. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0person. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.\u00a0K.\u00a0Aggarwal\u00a0was\u00a0present. \u00a0 2. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0filed\u00a0two\u00a0separate\u00a0appeals\u00a0which\u00a0we\u00a0have\u00a0clubbed\u00a0 together\u00a0for\u00a0hearing.\u00a0The\u00a0brief\u00a0facts\u00a0are\u00a0as\u00a0under. 3. In\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0number\u00a0000785,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a0 30 \u00a0 August \u00a0 2008, \u00a0 requested \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 for \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-14T01:47:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-14T01:47:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":616,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-14T01:47:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-14T01:47:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-14T01:47:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010"},"wordCount":616,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010","name":"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-14T01:47:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-k-sharma-vs-state-bank-of-bikaner-and-jaipur-on-29-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. J K Sharma vs State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur on 29 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}