{"id":235663,"date":"2011-06-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011"},"modified":"2014-04-06T10:42:37","modified_gmt":"2014-04-06T05:12:37","slug":"sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n<pre>of the conductor. The diseipiinary authority issued a\n\nnotice cit. 22\/11\/2000, Calling upon the eendueterrrto\n\nShow Cause as to why his past record \n\ndisclosing irnpositian of m1h0rV\u00bbAApun1sh:I1'errt.(Bil '4 V 'V\n\neeeasiens for similar such rnisee._nd?;;1'et,;' shottlti \n\nConsidered while imposing pitm-ishment.  eexzdtgefior, . *\n\nhaving acknowledged the  1}e\u00a7,rert1t:e1e_es_\ufb01tiid not\nsubmit an  authority, on\nan independerrt iashsesstiiet\ufb01i '   aeireumstances\nand evidenee'    guilty of the\ncharge   dt. 18 \/ 4 \/ 2001,\nimposedthe  eliemissal from service.\n\n_;:':'\u00bb\". ,T he eoridttleterf aggrieved by the said order of\n\n  authority, filed a elaim statement U\/s.\n\n:'3':.\u20ac'_J'(\"-t?'tt_~_\u00a7A)\"'e\u00e9'{'_\u00a7jj;e.t'V:'i:'idustrial Disputes Act, 1947', which was\n\nV . regietereti 'tie I.D.A.No. 40\/2001 before the Labour\n\n.. H   '   Vt tlhieknaagalur. Resp0nder1t~Roac:I Transport\n\n C-Qrberation arraigned as 2?\" party in the said\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Labour Court, having regard to the \n\nrecord and the evidence, both oral and  \n\nconfirmed the findings of the  \n\nthe conductor guilty of the,2eharge=,_2and aeesgrdirliglyldhyd'g\n\naward dt. 22\/8\/2088, rejeet'ed_V'h'ethe liefelreriee\ufb02\ufb01i l~lenee\n\nthis petition.\n\n5. Learn   titioner contends\nthat ample  not extended to\nthe   and therefore the\nfindinnl-on dt. 4\/ 12\/2002, calls for\n\ninterference'.  Per Feofitra, learned counsel for the\n\n22'*re$ponden't:Corporation points out to paragraphs '7\n\n 2 order impugned, to contend that the\n\nvery eQ_nten~tion advanced by the learned Counsel for the\n\n2'   petitioner was repelled by an elaborate discussion.\n\n6. Having examined the order dt. 4\/12\/2002,\nAr1neX.l'v'L there ean be no more doubt in my mind that\n\nthe petitioner was extended more than reasonable\n\n\n\n~E{}~\n\nthe bus and that the tioketless passengers  \n\npenalty amount of RS300\/~. According  u  '\n\nCounsel, the findings recorded Zhyzfl R\n\nAuthority and the Labour tionrt hsnhtfers  (J\nperversity V\n\n8. Per Contra, leetrned  respondent<\/pre>\n<p>Corporation see}\u00a7s.__to &#8216;impugned as<br \/>\nbeing Well   tioes not Call for<br \/>\ninterference.&#8217;T;Le2rrfred C5.o&#8217;ovneei&#8217;*vp1a&#8217;f&lt;:es reliance upon the<br \/>\ndecision&#039;-._pf  Division Benches of this<\/p>\n<p>court in  NORTH KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT<\/p>\n<p> HUBLi&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&amp; ANOTHER VS. S.S.PoLEsH11 and<\/p>\n<p>  I{AR;NArAr:gx&#039;*\u00ab.S1&#039;ATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,<\/p>\n<p>CEMQRAL _  BANGALORE &amp; ANOTHER VS.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;SATHYANARAYANZ in addition to the following decisions of<\/p>\n<p>   Court:\n<\/p>\n<p>   3(}\u20acfi}{4) \u00a3&lt;::r.L.J, 532%. {D8} Ers\u00e9<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00bb_ &#8221;2&lt;o:2o3{2i; K;1r,I.,J. :25 {DB}<\/p>\n<p>(11 REGIONAL MANAGER, URSRTC, E&#039;i&#039;A\\PVAH &lt;8: <\/p>\n<p>VS. HGTI LAL &amp; ANOTHER3<\/p>\n<p>(2) REGIONAL MANAGER, RAJASTHAN   <\/p>\n<p>TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND SQHAN L\u00ab\u00a3&quot;i};4&#039; = ..  &#039; , _<br \/>\n{3} DELHITRANSPORTCQRPORA&#039;i&#039;iO?\\i \\fS;&quot;SI5iYAM;\u00abLAL5__ V <\/p>\n<p>9. Having heard &#8216;the__ Iearvnei Counsel,  an &#8211;. L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>examination of the Passengers&#8217;-.V_\u00bb stetem_entuiE&#8217;,x.M22,<br \/>\ndiseioses that they we;:ie&#8217;:&#8221;tie1\u00a5ret\u00a7e\u00e9\u00a7.S~&#8211;.at&#8221;the time &#8220;of check<br \/>\nand their statement  jV;ii&#8217;esenee of the<br \/>\nconductor who   This document,<br \/>\nwithout  that the delinquent<br \/>\neondueton  theiiif\u00e9ire from the ticketless<br \/>\npassenggere tdid:  for it and with an ulterior<\/p>\n<p>motive to .vm&#8217;isap_propi*i.:\u00a7ite the same, carried the<\/p>\n<p>pas$e&#8217;ngei3V in ti&#8217;1e&#8230;.b.us from Hassan to Shantigrama.<\/p>\n<p>The fir1ding\u00ab.reCorded by the Labour Court that the 10<\/p>\n<p>tieke\ufb01ess&#8217; &#8220;.p&#8211;aS&#8217;:e3engers were travelling from Hassan to<\/p>\n<p>V -V Shan&#8217;tigi{em&#8217;;i; cannot be said to be perverse. The<\/p>\n<p>igabonr &#8216;&#8221;&#8221;C.3ourt, having regard to the overwhelming<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  T&#8217; (\u00e9\u00ab;;ii3;3 SCC ans<\/p>\n<p>3 3<\/p>\n<p> .. f2.\u20ac}()4\u20ac3)1v,.i_..J. i{)7&#8217;\u00e9\u20ac<\/p>\n<p>material on record constituting arnpie and sufficient<\/p>\n<p>basis for recording its \ufb01ndings, the rnannerr of<\/p>\n<p>consideration undertaken, the objectivity  <\/p>\n<p>adopted and the reasonableness of the    &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>opinion, are unexeeptionable.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. in S.S.PoLEsHI&#8217;S e2tse&#8221;soupr.a,&#8217;-atDix%ision&#8221;Beneh V<\/p>\n<p>of this court held that  a  strict and<br \/>\nsophisticated rules it  the Indian<br \/>\nEvidence Aot,3~&#8217;\\x}&#8217;&amp;?\u00bb1i&#8221;i*d riot   it observed<br \/>\nthat there  provided it<br \/>\nhad   The question,<br \/>\nwhetherthere  or no evidence, not in<\/p>\n<p>the ssense ofdthedtedchnioeil rules governing regular Court<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;proeeedifigsbut in a fair commonsense way as men of<\/p>\n<p>A  Worldly wisdom wiil accept.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1_1A.&#8217;:. In SATHYANARAYANA&#8217;S ease supra, 21 Division<\/p>\n<p> heid that the passengers&#8217; statements containing<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8220;*&#8217;:oo4 AER sew 47:: \u00a7=\u00a7;e%<\/p>\n<p>the signature of the Werkrnan which would  <\/p>\n<p>that the Conductor had collected the fare..e_{nd   9 <\/p>\n<p>account for it with an intentionftow fni3e;ppro.;\ufb01\u00a3ate'&#8221;the&#8221;1<\/p>\n<p>same. Further it was obserVee1V._that the; <\/p>\n<p>eoileeting fare from passenge.:\u00e9&#8221;~.and &#8220;11ot&#8217;a&#8217;eeo1intt:&#8217;1g&#8221;&#8216; for t&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the same to the credit of the VAC3otfporation,&#8217; hehonlti not be<br \/>\npermitted to Continue  the  the Corporation.\n<\/p>\n<p>12. In   was held that a<br \/>\nconductor holdefa  ;of&#8221;tr1j}st&#8217; where honesty and<br \/>\nintegrity  &#8221;  reqnirements of functioning and<\/p>\n<p>that sue&#8217;i1.Vn3atte1f_\u00e9 dealt with iron hands and<\/p>\n<p>not lenientlyg &#8216;The__A&#8217;peX&#8230;{3ourt in that case upheld the<\/p>\n<p> _ter1nii\u00ab1atjfon_ of eemicee of 3 bus conductor for carrying<\/p>\n<p>tieket1es$V&#8217;pe;seengers in the SRTC bus, though the loss<\/p>\n<p>wag as, 16:5,\/5&#8217;-5 was inconsequential.<\/p>\n<p> x  Z In SOHAN LAL&#8217;S ease supra, the Supreme<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; . C~onrt&#8221;ebeerves that once the miseonduot of non&#8211;issne of<\/p>\n<p> tieiiets to passengers is proved, it cannot be said that<\/p>\n<p>hex<\/p>\n<p>gt:\n<\/p>\n<p>$7<\/p>\n<p>the punishment of eiiemissai was disproportionate,  the&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>misconduct was (me of dishonesty. V  b I &#8221;  &#8221; = I<\/p>\n<p>14. In SHYAM LAIXS ease s1:Vibra;&#8217;Ihe&#8221;Ape2x:._(;Qe:\u00a3&#8217;hel\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>that a statement made by a passenger haVihg_baid&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>to the eenduetor is not in the \ufb01afinfe Sf h&#8217;eafsae3}_=ex?i1riehVee.\n<\/p>\n<p>15. In the instant case, the passengers&#8217; statement ~<\/p>\n<p>EX.1\\\/[22 having been    there being no<br \/>\nrebuttal evidence of the to establish<br \/>\nhis defense  sitebbpedibdue to mechanical<br \/>\nbreakdowni.   boarded the bus at<br \/>\n  not made out a case for<br \/>\ninterfefehee  0if~&#8217;domestiC enquiry as Well as the<\/p>\n<p>awaxfdef the&#8221;L_.\u00e91b01i&#8217;r  writ petition being without merit,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; V&#8217;  _ is \u00e9eeeordiirxgly rejeei:e:i;V<\/p>\n<p>S\u00e9\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>EUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy of the conductor. The diseipiinary authority issued a notice cit. 22\/11\/2000, Calling upon the eendueterrrto Show Cause as to why his past record disclosing irnpositian of m1h0rV\u00bbAApun1sh:I1&#8217;errt.(Bil &#8216;4 V &#8216;V eeeasiens for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since ... vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since ... vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-06T05:12:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-06T05:12:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":682,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since ... vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-06T05:12:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since ... vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since ... vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-06T05:12:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-06T05:12:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011"},"wordCount":682,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011","name":"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since ... vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-06T05:12:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-y-r-rajashekharappa-since-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Y R Rajashekharappa Since &#8230; vs The Karnataka State Road &#8230; on 1 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235663\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}