{"id":23570,"date":"2008-06-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-28T15:40:18","modified_gmt":"2014-04-28T10:10:18","slug":"eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1425 of 2008()\n\n\n1. ELDHOSE, S\/O.MATHAI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. T.J.JOY, THELLINYANKKAL HOUSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. K.J.KURIACHAN, KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE,\n\n3. V.J.MOHANAN, VAZHAPARAMBIL HOUSE,\n\n4. K.P.JOSE, KAYIKKAKUDI HOUSE,\n\n5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.M.VARGHESE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.K.JOHN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR\n\n Dated :11\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                     V.RAMKUMAR, J.\n       ======================================\n                 CRL.R.P. NO. 1425 OF 2008\n       ======================================\n             Dated this the 11th day of June 2008\n\n                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Heard both sides.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. The revision petitioner who was the counter<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in M.C.No.14\/2007 on the file of the Sub<\/p>\n<p>Divisional Magistrate, Devicolam, challenges the final<\/p>\n<p>order dated 3.1.2008 passed by the Sub Divisional<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. The revision petitioner &#8211; Eldhose @ Kunjumon is<\/p>\n<p>the uncle of one Mahesh Varkey, who has an item of<\/p>\n<p>property situated at Anaviratty in Vellathooval Village<\/p>\n<p>bounded on the west by a Panchayat road and on the<\/p>\n<p>south by a big water channel for the drainage of water.<\/p>\n<p>Since the said Mahesh Varkey is stated to be abroad, the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner is looking after the said property on<\/p>\n<p>behalf of his nephew. The eastern boundary of the said<\/p>\n<p>property is the property of T.J.Joy, the first respondent<\/p>\n<p>herein   and   the   said     property    does   not extend<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008       2<\/p>\n<p>    southwards upto the big water channel. In between the<\/p>\n<p>    property of T.J.Joy and the southern water channel is<\/p>\n<p>    the property of the 4th respondent, K.P.Jose Kayikkakudi.<\/p>\n<p>    Immediately to the east of the property of the first<\/p>\n<p>    respondent &#8211; T.J.Joy is the property of the second<\/p>\n<p>    respondent &#8211; K.J.Kuriachan. The common northern<\/p>\n<p>    boundary of the property of Mahesh Varkey, T.J.Joy and<\/p>\n<p>    K.J.Kuriachan is the Adimaly-Munnar National Highway<\/p>\n<p>    called N.H.49. There is no dispute that the lie of the land<\/p>\n<p>    is such that it slopes towards south or south &#8211; west.<\/p>\n<p>           4. On 15.5.2007, respondents 1, 2 and 4 herein and<\/p>\n<p>    one V.J.Mohanan moved the Sub Divisional Magistrate,<\/p>\n<p>    Devikulam alleging that a thodu which proceeds from the<\/p>\n<p>    National Highway southwards and turns westwards at the<\/p>\n<p>    southern boundary of the first respondent&#8217;s property and<\/p>\n<p>    passing through the property of Mahesh Varkey was<\/p>\n<p>    obstructed by the revision petitioner, who is the uncle of<\/p>\n<p>    Mahesh Varkey causing inundation of water and deposit<\/p>\n<p>    of mud and silt in the property of the complainants.<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008      3<\/p>\n<p>    They also alleged that the said thodu was used for<\/p>\n<p>    draining water for the last several years and the revision<\/p>\n<p>    petitioner who is looking after the property of Mahesh<\/p>\n<p>    Varkey had filled up portions of the thodu passing<\/p>\n<p>    through the property of Mahesh Varkey by filling up the<\/p>\n<p>    same with earth. They further alleged that during the<\/p>\n<p>    monsoon season, excess water and silt came to be<\/p>\n<p>    deposited in their property resulting in damage to the<\/p>\n<p>    paddy cultivation. They, therefore, prayed for appropriate<\/p>\n<p>    directions for redressel of their grievances.<\/p>\n<p>           5. The Sub Divisional Magistrate called for a report<\/p>\n<p>    from the Village Officer Vellathooval. On 2.6.2007, the<\/p>\n<p>    Village Officer, Vellathooval submitted a report to the<\/p>\n<p>    following effect:-\n<\/p>\n<p>           There is a thodu along the culvert, across the<\/p>\n<p>    National Highway on the north. The said thodu is passing<\/p>\n<p>    and passing in between the properties of T.J.Joy and<\/p>\n<p>    K.J.Kuriachan and having a width of 1 metre is meant for<\/p>\n<p>    draining rain water to the southern water canal. His<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008      4<\/p>\n<p>    enquiry with the neighbors revealed that the said thodu<\/p>\n<p>    after passing southwards was passing through the<\/p>\n<p>    property of the revision petitioners to eventually reach<\/p>\n<p>    the southern water canal, situated about 200 meters<\/p>\n<p>    away and on account of the blockage created by the<\/p>\n<p>    revision petitioner, there was likelihood of collection of<\/p>\n<p>    mud and earth and damage the paddy cultivation. The<\/p>\n<p>    Field Measurement Book pertaining to re-survey does not<\/p>\n<p>    show the existence of the thodu starting from the<\/p>\n<p>    National Highway. But the enquiry conducted by him<\/p>\n<p>    revealed that the thodu, as alleged by the complainants,<\/p>\n<p>    was in existence for the past 40 years and the water<\/p>\n<p>    channel which was obstructed by the revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>    has to be restored to its original condition. On discussing<\/p>\n<p>    the matter with the revision petitioner and the<\/p>\n<p>    complainants, the revision petitioner had objected to the<\/p>\n<p>    carriage of water through his property but had agreed to<\/p>\n<p>    construct a new thodu along his eastern boundary so as<\/p>\n<p>    to reach the southern water canal.\n<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008       5<\/p>\n<p>           6. On 27.6.2007, the Sub Divisional Magistrate<\/p>\n<p>    passed a conditional order under Section 133 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p>    directing     the  revision petitioner    to   remove  the<\/p>\n<p>    obstruction caused to the free flow of rain water by<\/p>\n<p>    blocking the thodu passing through his property and by<\/p>\n<p>    diverting the course of the water channel and directing<\/p>\n<p>    the revision petitioner to restore the water channel to its<\/p>\n<p>    original position or to appear before the Sub Divisional<\/p>\n<p>    Magistrate on 12.7.2007 and show cause why the<\/p>\n<p>    conditional     order  should  not   be    made   absolute.<\/p>\n<p>    Thereafter the Sub Divisional Magistrate, as per the<\/p>\n<p>    impugned order dated 3.1.2008 made the conditional<\/p>\n<p>    order absolute, after taking note of the pendency of a<\/p>\n<p>    suit filed by the revision petitioner as O.S.111 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>    before the Munsiff Court, Devikulam and after adverting<\/p>\n<p>    to the statement of witnesses, by name, Shaji, Regi, Anil<\/p>\n<p>    Kumar and that of the Village Officer, Vellathooval. It is<\/p>\n<p>    the said order which is assailed in this revision.<\/p>\n<p>           7. After hearing both sides and perusing the lower<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008      6<\/p>\n<p>    court records, I am of the view that if the impugned<\/p>\n<p>    order is upheld, then it will have the effect of virtually<\/p>\n<p>    cutting the property of the revision petitioner&#8217;s nephew<\/p>\n<p>    into two segments which may render the property<\/p>\n<p>    useless. As mentioned earlier, the revision petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>    property is bounded on the west by a Panchayat road<\/p>\n<p>    and on the southern side by the main water canal into<\/p>\n<p>    which the water collected in the National Highway which<\/p>\n<p>    is at a higher level is said to eventually reach through<\/p>\n<p>    the disputed thodu. While there is no dispute regarding<\/p>\n<p>    that portion of the thodu which run southwards in<\/p>\n<p>    between the properties of T.J.Joy and K.J.Kuriachan and<\/p>\n<p>    reaching up to the southern boundary of the property of<\/p>\n<p>    T.J.Joy, the dispute is really pertaining to the further<\/p>\n<p>    course of the thodu running from east to west almost<\/p>\n<p>    through the middle of the revision petitioner&#8217;s property.<\/p>\n<p>    According to the complainants, from the point where the<\/p>\n<p>    said thodu touches the eastern boundary of the revision<\/p>\n<p>    petitioner&#8217;s property, it was running westwards to reach<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008      7<\/p>\n<p>    the Panchayat road and then southwards to reach the<\/p>\n<p>    southern      water canal.  According   to  the   revision<\/p>\n<p>    petitioner, there was no thodu passing through his<\/p>\n<p>    property allowing water to be drained into the southern<\/p>\n<p>    water canal. But the revision petitioner had made an<\/p>\n<p>    undertaking before the Village Officer at the time of  his<\/p>\n<p>    inspection, that he is willing to construct a thodu from<\/p>\n<p>    the point where the existing thodu touches his eastern<\/p>\n<p>    boundary, up to the southern water canal along his<\/p>\n<p>    eastern boundary. Unfortunately, this aspect of the<\/p>\n<p>    matter has not been gone into by the Sub Divisional<\/p>\n<p>    Magistrate, who has also not explored the possibility of<\/p>\n<p>    draining water to the southern water canal along the<\/p>\n<p>    eastern boundary of the revision petitioner&#8217;s property. In<\/p>\n<p>    case the course of the existing thodu could be directed<\/p>\n<p>    to the southern water canal through the eastern<\/p>\n<p>    boundary of the revision petitioner&#8217;s property, that may<\/p>\n<p>    abate the nuisance alleged by the respondents 1 to 4.<\/p>\n<p>    That is certainly a possible alignment which can cause<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008       8<\/p>\n<p>    least hardship and inconvenience to all the parties. If the<\/p>\n<p>    problem of inundation of water and collection of earth on<\/p>\n<p>    account of the blockage at the disputed point could be<\/p>\n<p>    got over by extending the thodu along with the eastern<\/p>\n<p>    boundary of the revision petitioner&#8217;s property, that will<\/p>\n<p>    certainly solve the problem faced by the respondents 1 to<\/p>\n<p>    4 herein. Such an alternative alignment can allay the<\/p>\n<p>    heartburn caused to the revision petitioner also. I,<\/p>\n<p>    therefore, set aside the final order dated 3.1.2008<\/p>\n<p>    passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate and remit the<\/p>\n<p>    matter to the Sub Divisional Magistrate to explore the<\/p>\n<p>    possibilities of the aforementioned or any other alternate<\/p>\n<p>    alignment which may cause the least inconvenience to<\/p>\n<p>    either parties. In case after considering the topography<\/p>\n<p>    of the land,       water could be drained through the<\/p>\n<p>    aforementioned or any other alternate alignment, that<\/p>\n<p>    can be the best possible solution to this problem. Both<\/p>\n<p>    the parties shall adduce evidence to show whether the<\/p>\n<p>    above alternate course could be adopted so that there is<\/p>\n<p>CRL.R.P.1425 of 2008       9<\/p>\n<p>    no heartburn for either side. The sub Divisional<\/p>\n<p>    Magistrate shall call for a report from the Village Officer<\/p>\n<p>    during the ensuing monsoon and may also conduct a<\/p>\n<p>    local inspection, if necessary.\n<\/p>\n<p>           The Revision Petition is allowed as above.<\/p>\n<p>                                       V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>    css\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1425 of 2008() 1. ELDHOSE, S\/O.MATHAI, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. T.J.JOY, THELLINYANKKAL HOUSE, &#8230; Respondent 2. K.J.KURIACHAN, KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, 3. V.J.MOHANAN, VAZHAPARAMBIL HOUSE, 4. K.P.JOSE, KAYIKKAKUDI HOUSE, 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC For Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-28T10:10:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-28T10:10:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1409,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-28T10:10:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-28T10:10:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-28T10:10:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008"},"wordCount":1409,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008","name":"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-28T10:10:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/eldhose-vs-t-j-joy-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Eldhose vs T.J.Joy on 11 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23570\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}