{"id":235792,"date":"2008-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008"},"modified":"2015-10-13T11:09:45","modified_gmt":"2015-10-13T05:39:45","slug":"p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008","title":{"rendered":"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMFA No. 389 of 2002()\n\n\n1. P.T.SREENARAYANAN UNNI,S\/O.P.N.MENON,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. P.T.SREEKUMARI, D\/O. P.N.MENON,\n3. P.T.SREEVALSAN UNNI, S\/O.P.N.MENON,\n4. P.T.SREEDEVAN UNNI, S\/O. P.N.MENON,\n5. P.T.SREEKUMARAN UNNI,S\/O.P.N.MENON,\n6. P.T.SREEDEVI, D\/O. P.N.MENON,\n7. P.T.SREE BALA, D\/O. P.N.MENON,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. CUSTODIAN OF VESTED FORESTS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SPL.GOVT.PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY\nThe Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA\n\n Dated :01\/01\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                  J.B.KOSHY &amp; K.HEMA, JJ.\n                   -------------------------------\n                 M.F.A.NO.389 OF 2002 (C)\n                 -----------------------------------\n        Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008\n\n                        J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>KOSHY,J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant is a partnership firm consisting of seven<\/p>\n<p>partners.  They filed an application under Section 8 of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Private Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act (in short<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Vesting Act&#8217;), for a declaration that 79 acres 68.5 cents of land<\/p>\n<p>in Survey No.186\/1A1 of Kunnathidavaka Village described in<\/p>\n<p>the schedule is not a private forest and is not vested in the<\/p>\n<p>Government. The partnership firm purchased 100 acres of land<\/p>\n<p>from one Phathumma as seen from Ext.A47 document. In the<\/p>\n<p>document, it is stated that the estate was sold for cultivation of<\/p>\n<p>cardomom, rubber, coffee etc. It is also stated that earlier it<\/p>\n<p>was cultivated with such plantations. But that was destroyed.<\/p>\n<p>It was convinced that they can re-cultivate the same. Ext.A47<\/p>\n<p>document is dated 15.5.1967 much prior to the enactment of<\/p>\n<p>Vesting Act. The fact that scheduled property is held by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MFA.389\/2002                     2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>appellant, by registered title deed of the property is not<\/p>\n<p>seriously disputed.      Kerala Private Forest (Vesting and<\/p>\n<p>Assignment) Act 1971 came into force with effect from<\/p>\n<p>10.5.1971, the appointed day under the Act. The petitioner<\/p>\n<p>firm obtained the title of the property before the relevant date.<\/p>\n<p>All private forests are vested with the State under Section 3(1)<\/p>\n<p>of the Vesting Act.    Whether the land was demarcated and<\/p>\n<p>notified or not, if the land is a private forest, unless it is<\/p>\n<p>exempted, is vested with the Government under Section 3(1).<\/p>\n<p>Section 3(2) provides exemption if the land is under personal<\/p>\n<p>cultivation of the owner. Section 3(3) gives further exemption<\/p>\n<p>that if the land is owned by a valid registered document<\/p>\n<p>executed before the appointed day and intended for cultivation<\/p>\n<p>and if the extent of land is below ceiling area under Section 82<\/p>\n<p>of the Land Reforms Act. The tribunal found that there was no<\/p>\n<p>evidence of cultivation of the land on the appointed day and<\/p>\n<p>burden is on the appellants to prove that land is under personal<\/p>\n<p>cultivation to claim exemption under Section 3(2).       Various<\/p>\n<p>Commissioners reports (Exts.C1, C2 and C4) produced show<\/p>\n<p>that there was no evidence of cultivation.    Ext.C1 report was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MFA.389\/2002                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>dated 27.11.1993. Ext.C2 report was in 1998 and Ext.C4 was<\/p>\n<p>in 1999. It is the contention of the appellant that after the Act<\/p>\n<p>came into force they were not allowed to cultivate the land and<\/p>\n<p>the forest department destroyed cultivation and that is why the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioners were not able to find out any evidence of<\/p>\n<p>cultivation.  Reminiscence of cultivation was also not seen by<\/p>\n<p>the Commissioners. But Ext.C4 report shows that part of the<\/p>\n<p>land was ready for cultivation and part of the land had no<\/p>\n<p>plants at all. There is also no evidence of wild trees or forest<\/p>\n<p>trees in the area other than planted accasia on part of the land.<\/p>\n<p>One boundary of the land was vested forest and others are<\/p>\n<p>private lands.     Since there was no evidence of personal<\/p>\n<p>cultivation on the appointed day the appellants are not entitled<\/p>\n<p>to the benefit under Section 3(2).    We agree with the above<\/p>\n<p>findings of the tribunal.      Then the question is whether<\/p>\n<p>appellants are entitled to exemption under section 3(3) as they<\/p>\n<p>had intention to cultivate the land on the appointed day and<\/p>\n<p>they were holding the land by a registered deed. Appellants<\/p>\n<p>produced registration from the Rubber Board for cultivating 10<\/p>\n<p>acres of land. The date of issue was 29.12.1967. The planting<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MFA.389\/2002                     4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>licence was given to plant the land on 31.12.1967 much prior<\/p>\n<p>to appointed day (10.5.1971).       Ext.A44 is the new rubber<\/p>\n<p>planting licence. Petitioner also relied on Ext.A45 which is an<\/p>\n<p>application for planting coffee. But there is no evidence to<\/p>\n<p>show that such application was filed before the Coffee Board. It<\/p>\n<p>is only a copy of application. After considering Ext.A44 tribunal<\/p>\n<p>found as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;To say that license was given to plant 10<br \/>\n         acres of land with rubber is one thing and to say<br \/>\n         that 10 acres of land was cultivated with rubber<br \/>\n         is a different thing. The applicants have no case<br \/>\n         that they have cut and removed those rubber<br \/>\n         trees. Had 10 acres of land was cultivated with<br \/>\n         rubber in pursuance of Ext.A44 there ought to<br \/>\n         have been some rubber trees on the ground to<br \/>\n         evidence that planting. There is no case for the<br \/>\n         applicants there exists some rubber plants which<br \/>\n         were planted in pursuance of Ext.A44.      In my<br \/>\n         opinion Ext.A44 shows the intention of the<br \/>\n         applicants to cultivate 10 acres of land with<br \/>\n         rubber.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Therefore the tribunal found that there was intention to plant<\/p>\n<p>10 acres of land with rubber that, on the appointed day land<\/p>\n<p>was not cultivated.       The claimants also produced various<\/p>\n<p>exhibits, Exts.A1 to A37 to show that they spent large amount<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MFA.389\/2002                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>for planting the same through their Supervisor.      It was found<\/p>\n<p>by the tribunal that their intention is to cultivate 10 acres of<\/p>\n<p>land.    There is no case for the appellant in holding land in<\/p>\n<p>excess of the land ceiling area under the Land Reforms Act.<\/p>\n<p>They were holding the land by a registered deed executed prior<\/p>\n<p>to the enactment of the Vesting Act. Hence, we are of the<\/p>\n<p>opinion that in the normal course, they would have been<\/p>\n<p>allowed 10 acres of land as exempted land which the<\/p>\n<p>appellants had intention to cultivate before the appointed day<\/p>\n<p>under the Act. In this connection we also refer to the decision<\/p>\n<p>in <a href=\"\/doc\/1965090\/\">Joseph v. State of Kerala<\/a> (2007 (3) KLT 144 (SC)).<\/p>\n<p>Apex Court held as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;Such intention on the part of the purchaser<br \/>\n         can be gathered from his conduct in regard to<br \/>\n         the development of land for making it fit for<br \/>\n         cultivation preceding to and subsequent to the<br \/>\n         date of vesting.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here intention can be gathered by development of property<\/p>\n<p>and obtaining the planting licence, specially made for planting<\/p>\n<p>etc.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MFA.389\/2002                    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      3. Now we will again come to the Commissioners report.<\/p>\n<p>Commissioners report and plan shows that the petitioner is in<\/p>\n<p>possession of the land which is marked as &#8216;B&#8217;. According to<\/p>\n<p>PW1, they were in possession of 20 and additional acres of land<\/p>\n<p>and the Commissioner&#8217;s marked it as &#8216;B&#8217; portion in yellow<\/p>\n<p>colour which is only 8.2250 hectors, that means, 20 acres and<\/p>\n<p>311\/2 cents. It has come out in evidence that out of the above<\/p>\n<p>land, 12.5 cents of land was already surrendered as excess<\/p>\n<p>land.     According to the Commissioners, 20 acres and 311\/2<\/p>\n<p>cents marked as &#8216;B&#8217; (coloured yellow) in Ext.C5 Plan which is in<\/p>\n<p>possession of the appellants is inclusive of the above excess<\/p>\n<p>land surrendered. Therefore, excluding the land surrendered<\/p>\n<p>as excess land, they are in active possession of 7.85 acres. So<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners had intention to cultivate 10 acres of the land at<\/p>\n<p>the time of appointed day. But after excluding the surrendered<\/p>\n<p>land as the excess land, balance is 81.5 acres of land in the<\/p>\n<p>plot marked as &#8216;B&#8217; in Ext.C5 Plan.     Hence against a claim for<\/p>\n<p>79 acres and 68.5 cents of land, claimants are entitled to get<\/p>\n<p>exemption of 7 acres and 81.5 cents only and it cannot be<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MFA.389\/2002                   7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>disputed that they had intention to cultivate the above land<\/p>\n<p>and they had registered document in their favour even before<\/p>\n<p>the Act came into force.     Hence    they are entitled for a<\/p>\n<p>declaration that 7 acres and 85 cents of land in the portion<\/p>\n<p>marked as &#8216;B&#8217; (out of 20 acres and 311\/2 cents coloured portion<\/p>\n<p>after deducting surrendered land of 12.5 acres) are exempted<\/p>\n<p>under Section 3(3) of the Vesting Act.    Appeal is accordingly<\/p>\n<p>partly allowed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                           K.HEMA, JUDGE<br \/>\nprp<\/p>\n<p>                       J.B.KOSHY &amp; K.HEMA, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>                       M.F.A.NO.389 OF 2002 ()<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>                                    J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                  1st January, 2008<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MFA No. 389 of 2002() 1. P.T.SREENARAYANAN UNNI,S\/O.P.N.MENON, &#8230; Petitioner 2. P.T.SREEKUMARI, D\/O. P.N.MENON, 3. P.T.SREEVALSAN UNNI, S\/O.P.N.MENON, 4. P.T.SREEDEVAN UNNI, S\/O. P.N.MENON, 5. P.T.SREEKUMARAN UNNI,S\/O.P.N.MENON, 6. P.T.SREEDEVI, D\/O. P.N.MENON, 7. P.T.SREE BALA, D\/O. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-13T05:39:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-13T05:39:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1267,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\",\"name\":\"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-13T05:39:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-13T05:39:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008","datePublished":"2007-12-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-13T05:39:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008"},"wordCount":1267,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008","name":"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-13T05:39:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-t-sreenarayanan-unni-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-january-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.T.Sreenarayanan Unni vs State Of Kerala on 1 January, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235792"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235792\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}