{"id":235811,"date":"2009-03-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009"},"modified":"2014-01-18T13:51:20","modified_gmt":"2014-01-18T08:21:20","slug":"parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nEx.FA.No. 19 of 2006()\n\n\n1. PARAKANDY VASU, S\/O.RARICHUTTY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. PARAKANDY BALAN, S\/O.RARICHUTTY,\n3. PARAKANDY KARUNAKARAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. CHAMAVIL SATHYANANDAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. KAVILPURAYIL SOBHANA, D\/O.AYYAPUTTY,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN\n\n Dated :23\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            P.R.RAMAN &amp; P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.\n\n                   -------------------------------\n\n             Ex.F.A.Nos.19, 21, 33, 34, 35, 42, 46,\n                       47 &amp; 48 of 2006 and\n                       Ex.F.A.No.6 of 2007\n\n                   -------------------------------\n\n                Dated this the 23rd March, 2009\n\n                         J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>Raman, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>             Ex.F.A.No.19 of 2006 arises out of the order in<\/p>\n<p>E.A.No.991 of 2004 and E.A.No.992 of 2004 in E.P.No.310 of<\/p>\n<p>1986 in O.S.No.71 of 1983; Ex.F.A.No.21 of 2006 against the<\/p>\n<p>order in E.A.No.989 of 2004          and E.A.No.990 of 2004 in<\/p>\n<p>E.P.No.310 of 1986 in O.S.No.71 of 1983; Ex.F.A.No.33 of 2006<\/p>\n<p>against the order in E.A.No.997 of 2004 and E.A.No.998 of 2004<\/p>\n<p>in E.P.No.312 of 1986 in O.S.No.70 of 1983; Ex.F.A.No.34 of<\/p>\n<p>2006 arise out of the order in E.A.No.985 of 2004 and E.A.No.986<\/p>\n<p>of 2004 in E.P.No.309 of 1986 in O.S.No.66 of 1983;<\/p>\n<p>Ex.F.A.No.35 of 2006 against the order in E.A.No.993 of 2004<\/p>\n<p>and E.A.No.994 of 2004 in E.P.No.311 of 1986 in O.S.No.72 of<\/p>\n<p>1983; Ex.F.A.No.42 of 2006 against the order in E.A.No.995 of<\/p>\n<p>2004 and E.A.No.996 of 2004 in E.P.No.311 of 1986 in O.S.No.72<\/p>\n<p>Ex.F.A.Nos.19 of 2006 etc.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of 1983; Ex.F.A.No.46 of 2006 against the order in E.A.No.999 of<\/p>\n<p>2004 and E.A.No.1000 of 2004 in E.P.No.312 of 1986 in<\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.70 of 1983; Ex.F.A.No.47 of 2006 against the order in<\/p>\n<p>E.A.No.1003 of 2004 and E.A.No.1004 of 2004 in E.P.No.313 of<\/p>\n<p>1986 in O.S.No.69 of 1983; Ex.F.A.No.48 of 2006 against the<\/p>\n<p>order in E.A.No.1001 of 2004 and E.A.No.1002 of 2004 in<\/p>\n<p>E.P.No.313 of 1986 in O.S.No.69\/1983; and Ex.F.A.No.6 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>in E.A.No.987 of 2004 and E.A.No.988 of 2004 in E.P.No.309 of<\/p>\n<p>1986 in O.S.No.66 of 1983, on the file of I Additional Sub Court,<\/p>\n<p>Kozhikode.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                2. There were five money suits instituted by the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs, O.S.Nos.66, 69, 70, 71 and 72 of 1983, on the file of I<\/p>\n<p>Additional Sub Court, Kozhikode.     During the pendency of the<\/p>\n<p>suits, 4 items of properties were attached before judgment.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, the suits were decreed. After the decree, the decree<\/p>\n<p>holders sought to execute the decrees by filing E.P.Nos.309, 310,<\/p>\n<p>311, 312 and 313 of 1986.        Item Nos.3 and 4 were sold in<\/p>\n<p>auction and purchased by third parties.       Item Nos.1 and 2,<\/p>\n<p>Ex.F.A.Nos.19 of 2006 etc.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>though were subject matter of attachment, were subsequently<\/p>\n<p>sold by the judgment debtor in favour of third parties, who later<\/p>\n<p>filed claim petitions before the Execution Court seeking to lift the<\/p>\n<p>attachment in respect of Item Nos.1 and 2. True, that they had<\/p>\n<p>on earlier occasions sought to lift the attachment which was<\/p>\n<p>however declined and there were proceeding before this Court<\/p>\n<p>also, but this Court did not interfere with the order, dismissing<\/p>\n<p>such claims, obviously for the reason that the decree was<\/p>\n<p>pending execution. Now that the decree in all the five suits<\/p>\n<p>having been recorded satisfaction, by selling two items, viz., Item<\/p>\n<p>Nos.3 and 4, they have preferred separate applications.         The<\/p>\n<p>court below allowed the applications and lifted the attachment in<\/p>\n<p>respect of Item Nos.1 and 2 on the following grounds. Since the<\/p>\n<p>decree has been closed after recording satisfaction, there is no<\/p>\n<p>justification for continuing the attachment in respect of Items.1<\/p>\n<p>and 2. The court below also declared title in respect of third<\/p>\n<p>parties who have purchased the properties from the judgment<\/p>\n<p>debtors.\n<\/p>\n<p>Ex.F.A.Nos.19 of 2006 etc.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                3.   The appellants contend that in so far as the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings against Item Nos.3 and 4 have not been completed,<\/p>\n<p>since there are claim petitions against those items, the court<\/p>\n<p>below ought not have lifted the attachment in respect of Item<\/p>\n<p>Nos. 1 and 2. The claim petitions preferred against Item Nos. 3<\/p>\n<p>and 4 are the subject matter of the appeals in connected two<\/p>\n<p>sets. It is also contended that the judgment debtor could not<\/p>\n<p>have sold item Nos.1 and 2 ignoring the attachment and the<\/p>\n<p>purchaser cannot get any valid title, so long as the attachment<\/p>\n<p>continues and the purchase was during the pendency of such<\/p>\n<p>attachment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                4. As regards the second submission, we find force<\/p>\n<p>in the contention.       If item Nos. 1 and 2 were already under<\/p>\n<p>attachment before judgment and continued, the judgment debtor<\/p>\n<p>could not have transferred valid title in favour of third parties,<\/p>\n<p>until those attachments were lifted.     Therefore, that is not a<\/p>\n<p>reason for lifting the attachment in respect of Item Nos. 1 and 2.<\/p>\n<p>The subsequent purchase from the judgment debtor has only to<\/p>\n<p>Ex.F.A.Nos.19 of 2006 etc.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>be ignored, as against the decree decree holder, if those items<\/p>\n<p>are required to be proceeded with.           However, on the first<\/p>\n<p>contention, if the decree is fully satisfied and the court below has<\/p>\n<p>recorded satisfaction and         there is no further execution<\/p>\n<p>proceedings pending, in which event the attachment in respect<\/p>\n<p>of the remaining property is unnecessary to continue and hence<\/p>\n<p>lifting of attachment on that ground is found quite just and<\/p>\n<p>proper. The appeals are devoid of merit and are dismissed. No<\/p>\n<p>costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                       P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nnj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Ex.FA.No. 19 of 2006() 1. PARAKANDY VASU, S\/O.RARICHUTTY, &#8230; Petitioner 2. PARAKANDY BALAN, S\/O.RARICHUTTY, 3. PARAKANDY KARUNAKARAN, Vs 1. CHAMAVIL SATHYANANDAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. KAVILPURAYIL SOBHANA, D\/O.AYYAPUTTY, For Petitioner :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN For Respondent :SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-18T08:21:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-18T08:21:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":841,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-18T08:21:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-18T08:21:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-18T08:21:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009"},"wordCount":841,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009","name":"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-18T08:21:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandy-vasu-vs-chamavil-sathyanandan-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parakandy Vasu vs Chamavil Sathyanandan on 23 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}