{"id":235837,"date":"2008-03-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008"},"modified":"2014-08-03T11:09:05","modified_gmt":"2014-08-03T05:39:05","slug":"nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Chidananda Ullal A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
an i  \"\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA A-'1' BANGALORE\nDated this the 2531 day of March, \n\nPRESENT  MA   \n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE CHIDANAiVDA:VV:[ii}Li\u20acL  <\/pre>\n
AND’          A’ <\/p>\n
THE HONBLE MR.JlIS’I*I4CE-AS iPAeHHiAPt_IRe7<\/p>\n
M.tr.A.Nu.3372′;20o3 (Mm A  t <\/p>\n
Smt.Nagamma, ,  A
\nW\/o.Keriyappe,_Moger,   ‘
\nAge 46 years,   I ”\n<\/p>\n
Rfe.Peeja1″iina:;ie,_V . *<\/p>\n
Taluk Batkai. ;j_ ‘   ..   .. Appellant<\/p>\n
(By   -‘for appellant.)<\/p>\n
And;\n<\/p>\n
1;: si\ufb02iagesh  Moger,
\n2 Age. iivisajoi’, 1’7′ o.Be1a11e,
\n T.  Dist. Katwar.\n<\/p>\n
Tiiei’ iliiiieional Manager,
\nThe New India Assurance<\/p>\n
” _C-bnlpany Limited,
\nDivisional Office,
\nEnkay Complex,<\/p>\n
Hublii i G ;Rt:S.p0f’Id.E:1’1tS<\/p>\n
l’I–\\<\/p>\n
[by Sri B C Seetharama Rae, Adv. for R2)<\/p>\n
This MFA is \ufb01led under Section 17 3( 1) of the Motor
\nVehicles Act, 1988, praying to modify the judgnient and<\/p>\n
award dated 23.1.2003 passed by the Additional Motor
\nAccident Claims Tribunal, Honnavar in MVC No.6f35 2001.<\/p>\n
This MFA coming on for final  day,
\nA S PACHHAFURE J, delivered the foliowii\/1g73:.. ” ” ._  <\/p>\n
– JUDGMENT’_'”‘V”””‘*~:W ‘ i
\nThe appellant clissatisfied-f_’_’i   it l::”i’i’a,’\u00a7?’ard illoi”<\/p>\n
conipensation awarded Vf:;)_f_ the” injiigries “~._:s’estai1’1ed~~ has<\/p>\n
The factsV_1’e1eva:1t.V:fo1f ‘the are as under:<\/p>\n
2. It   1;ea5_3995’i+-site-can t.m. 2<\/p>\n
‘A pa.\n<\/p>\n
. hi<\/p>\n
claimant]  i    an autorickshaw, the
\naccident  due”-to the rash and negligent driving and
\nthe vehicleiiturtledil’ claimant suffered four injuries, out of<\/p>\n
\\.x{,._@Li..h,. the in._iu1*ies’ No.1 to 3 are grievous in nature, which<\/p>\n
  rlve\ufb01ifving “1jui”‘, fr-“cture -tlislwsation of le… ankle,
\n ~. lisfranc’s (partial) etc., and she claimed that she
\n  any work. During the course of enquiry, she was<\/p>\n
  ” exaxnined as PW. 1 and the doctor – PW.2 and the documents<\/p>\n
 – E’.-xs.P1 te P1-54 were 1_-__1″l:e(:_, _i_e insurance policy of the<\/p>\n
vehicie was markeci as “”x.R1. G11 app1’e”i-“ti'”1 “f the
\nis:\n<\/p>\n
evidence on record, the Tribunal has awarded einount of<\/p>\n
Towards pain and sufferings   R’e;’35,–5’G~’\u00a7)\/’-a<\/p>\n
Towa_rd_s medical expenses H   Ref;87,330_(–
\nTowards loss of amenity and shortening oi”e–Rs\u00a72’9’_g_’)OQ\/4′ .
\nTowards loss of earnings c1L11’ing.thei”peI’iocl’ –.1′?ie*;…E:’H._._i”t)\u00ab!.;_)(‘Ji–,l.-\n<\/p>\n
oftreatzment  .4    '   \nTowards eomreyanee and 011'-:3.ttt..,.1-tlat'it_:Ia '    1,300]-\n<\/pre>\n
Towards future medical expenses .  4′  R1s.3O,OO0\/–
\n‘Towards loss of’ eaxnings due  pennanerrt vi\u20acs.58,50G\/’~
\ndisability   ‘  <\/p>\n
   ‘;pta1 Rs.2,49, 130 \/-\n<\/p>\n
The appeel:_ie  i<\/p>\n
3.   heal   coutnsel for the appellant.<\/p>\n
and also-.’tl1e i*eefp.oi’iclei1t.’  Insurance Co.<\/p>\n
4. _ — It is ‘they eorit.ention of the counsel for the appellant that.\n<\/p>\n
 – the \u20ac’cl\u00a31i1Iio.1’1t weelle \ufb01sher woman, who sustained severe<\/p>\n
i t. in 3. nos:-:.’_i ;n to co v work due to the<\/p>\n
1 110.\n<\/p>\n
diean   rei’eI”red to the 13″ “‘Dg1″‘p11S
\n   the evidence of PW.2 — (1()C'(;()1’, who stated that there
\n   disability in the left leg of the claimant. The Tribunal
\n~–l1as considered the disability at 25% of the whole body and<\/p>\n
.9 Rg._j._.\n<\/p>\n
.I.-{J-\\.J’\\J 1.; – J. .ys..a..u. …..u…..-.\u00bb ‘s.1|.I.I u. -…-<\/p>\n
aeseeeed we i”””‘I”S of the cl!-\ufb01nrr-n<\/p>\n
bf”\n<\/p>\n
01- er lav;\n<\/p>\n
{Inn<\/p>\n
‘ could we seen from the material on 1’CC01’dS, under an erent<\/p>\n
EV\/
\nI O6\u00bb
\n| <\/p>\n
heads i.e. medical expenses, loss of amenities, conveyance<\/p>\n
ehar”es etc, We are of the opinion .i1a., L.e_;’~I’131oL,_l has<\/p>\n
awarded appropriate amount of eo1npe11sat_ioi:1 oii-le-aci*s.._Tof the<\/p>\n
heads and we 1naiI1t.a_i11 the  .__We_”are”eoniiiIieedvi-to say<\/p>\n
that the compensation awa1’de'(i\u00ab Liiitiei’ the  arid ”<\/p>\n
s1__,,_.:_n_g is on the loweifside.  _'[‘h_ei’efor__e’,*~ into<\/p>\n
disability, we are of the_a.’o15i1:iior1  is just and proper to
\naward Rs.50,ClQ{)\/–   As regards t.o the<\/p>\n
income of  has assessed at Rs. 50\/ –<\/p>\n
:2.” A<\/p>\n
‘ ‘im~11<\/p>\n
w<\/p>\n
 see1’ri’rom the recent decision of the
\nApex Court; l5;’116rl11CGI11ll6 “gi=ietiit”ur-“‘ eeeiie is considered<\/p>\n
as Rs. 100\/-V_Vpe1″d–:1a3*_.i liii that View of the matter, we are of the<\/p>\n
V’  . opiiiion that it Woiilcl be just and proper to consider the<\/p>\n
 5_f- per day as the accident occurred in the<\/p>\n
 A p.111: \u00bb,__’l”hough the doctor has stated 1-<\/p>\n
.3′<\/p>\n
eeai” 1998_’..~a11d La-161.533}; tLe e1..iir-.__rit is e11titled_ to Rs.2,250_\/-<\/p>\n
  of the left. lower leg and the ‘I’rib11I1a1 has assessed the<\/p>\n
 disability at 25% to the whole body, looking into the I13.tL11’6 of<\/p>\n
t__e hijuries suifered and avocation of the clainiant, we do not<\/p>\n
think that the appeil-“it weal’<\/p>\n
3′
\nD
\nQ
\n3′
\nhad
\nC13
\n‘P
\n‘3
\nG’
\nE!
\n(D
\n*1
\nF<\/p>\n
,, ,’l___’l_11′<\/p>\n
coiisideration the (11 a ity su.u’r’ci -“‘u 11 r eer1di’u “=;, ‘W11 Cu<\/p>\n
is revealed from Exs.P14O to P143 —- the  are<\/p>\n
of t.he opinion that it would bejust_s1″1d preper to assess’ <\/p>\n
disability at 50% of the w11o1e:i”‘b0ti’y”  it<\/p>\n
assessed disa.,ili..y s… 40%   levger  1’l8.*….’Vi’=(.’.’., be
\nremembered that. ti1e..V.ciisai)iiity: tv’r’1oi1gi1i’iis’*~iess, the earning
\ncapacity is the   as regards the
\nco111peI1s.’s1t.i’\u00a711*g~::A1:-_V(VL):V–_~  ivfuture loss of income.
\nIn that  esiisid–eriI1g the disability at 50%,
\nthe    us.2,250\/– p.11}. an… 50%<\/p>\n
would’-1′)e<Rs. ..-= Rs. 13,500\/l p.a. As the Cid 1111' ant.<\/p>\n
was _aged" years}. \u00e9iptiropliate multiplier would be at ' 13'.<\/p>\n
'V V'  . uiietj1ossef'\ufb01it.u1'e income would be at Rs.13,500\/– x 13<\/p>\n
 1s.ite7s;5soe;-. Therefore_, the elainiant is entitled to<\/p>\n
.. -".7 1'"… 1.'.-..~. A4' '1 as-nn -:1-\\r|t\\ '
\nxv.-s_.i,:\u00bb 1 1 Luna 1 i' two me me. In View of the fact<\/p>\n
 xtil\u00e9itz, income assessed at Rs.2,250\/– p.111. takiiig into<\/p>\n
 –..V”eeiisic1eI’ation the period of treatment for four iiionths, the<\/p>\n
dclaimsnt is entitled to Rs.9,000\/- towards loss of inconie<\/p>\n
duriiig th_ period of treat1I1ent.. In the CiI’CLl111Si3{:11″1Ct3S_. the<\/p>\n
towards pain and suffering, additional sum of R3,’.-3,000\/– for
\nloss 0 V ‘<\/p>\n
Rs.1,75,500\/- for loss of future income. Tlioiindel’<\/p>\n
the said lieads is Rs. 1,99,000\/ -_..i  I11  <\/p>\n
claimant is entitlecl to additionai i Mi  ,s\u00a79;oood\/– r<\/p>\n
t.og,.t.11o_ w_J1 intorost at 9%__\u00b0p.Va. Ii: .t.1’1atV’vie’Vx\u00a7””of~ the Iliattor,<\/p>\n
The    V’1;:-‘tart granting additional<\/p>\n
compenszatioriof  \/”-t;V’JZi.ih interest. at 9% p.a. from<\/p>\n
the ;l.’3;’.;\u00a7;i’-oi’ .j::,oti-1o1- t;’i1.1_’i’-:3 p}\u00e9;y’r;1ont. Out. of the compensation<\/p>\n
.-u<\/p>\n
enhaIir.:ed_, ‘7″ %’of . tho.’\u00e9ni1a11cc:d ariount “*1”-“‘1 be deposited in
\nthe .11ame4″‘ofV_it.’ot;  for a period of five years with liberty
\nto-.t1t.i;iisc’~t.11o i11tore:St.accrucd on the do-posite\u00a7”\u00a7c1’iodical1y for<\/p>\n
her Ordered accordingly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 Author: Chidananda Ullal A.S.Pachhapure an i ” IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA A-‘1′ BANGALORE Dated this the 2531 day of March, PRESENT MA THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE CHIDANAiVDA:VV:[ii}Li\u20acL AND’ A’ THE HONBLE MR.JlIS’I*I4CE-AS iPAeHHiAPt_IRe7 M.tr.A.Nu.3372′;20o3 (Mm A t Smt.Nagamma, , A W\/o.Keriyappe,_Moger, ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-03T05:39:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-03T05:39:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1148,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-03T05:39:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-03T05:39:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-03T05:39:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008"},"wordCount":1148,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008","name":"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-03T05:39:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagamma-vs-nagesh-narayan-moger-on-25-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nagamma vs Nagesh Narayan Moger on 25 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235837","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}