{"id":236024,"date":"2009-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009"},"modified":"2018-07-20T09:59:34","modified_gmt":"2018-07-20T04:29:34","slug":"smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
LN \"FH\u00a73I1 Hi3\u00a7\u00e9&\"aryf&f \n\nwm' ms:*1*:*;*1<::r: No. 1. 10:20; 236398 {;\u00a7:.12--I2R}\u20ac$LJ:R';-- .  'V J 1:'\n\nBETWEEN: \u00bb _\nSmt.I{cmpamma V  \n\nW10. Late C11ikkasi1ankarappa '\n\nAgsd 65 yams, Agzicultuxigt _ _ \n\nR' [(1. \u20ac;ihikka11al1aI1i Vi11ag\u20ac:~~.__  A  _ V \nDuggasandra. Hobliz Mul\u00e9bagiiu. T2':\u00e9h';k  _ * \nKoiar Dist\ufb01ct.  V     '\n\n. . . Petitionsx"\n\n(By S\ufb01yzgthg  'EI__arip;:asad .N . , Advecates}\n\nAND: _L \u00bb r 3 ,\\ \n1. The Depgutgf C\u00a3%_m_mi3:-sioner\n;:'x;:;:oiar District; 'Ko1ar.\n\n2.. V  '"I'hi:- f%sVsAt.A_ Commissio11er\n\n .. V{{\u00e9':21j D\u00e9istri-::?;.\n\nu x V ' --  \" * L .. 4_ Sr\ufb01v Shankaxappa\n\n. _ S10. Muniyappa, Agassi 69 yams\n'E1 0. C11:ik1\u00ab:a;t1ah.a}}1' Village\nDuggasaudra Hab\ufb01, Mulabagihi Taiuk\nK.-9131* l}iS{I'iC1l.  Rmpondenis\n\nu (By Sri Riiumar, HCGP for R1 to R3; Sri M.C.E'am3{:h331dm\n\n55. zisaezciates, Advocaze\ufb01 for R4)\n\n\"K\n\n\n\nEm!\n\nThis eeiition is fiied under Article 2126 of the Cnsf.i\u00a5:i;1t:i\u00a3:;r_1\"c;f\n\nEnriia, p:*:3f,r\u00a7n_g to quasi\": the impugned orders in ER\"? }~?'~;\".r_>4:u1*e--F' am} G, the ctiders'-.Qf the\n\n\u00a72E:SiSt&I\":t Cemrrx\u00e9ssirsrzer, Kekar Sui}-\u00a7)ivi$%011;\"'v--%-\u20ac'}6A' vides _ ..\u00bb\".\u00bb.r>};r7eu-v.:'s_1.'f\u00a3--.'.-7.-J' \n\nrespeetiveiy 85 etc.\n\nThis peti\ufb01orz coming on fof've4e;.\u00a7\u00a7*e1imir1afy_Vhe:\u00a7f=in\u00a7iv\u00a73 Csreup\nthis day, the Com? made the fesliewrlng - ' i\n\nThe petitioner is e11a1:ILe:;g;i;iig'V'passed by the\nAssistant Cengiz\u00e9xeijseioner\u00e9  IV\u00a7}5';:-4*\u00a7i;I]1996-Q? eiated\n19.05.2vC}{}8_   'r.\u00a7ge~.__\u00a2:w;1\u00a2r passed by the Deputy\nf.T0mmissi01}er_iI1'Ne.f\u00a7\ufb01,':_i'1_T%'f'\u00a7OG5-O6 dated 05.042008 and\n\nsought fz\ufb01zf que;shi:1g'1the\"'3a..'e1e.\n\n .. \"i'T\u00a31e.: 'jpe_iitio3;;er preferre\u00e9 an appeal before the\n\nAezsietaznt C\u00e9mngissioner against the revenue entries made in\n\ner:\/ge  \"\"No;\u00ab-.V'3?i442f95~96 &. 344~3,'95-95. The Assistant\n\n.  Ve\u00a73e~n1$iseiener rejected the appeal on the ground that the\n\n d\"i\u00a7p11'fe hefxszeen the petitioner and the 49' respondent is civii<\/pre>\n
 \u00a311′ inature, hence in order to 301′: out the ciispilfie, they have<\/p>\n
” V to approach the competent ei ‘ Court. Further} the Asssistasilt<\/p>\n
in the I’f:’J\u20ac:1TlIl\ufb01 mcords. Accxardingly, the entzim sale deed is<\/p>\n
11113} anti void mid the ‘I’ahsi1da:r has entcned the name \ufb01f”t11e<\/p>\n
4th respondent, which is illegai and (t()1’IIT\u00a5’.’\u00bb3!I_Tk\u00a74T..””‘\u00a3gj\\L;:”.:’f}’!f\u00a7”_<\/p>\n
pmvisions of sections 1228 85 129 Gf tile <\/p>\n
Revenue ikct, 1964 (for short, ‘the Acft’).  \u00ab \u00ab_ <\/p>\n
4. The second  is that till
\n1983, the    V mortgagee and
\nhence no  in favour of the
\n4th :*r:s}}<)f:t'"it:z";\u00a3f;  t.i:\ufb011?'ig:.-"e "I'%mvz=: not been gone into<\/p>\n
by the Assistant Cv\u00e9\u00e9imission\u00e9x or the Deputy Cemmissioner,<\/p>\n
53"); '\u00a7'he  'c\ufb01zntf\ufb01ntion of the pe\ufb01tioner is that Sines<\/p>\n
. ' i:\u00a51e \ufb01afidi\u00e9i\ufb01 bf the: 4\u00a3"hH;"'{"\u00a3\u00a3~\u00a7p()T\u00a5f'3\u20ac\u20acT}t had no va\ufb01d title, the 53.811161<\/p>\n
:\u00a7$1".V\u00a3V\u20ac?'f.}}d' 1:}:ge' b\u20ac_E:1_f.: veri\ufb01\ufb01d before effecting revenue entries<\/p>\n
andqyu n(;ti<:Y\u00a2_–x%%as issu\u00e9d 1:53 the ;3{~:\u00a3\u00a3?:io11er's husband in this<\/p>\n
 ~  V'7\u00a3"\u00a73gE\u00a5.I"f}E .ETf\u00a7'\u20ac%\u00a7V}.1C\u20ac3; the 6:I1t:i11':: exercise Qf mutation and the orders<\/p>\n
'"–{n,apf:;\u20acai anti revision am Contrary to the p*mvisim1s of the<\/p>\n
  Abs: and accordixiglyg praycici. for setting aside the impugneci<\/p>\n
 orders.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8. ‘The iearnad Cmmsel for the 43′ mspmf1.d_emi<\/p>\n
submittmi that (even citixing the period sf mortgage, A’<\/p>\n
could b\u20ac said and ravelzu\ufb01 entxies {filiilld be Ch?\u00a7i\u00a5igC'(f1:. . ‘<\/p>\n
sons of 33%: Beerappa have sold the:   .\n<\/p>\n
fazvmn’ of the 4&1 rt\u00e9apondetwt. A<\u00a7::t031:'i'i1;gIy,:Tz_t'h:=:  <\/p>\n
auth<:a11'tics have 3:10 authority if: abject the' e;1;V1t1"y : :i:Aci:3L{;i\u00abetV_i;::.3t}1\u20ac
\nname cf the 49?' resqmndent in tfi\u00e9' .:'vEtEr\u00a7tn1z{\u00a7.'1'\u20ac:<_3{)rr3s;;i Hence,
\nthere Cannot be 3113; \u00a2:i\u20ac:f\u00e9:<:'r.  "1:ht:. \u00e9titjies.<\/p>\n
  is S:.:?3miiTt\u00e9d'V'\u00a7}iat the alieged saie deeci
\nis not }51_"z*:){'2urethis{i:);i1t.  ‘<\/p>\n
 fh’i:\u00a7* sf_a_g\u20ac;, tim faamrtd (“‘,.m:nse\u00a5 for the 431<\/p>\n
 ;’;a:$1′;;::111:3u=;_11tA vgjiiid submit that if an opportunity is given, the<\/p>\n
am 51%: pmducea.\n<\/p>\n
  ,T.}V1i1*ciZy, the: icarned Cotmsei fer the petitioner<\/p>\n
x V’ “. Lw\u20ac\u00a71i1d.\u00a2 &s11vi)mit that the appeliats authority and the revisionai<\/p>\n
—   113156 not decided the rights of eithar (If tha parties.<\/p>\n
” “\u00a5’}::\u20ac:: have pemnitfied the ;3a\ufb01es to appmacth the comgetent<\/p>\n
Civil C0111″: in md\ufb01r to establish their rights. Henct:,__ this<\/p>\n
C0111”: cannot ilxtsrfare with the said er\ufb01ers. Aoc>,o1tii::g.i\u00a7*\u00a7.._’fi3.\u20ac<\/p>\n
ieamed (tmln\ufb01el fm’ the 4*’ mspondetzt prays; for  _<\/p>\n
the pe\ufb01ticsn.\n<\/p>\n
:2. Sri R.Km:nar, Iemne\u00e9 H3.’:.G;??”submits:”1,\ufb01\u00e9{‘*~.rj:i2:;.f<\/p>\n
Assistant Commissioner 11as _ve3r\u00a7\ufb01ed”v.a1i Vth\u00e9\ufb01 Ac\u00a7q(3’a::1;1:1:1%1I:ts<\/p>\n
pe;r”t3;ini1:1g ta    ‘(ha 8316 cited
\ndated O9.09\u20ac’i\u00a7i’.G.  \u00a5\u00a7\u00a7(‘if2’\ufb01:’\u00a7’.*\ufb011C me\ufb01gaga EIIIEYCC1
\n‘iivio  $13′; the matter Ittquirtts to
\nbe resofiz\u00a2:fci” I’;ze:b%\u00e9’:ViE11:r\u00a7V  civil Cxmrt. The Assistant<\/p>\n
C’O\u00a7\u00a33II1iSSi0:f’)\u20acI_v”hEiS’Vf:1″i\ufb01dd..\u00a7\u00a7V\u20acI}_ the ragistsxttd sale deed aisc.<\/p>\n
~ V. ‘_Acc{>1’$ii1;guiy,Vpa1;t:iE3 w\u00a7:r<;: advised, to apprma-ch the: comjpcm\ufb01t<\/p>\n
2 <;5\\;ii* C7;0i,1;'\u20ac;. M * \u00b0'<\/p>\n
'A  hsaxzii the arguments made by the learned<\/p>\n
 –  V'{30uns\u00bb\u20ac”Z,Vf\u00a7ii:* the ggaaz\ufb01es.\n<\/p>\n
   “‘_!4. hi the Light. 01” the submissions made by the<\/p>\n
  Ic\ufb01iznygd Couusal for the respective pax\ufb01es, the fe\ufb02awing<\/p>\n
 paints would arias: far 3:}; c0nsi\u20acierati0:1:\u00ab<\/p>\n
“\\<\/p>\n
1. Whetiier the revenue authorities 1tgist\u00a3r\u00a7’\u00a3\u00a3 :<\/p>\n
the mama of the 43* respm1ri:=:\ufb01f.j y1zrc?12$r:~r.<3j:''.'__'_ '  <\/p>\n
the land in qu\u00e9stion on the basis  t\u00a7.1<:%:, '<\/p>\n
registemd $216 deed?   _<\/p>\n
2. Whether the 1’E3V\u20ac1’111C a:1\u00a5}1\u00a7$1fit3;t;-Tax\ufb01reriii\ufb01zgivth-5: ”  <\/p>\n
rezgistenszd salt”; daczd ‘c:\u00a5VcCidv:.i{rZ.\u00a7h1:’. <\/p>\n
the paj\ufb01czs b\u20acf0I’\u20ac ~l<?::I1?\u00e9f:};'J. Ii\u00a7g  of the
\n4:11 re_S\u00a7\u00a7Q1f?\u00a3'}enf!p1\u00a7:'(f.FIa\u00a3%\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7*~. {\u00a7fut'\u00a51t'\u00a7f'?\u00e9\u00a5"1('\u00a7 in the\n<\/p>\n
3.   __ V. .,.\n<\/p>\n
15;””f’h$ ‘j;C0iii::e11ti\u00a3:m.’*–.of “t’.i*:$– }3s\u00a3:ifio:1cr is that late<\/p>\n
Bc\u20ac1’app}-:–21 xs\u00e9\u00e9s ‘the’\u00a7\u00a7w31cr i\u00a71__}1:=$p\u20acct 0f the land in question.<\/p>\n
Except, Bc\u00e9i*a\u00a7J 1\u20ac\u00e9?:: V\u00e9Vei1 _ij.\u00a7s::_”.sons cannot transfer the ia\ufb02d to<\/p>\n
 3:13’ (>3.\u00a7}\u20ac. ‘F113 1311.5;-in {}_11\u20ac’5\ufb010I1 is the ssl\ufb01acqxliit\u00e9 property of<\/p>\n
 .,;:B\u20ac:f3.jvI;7:3\u00a7)}}E”; ‘2i*}:}d except him nabcsdy can claim any right<\/p>\n
\u00e9f3zt_&i* .;}1r:”‘_p\u00a7{i2p:\u00a35f;g;i” Wham things stead thus, {ha 30:15 cf Eats<\/p>\n
\u00a5%eef’;%.ppa”c\u00e9a:%’h:at $613 the }’?T'{ip\u20ac\u00a5’T}f to the 4&1 ras:{mz1:\u00a7ent, H is<\/p>\n
 :i1r:;t_mad’c:— known as to Whether late Beerappa was alive on<\/p>\n
 _ tht.’\u00bbd:a:te of allegad fransac\ufb01ijm. \u00a73I’\u20ac’:S{l\u00a3\ufb01’p\ufb01OZ1 can hrs: drawn<\/p>\n
v\u00e9  .. .,t,i3.:;11: laife Becrappa was aIivev\\as on the alleged data Of<\/p>\n
txansaction, sirzctt th\ufb01 ian\u00e9 was mdeei\ufb02ed  his4’fEa\u20acI0u%.v_I:f <\/p>\n
person acszguims tight evczr the  TT11r:A”1)’ossc:[_sL’;:*\u00bbe:\u00a7\u00a7,~[.:<\/p>\n
ownership of the 1Jm;:>e:”\u00a3:y. Beei’\u00e91:i’p\u00a7; ha\u00e9iv  id
\nany other persens. B12t _i:11e sczgg: B%’L’E1*g1,\ufb01:I’};i\\ J\ufb01;Ql\u20aci fhe:<\/p>\n
}and in qlles\ufb01on to the   year 1′}’?(). The
\nsaizl $336 deed has ngtt’  ” Either by thg
\nIjetitioner 03:.     \ufb01ib\ufb01sions of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
Whenever a   1:116 Qf\ufb01ce of the Sub–\n<\/p>\n
F?\u20acgisi1~a\u00a7”,  ‘\u00a7::\u00a7\u00a2_1;1ie  _’.3.:\u00a51:s tr} obtain xtgisfrafrioii
\nceI1:i.\ufb01c:ar\u00a7~   ;i”;E1\u00a7:’1’\u00a3%vr::11u:: entries, The revenue<\/p>\n
aut:h.0:1’iti.\u00a2:As  d:13i?_\u00a7?”b0;\u00e9inc\u00a7’ to verify who is the owner of the<\/p>\n
. who s\ufb013’\u00a3:’1Wi:\u00abh<-.3 ianci to the pumhaser.<\/p>\n
A  V 16.,!.n'  instant case, without 1}OSSf:3SSi11g 0W'I3.65I'Ship<\/p>\n
"of t11e;__ 7\u00a3and, the V"\u20ac:I}{\u00a7(}I'S namegr Shama:1:1a and<\/p>\n
" \u00a7n3z\u00bb1;?;i*:anap;1a have said the land in qlzestinn to the 45*<\/p>\n
 rc: $p0n\u00e9ent. This shxauid hav\ufb01 bmn veri\ufb01sd by the revenue<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
Clammisgioner am srzf. aside. The Tahs\ufb02ciar is dircctaed tea<\/p>\n
ve\ufb01fy from the alleged Sale deed as to Wheztht”-:1′ late Beerappa<\/p>\n
was this ahsaluta {3Wi\u00a31\u20acI’ {If the \u00a3a;t1d in ques\ufb01on as’ ::3i;:”L:’t.\u00a7e..<\/p>\n
data of execution of alleged sale deed and  H<\/p>\n
all\ufb01gal sale dsed was execnttad by i3~’:r’:”‘B~a5rap};>a .i’ii f:;1v\u00a3:5mf’,of <\/p>\n
the: 43′ respondent. If the saiirtged  i\u00e9. e\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9erjfi <\/p>\n
sons csf iatt Bserappa, than th\u00e9  is
\nwhethar late Beczrappa had tra1;Sf\u00e9f1*c;\u20aci”.11is n”g”i1t._\u00a70  sons,<\/p>\n
as on the data of exc:Cuti6i:. ::>f ‘$1.6   \u00e9eesii in favour<\/p>\n
of the? 47?” f’f:9’\u00a7}:A)Inf) 1 ?\u00a3’\u00a7EI}v1;’.;.T31.\u00a7’;I_\u00a7}fEfEffi{f=\ufb02\u20ac1′ 3116 the 431 E’f’:SpO1}dE’t’I”lf.
\nare a.;11:ct:.\u00ab.:1″m app:\u00e9z\u00a7f”t\u00a7tiii\u00a7f\u20ac”‘f11\u20ac Tahsiiciar 011 93.08.2009,<\/p>\n
\\2e”ith<3f:1'a–v .:–_1wa\ufb01"1s'2gVa1iy tmtice from the 'Tahsildar 811$ the<\/p>\n
%':ra;1s;:;1a:%% is cnre\u00a2\u00a3e';%:  to pass appropriate O\ufb01iers in<\/p>\n
 :a{\u00a7{#::ft1a::3\ufb02a;%x:A\u00a5\u00a2*1{ti:v'i;31s? within a period of fmxr months frmn the<\/p>\n
ziaiitzg\ufb01f  dfa Copy 0:1' this order',<\/p>\n
Sd\/-e
\nJudge<\/p>\n
 -81%:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy LN “FH\u00a73I1 Hi3\u00a7\u00e9&”aryf&f wm’ ms:*1*:*;*1<::r: No. 1. 10:20; 236398 {;\u00a7:.12–I2R}\u20ac$LJ:R';– . 'V J 1:' BETWEEN: \u00bb _ Smt.I{cmpamma V W10. Late C11ikkasi1ankarappa ' Agsd 65 yams, Agzicultuxigt _ _ R' [(1. \u20ac;ihikka11al1aI1i Vi11ag\u20ac:~~.__ A _ V Duggasandra. Hobliz Mul\u00e9bagiiu. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-20T04:29:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-20T04:29:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1243,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-20T04:29:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-20T04:29:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-20T04:29:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009"},"wordCount":1243,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009","name":"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-20T04:29:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Kempamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 29 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}