{"id":236144,"date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-02-03T14:47:32","modified_gmt":"2015-02-03T09:17:32","slug":"sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
\"IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT\nBANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 05*\" DAY OF OCTOBER, 20;\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRQEOOYO ' \n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAI_g1\u00a7f(i):,\" 19915 OCFO2;oe3yy%\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri. Boregowda,\n\nS\/O Shivanna,  _\n\nAged about 24 years, A _ ,\nResiding at Ijjaiaghatta, . \nHonakere HObli,=-- V  -- ,1\" A\n\nNagaz\ufb01angaiaVifalgig'  _ .--\nMandya I')i_St1'iC_t\"--f5--7]  V\u00bb A ~ y_ .. .APPELLANT\n\n(By Shri. i2'OOp'esf1 ~AdvOcate )\n\n '.  _    A.  A ..... .. V\n\n     \n\nA S\/O.7B_'OtegOwda\n,Aged~\"ab()ut 56 years,\n\n    Annegowda @ Raju\n\n S\/0 Shivanna,\nAged about 27 years,\n\nA' H H 3. Sri. Ramegowda,\n\nS\/O Late Nalasimhegowda,\n\n8\n\n\n\nix)\n\nAged about 56 years,\n\nAll are residing at\nIjjalaghatta Village,\n\nHonakere Hobii,\nNagamangala Taiuk,    \nMandya Bistrict.    \n\n(By Shri. s. Vishwamurthy, Advocate fQfsR.euSp\u00a7).i1dEtni'NQ_i.3;:.:tii\nShri. Vastt.K, Advocate for Respon'den\"t_No.l,'VRes\u00bbpondei1tvA \n\nNo.2 - Served) \n\nThis Reguiar Second Appeaiisiiitgd aiideriseetion 100\n\nof Code of Civil Procedore, 119208,' age.i.nfs't..the judgment and\ndecree dated 1.12.2007 ;iassed\"inf':R:;A.'N_o[7f2007 on the file\nof the Civil Eudge (Sr.IA),ii.).,._at1.dtIMFC;,Na3gaihangala partly\nallowing the appeai_antiE modifying~~.ti1eV judgment and decree\ndated 27.l0,20_08{passed\u00abin1O.S.No..S-4\/20023 on the \ufb01le of the\nCivil Judge\" (Jri.D:3.)' \"aiid,J wiiagamaogaia.\n\n  Apxldealyi coming on for I-Iearing\nthis day, the ctoui*tft\u00a7~e4liveied__the following:\n\n \";U;oGMENT\n\n- v  ., f\ufb02ie i:ap5;iel.laet wasitiieiolaintiff before the triai court in a suit\n\n 'foe gjartiftioii and' separate possession. Defendant no.3 had\n\ncoiitericiedtiiat the plaintiff alongwith other defendants had\n\n  'exeeuted a registered sake deed in favour of the said\n\n\"defetidant. However, the document of sate was not produced\n\n2 before the trial court. It transpires that though the appeliant\n\n@\n\n\n\nand other defendants had received the sale consideration, they\n\nhad refused to execute and register sale deed and the lnatter\n\nwas pending before the District. Registrar; \n\nRegistrar following the procedure under   the \n\nRegistration Act, 1908 and under Section.fl75._has'direoteda;v,C\n\nregistration of the document a'flte'r_vholdi'nglan entiuiry'..__T1ais C\n\nwas brought to the attention ofpth.e:'i'oWe.r appellate coiurt and\nthe Deed of Sale was   -lower appellate\ncourt by recourseV'to_Or\u00a7lelrVlXl;l  Code of Civil\n\nProcedure,l(hel'tfe.in'aiftetf'~~referred_.to as the 'CPC' for\nbrevityii). Thatg.\u00a3iPI5liVcatio'nl_'havingwbeen allowed, the lower\nappellate cotirt  tiph\u00a21a__ith5 contention of defendant no.3\n\nthat the suit lpmpeiily which was only one item of property,\n\n  sogldliuadervthe said sale deed. The present appeal is \ufb01led\n\nitoih'-cionteiid:.. even though the District Registrar had\n\n directeclrehglistration of the alleged sale deed, the appeliant\n\nA   challenged the very execution of the safe deed by\n\n   recourse to an independent Civil suit.\n\n\u00e9\n\n\n\n2. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit\n\nthat the substantial question of law that was framed at'\"the\n\ntime of admission of this appeal is as to whether the\" \n\nappellate court was justified in receiving additiionalvw.evi.denceD \n\non behalf of the respondent, withouti=.reco1?diivigiireasons ;_i i<\/pre>\n
admission allowing the doctlnientg to be iplacediionilfetcord<\/p>\n
without recourse to the ;_p1’ovisio_n.ii:Aof_ Order  28 of
\nthe CPC’ which mandates that sthle::’doTctttn\u20acf,ti’t.Vbe marked in<\/p>\n
evidence and. \u00ab’ther_ea\ufb01[er  “especially in the<\/p>\n
ci1’cumstance thiatggtlieh’-.appe’llair\u00a7’t~..hasiiitiled the suit questioning
\nthe vefv eitecutlon  reigistrationiiof the sale deed.\n<\/p>\n
3.i’  the li_glr-theftihei”appell.ate court having accepted<\/p>\n
the_sialec..deed  was duly registered, even though it is<\/p>\n
.i soL1_giit_ito. ‘oe’questioned by the appellant in an independent<\/p>\n
‘suit,-.7the ‘tiirrdiisgiiiof the lower appellate court that defendant<\/p>\n
 no.3 had: established his case that the suit property having<\/p>\n
 been; purchased under a registered sale deed cannot be<\/p>\n
M tiatilted. Order XLI Rule 28 of the cpc prescribes that<\/p>\n
wherever additional evidence is allowed to be produced, the<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
appellate court may either take such evidence or direct the<\/p>\n
court from whose decree the appeal is preferred, or any otriei’<\/p>\n
subordinate court to take such evidence and to sendfit~ .l_t0.__ti1e L <\/p>\n
appellate court. Since the document produc.ed.,V4_ a ”<\/p>\n
registered sale deed and even though :_tl1e.3lowe1%.lappel:late”ll”$.v:t’-;~-_VtzQ
\nthe document marked in evidence”‘p’:throu.gh xx.:_lIness and
\nthereafter addressing the  remained
\nopen, since the notilproduicejdlbefore the trial
\ncourt, has   an explanation that
\nsubseqzucriy  the District Registrar,
\nthe document’  and therefore, has been<\/p>\n
p1’od:;1cedi I~Ience,l_Vlthere is no substantial question of law that<\/p>\n
would _vaiiise:”fo1′ consideration in the above facts and<\/p>\n
Circw:nstaiic’e–S .l  it<\/p>\n
 -However, the learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
 .l_i:wou_ld yetplead an apprehension that if the present. appeal is<\/p>\n
.  diwsrriissed on merits, it would seriously prejudice the case of<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
the appellant pending consideration insofar as the very<\/p>\n
execution and registration of the sale deed is concerned. 71′.”‘i’1ips<\/p>\n
apprehension is misplaced as the appellant would   <\/p>\n
to establish at the trial in the pending suit thathe ,\\\\\u00a5\\\u00a7\\\\’\\\\{p\/’}i(i)::I,\u00ab.i]”1 vi ”<\/p>\n
fact, signed the document and registeredA.the’–_sarrie.i”‘i’:l’he”=:i;_*<\/p>\n
present appeal being dismissed would’.*t.hiere.forev:iinoptsiaes an
\nimpediment for the appellart_t…l:to_ “‘:=;stal).l’isl1\u00bb,_’Ahisi\u00a7 case
\nindependently in the pendliip, ‘saiit,  however, fails
\nandis dismissed\ufb01ii     H  I<\/p>\n
NV<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy “IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05*” DAY OF OCTOBER, 20; BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRQEOOYO ‘ REGULAR SECOND APPEAI_g1\u00a7f(i):,” 19915 OCFO2;oe3yy% BETWEEN: Sri. Boregowda, S\/O Shivanna, _ Aged about 24 years, A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-03T09:17:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-03T09:17:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":403,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-03T09:17:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-03T09:17:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-03T09:17:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010"},"wordCount":403,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010","name":"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-03T09:17:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-boregowda-vs-sri-shivanna-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Boregowda vs Sri Shivanna on 5 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}