{"id":236371,"date":"2009-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-16T09:09:22","modified_gmt":"2017-11-16T03:39:22","slug":"c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 362 of 2004()\n\n\n1. C.SASIKUMAR, PALAMUTTATHU VEEDU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. P.KUNJAKRISHNA PILLAI, THENGAYYATHU\n3. C.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, THENGAYATHU\n4. N.ARAVINDAKASHAN PILLAI, GIRIJALAYAM,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KUMAR CHITTY FUND, REP. BY ITS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. R.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, PALAMUTTATHU\n\n3. G.CHELLAMMA AMMA, PALAMUTTATHU VEEDU,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.MADHU\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS\n\n Dated :15\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n               M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, J.\n               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                 C.R.P.No. 362 of 2004\n               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n           Dated this the 15th day of July, 2009\n\n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>       This revision petition is filed by the judgment<\/p>\n<p>debtors 1, 4, 5 and 6 in E.P.No. 122 of 1994 in O.S.No. 11<\/p>\n<p>of 1991 on the file of the Sub Court, Kottarakkara, against<\/p>\n<p>the order in that E.P. dated 19.3.2004. Respondents 1 to 3<\/p>\n<p>herein are the decree holder and judgment debtors 2 and 3.<\/p>\n<p>       2. The facts of the case are briefly as follows. The<\/p>\n<p>first respondent decree holder obtained an ex parte decree<\/p>\n<p>against the judgment debtors for realisation of an amount<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.1,35,180\/- with interest.             The judgment debtors<\/p>\n<p>contended in the execution proceedings that the decree<\/p>\n<p>passed in the kuri transaction is null and void and is<\/p>\n<p>unexecutable.     When the court below refused to consider<\/p>\n<p>that contention,       the revision petitioner herein filed<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No. 613 of 2002 before this Court, which is now<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No. 362 of 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  pending. As the Execution Court rejected the application<\/p>\n<p>  filed by the first respondent\/decree holder for arresting the<\/p>\n<p>  judgment debtors, the decree holder filed C.R.P.No. 105<\/p>\n<p>  of 2002 before this Court, which was allowed and the<\/p>\n<p>  matter was remanded to the Execution Court.<\/p>\n<p>        3. The Execution Court, as per order in E.P. 122 of<\/p>\n<p>  1994 dated 19.3.2004 found that the judgment debtors 1,<\/p>\n<p>  4, 5 and 6 have means to pay the decree debt and issued<\/p>\n<p>  warrant against them. Against that order the judgment<\/p>\n<p>  debtors 1, 4, 5 and 6 filed this revision petition.<\/p>\n<p>        4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and<\/p>\n<p>  the learned counsel for the first respondent.<\/p>\n<p>        5. As per the order in E.P. 122 of 1994 in O.S.No. 11<\/p>\n<p>  of 1991 on the file of the Sub Court, Kottarakkara dated<\/p>\n<p>  16.10.2001, the execution court found that the judgment<\/p>\n<p>  debtors 1, 4, 5 and 6 are not liable to be arrested, as the<\/p>\n<p>  decree holder failed to prove their means and the prayer for<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No. 362 of 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  arrest and detention     of the judgment debtors is rejected.<\/p>\n<p>  Against that order, the decree holder filed C.R.P.No. 105 of<\/p>\n<p>  2002 before this Court.      This Court, as per order   dated<\/p>\n<p>  3.6.2003, set aside that order and the case was remanded back<\/p>\n<p>  to the lower court for fresh consideration after giving the<\/p>\n<p>  parties opportunity to adduce evidence. After the remand, no<\/p>\n<p>  further evidence was adduced from both sides.<\/p>\n<p>        6. The lower court, as per order in E.P. 122 of 1994<\/p>\n<p>  dated 19.3.2004, found that the judgment debtors 1,4, 5<\/p>\n<p>  and 6 have means and they are wilfully defaulting in<\/p>\n<p>  discharging the decree debt and warrant was ordered<\/p>\n<p>  against them.\n<\/p>\n<p>        7. Section 51 of the C.P.C. lays down the modes of<\/p>\n<p>  execution of a decree. Proviso to Section 51 lays down<\/p>\n<p>  that where the decree is for payment of money, execution<\/p>\n<p>  by detention in the prison shall not be ordered unless the<\/p>\n<p>  court is satisfied that the judgment debtor has or has had<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No. 362 of 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  since the date of the decree the means to pay the amount<\/p>\n<p>  of decree or some substantial part thereof and refused or<\/p>\n<p>  neglected or has refused or neglected to pay the same.<\/p>\n<p>  The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submits<\/p>\n<p>  that the revision petitioners have retired from government<\/p>\n<p>  service and that they have no means to pay the decree debt<\/p>\n<p>  and there is no wilful laches or negligence on their part to<\/p>\n<p>  pay the decree debt.     An ex parte decree was passed in<\/p>\n<p>  1994 and after the passing of the decree no amount was<\/p>\n<p>  paid by the judgment debtors. It is true that the judgment<\/p>\n<p>  debtors have retired from government service. But they<\/p>\n<p>  were in government service at the time of passing of the<\/p>\n<p>  decree and therefore it can be inferred that they<\/p>\n<p>  purposefully avoided the payment.\n<\/p>\n<p>        8.   As already mentioned, under       proviso (b) to<\/p>\n<p>  Section 51 C.P.C., if the judgment debtor has or has had<\/p>\n<p>  since the date of the decree means to pay the amount of<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No. 362 of 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  decree or some substantial part thereof, and refused or<\/p>\n<p>  neglected or has refused or neglected to pay the same,<\/p>\n<p>  arrest and detention is permissible. The decree holder has<\/p>\n<p>  given evidence as PW1 that the judgment debtors are<\/p>\n<p>  government servants and are drawing good salaries and<\/p>\n<p>  they are possessing        landed properties and getting<\/p>\n<p>  substantial income from that property.           No contra<\/p>\n<p>  evidence had been adduced on the side of them to show<\/p>\n<p>  that they have no means.\n<\/p>\n<p>        8. Therefore, the learned Sub Judge is fully justified<\/p>\n<p>  in finding that the judgment debtors have sufficient means<\/p>\n<p>  and they wilfully defaulted in discharging the decree debt<\/p>\n<p>  and the personal execution sought for by detention in<\/p>\n<p>  civil prison is allowed. Therefore, this revision petition is<\/p>\n<p>  liable to be dismissed, as it is without any merit.<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No. 362 of 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       10. This revision petition is accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>  The Execution Court can proceed with the execution in<\/p>\n<p>  accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                              (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS)<br \/>\n                                         Judge<br \/>\n  tm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 362 of 2004() 1. C.SASIKUMAR, PALAMUTTATHU VEEDU, &#8230; Petitioner 2. P.KUNJAKRISHNA PILLAI, THENGAYYATHU 3. C.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, THENGAYATHU 4. N.ARAVINDAKASHAN PILLAI, GIRIJALAYAM, Vs 1. KUMAR CHITTY FUND, REP. BY ITS &#8230; Respondent 2. R.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-16T03:39:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-16T03:39:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":794,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\",\"name\":\"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-16T03:39:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-16T03:39:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-16T03:39:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009"},"wordCount":794,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009","name":"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-16T03:39:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-sasikumar-vs-kumar-chitty-fund-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C.Sasikumar vs Kumar Chitty Fund on 15 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236371\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}