{"id":236460,"date":"2011-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011"},"modified":"2016-05-26T18:59:04","modified_gmt":"2016-05-26T13:29:04","slug":"mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000113\u00adAD\n                                                                                 CIC\/SS\/C\/2011\/000411\u00adAD\n                                                                                 CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000112\u00adAD\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a05,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a05,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Ravinder\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Malik\n           S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bhagwan\u00a0Malik\n           R\/o\u00a0F\u00ad243\/124\u00adC\n           Katwaria\u00a0Sarai\n           Behind\u00a0Mother\u00a0Dairy\n           Main\u00a0Road\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0016\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Delhi\u00a0Police\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Addl.\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0of\u00a0Police\n           South\u00a0District\n           DCP\u00a0Office\n           Hauz\u00a0Khas\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Surinder\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0PIO\n                                     Shri\u00a0Manish\u00a0Chandra\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Singh\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner          :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n ___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                   File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000113\u00adAD\n                                                                                            CIC\/SS\/C\/2011\/000411\u00adAD\n                                                                                             CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000112\u00adAD\n\n\n\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000113\u00adAD<\/p>\n
1.     The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application \u00a0 dt.11.11.09 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 ADCP, \u00a0 Delhi \u00a0 Police \u00a0 seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
       information\u00a0against\u00a0six\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.1.10.09.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n
       reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.22.12.09\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0complaint,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
       received \u00a0 a \u00a0 rejoinder \u00a0 dt.6.1.10 \u00a0 from \u00a0 Ms.Chhaya \u00a0 Sharma, \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 information \u00a0 has \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a08.12.09,\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0enclosed\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0rejoinder.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0<\/p>\n
       response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0rejoinder,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.1.2.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0<\/p>\n
       that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0 received\u00a0 certified\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0and\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Application\u00a0dt.11.11.09.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0H.G.S.Dhaliwal,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
       order\u00a0dt.2.3.10.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.24.5.10\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n
       CIC. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 vide \u00a0 his \u00a0 letter \u00a0 dt.2.6.10 \u00a0 addressed \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 requested \u00a0 that \u00a0 his\u00a0<\/p>\n
       complaint \u00a0 dt.22.12.09 \u00a0 may\u00a0 be\u00a0 considered\u00a0 as\u00a0 withdrawn\u00a0 without\u00a0 prejudice\u00a0 to\u00a0 his\u00a0 legal\u00a0 rights\u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n
       contentions\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.11.11.09\u00a0and\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.24.5.10.<\/p>\n
CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000411\u00adAD<\/p>\n
2.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.2.3.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0ADCP,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Police\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
       against\u00a0twelve\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0DCP\u00a0South.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0<\/p>\n
       dt.19.4.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.1.11.10\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
       27.4.10,\u00a0he\u00a0received\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.31.3.10(Copy\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0file)\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a010.5.10(Copy\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
       file)\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0requesting\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0grant\u00a0a\u00a0hearing\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0
\n          PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0complete\u00a0and\u00a0correct\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a011.6.10,\u00a0he\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0dt.8.6.10(copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
         not\u00a0in\u00a0file)\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0<\/p>\n
         appeal\u00a0dt.21.6.10\u00a0(Copy\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0file)\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0later\u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0to\u00a0consider\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
         complaint\u00a0dt.19.4.10\u00a0as\u00a0withdrawn\u00a0without\u00a0prejudice\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0legal\u00a0rights\u00a0and\u00a0contentions\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Application\u00a0dt.2.3.10\u00a0and\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.21.6.10.<\/p>\n
CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000112\u00adAD<\/p>\n
3.       The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application \u00a0 dt.23.11.09 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 ADCP, \u00a0 Delhi \u00a0 Police \u00a0 seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
         information\u00a0against\u00a0nine\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.29.9.09.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n
         reply,\u00a0 he\u00a0 filed\u00a0 a\u00a0 complaint\u00a0 dt.4.1.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0complaint,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
         received \u00a0 a \u00a0 rejoinder \u00a0 dt.7.1.10 \u00a0 from \u00a0 Ms.Chhaya \u00a0 Sharma, \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 information \u00a0 has \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n
         provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a021.12.09,\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0enclosed\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0rejoinder.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0<\/p>\n
         response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0rejoinder,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.1.2.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0<\/p>\n
         that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0 received\u00a0 certified\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0and\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Application\u00a0dt.23.11.09.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0H.G.S.Dhaliwal,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
         order\u00a0dt.2.3.10.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.4.10\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n
         CIC.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0however,\u00a0 \u00a0vide\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.2.6.10\u00a0 \u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0to\u00a0consider\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
         complaint\u00a0dt.4.1.10\u00a0 as\u00a0withdrawn\u00a0without\u00a0prejudice\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0legal\u00a0rights\u00a0and\u00a0contentions\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Application\u00a0dt.23.11.09\u00a0and\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.4.10.<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
4.       During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0intend\u00a0to\u00a0pursue\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0further\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         three \u00a0 cases. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Commission, \u00a0 therefore, \u00a0 decided \u00a0 not \u00a0 to \u00a0 consider \u00a0 the \u00a0 merits \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 cases \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n
         accordingly\u00a0the\u00a0appeals\u00a0are\u00a0closed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0end.\u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                                                          (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                 Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\n Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.      Shri\u00a0Ravinder\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Malik
\n        S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bhagwan\u00a0Malik
\n        R\/o\u00a0F\u00ad243\/124\u00adC
\n        Katwaria\u00a0Sarai
\n        Behind\u00a0Mother\u00a0Dairy
\n        Main\u00a0Road
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0016<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n        Delhi\u00a0Police
\n        O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Addl.\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0of\u00a0Police
\n        South\u00a0District
\n        DCP\u00a0Office
\n        Hauz\u00a0Khas
\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n        Delhi\u00a0Police
\n        O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0of\u00a0Police
\n        South\u00a0District
\n        DCP\u00a0Office
\n        Hauz\u00a0Khas
\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
4.      Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000113\u00adAD CIC\/SS\/C\/2011\/000411\u00adAD CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000112\u00adAD Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a05,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a05,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Ravinder\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Malik S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bhagwan\u00a0Malik R\/o\u00a0F\u00ad243\/124\u00adC Katwaria\u00a0Sarai Behind\u00a0Mother\u00a0Dairy Main\u00a0Road New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0016 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents Delhi\u00a0Police O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Addl.\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0of\u00a0Police South\u00a0District DCP\u00a0Office Hauz\u00a0Khas New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Surinder\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0PIO Shri\u00a0Manish\u00a0Chandra\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Singh Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000113\u00adAD CIC\/SS\/C\/2011\/000411\u00adAD CIC\/SS\/C\/2010\/000112\u00adAD ORDER Background […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-26T13:29:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-26T13:29:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":659,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-26T13:29:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-26T13:29:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-26T13:29:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011"},"wordCount":659,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011","name":"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-26T13:29:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ravinder-malik-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-5-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Ravinder Malik vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 5 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236460\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}