{"id":236554,"date":"2004-03-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-03-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004"},"modified":"2014-06-07T12:13:02","modified_gmt":"2014-06-07T06:43:02","slug":"shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004","title":{"rendered":"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 18\/03\/2004\n\nCORAM\n\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.SIRPURKAR\nAND\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE F.M.IBRAHIM KALIFULLA\n\nCriminal Appeal No.310 of 2004\n\n\nShahul Hammeed                                         ...     Appellant\n\n-Vs-\n\nState represented by\nDeputy Superintendent\nQ Branch, CID, Chennai-5\n(Central Crime Branch X\n Cr.No.298\/2002).                                       ...     Respondent\n\n\nPRAYER:  Appeal against the order dated 5.2.2004 in Cr.M.P.No.113 of 2 003  on\nthe  file  of the learned Special Judge, Special Court under the Prevention of\nTerrorism Act, Poonamallee.\n\n!For Appellant          :       Mr.K.Chandru, Senior Counsel\n                                for Mr.Yashod Vardhan\n\n^For Respondent         :       Mr.I.Subramanian\n                                Public Prosecutor\n\n\n:J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>(Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.S.SIRPURKAR, J.)<\/p>\n<p>        The accused is facing a prosecution for  the  commission  of  offences<br \/>\nunder Section 21(2) and (3) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (in short<br \/>\n&#8216;POTA&#8217;),  apart  from Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities ( Prevention) Act,<br \/>\n1967.  The allegation against him is that he has arranged  for  a  meeting  on<br \/>\n13.4.2002,  where inflammatory speeches were given by the speakers, suggesting<br \/>\ntheir support and inviting the support of the public to a banned  organisation<br \/>\ncalled Liberation  Tigers  of  Tamil  Eelam  (LTTE).  The offence having taken<br \/>\nplace in 2002, the other  accused  persons  later  on  came  to  be  arrested.<br \/>\nHowever,  this  accused came to be arrested only on 11.3.2003, as according to<br \/>\nthe accused he surrendered before the Deputy  Superintendent  of  Police,  &#8216;Q&#8217;<br \/>\nBranch.\n<\/p>\n<p>        2.   It  is  now  a settled position that if the accused, who face the<br \/>\nprosecution for the offences under POTA are behind  the  bars  for  one  year,<br \/>\nafter  one  year the question of their bail application would be considered in<br \/>\nthe light of ordinary law and not in the line of Section 4 9(6) of POTA.   The<br \/>\nSupreme  Court  has  already  held and confirmed the judgment by this Court in<br \/>\n&#8220;NEDUMARAN P.  AND FIVE OTHERS -VS-  STATE&#8221;  reported  in  2004(1)  C.T.C.721,<br \/>\ngranting  bail  to  the  other  co-accused in this case, who were charged with<br \/>\nmaking the inflammatory speeches.  Therefore, there will  be  no  question  to<br \/>\ntake any different view than in case of those persons.  The maximum punishment<br \/>\nthat could be ordered against the accused is also not exceeding ten years.  In<br \/>\nview of the bail already having been granted to the co-accused on the basis of<br \/>\nthe  Supreme  Court  judgment,  we  think  it fit to grant bail to the present<br \/>\naccused also.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3.  However, learned Public Prosecutor points out that  the  trial  is<br \/>\nalready  in  progress and that though this accused was required by the police,<br \/>\nhe was apprehended an year after the said meeting took place.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4.   In  order  to  allay  the  apprehension  of  the  learned  Public<br \/>\nProsecutor that he might abscond again, we would direct that on his release on<br \/>\nbail,  he  shall be report to &#8216;Q&#8217; branch police station everyday at 9 &#8216;O Clock<br \/>\nin the evening.  He shall be released on bail on the following conditions.\n<\/p>\n<p>1.He shall execute a bond in the sum of  Rs.50,000\/-  (Rupees  Fifty  Thousand<br \/>\nonly)  with  two  sureties  for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the Trial<br \/>\nCourt.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.He shall not in any way tamper with the evidence or  try  to  influence  the<br \/>\nwitnesses.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.He shall not address any public meeting during the pendency of the trial.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.If he holds passport, he shall deposit the same with the trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.He shall not in any manner keep any connection with the banned organisations<br \/>\nlike LTTE during the pendency of the trial.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.He  shall  also  attend  all  the  hearings before the trial Court regularly<br \/>\nwithout impeding the progress of the trial.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.Lastly, he shall desist from giving any  interview  to  any  mediaaudio  and<br \/>\nvideo-or by issuing any press statement, etc.<\/p>\n<p>        5.  With the above observations, the criminal appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>KST<\/p>\n<p>To<\/p>\n<p>1.Special Judge,<br \/>\nSpecial Court under the Prevention of Terrorism Act,<br \/>\nPoonamallee.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.Deputy Superintendent<br \/>\nQ Branch, CID, Chennai-5<br \/>\n(Central Crime Branch X<br \/>\nCr.No.298\/2002).\n<\/p>\n<p>3.The Public Prosecutor<br \/>\nHigh Court, Madras.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18\/03\/2004 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.SIRPURKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE F.M.IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Criminal Appeal No.310 of 2004 Shahul Hammeed &#8230; Appellant -Vs- State represented by Deputy Superintendent Q Branch, CID, Chennai-5 (Central Crime [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-07T06:43:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-07T06:43:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\"},\"wordCount\":560,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\",\"name\":\"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-07T06:43:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2004-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-07T06:43:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004","datePublished":"2004-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-07T06:43:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004"},"wordCount":560,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004","name":"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-07T06:43:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shahul-hammeed-vs-state-represented-by-on-18-march-2004#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shahul Hammeed vs State Represented By on 18 March, 2004"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236554\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}