{"id":236815,"date":"2009-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009"},"modified":"2018-07-05T17:25:43","modified_gmt":"2018-07-05T11:55:43","slug":"ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
MFA 1:599\/2005
\nC:\/w MFA 3137\/2006<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 0%’ KARNATAKA_….__ ‘
\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAB  k  <\/p>\n
DATED THiS THE 29TH EAY QR qANuAr<*Y- ;i::Qo'9{ 4- _ _: "  <\/p>\n
BEFORE .__
\nTHE HC}N"BLE MR;JL:_S?1C'\u00a7-3,B.s,PArriL;   1.<\/p>\n
m.1r.A.no.n59\u00a7g  3 <2:    <\/p>\n
m.F._4\u00a2u’\u00a2.32:7i3\u00a7oo5\u00a7’mc;\n<\/p>\n
In M.F.A.No. 1 1i59\u00a7’;v:2_.e0s\u00a7’%’ ”<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:     '\n\nms.  % A\nRepmscV:ntcd'br3fi.ts  ' \nAdminisna3ive.O\ufb01i\u00a2a:r;A   \nSri Baiju-K.S., -- <    \nS\/0 Sukumaran K;-P;,".  . \nAged 30 yeafs; V'   V '\nHulcki\u00e9\ufb01 \u00a3)istr;ct,.. _ '\n\n '~   rgaluk' "  ..... .. v\n\n\u00a73e1gau1n._ _  ..APPELLAN'I'\n\nA   M.Kha1mur, Adv.)\n\n' % V AND;\n\n  'Mr. I\u00e9mndra\n\n = .S[;'; Mallagxpa Jamani,\n Aged 30 years,\n Ullagaddi-Khanapur Taiuk,\nHukkeri Distxict,\n\ufb01elgaum.\n\n<\/pre>\n
2. NW; indiaA$Sura11cc Co. Ltd.,
\nReprestmtad by its
\nDivisional Manager,<\/p>\n
MFA 11599,\/2005
\ncjw MFA 33772005<\/p>\n
Club Road,
\nBelgaum. ..RESPON9EN’}’S<\/p>\n
(By Sri Basavaraj Kaxeddy, Adv. for R\u00ab~ 1;
\nSri S\ufb01rishaila, Adv. for R-2)<\/p>\n
In M.F.A.No.37′?f20(}6
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
New imlia Assurance Co. Ltd.,  ‘<\/p>\n
iiiivisional D\ufb01ice, Ciub Roa\u00e9, ” ‘<\/p>\n
Belgaum,<\/p>\n
Represented by<\/p>\n
Regional O\ufb01ce,<\/p>\n
Unity Building Annexe,<\/p>\n
P.Kalinga. Rao Road,<\/p>\n
Bangalore – 560 027, H  =  *   <\/p>\n
By its Manager. ‘   ;  . ” QAPPELLANT<\/p>\n
{By Sn: ._ ~ 5<\/p>\n
AND: _ _<\/p>\n
 ”  ;. re\u00a7$;anEd.g~av.%Ma12e\u00a7ppa—-J’amam,<\/p>\n
V ~-\u00abDVixzis.is;;:;~~E,<\/p>\n
Belgamm, awamiing compensatiora of Rs.2,.'{(“i:,41_4ir?
\ndisrec\ufb01ng the appellant herein to pay _.t1:;c*V..vii:ter;c_st “atsf <\/p>\n
Rs.3’?,436[ — out of the coz11pensatio11~amQun_t avV\\7 a1\ufb01r::<iiV."  <\/p>\n
MFA 337\/ 2095 is mad under. Sti'.-':\u20ac\u00e9ti*C$I'.1'rV';""}{)'('.1):'.(l']'?VViv:(:E;\ufb01LCt<\/p>\n
against the judgment and awex\ufb01 dated '2s.1o,2.'99s' pas3ea% in,
\nKPK\/SR-8:29\u20ac}5 on the  of the Ianbom: "\u00ab(_)'ff\u00a7Cf?3\u00a7 amif<\/p>\n
Commissioner for Workmezfs 'C9 1i3pcns3V.ijo_\ufb01, .I'\u00a3\u00a7ubv;Division~\u00a7,
\nBclgaum, awaxding campcnsgtiaig 'Qf R$."2,?1,451\u00a2%\/ \u00ab with
\ninterest. .    "  '  H 'A<\/p>\n
These: appeals are f()I: \u20ac:1{i.i1:n\u00a7iS;f3i0\ufb02, this day 'she
\nCmxrt delivered 11::-.s_*. fo}1oW~i–:;g.: V '  . '–<\/p>\n
01.   “by the employerdvlj S.P’t1I1j
\nLloyd  claimant Sri Ravin\u00e9ra and the<\/p>\n
New India \ufb01$3i1i’an\u00a7:’$  <\/p>\n
 ‘~   .C0mAA1’iii$–:3i91}\u20acr for Wor1m\u20ac:n’s Compensation,<\/p>\n
   ~-awarded compensation in a sum of<\/p>\n
 the permanent disab\ufb02ity suffered in an<\/p>\n
 acci\u00e9’em{” gag: occurred on 18.05.2004. The injured claimant<\/p>\n
Vv VA “. ,\u00a2,v’AA1tAa Wsgozfasw aged abzmt 30 years was engaged by the appeliant,<\/p>\n
–  a;cp\u20ac>zifiing to him as a censtruction worker ((Goundi work). He<\/p>\n
” .’i#\u00e9.s foun\ufb01 ‘\u00a39 baa earning Rs.3,’?’50\/– per month. He su\ufb01hre\u00e9<\/p>\n
fracture in his lei’: leg when the stone carried by a. vahicitz cm.<\/p>\n
MFA M599} 2005
\nC\/W MFA 33′?’\/2006<\/p>\n
the Pu11e-Bangaicrem road Wham the work was b<:.1l.f1_li3'_\u00bbltll:i_:):::.'aljq;::vV'u*t.11<\/p>\n
on his leg. He was admitted to K.L.E. Hospital  'A V' <\/p>\n
03. The claimant moved the <\/p>\n
Compensation claiming compehaa-atio;:1V.l’ a’}’lie  ;<\/p>\n
himself am} the doctor. T132:    iujuzies
\nsuffered inflicted 25%  lllll\u00e9wever, the
\nCommisgioner up\ufb01n appVxf::({:’1’lat;ili\u00a7:1_ilb   on record,
\nhath Oral and  ”  the ciaimaxzt had
\nsu\ufb01bxrcd     extent of 50%. The
\nincome  \u00e9s.3,’?50\/ ~–. Having regard
\nto his    apglying the I’Cl\u20ac’V8Lt’1t factor,<\/p>\n
c0mpe3;t_satic\u00a7i:ui1i a VsV=1ni’vof”Rlls.2,33,978\/– along with interest at<\/p>\n
 *  \u00a7\u00e9im—-~c\ufb01ect from the date of expiry of 39 days<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i  accident is awardcgi. Thus, a total sum of<\/p>\n
  :z;:3.aiI1 cantemion of the leammd Counsel for the<\/p>\n
VA  j2\u00a7p}\u00bb’\ufb01ll:\u00a7\u00e9ix:t\u00bbemp1oycr is that there was no relationship of<\/p>\n
  .l gxgiployer and employee and the Commissirmer committed an<\/p>\n
 error in recaxdirxg a \ufb01nding in {hat regard. ii is next ccmtended<\/p>\n
by him that the quantum of compensation awarded in a sum<\/p>\n
of Rs.2,33,9?’8\/- by taking 50% less of earning capacity is<\/p>\n
%\/.\n<\/p>\n
MFA M599\/’E005<\/p>\n
C\/W MFA 33?\/2005<\/p>\n
illegal. It is his further contention that the amceum: taken as
\nwages in a sum of Rs.3,?50\/- per month is <\/p>\n
from the evidence on record.\n<\/p>\n
05. Cennected appeal hearing M.\u00a75′;A;?\u00a3–o,3L?=_f?’\/  u b<\/p>\n
the insurance company. Apart   <\/p>\n
\ufb01nding neconded by the ‘V V’ T’  the-‘<\/p>\n
reiationship of employer and emylcyeeis u\ufb01sustaiizabie, the
\ninsurance company has   Commissioner was<\/p>\n
in ermr in not fasimzing  .fhe\ufb01’i’i1:su1*ance ccmpany<\/p>\n
as the   ::}j;jef}t\u00a2.’.'”1’13e’.c:i\u00bbi5i11y to engineers both semir
\nskilled ,e6.xei&ed1y the claimant was engaged<\/p>\n
as 9. ce\ufb01s\ufb02uetioix werker {<'3bs.1ndi).<\/p>\n
 V'   I3;ave"e–h eaxd'V fhe"1ea1'I:ed Counsel for the parties.<\/p>\n
\u20ac17,  questions that fall for consideration in<\/p>\n
_ these" apgjeal\ufb01are,<\/p>\n
 AA  (i}"" .. whether the findings recarded regarding the<\/p>\n
relationship between Pun} Llyod Ltd, and
\nthe efaimam' as employer and empfaryee is
\niiiegcu' and unsupparfable \ufb01om the em\ufb01ence<\/p>\n
on reward?\n<\/p>\n
MFA 1\u00a75\u00a7*9\/T2005
\nC\/W MFA 337’\/2006
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
(ii) “wfeeiher the order passed by the
\nCommfssfoner fastening the liability on thef<\/p>\n
insurance company w sustainable?<\/p>\n
(iii) whether the 1033 0fear71\u00a7ng capacity fa\u00a7I};\u00e9\ufb02”\u00bb\u00e9?,i  –1-
\n50% is illegal?\n<\/p>\n
()8. In so far as the mia\ufb01onskip :0f . fiz\ufb01zpiojr\u00e9r\u00e9’  <\/p>\n
amployee is concerned, {he Comazissi\u00e9n\u00e9i upc\u00bb:1″c\u00a2n4side1fa\u00a7;on”L.<\/p>\n
of the evidancc on record has    of the
\norder that the evidenc;;.”‘~z>f    he has
\ndisciosed the namgs of  ths fact that it
\nwas  ‘i3 \u00a711*$s\ufb01u1*a.m”%cngaged by the employer
\nwho  mm’ in   Belgaum for treatxnent having<\/p>\n
not been \u00e9tizallengizd Vth\u00e9:\u20ac\u00a7I.’L’was no reason to disbeiieve the<\/p>\n
 _ versicx\ufb01i u<)f~*:he  The Commissionar has also held that<\/p>\n
  '\u00abd:a;e7fags produced to ShOW that such an \u00e9tmployee<\/p>\n
was” \u00a3_s3tx the clate of accident. It is tso be noticed<\/p>\n
V V’ _ her6″.*i:hat._if  the claimant was not engaged as an tizmployec<\/p>\n
” N ”   the afJ’}:1;\u20ac:1}ant~Company, it coulci have certainfiy astabiisheci<\/p>\n
  ‘saine by pmducing the wage register and tha muster mil.<\/p>\n
  Th\u00e9 appeI1ant–Compaay being a construction company<\/p>\n
” V engaging severa} workers, it caught to have maintained, in the<\/p>\n
normal course of its businegs, the details of employ\ufb01es who<\/p>\n
%_.\n<\/p>\n
 _ A_Q13ine_\u20acii~t1\u00a7.r;1;t the C<\/p>\n
MFA H599\/200$
\nC\/W MFA 337\/2806<\/p>\n
were engaged by it. Failure to produce the same p1’C}Vi\u00a3i6S room
\nfor an adverse inference against the empioyer.  The<\/p>\n
Commissioner was right and justi\ufb01ed in };1o1<ii11g\\:1;e<\/p>\n
version of the ciaimant regarding the 1ie1ationsh2'\u00a7}:"0f  <\/p>\n
and employee desexves to be be1ieved;.\u00bbAwFo'r    x<\/p>\n
has to be helci that the \ufb01nding I\u00b0eeof:1ec1'_'_by'V<\/p>\n
holding that the claimant Wasijefaztglingi    L'<\/p>\n
for his work as a cons11uctio11___j\u00a7\u00e9rcn;'ker  \u00abdCS\u20acIf{7CS to be
\naccepted. The CommisSio.i1er'–wa:S 'v2fI'l'(3t: in recording<\/p>\n
such a \ufb01nding in 'me ab$\u20ac\ufb01CC::OfV i)I'()d1iC\u20acd by the<\/p>\n
employeritoivtheeV5<;o11\ufb01fei1\u00a7f'  of wage register or other
\nsuch     2<\/p>\n
09.   the.  of disability, the doctor has<\/p>\n
 * wet’ had su\ufb01emd 25% disabiiizy in the 1.211<\/p>\n
Valegi oiniaccouiiixofthe \ufb01acmre, whereas the Commissioner has<\/p>\n
aecesised  of earning capacity at 50%. The approach<\/p>\n
Ua;:1opte\u00ab:i thyhv ‘the Commissioner in this regaiti, as rightly<\/p>\n
AV ” jengieadea by the learned Counsel for the appeliants in both<\/p>\n
 M Cases is not based on any acceptable evidence.<\/p>\n
“‘}f’}:ierefoI’e, the matter requires I’6~COIlSi(iCI’a\ufb01OI1 by the<\/p>\n
Commissioner on this aspect. But the fact remains that the<\/p>\n
 1<\/span><\/p>\n
MFA 11599\/12005
\nC\/W MFA 3377\/2096
\n9<\/span><\/p>\n
the matter. He has persuaded himself to fasten the iiab-iiity on
\nthe insurance cempany without examining this ._:in<\/p>\n
detail.\n<\/p>\n
13. in a connected matter  <\/p>\n
Where the same question arose arid  T resecct’ (if s <\/p>\n
policy where szimiiar expressioxi slat ‘sea .  <\/p>\n
engineers was used, this Court *t11e ortier passes
\nby the Commissioner V  ‘ An=,m::\u00a712vde\u00a3\u00a5.ii matter for fresh
\nconsideration. In that vvieaxhz iafi  “even this \ufb01nding
\nwhich is zeco\ufb01ied  \ufb01\ufb02gi’-aciimmi. V.  Vre\u00e9guires to he set aside
\nand  __ to-i I\u00a52*C0\ufb02Sid6I’ the matter after<\/p>\n
pmvidhighfresh \u00a7p}wei~ii:n.ii3<.ti5"sn the parties.<\/p>\n
 V. &_ 12.  Kin:   as"'the___I}=.-zyment of interest is concerned, as per<\/p>\n
 ~ judgment the Apex Court in the case of National<\/p>\n
 Limited Vs. atuaasir Ahmad 65 Another<\/p>\n
V L rei\u00bb}<ii*tedv'–:V:i:\u00a71';\u00a7;tR 2007 sc 1203, interest is payable in case of<\/p>\n
  injuries from the date of award. The question<\/p>\n
  'Whether it is the liability of the emyioyer to pay the interest or<\/p>\n
   insurance company Will be liable to reimburse the same is<\/p>\n
V to he detexmined by the Commissioner after providing fair<\/p>\n
eppominity to both the parties. No Opinion is expressed an<\/p>\n
by<\/p>\n
MFA 12599\/2005
\nC\/W MFA 33'?\/2006
\n10<\/span><\/p>\n
this aspect in these appeals, So \ufb02ar as the compensatipn new<\/p>\n
orciemd is be paid by this _\u00a7udgment, the claima,t:t.”:~.V\u00a7ft\ufb02._vbe<\/p>\n
entitled to receive interest at 129\/: from the tlateit\u00e9t’  \u00a2rd_;\u00e9r_<\/p>\n
passed by the Commissicne: via,  batfact’ * . <\/p>\n
iii} the: dtposit is made.\n<\/p>\n
13. In the result and for thts\ufb01fozegohihng,   V<\/p>\n
a11(}W\u20ac:{i in part. The matter is -\ufb01at iii\u00e9\ufb01ix-..cv;n-isideration
\nto the Commissicner.  i\u00e9x to withdraw a<\/p>\n
sum of R$.1,1?,{){}Cg[ \u00ab fmtti’   deposited before<\/p>\n
this  deposit shall be invested<\/p>\n
in \ufb01xe\u00e9  andt  the 011181″ of the Commissioner.<\/p>\n
14. ” 4_\u00a7’:}”l1e. Com\ufb01ii\ufb01sibnetf is directed to dispose of the claim as<\/p>\n
 V\u00a7\u00e9x;’r\u00a2t:1itit$’ttsE3fA’a.s possible, at any rate within a period of fovur<\/p>\n
A  tlate of receipt f a copy of thia judgment.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Tmlge<\/p>\n
.’  K351′  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil MFA 1:599\/2005 C:\/w MFA 3137\/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT 0%’ KARNATAKA_….__ ‘ CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAB k DATED THiS THE 29TH EAY QR qANuAr<*Y- ;i::Qo'9{ 4- _ _: " BEFORE .__ THE HC}N"BLE MR;JL:_S?1C'\u00a7-3,B.s,PArriL; 1. m.1r.A.no.n59\u00a7g 3 <2: m.F._4\u00a2u’\u00a2.32:7i3\u00a7oo5\u00a7’mc; In […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-05T11:55:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-05T11:55:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1550,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\",\"name\":\"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-05T11:55:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-05T11:55:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-05T11:55:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009"},"wordCount":1550,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009","name":"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-05T11:55:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-punjllyod-ltd-vs-ms-ravindra-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Punjllyod Ltd vs M\/S Ravindra on 29 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236815\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}