{"id":237326,"date":"2008-07-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008"},"modified":"2018-06-09T18:53:40","modified_gmt":"2018-06-09T13:23:40","slug":"state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT 01:' KARNATAKA  \n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARG\ufb01\u00bb_.*'  '  K  v \n\nDATED mis THE 22% DAYWQF JLEI;1\"2:i):tf}8\"\"':: 4- _ _: \"  \n\nBEF0R_r.\u00ab'}.__ % Q\nTHE HON'BLE MR;JL3.STI(\u00a7E,_f\u00a7'.ANA3fi}'\u00a3;   %\nCRIMINAL APPEA1?N\u00e9}S53 6%'  \nBETWEEN:   _     \n\nState By D{2p11tyA.SupcI*i1:a.t\u00a2:1.;1d;*:1;'L:'\u00a3V   \nBasavana Bage.wjg1d,i Stzgb-E)i$\u00e9siqn;..VL'*,__ '  ' ...Appel]ant\n\n(By  Des.\u00e9i,'---Add1;'S\u00a7'E5)\n\n1.   Hugar\n\n    Hugar\n\n '    Hagar\n\n.    Ramaha' gappa Hagar\n\n'V 5. z  Basappa Hagar\n\n ., 6:\u00bb Vlv\u00e9aju Biddappa Hagar\n\n  Parasappa Sakreppa Hagar\n\n\n\n8. Chandrappa Ramaiingappa Hugar\n\nAll are major\n\nR] 0. Kudarisalavadagi,\n\nBasavana Bagcwadi Taluk    ' \u00e9 '\nBijapur District.    ...Respbn\u00a7;e1its_'  \n\n(By 813'. Ashok Haranahalli Associat\u00e9s, Aidv-\ufb01ca1tes)~     '\n\nThis appeal is filed und\u00e9f\"---gecti\ufb01nv. \u00e97s(1;v', 8g?..1g3;._,.cx:\u00a31=&gt;.c.,ff\n\npraying to grant leave to \ufb01le an ap\u00a7;c\u00e9tI,against. the _i1;_E(i\u00a77{}6nt dated\n09.19.2006 in Sp}. Case No.21\/2'G(_)':3, on thsy file of II Add}.\nSessions 8s Specials. Judge\" ~. Eat  Bijapur, \/acquitting\nrespondents \/ accused for .913?-.nce.\u00e9s puriiehable under sections 143,<\/pre>\n<p>147, 324, 323 r\/W 149 [PC &amp;ndL_sc%&lt;:ivion&#039;3(3\u00bb)(x}_of the Scheduled<br \/>\nCastes and Scheduled Tzibes {_Pre:veriticnV of&#8211;.}\u00a7t__r_r\u00a7cities) Act, 1989<br \/>\nand etc.    *  &quot; .  I .\n<\/p>\n<p>Tixis;  c\u20ac:i1ningVV\u00bb\u00e9n__farfadmission, this day, the Court<br \/>\ndeiivere\ufb02 &#8216;the-_ i&#8217;oi1owi3fig;~    &#8216;<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; &#8216;s\u00a7J&#8217;DGMENT<\/p>\n<p>   pas\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb01gntsl accused were tried and acquitted. of<\/p>\n<p>A \u00a7\ufb01&#8221;cnces,&#8217;pu;a;\u00a7s2aab1e under sections 143, 147, 323, 324 r\/W<\/p>\n<p>H   for an o\ufb01encc punishable under section<\/p>\n<p>3(:}(x) &#8220;*\u00a7r'{he Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes<\/p>\n<p>  (?rej9*e\ufb01fion of Atmcities) Act, 1989 in Special Case<\/p>\n<p>2342005, on the \ufb01le of :1 Add}. Sessions Judge at Bijapur.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   Thcrcfom, State has prcfcmed this appeal. :<br \/>\nom.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2. i have heard Add}. State Public Prosecutor fp&#8217;\ufb01T_Staa1te.<br \/>\nI have been taken thmugh evidence  %<\/p>\n<p>judgcxcnt.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. In brief, case of prosccu\ufb01xigg  V-V &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>The prosecution witnesseg     L.\n<\/p>\n<p>to Scheduled Caste. They axe&#8221;\u00a3e\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2e;;ts<br \/>\nvillage, Within the   Ba\ufb01g\u00e9w\u00e9di Police<br \/>\nSta\ufb01on. During  some time<\/p>\n<p>prior  &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;   3 had supported the<br \/>\n  and he was the<\/p>\n<p>succcssfui  accused were in the opposite<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;_  :t\u00a71jicr\u00a7:fo:;\u00a2,&#8221;*th\u00a2r\u00a2vWas enmity bctwccazz PW:-3 1 to 4 and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>H 2   at about 5 p.1n., PW} was in from of<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;V thekizqii\ufb01g bf; Halappa Waddar. Accused 1 to 8 formed into an<\/p>\n<p>   assembly with the common object of asaaulting and<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;i;3;1i:\u00a3:\ufb01&#8217;1:ion,aJ1y insulting PW1. In furtherance of such common<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;bTbje-ct, accnsecl 1 to 8 abused PW1 in \ufb01lthy language,<\/p>\n<p>accused. 1, 4 and 6 draggad PW1 up t0 Birappa temple, while<br \/>\n(U;\n<\/p>\n<p>other accused \ufb01stcd \u00a5&#8221;W1. On seeing the<br \/>\nNingappa Chandramappa Waddam, the father _{:\u00a7&#8217;i&#8221;P&#8221;.-if _<br \/>\nand rescued PW}. The accused abuseci  &#8216;*b.1;1&#8217;f:-.<br \/>\nname of his caste to insult him<br \/>\nwas lodged against accused.V,Af\ufb01er i41\u00ab1vt_:\u00a7 3tiga.1:icV&gt;.*.3.V&#8211;,  ..<\/p>\n<p>was filed against accused I   V&#8217;\n<\/p>\n<p>4. On behalf    7 were<br \/>\nexamined. The  i\ufb01rosecution were<\/p>\n<p>marked&#8217;    znatexial objects were<br \/>\nmarked _ as &#8220;B\/\u00a7;&#8217;-53;   V&#8217;   &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>5.  is  judgment of acquittal. This<\/p>\n<p>    the judgment of acquittal, if there<\/p>\n<p>    Compeiiing reasons.\n<\/p>\n<p>  fnom evidence of PWS I to 4, occurrence<\/p>\n<p>   tin fmnt of the house of Hulagappa Wa\u00e9dar.<\/p>\n<p> V\u00bb  contents of spot mahazar and mugh sketch would<\/p>\n<p> ..   1;:x\u00bb)::.a1 occurrence took place on a public road near Birappa<\/p>\n<p>temple. Them is no satisfactoxy explanation ~<\/p>\n<p>discxtpancy reiating to place of occurrence.<\/p>\n<p>7. PW9. 1 to 4 have consisteutky  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>dragged by accused to Birappa   <\/p>\n<p>assaulted PW1 with stones a;:gid_a1s&lt;A$&quot; \ufb01stec\ufb01 h\ufb01ii\u00a7V&quot;&#039;E{V0&#039;~i\u00e9evcr,&quot;V <\/p>\n<p>prosecution has not  who  treated<br \/>\nPW1. The Wound    reveal PW1<\/p>\n<p>had not su\ufb01&#039;erec_l&#039;a;1y  V<\/p>\n<p>   to 4, oecmmnce took place<br \/>\nat about.39.m.,..&#039;51;%.&#039;A23&#039;.&#039;a\u00a73;2695 in Kudaxisaxavaczagj v1}&#039;iage,<\/p>\n<p>whirgh\u00bb is atk  15 lms from Basavana Bagcwadi<\/p>\n<p>.   E&#039; &#039;3?3\ufb0101l-  a complaint at 3.30 pm. on<\/p>\n<p>   v&quot;T~%I:&#039;1;e1\\2 is no satisfactory explanation for<\/p>\n<p>B\u00e9l\ufb01iedly.  complaint. On the other hand, PW}. has<\/p>\n<p> depoz\u00e9ctfhe had lodged the complaint a\ufb01er deliberations with<\/p>\n<p> eth\u00e9r villagers.\n<\/p>\n<p>PW 1 has deposed all the accused had assaulted him<\/p>\n<p>with stories. However, PWS 3 6:. 4 have deposed about<\/p>\n<p>IV\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>presence of accused 4 and 6. PWS 2 8:. 3 have admiti\u00a7:\u00a7iT.\u00a7hat<\/p>\n<p>there was a petty quarrel between relative of _<\/p>\n<p>accused No.6.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Due to non&#8211;e.xamination &#8216;of  <\/p>\n<p>injuries in the Wound  \u00e9asgf: ef that V L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>PW 1 was assauited by  Lbe\n<\/p>\n<p>10. There is no  ztgaxtiing abuses<\/p>\n<p>uttered by acgzusigc\u00e9 &#8216;&lt;&#039;)&#039;1:\u00a7t  taste of PW1 with<\/p>\n<p>an m=;~cn\ufb01o\u00a7&quot;5ng;a1t hi;n.i11 public view. PWS 1 8:. 3 have<br \/>\ndeposeci     abused PW1 in from of the<\/p>\n<p>hougsc qf  W\u00e9dciar by taking out the name of his<\/p>\n<p>.  &quot; \u00a7;\u00e9~$! \u00a7\u00a7. E\ufb01mafcycr, PW4&#039; has deposed accused No.1 abused PW}<\/p>\n<p>  ib.)_7-   of his caste. Even there is discrepancy<\/p>\n<p>  uttered by accused.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  PW} has deposed accused abused him by uttering<\/p>\n<p>  sale maganc ninn% suttu bidutteve&#8217;. Contrary<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;   this, PW-4 has deposed accused No.1 alone abused PW1 by<\/p>\n<p>taking the name of his caste. Even otherwise, PWS 1 to 4<br \/>\nN.\n<\/p>\n<p>have not deposed that accused abused PW1  an<\/p>\n<p>intentzion to insult him Within public vision.<\/p>\n<p>12. The prosecution has nofg cx}a1n_ineci.:w. b <\/p>\n<p>witnesses. The entire investigatidn was\u00a7done. by  S13hA~<\/p>\n<p>inspector of Poiice. However; the Dep\ufb01iy  of ;<\/p>\n<p>Poiice has subscribed his sf\ufb01ustaxes   ifiyes\ufb01ga\ufb01on<br \/>\npapers. The manner &#8216;vis not&#8221;  The<br \/>\nlearned sessions Judge  -&#8216;agspii\u00e9eifi\ufb01on of evidence<\/p>\n<p>has   }ight&#8221;*&#8211;eo\ufb01ciusicns. 011 reappiveciation of<br \/>\nevideszlmt,  has fa1le&#8217; d to prove charges<\/p>\n<p>framed  aeedsed; .\n<\/p>\n<p>   do not \ufb01nd any grounds to inteifere<\/p>\n<p>    judgment of acquittal. For these reasons,<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>3&#8243;&#8221; Iudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH COURT 01:&#8217; KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARG\ufb01\u00bb_.*&#8217; &#8216; K v DATED mis THE 22% DAYWQF JLEI;1&#8243;2:i):tf}8&#8243;&#8221;&#8216;:: 4- _ _: &#8221; BEF0R_r.\u00ab&#8217;}.__ % Q THE HON&#8217;BLE MR;JL3.STI(\u00a7E,_f\u00a7&#8217;.ANA3fi}&#8217;\u00a3; % CRIMINAL APPEA1?N\u00e9}S53 6%&#8217; BETWEEN: _ State By D{2p11tyA.SupcI*i1:a.t\u00a2:1.;1d;*:1;&#8217;L:&#8217;\u00a3V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-237326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-09T13:23:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-09T13:23:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":766,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\",\"name\":\"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-09T13:23:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-09T13:23:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-09T13:23:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008"},"wordCount":766,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008","name":"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-09T13:23:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-deputy-superintendent-vs-sakrappa-ramalingappa-hugar-on-22-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Deputy Superintendent vs Sakrappa Ramalingappa Hugar on 22 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237326"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237326\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}