{"id":237377,"date":"2009-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2"},"modified":"2015-05-10T16:46:07","modified_gmt":"2015-05-10T11:16:07","slug":"vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                                     1\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                     CHANDIGARH\n\n                         Crl. Misc. No. 32817--M of 2008\n                         Date of Decision: 13.7.2009\n                                     ***\nRajneesh Kumar\n                                                      .. Petitioner.\n            Vs.\n\nState of Punjab &amp; Anr.\n                                                      .. Respondents.\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR,\n\nPresent:-   Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate\n            for the petitioner.\n\n            Mr. B.S. Sra, Addl. A.G. Punjab.\n\n            Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate\n            for respondent No.2.\n            ***\n\nARVIND KUMAR, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>            The petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 142 dated<br \/>\n6.10.2002, registered under Sections 409, 420, 506 IPC, at Police Station<br \/>\nDivision No.3, Jalandhar, Punjab on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-\n<\/p>\n<p>2) entered between the parties<br \/>\n            The impugned FIR was got lodged by respondent No.2 against<br \/>\nthe petitioner and it has been contended that now with the intervention of<br \/>\nrespectables, both the parties have settled their dispute and the complainant<br \/>\nhas decided not to pursue the impugned FIR registered against the<br \/>\npetitioner. Compromise (Annexure P-2) has also been placed on record. As<br \/>\nper compromise the dispute pending between the parties have been resolved<br \/>\namicably by making the due payment. Learned counsel for the petitioner has<br \/>\npointed out that against one of the co-accused namely Vinay Jallandhari the<br \/>\nimpugned FIR has already been quashed by this Court vide order dated<br \/>\n26.5.2008 (Annexure P-3), on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).\n<\/p>\n<p>            The attorney namely Manjeet Singh of the complainant-<br \/>\nrespondent No.2 has put in appearance through counsel and placed on<br \/>\nrecord the attested copy of the power of attorney. He has also filed an<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>affidavit admitting the factum of the compromise having entered between<br \/>\nthe parties and no objection for quashing of the impugned FIR.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In the reply filed on behalf of State although quashing has been<br \/>\nopposed, but by now it is fully settled that the High Court in exercise of<br \/>\ninherent powers can quash the proceedings if it finds that allowing of any<br \/>\nsuch proceedings to continue would be an abuse of process of the Court or<br \/>\nthat ends of justice require that the proceedings be quashed. In the case of<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/doc\/548497\/\">State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswami, AIR<\/a> 1977 SC 1489, the Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\nSupreme Court has observed that the ends of justice are higher than ends of<br \/>\nmere law, though justice has got to be administered according to the laws<br \/>\nmade by the legislature yet the Court proceeding ought not to be permitted<br \/>\nto degenerate into a weapon of harassment or persecution.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In the case of <a href=\"\/doc\/297418\/\">Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney v. Mrs. Kaushalya<br \/>\nand others<\/a> 1980(1) SCC 63, the essence of compromise has been summed<br \/>\nup in following words:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                  &#8221; The finest hour of justice arrives propitiously when<br \/>\n                  parties, despite falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave<br \/>\n                  a sense of fellowship of reunion.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            The Larger Bench of this Court in the case of Kulvinder Singh<br \/>\n&amp; Ors. Vs. State of Punjab &amp; Anr. 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, while<br \/>\ndiscussing the scope of quashing of prosecution on the basis of compromise,<br \/>\nby this Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even in non-<br \/>\ncompoundable offence(s) has held as under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                  &#8220;28.    The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine<br \/>\n                  qua non of harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul<br \/>\n                  of justice and if the power under Section 482 of the<br \/>\n                  Cr.P.C. is used to enhance such a compromise which, in<br \/>\n                  turn, enhances the social amity and reduces friction, then<br \/>\n                  it truly is &#8220;finest hour of justice&#8221;. Disputes which have<br \/>\n                  their genesis in a matrimonial discord, landlord-tenant<br \/>\n                  matters, commercial transactions and other such matters<br \/>\n                  can safely be dealt with by the Court by exercising its<br \/>\n                  powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. in the event of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                  a compromise, but this is not to say that the power is<br \/>\n                  limited to such cases. There can never be any such rigid<br \/>\n                  rule to prescribe the exercise of such power, especially in<br \/>\n                  the absence of any premonitions to forecast and predict<br \/>\n                  eventualities which the cause of justice may throw up<br \/>\n                  during the course of a litigation.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                  29.      The only inevitable conclusion from the above<br \/>\n                  discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the<br \/>\n                  Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court<br \/>\n                  under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to<br \/>\n                  matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide<br \/>\n                  power     to   quash   the   proceedings     even   in   non-<br \/>\n                  compoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under<br \/>\n                  Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in order to prevent the abuse<br \/>\n                  of law and to secure the ends of justice.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            In the instant case, as emerges from record, the parties have<br \/>\nmutually settled their dispute and have put to rest their litigation and the<br \/>\ncomplainant, the star witness of the prosecution has since decided to<br \/>\nwithdraw from the prosecution, this Court is of the considered view that<br \/>\ncontinuance of such a prosecution is nothing but an exercise in futility and<br \/>\nsheer wastage of time of Court. Therefore, considering the aspect of<br \/>\nsettlement having arrived at between the parties, it is a fit case where<br \/>\ninterference of this Court in exercise of its inherent powers under Section<br \/>\n482 Cr.P.C. is made out.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Therefore, in view of the discussion above, the instant petition<br \/>\nis allowed. Consequently, impugned FIR registered against the petitioner<br \/>\nand all other subsequent proceedings therein are quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       (ARVIND KUMAR)<br \/>\n                                                              JUDGE<br \/>\nJuly 13,2009<br \/>\nJiten\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court *** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. 32817&#8211;M of 2008 Date of Decision: 13.7.2009 *** Rajneesh Kumar .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab &amp; Anr. .. Respondents. CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-237377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-10T11:16:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-10T11:16:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":821,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\",\"name\":\"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-10T11:16:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-10T11:16:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-10T11:16:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2"},"wordCount":821,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2","name":"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-10T11:16:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-state-of-punjab-anr-on-13-july-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"*** vs State Of Punjab &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237377"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237377\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}