{"id":237989,"date":"2009-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009"},"modified":"2014-02-17T22:23:04","modified_gmt":"2014-02-17T16:53:04","slug":"badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n<pre>IN TEIE HIGH C{}Ui~?T OF' KARNEEFAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED '\"E'I:i\u00a7S ma 18TH DAY 01:' NovEM8'g:\u00e9\u00a7;2'G:)'\u00a7;: *' \n\nBEFORE  \u00bb\n\nTHE m:&gt;N'BLE MR. JUSTICE} :31. N.:%'?AY;?&amp;N;\u00e9A.'SW}\u00a5\u00a7$iY&amp; \n\ncmmml. PE.'g:I_:r1oN isrpg' ':929;\"2\u00a7:\u00a7)9 \nBETWEEN:   \" V' I V\n\n1. BAQAL   5   \n:3\/0. PYFAMBAR NAVAL\u00a7_\u00a7B':;A.R,    _\nAGE. 47 YEARS, \"  '   \nace. GO'_fii__SERVAN'Ii. _ _ _ \nR\/G. safamsn mc;A;2,  A ' \nTQ. HUEiLI;I .'. = __    .\nms? DirIk\u00a7RW;%.D.\"'-f','i  \n\n2. SAWAN _ _ .  \nV _ 5\/ 0. ';9:TA}.a:BA\u00a3\u00e9v.NAvALEI&lt;A;?,\n AGE. 49&quot;\u20acE:A12s,,\n r:;:(;;\u00bb%. QoVr.\":5;ERvAN'1',\n R;'.Q..{}ANDHINAGAR,\n\"V _ 'mg. az+\"z:1Isf:*. GADAG. . ., P-E:'m':\u00a3&gt;NE12\n\n\"  (Bf{\u00a7;_2_:.}' 33. PATEL, ADV.)\n\nAm .. \"\n\nA' ' 4.\/rag S'I\"A'l\"'E or KARNATAKA\n\n    ..=R:a:P;2EsE:NTED BY SPP,\n\nHEGH CGUR7' OF' KA.RNA'I'AKA,\nAT. BHARWAQ.\n RESP\u00a3}NDENT'\n\n{By SRI. K. QMPKUMAR, H.C.G.P.)\n\n*\n<\/pre>\n<p>THIS Cf~?L.P. ES E&#8217;iL-EED \u00a3\u00a7f\\\u00e9E)ER SE&#8217;:CTE(i)i\\E ;:3.:_a?\u00a7;;\u00bb.\u00bb%;*:&#8217;5\u00e9i\u00a7&gt;.&#8221;::&#8221;:.,<\/p>\n<p>BE&#8217; &#8216;\u00a7&#8217;HE ADVC}*f3A&#8217;FE&#8217;; FOR THE PE\u00a7TfTI\u20ac}NE\u00a7R  \u00a5:=&#8217;I[&#8216;~\u00a7i&#8217;g2&#8217;%..\u00a7i2{3;.E*Z <\/p>\n<p>THE PE&#8217;;&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;I&#8217;f&#8217;IO?~E\u00a3iiRS EN \u00a5&#8217;*J\u00a7&#8217;PPAf&#8217;~Ii RS. CRIME N43. &#8216;3F&#8217;r(}]2G&#8221;C?9<\/p>\n<p>UN RE3GUi,J&amp;f\u00a7? BAIL F&#8217;Ol3&#8242;&lt;&#039;3 THE \u20ac:}EE?_ENC_E\u00a7S&#039;&quot;{3I}&#039;NE&#039;;\u00a7HAB\u00a3;E\u00a7&#039; &#039;<\/p>\n<p>Lrgsgc. 395 cm 1. EH13.\n<\/p>\n<p>T}\u00abIiS CRLP. IS COMING ms i1~&#8221;01\u00a7#2&#8211;._&lt;_:\u00a52r;);\u00a7:r;*s&quot;;A&#039;&quot;r:\u00ab&#039;i:S=&#8211;&#039;Ijm*,&#039;*VV%<\/p>\n<p>&#039;\u00a7&#039;\u00a7&#039;{ E3 CO1} RT MADE: TH 3 F0 ENCEV.\n<\/p>\n<p>O R 17) &#8216;r:: R <\/p>\n<p>This petition  VA (\u00a333.66,   439 Cr.P.\u20ac3. for<br \/>\nctzlargeme\ufb01t 0I3._ bai1.   has appr0a(:h&lt;:e:i<br \/>\nthe S{=;3sio__n:s a*;t :3;::g;;u;n  Cri&#039;.WI\\\/Iisc. Ne. &quot;F21\/2909<br \/>\nand tbfr cou\ufb01 ifs  did. 03,308] 2909 dismisgtici the<br \/>\ncast: Gf \u20act&#039;:$_  ~  the petitionar pmfermd this<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7}\u20ac\u00a7i_\ufb01{\u00a7I3&quot;fO\u00a5 ih\u00e9  Itji\u00e9f.\n<\/p>\n<p> . &#8220;rF\u00a7i\u20ac5&#8217;C0\ufb02f\ufb02\ufb01&#8217;\ufb01HGI1 of 15311166 (3Q11{1Sf3I fer the petitiemzrs<\/p>\n<p>  V&#8217;V{37:;_ai.V N05 1 and 12 are the Govsmment sexva\ufb01ts<\/p>\n<p>:2f:a.e.j%V t}1eV\u00a7\u00b0.\u00a5::1::;i\u00a72r&#8217;eTV not participated in ihfi G\ufb01enca, which is put at<\/p>\n<p> agai117:~:tV__\u00a7LE1em. In the Complai\ufb02t itseif the: complainant: has<\/p>\n<p> iF}.(_}f&#8217;.&#8221; &#8216;5-5&#8217;-t3&#8243;\u00a31Z(i anyihizzg against the peti\ufb01orrmrs. The ziescxiptions<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>najmted in the peiitiarzs am aitegethftr (}ifI3:tI&#8217;\u20acnt.,.ff0\u00a7\u00a73;..V_t11\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>rccov\u00e9ii&#8221;? ma\ufb01a fmm the p\ufb01ftitioners NQY 1 and 13:. \u00a7:i: ; <\/p>\n<p>\u00e9iair: the pvsiiiicners were travellingii\ufb01 \ufb02it?&#8217; \u00ab_s&#8217;a;.mc:&lt;  bt1\u20acV\u00ab&#039;th\u00a2y<\/p>\n<p>siid not Commit. any a\ufb01ence by sna:tCh.&#039;i:1Vg the jgtfxvl\ufb01isu<\/p>\n<p>Cgmpiainant. By mistake {\u00a7m_T::1Ct, T318  aii\u00e9iif\u00e9 fa1=:\u00a7?tii_j&gt;&#8217;. accortlijlg to the<\/p>\n<p>raspondent. is_.f\u00a7\ufb01:a:p n\u00a7:tWLi1a:\u00a7.c  &#8216;the~_\u00a7\u20actitio31ers. Under<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02}$S\u20ac?;:x(Ti1&#8217;C11I\u00a7:Sii4\u00a31Q\u00e9S,&gt;@~tfif.&#8217;};:?\u20ac3.,i\u00a5i#f.)I}n\u20ac:&#8217;I&#8217;S are entiflsd for bail<\/p>\n<p>4; &#8216;V &#8216;&#8221;:&#8211;&#8216;;::;e &#8216;\u00a7.c;f\u00e9:i&#8217;:%;&#8217;13:i&#8221;&#8216;~\u00a7:j_&#8217;kT0%,I\u00bb:i&#8217;r1:11I1:txf1t Pleads: has \ufb02ied ms<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7ta\u00a7\ufb01ZX\u00a7${1\u00a7.&#8221;;f}fV_\u20ac)&gt;i}jf\u00a7\u20ac?f\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9\u00a7\u00a71\u00a3;&#8221;\u00e9\ufb02\u00e9 s\u00e9atrsd ihat am. 83[{)&#8217;?f2Q\u00a3}9 at<\/p>\n<p>   $316 \u00a7\u00e9ti&#8217;z&#8217;;Ez3.i1e1&#8217;s N0. 1 and 2 have Cgmmitisd the<\/p>\n<p>V  .\u20acf\u00a7:&#8221;g i&#8217;};&amp; basiS ef the ~::0mp1ai&#8217;1r1&#8217;\u00a5:, the h1vt:stigai\u00a711g<\/p>\n<p> {3fiiC\u20acm }\u00a7}\u00a7]_&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;\u00a2:::; mitovereti imam {E16 ;}\u20acti.ticmm&#8221;&#8216; Na. 1 ail abmit<\/p>\n<p>Rs,5\u00e9), C}\u00a7_}\ufb01;&#8217;&#8211; Cash, fczmz&#8217; barzlgitss, C3116 Chain, one Tam Same:<\/p>\n<p> xa;1&#8242;:&#8217;Li..&amp;f1&#8242;&lt;3m petiti&lt;)r:\u20ac:r N0? 2 Rs.&#039;?,\u20ac}f}0{&#8211; has been I&#039;\u20ac(3\u20ac}V{&#039;:I&quot;Ei\u20aci<\/p>\n<p> &#039;j\u00a3.1:re&#039;:Amgh pancfhas. In View of that }f&#039;t3{i&#039;{)V\u20aci&#039;1&quot;}&#039; fmm pefitionezrs<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>N0. 1 an\u00e9 2,, it is neediess to say that the <\/p>\n<p>Camznitteii the o\ufb01kfnces. They are net the loca 1_&quot;;3\u00a3:{;;\u00a7i\u00e9&#039;:&#039;   <\/p>\n<p>thtry do not have any pezmanent fr\u00e9isixiencfj   <\/p>\n<p>case if they are enlarg\u00e9d on bai},  he  <\/p>\n<p>the poiics to .&#039;:ElI&#039;I&#039;EiS! the pers0f1s_,&#039;..{L}n:1\u00a3tf 131613; \u00a7?:i;&quot;c5&quot;e.1;ii:2;;2s&#039;tair1ces &#039;V<\/p>\n<p>the prayer made by the }Jetition::r i$s..r\u00e9:q3,1irtt{&#039;i atohfr \ufb01rjecited.<\/p>\n<p>5. I have hsax\ufb02 t}1e&#8221;a1*giim\u20ac;1f$_o:3 .b{&gt;i}1&#8217;si(ies.<\/p>\n<p>8. Frcirii  .i$ .s\u20aci\u00e9n&#8217;Vthat while \u00a3116 persons<br \/>\nwere   ie\ufb01ii\u00e9\u00e9. started tc: quarml with<br \/>\nthe p&lt;:r\u00e9.&#039;o;n 5._ am}.  $31116 the petitioner Na. 1<\/p>\n<p>have snat.ciitr1 t11eVi&#039;:gag;._\\2\u00e9&#039;hZ:rein it Contamczd the jewels. In<\/p>\n<p>&quot; 2 \u00a2_vvi6%I;&#039;:   sam\u20acAA1&quot;iea?.3&#8211;ade a complaint without eveu I&#039;f:f\u20ac:I&#039;I&#039;\u00a7..&#039;{1g<\/p>\n<p> 1e3, i;I&#039;1r: ;3\u00a7\ufb01tiQv3:\u00a7\u00e9:&#039;1*s&#039; name. However, by making this hectic<\/p>\n<p>e\u00a7fo1.:&quot;\u00a5:; t}1\u00e9&#039;  have recovered \u00a3116 Said m\ufb01cles from the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;V peti\ufb014&lt;&#039;3r\u00a7\u20ac%sV.  &#039;i&#039;hough the petitianers state\ufb01 that they are the<\/p>\n<p>i !;}\u00e9\u00abs;t:;::1ment servants, no proef has bfft\ufb01il produced either<\/p>\n<p>.  l3$:f:\u00a7&#039;r\u20acAAt11e Coax&#039;: below or bsfore this Court as it is submitted<\/p>\n<p>~ u bfthe 16::-3137166 Gavemmeni Pleads}? they are not Govemmerit<\/p>\n<p>&quot; servanfs and timy are wcrking in aidtzd in\u00a7\ufb01tufi9n.s, they (10<\/p>\n<p>T<\/p>\n<p>not have any permanent residence here. L\u00a7I1\u20acir:\u00a7&#039;&#8230;__\ufb02\u00e9c_sc:.<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, if they are enlarged on ba:i1,..itV_A4is.Vd}.fi:icu1LTV is ., VV <\/p>\n<p>secure the prtrsezlce. Hence, the \u00a7fdfg&#039;\u00e9f <\/p>\n<p>pctiizioners is hemby 1&#039;ej&lt;:ctsd.  _<\/p>\n<p>In the result, I:&#039;t&quot;:&#039;.titiOil is d.i\u00e9;misseil.&#039;._ V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy IN TEIE HIGH C{}Ui~?T OF&#8217; KARNEEFAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED &#8216;&#8221;E&#8217;I:i\u00a7S ma 18TH DAY 01:&#8217; NovEM8&#8217;g:\u00e9\u00a7;2&#8217;G:)&#8217;\u00a7;: *&#8217; BEFORE \u00bb THE m:&gt;N&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE} :31. N.:%&#8217;?AY;?&amp;N;\u00e9A.&#8217;SW}\u00a5\u00a7$iY&amp; cmmml. PE.&#8217;g:I_:r1oN isrpg&#8217; &#8216;:929;&#8221;2\u00a7:\u00a7)9 BETWEEN: &#8221; V&#8217; I V 1. BAQAL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-237989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-17T16:53:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-17T16:53:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":767,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-17T16:53:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-17T16:53:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-17T16:53:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009"},"wordCount":767,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009","name":"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-17T16:53:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/badal-so-pitambar-navalekar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Badal S\/O Pitambar Navalekar vs State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237989\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}