{"id":238035,"date":"2009-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-02T06:13:43","modified_gmt":"2016-05-02T00:43:43","slug":"basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
1\u00bb: THE HIGH coum' on KARNATAKA AT   \n\nDATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUA}.?I'!..\"2%0(:)\u00a7:>:::  1 A; \"  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUS'I'ICEK..I\u00a7I.   V\n\n.R_.\u00a7.A. No. 43:sM\"o\u00a7'_~;>_o03    \n\n1 BASAVANNA   \ns\/0 LATE MA'D__APPA\"\"' ; %  %  =\n40 ms, R\/o:13HANAGALL1%%v:LmGE\nMYSORE\"TALUK:; N1Y.3..0RE ~ms*r %\n\n(BY sR1:1L1 Q AB-.vocATE )\n\nAND:\n\n  1 Lwmn\ufb01vm\u00e9pg\n\n._ 0% ._Ci-EILLAREVANGADI MADAPPA\nA  T'sI1\u00a7a::E\"~!)'%:\u00e9\u00a7:a:AsED BY ms\n\nH (A) 'GURULINGAPPA\n  3\/9 LATE MAI-IABEVAPPA\n.% \" MAJOR, R\/O NO 2365,\n \"MAD-HWACHAR ROAD\nK 12 MOHALLA, MYSORE\n\n(B) MAHADEVASWAMY\nS] 0 LATE MAHADEVAPPA\nMAJOR, R\/O NO 2365,\nMADHWACHAR ROAD\nK R MOHALLA, MYSORE\n\ng\ufb01ll\n\n\n\n(C) SHIVAKUMAR\ns\/0 LATE MAHADEVAPPA\nMAJOR, R\/O N0 2365,\nMADHWAGHAR ROAD\nK R MOHALLA, MYSORE\n\n(D) NAGALAMBIKA V\nW\/O CHANDRASHEKARX' \u00ab \u00ab_ \nI)\/O LATE MAHADEVAPPA  .. \nMAJOR, R\/O N0 2365,  \nMADI-IWACHAR R0;-iD~.._V '-\nK R MOHALLA, \n\nc\/0 MEHABOOB  _  \nMAJOR, PROPRIETOR,!. V\nG.M.P. CYCLE.     if\n\n2336\/2,.'?'I\ufb01C.I\u00a7QS'S;_\"\"-..,.__ .\nMmHwAcHARRo.w-. \nK 12 MCJHALLA, \n\nMARIYAPFA 1}  \" \n.1yiMoR., R\/3...gI~EOP NO 2386\/1,\n\n f \u00ab, _7TH'\"'CRQ'\u20ac-.3, MADHWACHAR ROAD\n K13 MYSORE - nmsmn\n\nVIBE C.O.\nDT.26.7.04\n\nYELWPA\n\n' AA O\"C\"HILL.ARE ANGADI MADAPPA\n\" V VMAJGR, R\/0 NO 2386,\n ' 'EEADHWACHAR ROAD\n K R MOHALLA, MYSORE.\n\nS12-IANTHAMMA\nD\/O LATE MADAPPA\nw\/0 DYAVANNA \n\n\n\nMAJOR, R] 0 DARIPURA,\nJAIPURA HOBLI\nTALUK AND DIST MYSORE\n\n RESPONDEI\u00a7\u00a5'I'S* \" \n\n(BY SR1 : K s RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, ADvQ\u00a2g\u00a7;giA'M%){  % \"  A'  \n\nRSA FILED U\/S.l0O OF  A(}AiNSfi\"%w\ufb011jH E_ \nJUDGMENT AND DEGREE DATED 15.3 .2003'~PASSED\nR.A.NO.244\/1993 ON THE FILE OF  I AIJDL'; CIVIL\n\nJUDGE (SR.DN.), MYSORE, ' PAR'rLY'~ AL;.ow11eGWrHE\nAPPEAL AND SE'i'TING ASIDE\"=j1'HE JUD_GMEN'Ef AND\nDEGREE DATED 25.8.93 PASS;-;D_'\u00bbm'vVQ.s.N0.47819o ON\nTHE FILE OF THE PRL. I '_M'~!JNS:IFF,: MYS()RE.\n\nTHIS RSA IS COMING o:1\u00a7I':%t:):2  THIS DAY,\nTHE COURT DELISIEREI)\"FHE..fP{)LL{)Y\u20acn'IN\u00a7}i'4\n\n....  _ '  u  \n'I'hi$ St'$co1\u00a7xi-  aga311s' t the judgment\n\nand decree  1.5.%o3%;2o63 passed by the 1~=: Additional\n\ncm Jgidgga; (v$r.DI;.);\"\"\"2\ufb01ysore, in RA. No.244 of 1993,\n\nV$iir1\u00a7:<=:\u00e9t*\u00a2'7 ti11:i{\u00a7':r;:V:t.'ie~:J'i;.ci@ent and Decree elated 25.08.1993\n\n--     E Munsi\ufb01} Mysore, in O.S. No.478\n\n-   i .. \u00ab .4 _\u00e9f..,1990,  modi\ufb01ed.\n\n'   I3}  Appellant is the 23*' plainti\ufb01 before the 'l'nal'\n\nT  Appellant and his sister  med the suit only\n\na i\u00e9.ga1':ast their Umzic Mahadevappa for mrtition and\n\n\n\nseparate possession of their share in the suit scheduke\nproperties. Item No.1 of the Schedule is house \nbeaxing Door No.238q1and item No.2 is \n\nNo.23!-36 both situated at Madavaotxar   u " = \n\nHowever, subsequently, the 2""  - \noccupation of Item No.1 and'   arxotiiee,\n\nYellappa were impleaded as  2     suit\n\n3) The case of the piaii1t~3i?s:'in:_:I1t\u00a7IId1;ngA'   VA\n\nSchedule Property as a whole \ufb01e' \nbefore the partition   _ag_e, the shop\nportion of time  ivetnong thtee\nbrothers,       04.06. 1947,\n ailotted with two\nshops  2336\/2, whereas the house\n\nportion was    of the mother. He further\n\n  deed dated 06.04.1979, the\n\n of  for leg! necessities sold the mrtien\n\nV  p   him under the partition Therefore,\n \u00e9    property is bmidlnggw on the p1ammfe' ' .\n\ne    circumstances, he sought for diemissal of the\n\n   \n\n5) In the light ofthe pleadings of the mties, the\n\n\/7\n\nTriai Court framed the following issues\u00bb \/\/\n\n\n\n18%\n\n \n\nWhether the Flainti\ufb01s Prove that     ' 1 \nis ma1n1:a2.na' ' me without'  \ncancellation of the   \n06.04.1979<\/pre>\n
 execuugby  ”\n<\/p>\n
favour of the aefcmaxa\ufb01<\/p>\n
Whether the ,_ mm
\nin joint possession
\nwith tggeaefqatida-as ma%%me,\u00a2o.m fee
\n._as 3i3jj\u00ab3:i1’\u00a7i\u00e9i\u00e9nt?\n<\/p>\n
   that the sale
\n ‘hy’1.;\u00a3due immense and
\n‘does gateway any right to the<\/p>\n
. _ d\u00e9fen;_:’iant’–“$uit properties?
\nhgthef A  defendant proves that the
\n1  portion was divided among the
\n  and the shop premises
\n Nos. 2386\/1 and 2386\/2 \u00a3311 to<\/p>\n
”  share of the plainti\ufb02’s \ufb01ther?<\/p>\n
Whether the plain\ufb01\ufb01s are entitled to past
\nmeans profits of Rs.758\/– 033%?<\/p>\n
\/W.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
vi) Whether the plainti\ufb01s are entitled
\nshare: in the suit propertim? If so,   ”
\nIstheirshare?\n<\/p>\n
Vii} What reiiefs are the   3 ‘<\/p>\n
i} Whether the defengia\ufb01ta. L2    the
\ntenants in  t;e\u00a7rin;g%f*Ne.23s5\/2 and
\n2386\/1’? T     =<\/p>\n
ii)  receiving’ ‘ rents
\n  desmaams\u00bb2  3 and compeiling
\n N<$:.3';tx:VVpga;;v'reaf\u00a3Vf:~\u00a7'vvtfo_hir:;?'\n<\/p>\n
6)    evidence, the trial Court by its<\/p>\n
judgmegat and ude:\u00a71fee.’dafed&\u00a75.O8.93, answered Issue No.1 in the<\/p>\n
 am :mA   suit of the p1ainti\ufb01’ is mainmigmble<\/p>\n
 of the Sale Deed dated 5.4.1979,<\/p>\n
  but I\u00e9s\u00e9ue Nos. 2 and 3 in the neytive holding that the<\/p>\n
‘ ” –;V3VVl’.’\u00ab.e*s;.,i,AA1:1VtT:Li\ufb01’:;-1.’ hive failed to prove that they are in joint possession of<\/p>\n
A    preper\ufb01es and they have further failed to prove<\/p>\n
   t.bat% the Sale Deed is vitiated by umue in\ufb02uence. On Issue<\/p>\n
VA   “$0.4, the Trial Court held that the 1” defemant ms proved ttmt
\n(3 .\n<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
the shop portion was divided among three brothers and the shop
\npremises bearing No.2386\/1 fell to the share of t1’l8;}’)1fiI.iIltiES<\/p>\n
father. In that View of the matter, the trial Court <\/p>\n
No.4 in the amrxnative. Having rcgaxd to the <\/p>\n
that the shop premises was    <\/p>\n
under the partiu’oI1, the trial Court  1’tIon.”t1x1e ‘A<\/p>\n
suit schedule was an ancestral     haiids
\nof Madappa, as such, ‘”Msdap}5s” ‘”I._l’O  a bsoi1 3.te right to
\nalienate the said pmpertf   V   by legal<\/p>\n
necessities and s:ii:c\u00a7 j’sthei\u00a7e vgzss’  on the part of<\/p>\n
Madappaio  property, it was held that the<\/p>\n
sale deed    is not binding on the 2’1′<\/p>\n
F pzainti\ufb01;   ‘ As the being the daughter of Madappa and<\/p>\n
‘  ‘-\\’\\o., ‘;:;s”5  as on<\/p>\n
1\/  even much prior to 1992, the trial Court hcki<\/p>\n
 shsis  to question. the alienation e\ufb01ected by her<\/p>\n
V V’   View of the matter, the Trial Court decreed the<\/p>\n
 ma deszams that the 2nd pmins\ufb01 is entitled for partJ;t1o’ ‘ n<\/p>\n
 possession of 95 (halt) share in Item No. 1 and 1\/6*’<\/p>\n
T  in item No.2. Being aggrieved by the said judment and<\/p>\n
\u00abo<\/p>\n
decree, the 1″ defendant Mahadevappa \ufb01led appeal before the<\/p>\n
court of Civil Judge, (Sr.Dn.) in RA. of .244 of 1993.’  .\n<\/p>\n
7) Tm First Appellate  by
\nappeal, allowed the appeal in    if<\/p>\n
judgment, the First Appellate    <\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
for consideration.\n<\/p>\n
i)<\/p>\n
Whether the A-;3._Ei’I1t\u00a7A\ufb02’s;;_ vgiriweezhet the suit is
\nmaintainable  of
\nthe gaze aeec1dat\u00a2;a .;)e.;e4u.19%r9 executed by
\n in  ef the defemant?\n<\/p>\n
 “–Whe&1e13′:’f11e prove that they were in<\/p>\n
joi1;i;t._ peeee\ufb01\u00e9seon of the suit scheduie<\/p>\n
” eepropei-tiee  the defendant and the Court fee
\nggexa\ufb01orxed  payable and su\ufb01cient?<\/p>\n
 ” ei’ the p1aint1\ufb013gp’ rove that the sale deed ‘m<\/p>\n
 _ W
\n  by undue in\ufb02uence and does not
\n* _ eonvey any right to the defendant in the suit<\/p>\n
properdee?\n<\/p>\n
Whether the defendant proves that the shop
\nportion was divided among the three brothers<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
and the shop premises bearing  W V.
\n2386\/2 \ufb01ell to the smre ofthe  1 <\/p>\n
v) Whether the plaintiffs
\nmesnc Pro\ufb01ts ofRs.758\/  –._ e,  <\/p>\n
vi) Whether the
\nthe suit propejrws? VAEf-ab;-whet is  efmre?<\/p>\n
vii) What mliefare the to?\n<\/p>\n
8)    on recent} and also
\ntaking’ into   evidence, the First
\n\ufb01aat’fatJ-set of the p1a.in!:i\ufb01’s had right to
\nsell his     ef the suit schedule property and<\/p>\n
__tI1eref9;_\u00a7e,’V in  itejn No.1 of the suit schedule property is<\/p>\n
 is not binding on the 21*’ plaintiff} as such,<\/p>\n
  for the partition in Item No. 1, but they<\/p>\n
H V’ are en\ufb01\ufb02etff’ for any share in Item Ne.2. In that View of the<\/p>\n
‘ H H ”   emit of the plain\ufb01\ufb01 in respect of Item No.2 came to<\/p>\n
  and it was further 13:16 that the \ufb01rst plainti\ufb01” is<\/p>\n
 ‘I ene’–1-\ufb01lm for 1\/4:-In share and the 2nd pxamm is eneued for 3\/4th<\/p>\n
 in Item No.1. Being agg\ufb01eved by the Judment and<\/p>\n
I’?\n<\/p>\n
\u00aby<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
“Decree passed by the First Appdlate Court, the 29\u00a2. has<\/p>\n
\ufb01led this Second Appeal.\n<\/p>\n
9) While admittitg the  gm  <\/p>\n
following substantial questixm Qt”
\ninthis appeal ‘  _ V A 3 \ufb02 ‘
\n‘whetlmr me%%%%%JAppe1ia:t\u00a7=A%g\u00a7a;\u00a2  c?rred  in
\nreversing the   share
\nto the appellant  gjfoperty and in
\nrejecting (Sf  respect of Item
\nNo.2 aixgl   that behalf 0f the<\/p>\n
   contraxy to law’<\/p>\n
10_)_   of notice of this appeal,<\/p>\n
‘Vrespoii\u00a7i\u00e911t,?def\u00a2nd\u00a7\u00a7itit”‘iib.1, who is the contesting party, has<\/p>\n
   learned cotmsel.\n<\/p>\n
ii)  Ix\u00e9ve heard the learned counsel on both sides on the<\/p>\n
 Question of Law raised by the Court.<\/p>\n
 12) There is no cfmpute regrding the relationship<\/p>\n
 A\u00bb.._4’4between the paras’ s. The 1″ defendant Mahadcvappa is<\/p>\n
the Junior Paternal Uncie of the plain\ufb01\ufb02s. There also<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
appears to be no serious dispute that both Item Nos. 1 <\/p>\n
k;\\\\e,~c C;\n<\/p>\n
2 of the plaizzt schedule w\ufb01 owned by cwme Angage<\/p>\n
Madappa, the paternal grand father of the  <\/p>\n
Name’ mma was the wife of Chil1are__A ngadi   ‘ V<\/p>\n
paternal grandmother of the plainti\ufb02e.   1’-I.<\/p>\n
owned by Chillarc Angadi  <\/p>\n
ii). the \ufb01ont and house pogtion  si\u20acie;– It  mt in
\nserious dispute that  Ta  dated<\/p>\n
04.06.1949,     the shop<\/p>\n
portions iiis   house portion to his
\nwife Smt. vffarg” 5a’ m’  evidence that Sri. Madappa<\/p>\n
executed   theeale deed  06.04.1979 marked as Ex.I}1<\/p>\n
‘V aof  1′; defehdant Mahadevappa in respect of<\/p>\n
 his share in Item No.2. 1: is the case of<\/p>\n
: VV     properties are ancestral propertnes’ at<\/p>\n
fihe hantieiaf Madappa and since there was no legal<\/p>\n
   for Madappa te alienate the propert1es’ , ttw<\/p>\n
. K  in favour of the 1″ defendant under Ex.D1 is not<\/p>\n
  [binding on the plaintiff, as such, the 2nd plainti\ufb01’ is<\/p>\n
entitled for shaxe in both the properties. However, the<\/p>\n
\/J’<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
First Appe\ufb02ate Court held that only Item I~{q._~ 2<\/p>\n
ancestral property at the hands of Madappa as  gjgi   <\/p>\n
same under Ex.P1, therefore, Mads;p\u00a7a”‘ 2:ad n.<;3  <\/p>\n
to alienate the same, as such, the   is <\/p>\n
binding on the 2nd pxaimi\ufb01".\n<\/p>\n
No.2, the First Appelme    said\nproperty was settled in fav\u00e9f\ufb01ixr'    and since\nsm. Name' mm.    her three\nsons, the   in Item No.2\nbecame  as such, he was\n\nentitled    wstho' ut there bang' any\n\n<\/pre>\n
legal x1\u00a2c\u00a2ssity: ‘1’i1ar\u00e9foic,V”‘f11e sale etfected by Mactappa<\/p>\n
Aum;1gr%%j\u00e9:x;%n1  meg: of mm No.2 is bindm on the<\/p>\n
  a\u00a7s s i:_1jch, the plainti\ufb01s are not entitled for any<\/p>\n
i   sha1″e    In so far as gant of relief of par\ufb01tion<\/p>\n
 V A’ \u00a5
\n i’avou”r.__\u00a33f mm piain\ufb02\ufb01s in respect of Item No.1 is<\/p>\n
  the defendants have not challewd the<\/p>\n
.   of the Courts below. Therefore, in so far as Itiem<\/p>\n
  $10.1 is concerned, this Court is not required to comider<\/p>\n
said aspect of the matter. Therefore, tm only question<\/p>\n
\/M<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
required to be considered is, as to whether deniggl’-.,<\/p>\n
share in Item No.2 to me plainti\ufb01isjustri\ufb01ed.    <\/p>\n
13) As noticed above, 1mder E5(;P1,’_    <\/p>\n
settled in favour of Smt.\n<\/p>\n
grandmother of the piainti\ufb01s.  a “1’ea1_i,1;t;V:”It:L?\u00a7i\u00a3;i\u00a5I<;.2
\nbecame the absolute progjsx\ufb01y of Tilers is
\nrm dispute that Smt.    leaving
\nbehind her    Yenappa and
\nMahadcvappa'.     Hindu Succession<\/p>\n
Act, the 1L\u00a7;"o1::_e1AI?AtAV3V?'L'<;x.tV' feztiialg I-Iintiu dying intestate shall<\/p>\n
devolve  to   eut in Section 16, \ufb01rstly,<\/p>\n
_ upon j;\u00a7;1\u00a2"    ('iat%l\u00a7_gh.hers (including children of any<\/p>\n
   or daughter) and the husband. As per<\/p>\n
s\u00a2c13o?:1%'isg heirs speci\ufb01ed in subsectsion (1) of<\/p>\n
 Sectioisz  in one entzy smll be preferred to those in<\/p>\n
a.t iVyn  eatry, those inclucled in its same entry<\/p>\n
 simnltarxeously. Therefore, all the thme sons of<\/p>\n
VT  sueceeded no the estate of 81111;. Nanjamma in<\/p>\n
 shares as per Sections 15 and 16 of the H1nd' u<\/p>\n
if?\n<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
Succession Act upon the dmth of Salt. <\/p>\n
intestate.\n<\/p>\n
14) As the property at Item No.2 was   K  <\/p>\n
Madappa to an extent of 1\/3″‘  J <\/p>\n
cannot constitute as axmest1fe;E_ prdpmxiy at ?   }r3.a\u00a7:isf.iA.\u00a5;< <\/p>\n
Mahadevappa. In the case of
\nVs. -Hm sums
\nsocmw mama  division
\nBench of this   constitutes
\n  the decision of the Privy
\nCounsel in   HUSAIN mm vs.<\/p>\n
   mm 1937 to 233;, it has<\/p>\n
 properties inherited from the male<\/p>\n
    i\ufb01ouki constitute as ancestral properties<\/p>\n
    inherited from the female descendant<\/p>\n
'   L\ufb01:}s;m;t16t\u00ab.po1istitute as ancestral property.<\/p>\n
i 15) In 'Hindu law' of 14th Edition Page 625, the<\/p>\n
   ieamed Author Mr. Mullah has stated that, it is settled<\/p>\n
by a decision of the Judicial committee,  terns:<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
‘Anecestral Property’ must be con\ufb01ned to ” <\/p>\n
descending to the children \ufb01om male \ufb01ne and    o  o  <\/p>\n
that property that the son   <\/p>\n
jointly and equally to that of nfm   or\u00bb <\/p>\n
above, it  clear that the o\u00a3t1te\u00a5’cSt_Vof  in
\nthe property of Smt.    \u00e9osolute
\nproperty of Madappa,   right to
\nalienate. Under:  Appelhte
\nCourt has:   by Madappa in
\nfavour of:  in respect of Item
\nNo.2 is  V  the plainti\ufb02h are not
\nentitled to:  ‘gn%:r?.c::;o’No.2 .<\/p>\n
    of the above, I do not we any error<\/p>\n
 Appellate Court in reveming the<\/p>\n
of  Court in respect of Item No.2 of the<\/p>\n
o ;s;c11Tet:h;11e is comemed. The finding in this regard is
\n Aaocordoance with law and also evidence on record. There<\/p>\n
  grounds to interfbre with the said fuxiim ofthe F’n*st<\/p>\n
  \ufb02ope\ufb02am Court. The \ufb01nding of the Lower Appe\ufb01ate Court<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
18<\/span><\/p>\n
in this regard is sound and based on the settkad a,<\/p>\n
of law. As such, there is no perversity in the  <\/p>\n
the Court below. In this View of     k’<\/p>\n
in this appeal. Hence, the  <\/p>\n
reused’ for consideration is  ae\ufb01cmfc\ufb01ne. igfiyg
\nappeal is liable to be dism1eeed.Aeeeeee’    j
\nAccordingly, the  no order as<\/p>\n
to costs.\n<\/p>\n
:er’\u00ab\u00bb’ –\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana 1\u00bb: THE HIGH coum’ on KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUA}.?I’!..”2%0(:)\u00a7:>::: 1 A; ” BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUS’I’ICEK..I\u00a7I. V .R_.\u00a7.A. No. 43:sM”o\u00a7’_~;>_o03 1 BASAVANNA s\/0 LATE MA’D__APPA””‘ ; % % = 40 ms, R\/o:13HANAGALL1%%v:LmGE MYSORE”TALUK:; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBasavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-02T00:43:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\\\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-02T00:43:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1673,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\\\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-02T00:43:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\\\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-02T00:43:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-02T00:43:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009"},"wordCount":1673,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009","name":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi ... on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-02T00:43:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basavanna-vs-mahadevappa-so-chillare-angadi-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Basavanna vs Mahadevappa S\/O Chillare Angadi … on 18 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238035\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}