{"id":238133,"date":"2008-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-11-28T22:19:06","modified_gmt":"2016-11-28T16:49:06","slug":"north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH CQURT or KARNATAKA, aANGAE}f\u00a7i'RE\\:\u00bb\/Z \"  : \"\nDATED mas THE 15*\" DAY::3'\u00a7i'3:.54N5,--'_\u00e9\u00ae\u00e93j' l    \n\nBEFGRE A V  I    V' \n\nTHE HQNBLE MR. 3USTICf'\u00a7:._;_5\u00a7S.fiGl(2AB; i\u00a7_f\u00a7Es'*~l_VC:l!F\u00a7 I:'t\".a;'EFRi\"' \n\nM.F A. r~;::;.7233 QEQZQQSV\u00bb gm % \nBEIWEEN V  'V  \n\nNORTH EAST KARNATAKZA  -_\nROAQ TRANSPORT (;\u20ac.z--R;P\u20ac:RA'J;{:r394    5\nCENTRAL QF\u00a7ICE,sAR3i\u00a33\u00bbE_.5\u00e9;DH\ufb01;_NA _  ' \nGULBARGA,  \"     \nBY ITS MANAGIM3 \ufb01:j{_RECTC)R.._V  '_ \" \n\nV  T   _ ,..APPELLANT\n L (5% ?3a=;\u00a7j wJ%A?\u00a3\u00a7wur4Aa, ADVOCATE)\nSR1 SHES?iRAQ\n\n_gi~0 SAi'.\u00a3C\u00a7RA,\u00a3\u00a51 MLLALE \u00e9  ..... M -\n'AGE?I3.AB*OU'I' 3? vsans,\n\n \"'-\"\"AURAD--5,_._ mLL%K;;..- '\n\nOi'-SC'; 'FIELD --w'0R;;::. SUPERVISOR,\nRJQL--.BETELa:0LQNY;~-_.~~\n\nTHANAKU\u00a3\u00a7HNG\u00a37R, \n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p> t\ufb01Y SR1 SANYQSH BIRADAR, ADVGCATE)<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;._THIS MFA IS FILE3 U,\/S 173(1) {}F MV ACT AGAINST THE<\/p>\n<p>T h  JUDGMENT AND AWARE} DATE\u00a7:18.6.G5 PASSES ZN MVC NO.2S5;&#8217;O3<\/p>\n<p> T QM -\u00bbT!&#8221;&#8211;iE FILE OF THE PRL. MACT AND PRL DIST. EUDGE, BIEDAR,<\/p>\n<p> AWARDING COMFENSATION OF RS.4,67,0G0\/- WITH INTEREST AT 6%<br \/>\n FA. FROM 3(}.?.20{}3 TILL ITS REALISATION.<\/p>\n<p>THIS MFA CQMING GIN FOR FINAL HEARIFQG THIS DAY, THE<\/p>\n<p>COURT GELIVEREC3 THE FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n<p>excessively and without any basis therefor. Altheugh th:s.\u00a7frtiu_hd<\/p>\n<p>of csntrihutory negligence is taken in the epseal  <\/p>\n<p>he gives it up in the course at the a:i&#8221;qu\u00abmeht, aisitihreV&#8221;issue&#8217;.is&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>already decided against the apsella.nt hy&#8212;-._ti&#8221;iVisj&#8221;.= shy its<\/p>\n<p>judgment, dated 283&#8242; February, 2ooail.gal;;;se;;: in\u00e9li&#8217;-V&#8221;\u00a3&#8217;.&#8221;i&#8217;-&#8216;A. \u00a5\\io.7234<\/p>\n<p>{if 2095.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. &#8216;i;*ii+:i-it there is he basis<br \/>\nwhatseever for  ihcome to be Rs.4,500!-\n<\/p>\n<p>a month.  _ia&#8217;_lst&gt;vj&#8217;._reis:eVs  ever the employment cf<br \/>\nmultiplier 1&#8217;S&#8230;l_L&#8221;i-ie  as the petitioner himself has<\/p>\n<p>admitteclgthat he has] &#8216;e&#8217;ight&#8217; children and that his eldest daughter<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;is\u00e9i;:eti&#8221;&#8221;ieffthe*~.respurie&#8217;ent&#8217;s age cannot be below 40 years.<\/p>\n<p>The;-&#8216;stare&#8217;iziieurjeieigg-e&#8211;i*it multiplier would be &#8216;:14&#8242; and not &#8217;15&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>5.&#8221;*&#8211;Sri\u00bb.fivijsyakumar also takes serious exceptien to the<\/p>\n<p> of&#8221;i\u00a7s.S2,0Q0\/- towards medicai expenses. He submits<\/p>\n<p>  doctor frum Prayavi Muiti Speciaiity Hospital, Bidar is<\/p>\n<p>it ..&#8221;iiuZi:(V&#8217;;&#8217;\u00bbI&#8221;:l&#8217;i&#8221;:&#8217;i&#8217;ihVi&#8217;ie\u20acIi; the respondent himself has net said anything about<\/p>\n<p> undergeirig the treatment at the said hospital. Even then the<\/p>\n<p>H Tribunal has granted Rs.29,00G\/- based on the receipt (Exhibit<\/p>\n<p>H. 3.21%.\n<\/p>\n<p>P31) issued by the said hospital. He else disputes ttieef<\/p>\n<p>the medical bills at Exhibits P&#8217;? to 26 and&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;:.:&#8217;25&#8217;i&#8217;~:VVlee&#8217;V&#8211;li9&#8217;V&#8221;&#8211;..,<\/p>\n<p>cerresponding medical prescriptiens ar;e&#8217;prfeci~zjcetl~;   V x<\/p>\n<p>&amp;. Pet contra, Sri Sentosh Biriaitiiar, the.!eeeir:ited\u00a7l&#8221;1;fa&#8217;ti&#8217;nlsel Eel?<\/p>\n<p>the respenclent claimant giggqgfrgits&#8217;i&#8217;t&#8217;i}et&#8217;j}~iVl\u00a7at. is eiltiardved by the<br \/>\nTribunal is fair and proper  this Court is<br \/>\nwarranted in this   V i it  it<\/p>\n<p>7. My &#8216;Records reveals that no<br \/>\nprescrietiefieferi;\u00a7ggf;,\u00a7diceii&#8217;i3i:l:ivsiteceiiet\u00e9i are preeuced. The receipt<br \/>\nat P31 deeeeet  the amount deposited at the<\/p>\n<p>time ofAV.evdmis\u00a7&#8217;i::Vif: ta t&#8217;i1eV&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;l1ospital. The column &#8220;amount<\/p>\n<p>a,fciepeeit&#8217;eci&#8221; gig seft bl1eaij&#8217;fe ruled eut. The position is the same in respect ef the<\/p>\n<p>. &#8216;V7-r:ecei_c\u00a3ts for having purchased the medicines in the absence ef<\/p>\n<p>riiedicel prescriptiens. Considering the gravity of the injuries,<\/p>\n<p> the treatment given and the proceeure feilewee, I deem it<\/p>\n<p>91334.\n<\/p>\n<p>necessary ta reduce the ameunts awarded tewards medical<\/p>\n<p>expenses from Rs~:.52,0G0\/- to Rs.3G,{)0\u00a33\/-,.<\/p>\n<p>8. &#8216;i&#8217;he&#8221;\u00a5&#8217;ribunaf has taken the re$ppri_deni:&#8217;$&#8221;&#8216;ii:\u00a7;;;sfri&#8217;e\u00a7 tr; nae &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,500\/- per menth. Aitheugh Sri Bfaebuafaa7&#8217;Wa.\u00a7rri\u00a7&#8217;re&#8217;,&#8221;iuridieiji<\/p>\n<p>whom the respondent ciaims t0:_&#8217;i:~.e tiife.&#8217;S:iper$2i&#8217;3evr,..rris; nvc%:at&#8211;.i*<\/p>\n<p>examined, i do not proppse to____i:re\u00a7i_u\u00abee ti\u00e9&#8217;e&#8211;\u00abi_iricor*ne from<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,SGD\/- is Rs,.3,G00\/- bee.e&#8217;u_se_L2{_a\ufb01ree~iieiteh the reasoning<\/p>\n<p>adopted by the &#8216;I&#8221;ribu.r!a! th,at*iii?Ie&#8217;~&#8221;.income is Iesss<\/p>\n<p>than Rs.4,.S:00&#8243;\/; ea&#8217;ur_i&#8217;r;&#8217;oTfj support his big farniiy<br \/>\ncensistino of:VV&#8217;wil:&#8217;e_ a\u00e9iiriii: Hewever the Tribunal has<br \/>\nerred in emv;3f0u\u00a7i&#8217;n.gV_&#8221;&#8216;-the&#8217;v\u00ab.niui_li&#8217;ti&#8217;eiiiier 15., The relevant muitipiier<br \/>\na;\u00a7&#8221;pi.i.;abi.\u00a7&#8217;iv~1c}&#8217;i.i:Ic;i .__bne 1A\u00a7&#8217;te%&lt;i\u00abn&#039;g the respondent&#039;s age to be areund<\/p>\n<p>38.44? vyreairsi&#039;~\u00e9\u00a7in:.\u00a7&#039;i&#039;ri.eri.;1g that his eidest daughter herseif is 20<\/p>\n<p> i&#039;~&#8230;&#8230;i,r,ear$ erase.\n<\/p>\n<p> Sirriii\ufb01iy, the Tribunal has taken up the Said-up period<\/p>\n<p>#7.. r&#8211;1&#8211;V.io~&#8211;t5e&#8221;_As&#8217;i.x_rf:onths. But as the appeiiant was an inpatient unity for<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; _?___\u20aciays and thereafter assuming that he was advised to take<\/p>\n<p>bee&#8217; rest for 2-3 menths, I deem it reasenabie to take up the<\/p>\n<p>S &#8220;iaid-tie eerioci as three months and net as six months.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3834.\n<\/p>\n<p>the res-pendent is entitled to the ioss cf of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.13,,50G\/- for the laid-up gaeriod of three   d<\/p>\n<p>16. Sri Vijaykurnar further :=_sub_mit?au3i;het&#8217;-\u00e9talgiii\ufb01aeef  <\/p>\n<p>disability percentage at 40 is or:&#8217;th__e hiVc&#8221;;Aif;_eIi* side?&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>that the doctor who actually treeteve&#8217;=eneVVceridueted examination<\/p>\n<p>at Prayavi Multi Speciality  e;;a_rnined. His allied<br \/>\nsubmission is thavtiagheh  assessed that the<br \/>\nrespondent has disabiiity of the right<br \/>\nleg, oniy ltd&#8217; &#8220;_as&#8221;&#8216;the disabiiity percentage in<br \/>\nrelation  not in a position to give<\/p>\n<p>acceptabiiity tetiiei sLii:i.rr&#8217;iis_si&#8217;~i*i ef Sri Vijaykurnar fer two distinct<\/p>\n<p>:_v*ree.sonef&#8217;~- {5}.__there&#8221;h~es&#8221; been ne specific crass-examination<\/p>\n<p>\u00bbiih.a_&#8217;tseei;erv&#8230;:_i:;i&#8217;= disability percentage; (13) the weund<\/p>\n<p> s&#8217;~&#8230;&#8230;v.certifi&#8217;ca;te  P6 enumerates the injuries as foiiows:<\/p>\n<p>1, a&#8221; .c_ii~t iecerated weund on it knee joint measuring 2&#8243; x<\/p>\n<p>it &#8221; vine&#8217;\/2&#8243;&#8216;, bone deep bleeding present;<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;*2 # of lower third of rt femur;\n<\/p>\n<p>   2 it 03&#8242; upeer third of rt tibia and fibula.\n<\/p>\n<p>Q <\/p>\n<p>R<\/p>\n<p>.@9w%W\u00aer<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  shali alse carry interest at the rate sf 6% per annum frem<br \/>\n date of presentation of the ciairn petitfun tit! the date of<\/p>\n<p>  payment.\n<\/p>\n<p>It further states that the muries N32 and 3 are.&#8217;..er&#8217;ie$\u00a7?&#8217;\u00a7:b&#8211;;.z&#8217;Ss.,4in<br \/>\nnature. It is ernbable that the decter has deposed<br \/>\n40% disability in reiation to whole bo:dy&#8217;taking&#8217; tide &#8216; j<br \/>\nother twci injuries a\u00a5so. I I V &#8216;    <\/p>\n<p>11. The ameunts awa:*rd&#8217;ab!e..i:6wa&#8217;:fd$;1ess offuture inceme<\/p>\n<p>would be as fekewsz<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,500_\/f   g._4&#8243;\u00e9n:_&#8217;aQA  &#8216;R.s{3,o2;4oe\/-.<\/p>\n<p>12. N\u00a7aw..th&#8217;\u00e9..fiiei\u00a7\u00a7fi.ed&#8211;\u00bb.\u00a7&#8217;w_e&#8217;:&#8217;d &#8216;s&#8217;1:a.n.:is as fo\ufb02owe:<\/p>\n<p>Amount<br \/>\n   .&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221; &#8211; (R3-3<\/p>\n<p>Less of amenities  &#8216; 30,000.00<br \/>\ngain, &#8216;i~n}&#8217;ur&#8217;y a&#8217;ndvtraL.:ma 25,000.00<br \/>\n. &#8216;Medical 1-.=:X;:vense\u00a7&#8221;&#8221; 30,000.09<br \/>\n\u00bb &#8216; Food, &#8216;nutvr\ufb01\u00e9on and attendant charges 5,000.00<br \/>\n &#8221; ..Loss._&#8217;je&#8211;\u20acj ir&#8217;z\u00a2eme for the talc!\u00bb-\u00bbup period 13,500.00<br \/>\nL was efTfg1_t\ufb01:re income e 3,o2,4ee.oe<br \/>\nEuture~m&#8217;edicai expenses 4,008.00<br \/>\n V Total 4,G\u00a7,900.00<\/p>\n<p>SI.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; Pertieui\u00e9ie<br \/>\nNo. ; .\n<\/p>\n<p> is clarified that the ameunts awarded\/enhanced<\/p>\n<p>585%.\n<\/p>\n<p>14, The sum Gf Rs.25,a00\/- deposited by the app&#8217;\u00e9\u00a5f&#8217; at at<\/p>\n<p>the time Qf institution of this appeat is ordered to <\/p>\n<p>ta the &#8216;E&#8217;ribuna\u00a3.\n<\/p>\n<p>inn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH CQURT or KARNATAKA, aANGAE}f\u00a7i&#8217;RE\\:\u00bb\/Z &#8221; : &#8221; DATED mas THE 15*&#8221; DAY::3&#8217;\u00a7i&#8217;3:.54N5,&#8211;&#8216;_\u00e9\u00ae\u00e93j&#8217; l BEFGRE A V I V&#8217; THE HQNBLE MR. 3USTICf&#8217;\u00a7:._;_5\u00a7S.fiGl(2AB; i\u00a7_f\u00a7Es&#8217;*~l_VC:l!F\u00a7 I:&#8217;t&#8221;.a;&#8217;EFRi&#8221;&#8216; M.F A. r~;::;.7233 QEQZQQSV\u00bb gm % BEIWEEN V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>North East Karnataka Road ... vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"North East Karnataka Road ... vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-28T16:49:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\\\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T16:49:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1087,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\",\"name\":\"North East Karnataka Road ... vs Sheshrao S\\\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T16:49:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\\\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"North East Karnataka Road ... vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"North East Karnataka Road ... vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-28T16:49:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-28T16:49:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008"},"wordCount":1087,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008","name":"North East Karnataka Road ... vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-28T16:49:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-east-karnataka-road-vs-sheshrao-so-sangram-hallale-on-16-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"North East Karnataka Road &#8230; vs Sheshrao S\/O Sangram Hallale on 16 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}