{"id":238171,"date":"2005-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5"},"modified":"2018-03-11T17:30:52","modified_gmt":"2018-03-11T12:00:52","slug":"alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5","title":{"rendered":"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Authority Tribunal<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S S Quadri, S Pal, B Agrawal<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>RULINGS<br \/>\nNEW DELHI<br \/>\nCENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX<\/p>\n<p> Ruling No. AAR\/20(Cus)\/2005 in Application No. AAR\/44(Cus)\/32\/2005<\/p>\n<p>Decided On:  24.11.2005<\/p>\n<p>Appellants:  Alcatel India Ltd. <\/p>\n<p>Vs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent:  Commissioner of Customs<\/p>\n<p>Hon&#8217;ble Judges:\n<\/p>\n<p> Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. (Chairman),  Somnath Pal and  B.A. Agrawal, Members<\/p>\n<p>Counsels:\n<\/p>\n<p>For Appellant\/Petitioner\/Plaintiff:  None <\/p>\n<p>For Respondents\/Defendant:  A.K. Roy, Joint CDR CESTAT<\/p>\n<p>Subject:  Customs<\/p>\n<p>Acts\/Rules\/Orders:\n<\/p>\n<p> Customs Act, 1962 &#8211; Section 28H;  Customs Tariff Act, 1975;  Customs Tariff Rules &#8211; Rules 1 and 6<\/p>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. (Chairman)<\/p>\n<p>1. In this application under Section 28H of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short &#8220;the Act&#8221;), M\/s. Alcatel India Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Alcatel, France, proposes to import into India the latest technology equipment of Optical Networking\/GSM equipment etc. To ascertain its customs duty liability in regard to the hardware and optical fibre cables for submarine telecommunications systems, it seeks advance ruling of the Authority on the following question:<br \/>\n &#8220;Whether 1640 Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexer Node to be imported into India, is classifiable under Heading No. 8517 5099 of the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>The Alcatel 1640 WM Telecommunication Equipment (1640 WM) (for short &#8220;the goods&#8221;) is a hybrid of optical, electronic and mechanical systems that forms part of a telecommunication system for use in transmission of aggregate data. The goods are multi wavelength transmission system with Software reconfigurable Add and Drop functionality. It can transmit signals, one pair of fibre, up to 320 channels (160 channels for single fibre) that can support any type of asynchronous traffic with bit rate from 100 Mb\/s to 2, 5 Gb\/s and synchronous STM-16 and STM-64 traffics. The goods include standard transponders, optical adapters and concentrators. It is submitted that in accordance with Rule 1 of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 (for short &#8220;the Rules&#8221;) the goods are classifiable under Tariff heading 8517; in accordance with Rule 6, these goods will fall under sub-heading 8517 50 and that the appropriate tariff heading is 8517 50 99. It is added that the U.K. has classified the said goods under tariff heading 8517 50.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. In his comments the designated Commissioner of Customs states as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Comments: On the basis of description of goods given in Annexure II and product Application given in Technical documents, it appears that the party&#8217;s contention that in accordance with Rule 1 of the General Rule of interpretation, these goods are classified under tariff heading 8517 Electrical apparatus for line telephony or line telegraphy, including line telephone sets with cordless handsets and telecommunication apparatus for carrier &#8211; current line systems or for digital line systems; videophones is correct. The product is an equipment meant for Telecommunication functions and merits classification under Tariff heading 85175099 of the First Schedule.\n<\/p>\n<p>Conclusion: In view of above, proposed classification of item under tariff heading 8517 5099 may be accepted.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>3. It is evident that the proposed classification by the applicant is accepted by the Commissioner of Customs.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Tariff heading 8517 , the relevant sub-heading and the tariff items read as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>                                             TARIFF HEADING 8517<br \/>\nTariff Item                    Description of goods<br \/>\n8517                           Electrical apparatus for line telephony or line<br \/>\n                               telegraphy, including line telephone sets with<br \/>\n                               cordless hand-sets and telecommunication apparatus<br \/>\n                               for carrier-current line systems or for digital line<br \/>\n                               systems; video-phones <\/p>\n<p>Heading 8517 deals with electrical apparatus for line telephony or line telegraphy including line telephone sets with cordless hands-sets and  telecommunication apparatus for carrier-current line systems or for digital line systems.<\/p>\n<pre>\n                          SUB-HEADING AND TARIFF ITEMS\nTariff Item         Description of goods               Unit        Rate of duty\n                                                             Standard    Preferential\n                                                                         Areas\n   (1)                       (2)                      (3)          (4)      (5)\n8517 50    -   Other apparatus, for carrier-\n                  current line systems or for\n                  digital line systems: \n8517 50 10  --  PLCC equipment                         u         Free       -\n8517 50 20  --  Voice frequency telegraphy             u         Free       -\n8517 50 30  --  Modems (modulators-                    u         Free       -\n                demodulators)\n8517 50 40  --  High bit rate digital subscriber       u         Free       -\n                line system (HDSL) \n8517 50 50  --  Digital loop carrier system            u         Free       -\n               (DLC) \n8517 50 60  --  Synchronous digital hierarchy          u         Free       -\n                system (SDH) \n8517 50 70  --  Multiplexer, statistical               u         Free       -\n                multiplexer\n           ---  Other:\n8517 50 91 ---  ISDN terminals                         u         Free       -\n8517 50 92 ---  ISDN terminal adapters                 u         Free       -\n8517 50 93 ---  Routers                                u         Free       -\n8517 50 94 ---  X25 pads                               u         Free       -\n8517 50 99 ---  Other\n\n \n\n<\/pre>\n<p>On a combined reading of Rules 1 and 6 of the Rules and the terms of the heading, sub-heading and tariff items, having regard to the description of the goods, given above, we rule that Alcatel 1640 Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexer Node is classifiable under tariff item 8517 50 99.\n<\/p>\n<p>Pronounced in the open Court on this 24th day of November, 2005.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Authority Tribunal Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 Bench: S S Quadri, S Pal, B Agrawal RULINGS NEW DELHI CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX Ruling No. AAR\/20(Cus)\/2005 in Application No. AAR\/44(Cus)\/32\/2005 Decided On: 24.11.2005 Appellants: Alcatel India Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Commissioner of Customs Hon&#8217;ble Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-11T12:00:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005\",\"datePublished\":\"2005-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-11T12:00:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\"},\"wordCount\":641,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\",\"name\":\"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-11T12:00:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2005-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-11T12:00:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005","datePublished":"2005-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-11T12:00:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5"},"wordCount":641,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5","name":"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-11T12:00:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/alcatel-india-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-customs-on-24-november-2005-5#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Alcatel India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 24 November, 2005"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238171\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}