{"id":238403,"date":"2009-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-26T19:42:02","modified_gmt":"2018-06-26T14:12:02","slug":"veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar &B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA \nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD O\n\nDATED THIS THE 3TH DAY op SEPTEMB;ER..'2Q(\u00a79_:: %\n\n1>REsE1~zTM J %\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JU$TIQ-EO..Fi.'4'K_i:fM'ER' \nTHE HON'BLE MR.._TUsT1\u00a2E'jAE,%sEEENITrA$Ef%GowDA\n\nRFA No T2-1129}-.;'ZD'GE6O':E{:1523TR)\n\nBETWEEN: \nVEEREEHK:g'_,_, vk, A\nS \/ o 'LAT.E;\u00bb'_DU}1ZU_GA'PPA~'MEDAR\nAGED 'ABGET 3:2 Y_ElARS.... \nOCC: AG:R1C'[VJLT.U'R_E. T\nR] 0 NEAR .K.AI*JAK_AD__U RGA\nTALKEES,*1SLAM}3URiGANGAVATI,\nGANGAVAT\"HI'TAI.._.-UK\n\n_;' KOPPAL DESTRECT 583227.\n\n    ----------  ...APPELLANT\n\n    EMANTHAREDDY SAHUKAR, ADV.)\n\n A 1. \"s1&2;T MALLAMMA\n\n W\/O LATE SHESHAPPA M\n OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK\nR\/O DEVARAJ URS COLONY\nKOPPA DISTRICT 583227\n\n1\/\n\n\n\nMANJUNATHA\n\nS\/O LATE SHESI-IAPPA MEDAR\nAGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,\n\nOCC: STUDENT\n\nR\/O DEVARAJ URS COLONY\nKOPPA DISTRICT 583227\n\nKUM KANAKESHWAR1 ._\n\nD\/O SHESHAPPA MEDAR\n\nAGED ABOUT 15 YEAR:'}.,_\n\n(MINOR) THROUGH  \nNATURAL GUARDIAN   \nSMT.\u00a7\\\/EALLAMMA~33\/IEIZEARLE. R1\n\nR \/O DEJVARAJ URS   .\nKOPPA D1STRICT 5233227 :  \" \n\nTIPPANN:A';_   O_  \nS,'-GA\u00bbI.;A'1'.E OUR U.OAPPA----M.EDAR\nAGED AB1O.U'TV%8O_YE_A.R:3\n\nOCC: 4AGRI{\u00a7fU.LTU'i?;E' O.\nR\/O_GUND.AMAMA'*CAMP,\n\nSince deceased,\nappekiant &\nrespondents E--8 are\n\namended  per\n\nL V Court Order dated\nGAN G~AVATI'   ; 2,08_0\u20ac)\n\n4; KOPPAL\"~D_ISTRICT 58322 7\n\n3 SMT' SAVITRAWWA\n\nU A A W-,!_O .I;\"A_'I'E NAGARAJ MEOAR\n %.A'OI%;~1'>_ ABOUT 35 YEARS\n\n ' OC.Ci*\"i\u00a7lOUSE3HOLD\n\n R {O GUNDAMMA CAMP,\n\nG.A\u00a7?JGAVATI TALUK\n\nA 'A  KOPPAL DISTRICT 583227'\n\n\"RUM PUSHPA\n\nD\/ O LATE NAGARAJ MEDAR\nMINOR, AGE 6 YEARS, U\/G OF' HER\n\nLRS Ofdeceased R4,\n\n\n\nTHIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS\"---THIS\nDAY, KUMARJ DELIVERED THE) FOLLOWING?\"\ufb02\"\u00bb_._f'~..V\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
This appeal is by the 6*?\n<\/p>\n
judgment and decree whichfhas
\nplaintiffs declaring that  entitled to
\n1\/4111 share in all suite.psephefldfttpfep’plfoperties except
\nsuit item   3 acres 25
\nguntas ave   efendant No.7 .\n<\/p>\n
 –_  fof convenience, the parties
\nare refaf\u00e9cz  referred to in the original<\/p>\n
stut. *<\/p>\n
 * Z  Durugappa Medar is the propositor. He<\/p>\n
had  sons by name Maliyappa, Tippanna and<\/p>\n
 ..Ht1lt1gappa. In turn, Tippanna had three sons by name<\/p>\n
fl “‘V_VDuAfugappa, Sheshappa and Nagappa. The 18′ plaintiff<\/p>\n
“this the widow of Sheshappa and other plaintiffs are son<\/p>\n
ii\/D<\/p>\n
_5l<\/p>\n
and daughter. The ls’ defendant is Tippanna. The
\ndefendants 2 to 5 are the widow and children of
\nNagappa. 6*’ defendant is the son of Durugapp.a.,_\u00bb 731
\ndefendant is the purchaser of one of the <\/p>\n
joint family properties.\n<\/p>\n
4. The case of the plajri\ufb01fm “is<\/p>\n
schedule properties arefjoint “far;n.ily ,p’ropertie;su”of<\/p>\n
plaintiffs and defendants. iVif’13’xT’.:isched’t’\u00a3l\u20ac:VV:[properties are
\nlanded properties and_xVfB_’ sch;edi1l.e~.p”roperties are house<\/p>\n
prope.rtiies:’j.’llh\u00e9i:;;y.lst of *~-Tippanna, Durugappa died
\nprior 7.1;o ” the   H Subsequently, his widow<\/p>\n
Mallamrr1ia.ialvsoidie’d iileaving behind them their only son<\/p>\n
   theV””d-.ef\u00abendant No.6. The second son<\/p>\n
  ligiircgoi on o9.1i.2o02 leaving behind plaintiffs<\/p>\n
ll   legal heirs. The 3″? son Nagappa also died<\/p>\n
 leavi’i1g;’i~behind defendants 2 to 5 as his legal heirs. The<\/p>\n
 ‘ll\u00e9\u00e9ttlefendant was the Kartha and manager of the family.<\/p>\n
A ___\u00a7No partition has taken place in the joint family. All the<\/p>\n
34\/<\/p>\n
l5t<\/p>\n
properties are enjoyed by ail the members of the joint
\nfamily. When the 6″? defendant sold Survey No.13}\/D<\/p>\n
in favour of 7*’ defendant and mutation entries”-.__were<\/p>\n
made in pursuance of the sale deed, the <\/p>\n
18* plaintiff has challenged the <\/p>\n
Assistant Commissioner.  i’6?=’i “\u00abdefe3i1.:diz3.I1.tf”also<\/p>\n
instigated by other defendants Aei=(clude:..t;hie” <\/p>\n
from enjoying the properties”:t\u00bb.:”In fact;  jhilstadefendant<\/p>\n
went to the extent  husband of the
\nplaintiff No.1, Sheishvappali   meanwhile,<\/p>\n
SheshappaA”i5di_eVdn3._a~nd~\u00ab..VV__pla_intiffs were denied their
\nlegitimate share’  theiyiiipiroperties. Hence, they were<\/p>\n
eon;st’1’arined ‘to; file a” suit for l\/411* share in alt the suit<\/p>\n
 ditzljoperties. In fact, by amendment they<\/p>\n
  the Item Nos.l and 2 of the suit<\/p>\n
sehed’u:le”idroperties were purchased under registered<\/p>\n
 “sale deed on 10.05.1973 by Sheshappa. The said<\/p>\n
“‘proi1i3erties are his self acquired properties and therefore,<\/p>\n
V Wthey are entitled to the said property exclusively’.<\/p>\n
it\/,<\/p>\n
5. After service of summons, defendants
\nentered appearance. Defendants 1 to 5 filed-fcohrrwnzon
\nWritten statement. They did not
\nrelationship between the parties;
\nthat all the suit schedule A
\nproperties. It is specif”i’ca’lly  late’<\/p>\n
jgaljways nsed”to pick up<\/p>\n
Sheshappa and defe’rid&antrr’iNlo’;5l
\nquarrel with the defendaritl\ufb02o.l.~i._ln_’;rlespect of sharing
\nthe proper;ties;.gVp:li’and L13-ed  the old aged<\/p>\n
defendan  it  1″ has suffered mentally<\/p>\n
and  due to harassment of<\/p>\n
sheshagp\u00e9 v.anld__ldeilf”eridant No.6 who made his life<\/p>\n
 Latev-Sheshappa even tried to kill defendant<\/p>\n
 fire and criminal proceedings were<\/p>\n
linitiatedlagainst him. Since then, the ls” defendant was<\/p>\n
 und”er_A’i~the fear of death and used to act as per the<\/p>\n
  *w_is,hes of Sheshappa only to avoid untoward incidents<\/p>\n
fin the family. Defendant No.6 taking undue advantage<\/p>\n
of the defendant No.1_’s condition and health coei\u00e9eiveiy
\nunder threat got executed partition deed excittdingidthue
\nSheshappa. The contents of the said  ”
\ntrue and correct and the SaIt’1\u20ac:’iS”T10t  in
\nView of the facts and
\nNo.1 has sold the   “‘St5irVeyf’
\nNos.131\/D\/1 m\u20acaS”t;t1-.i._ng   to the
\ndefendant No.7 for  is binding<\/p>\n
on all the  and ide’feftdan.ts._2,;t0 6.
\n  idieferitdant filed a separate written
\nstatefnent.   case that the suit schedule<\/p>\n
properties–,aI’e not\u00a7.Q’i1i.t~’i’fami1y properties. They are the<\/p>\n
 se:If=~a{;:c:1ui,red A’151′(3vp.er”ties of Tippanna, the 1.5? defendant.<\/p>\n
   the relationship between the parties<\/p>\n
pleadiedil in the plaint. After denying all the<\/p>\n
 allegations in the plaint, the 6″” defendant has<\/p>\n
u”Vi.AA’s1deAeifica11y pleaded that the husband of the plaintiff<\/p>\n
it ___\u00a7N0.1 and father of Plaintiffs 2 and 3 by name<\/p>\n
_;Q_<\/p>\n
partition deed has been entered into among the l5′ and
\n2nd defendant and 6″‘ defendant on 06.02.2002 at
\nGangavati partitioning the remaining properties”, ‘A’<\/p>\n
schedule properties in the said registered par.t1_tio’n4r:4deed<\/p>\n
have fallen to the share of Tippanna  2′<\/p>\n
i.e., the ire and 2nd defendaiits:A”ai1\u00a7’d
\nproperties have been fallen  sharedofi’
\ndefendant. Out of the eeiefpropeir:ie’e,i-I Weed 2nd’
\ndefendants have sold:_t’he   131 \/D
\nmeasuring 3 acres  E'(3~.iv.’Oii}1\\~:;:.’g:1v..’.E\\\/iadhL1SLld}’18.l’1El<\/p>\n
Rao’s: \\?Vlf\u20ac:iAibjxf-V’IflvE};lT1’l\u20ac”:*.S’E,’i1fIlEtlZl’lEl, the 71-” defendant. The
\nlaintiffs 4have=._no.’ ‘1’iifl1_t.”to uestion the aforesaid sale.
\nI3 .p . .3  (3%<\/p>\n
Therefore, ‘it’-WfC1s”‘contended that the suit of the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
gifor  and separate possession is not<\/p>\n
1″ . 1ri’aintair_iabl.e’;\n<\/p>\n
” The 79″ defendant fiied a separate written<\/p>\n
\u00abstatement contending that 1*’ defendant, being the<\/p>\n
  ___;\u00a7Kartha of the family, has executed a sale deed in their<\/p>\n
-11″\n<\/p>\n
favour for a valuabie consideration in order to meet the
\nfamily necessities which is binding on an the plaintiffs
\nand defendants 2 to 6.\n<\/p>\n
8. On the aforesaid pleadings, <\/p>\n
framed the foilowing six issues and_t\\p2i\u00a5’o._ ad’dit’ioi1*ia1’i<\/p>\n
issues which are as under:\n<\/p>\n
1) Whether the plaintiffs prove that’ the?’
\nsuit schedule p1=so:pV-erties  <\/p>\n
family properties\ufb02  <\/p>\n
1’2) .:\\.\/ilheitf\u00e9\ufb01ier No.6 proves that
\ni i’ i_ the dmieasesdiiiSheshappa has separated<\/p>\n
 “fr_orh_the fahgily during his life time?<\/p>\n
   Whe’th–er’ valuation of the suit
\n‘\u00ab.spVipr_operties and the payment of court fee<\/p>\n
 ~., _  V Eiorre ct?\n<\/p>\n
 p  Whether defendant N03″? proves that
\nif she is the bonafide purchaser of<\/p>\n
Sy.No.131\/D\/1 of Gangavathi?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-12r<\/p>\n
5) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to___
\n1\/4″‘ share in the suit schedueiie-.._’ii~.._<\/p>\n
properties?\n<\/p>\n
6) What decree or order_?~~
\nAdditional Issues:\n<\/p>\n
1) Whether the p1ai\u00b0n..1;iffsV prove:’thati:’:suit
\nsi.No.1 es  of  1:-f1aiVri’t..\u00abschediuie are
\nthe self iac.q_uii1r.eid;’  of iate<\/p>\n
Sh eishappa “S   Ti\/liedar?\n<\/p>\n
2)   further prove
\n iiii   .ti\u00bb;\u00ab.=;f’  Registered saie Deed
\nA  ~ dated 07\/08\/02<\/p>\n
4′ “\u20acX’eVi:'{1’VJ-.tf.\u20ac’V(-I45  defendants in favour of
\nii’defe.ridaritii”‘i\\Eo.’7 is not binding on<\/p>\n
 th\u00e9inv? …. ~ =<\/p>\n
  order to substantiate their ciairn,<\/p>\n
I\\\/iianjiainaih, the 2nd plaintiff was examined as PW~1 and<\/p>\n
 “two vifitnesses were examined as PWWQ and PWWS. On<\/p>\n
itghehalf of the defendants, 6*” defendant was examined. as<\/p>\n
 DW~1 and he has examined four vvimesses as DWS. 2 to<\/p>\n
%\/it<\/p>\n
dies<\/p>\n
the saie deed executed by IS’ defendant in favour__._of 7th
\ndefendant dated 07\/08\/2002 is not binding
\nThus, it decreed the suit of the plaintiffs’
\nrespect of Survey No. 131 \/ D\/ 1 it
\nby the said judgment and Vdecr1ee__ <\/p>\n
defendant is in appeal.\n<\/p>\n
11. The learned..  the appellant
\nassailing the contends
\nthat the  member of the
\njoint  to the date of the suit.\n<\/p>\n
Thereggprie\u00e9\u00e9 hischeduie properties are at}<\/p>\n
either joint t’arni-1yiprop~erties or seif acquired properties<\/p>\n
  oef:i_:’E’iqe_..iiV:}tH’.__defendan\u00abt’and other defendants, the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
   the same. in fact to prove the factuin of<\/p>\n
partition’,t”3.t*ai?o witnesses have been examined. In fact,<\/p>\n
 Ex.}32_i’1-is also produced to show that the mutation<\/p>\n
  ‘ve,nti’ies were made in the name of Sheshappa in terms of<\/p>\n
___5the partition. The trial Court has misread the whoie<\/p>\n
t\/\/<\/p>\n
evidence and committed a serious error in not accepting<\/p>\n
the partition pleaded by the 6′?’ defendant and <\/p>\n
he submits that the judgment and decreefrofv<\/p>\n
Court requires interference.\n<\/p>\n
12. Per contra, V’ie’arned”-..iCoVunseI_:.__for_:\u00a7 <\/p>\n
respondents supported  and
\ndecree of the trail   L A.\n<\/p>\n
It is  pendency of this
\nappea},   Therefore, his
\n1  Section 8 of the Hindu
\nSuccesision 1 iegai heir ie, that share<\/p>\n
cotjdd be wor-ked”out during final decree proceedings.<\/p>\n
  in~–.the light of the aforesaid facts and rival<\/p>\n
‘eonten.tion_s:,i the point that arise for consideration in<\/p>\n
 this’~appea1 is as underr-\n<\/p>\n
“Whether Sheshappa, the 21*” son of<\/p>\n
Tippanna, 181- defendant ceased to be a<\/p>\n
-16,<\/p>\n
member of the joint family after he was given
\nhis share in the family properties about 20<\/p>\n
years prior to the date of the suit?”<\/p>\n
14. The pleadings of the parties makejit’c.1hea.r:the~.<\/p>\n
relationship between the parties is not  1}’: ._ <\/p>\n
defendant, the Karta of the  fhas I categori_ca1;1yA<\/p>\n
stated in the written siiate.me1″it~.. that fail the  <\/p>\n
schedule properties are th_e”-jVoi:i_\u00bbt famihi properties.<\/p>\n
whereas the 5m deferidam”.r;oiiteri’ds that the properties<\/p>\n
in ques’tiori”j;are’;”se\u00a7*f_’acqi:’i’req’ properties of the IS!<\/p>\n
defentia1it._aridiitherper.are:riVo joint famiiy properties. The<\/p>\n
181 d_efend”ar1t’ in_’vt_he-._Wi=–i”tten statement has categorically<\/p>\n
  both”his’Vsecorad son Sheshappa and the 63*<\/p>\n
 ‘Ci.e.fe:3c[a’:i’E:”i’we1je quarreiirig with him demanding for<\/p>\n
 fact, Sheshappa went to the extent of<\/p>\n
 settii1g__t’i.re to the father as he was not given a share in<\/p>\n
th_e_’f.-‘properties. However: the 6*” defendant contends<\/p>\n
 V. _..that Sheshappa has been given a share immediately<\/p>\n
3,\/’<\/p>\n
_17_<\/p>\n
after his marriage by Tippanna, which is about 20_years
\nprior to the date of the suit. According
\ndefendant, only one landed property,
\nproperty and one piot are
\nsaid partition and a sum
\ngiven. It i.s the specific case”oi:”the  he’
\nhas sold Item No.’:i3″i\/D\/iii’iiI%;.\u00a7i:”eopangai\u00e9athi to 7m
\ndefendant to rneet  of the family.
\nHowever, gito iihthie  Sheshappa
\ngave v’:Shiejshappa at the time of
\npartit:ion__i    Admittedly, so called
\n writing. Even the date of<\/p>\n
partition is notisitated. There is nothing to indicate that<\/p>\n
. “the said pairtition was acted upon and any mutation<\/p>\n
‘ ~.ei1.trie’s\u00abWerejrnade in the name of Sheshappa in respect<\/p>\n
of.i”pro’pAer’t’iies which are given to him. The only entry in<\/p>\n
Aim-ea name of Sheshappa is in the year 2005 i.e., after<\/p>\n
 of the suit, after his death as per Ex.D2 in respect<\/p>\n
of two items of the suit schedule properties. Taking<\/p>\n
yr<\/p>\n
_]8c<\/p>\n
advantage of the same, the plaintiffs are contertding
\nitems 1 and 2 are the self acquired proper’ti:ep_s:”~of
\nSheshappa. Therefore, it is clear from   ‘
\nrecord and the conduct of the
\nprepared to go to any
\nproperties. Under these  off’
\nthe 1st defendant,
\nThe triai Judge on   on record
\nhas rightiy   properties are
\nJoint farnil\ufb01f  and 2 are not the self
\nacqui_red_!   as contended by the
\npia.iI-lti’f’fS_”” \u00bb no partition under which<\/p>\n
Sheshappa was Vsent out of the family 20 years prior to<\/p>\n
if ‘tithe  of’\u00abthe suit. As admittedly all the suit Schedule<\/p>\n
i”~.p’ir–oppertiI’e.s  the joint family properties, father and<\/p>\n
th4r”ee”~–sons” constituted the joint farnily in which they are<\/p>\n
 nentitleid to 1\/4″” share in the suit schedule properties<\/p>\n
Aigeixcept one of the property i_.e., Ssurvey No.13}.\/D\/1<\/p>\n
H which has been sold in favour of 7″‘ defendant for legal<\/p>\n
_;g_<\/p>\n
necessities which is binding on all the members Qf the<\/p>\n
joint family as admitted by the W defendant.<\/p>\n
View of the matter, we do not see any r;1″e’rit~.ai Ii-ttthis <\/p>\n
appeal. Ac:c0rding1y,the appeai:ia”d’i’erI}i.t3se_(j”_ ‘iv   <\/p>\n
t\u00a7UDGE<\/p>\n
        ea\/~
\n        33333<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 Author: N.Kumar &B.Sreenivase Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD O DATED THIS THE 3TH DAY op SEPTEMB;ER..’2Q(\u00a79_:: % 1>REsE1~zTM J % THE I-ION’BLE MR. JU$TIQ-EO..Fi.’4’K_i:fM’ER’ THE HON’BLE MR.._TUsT1\u00a2E’jAE,%sEEENITrA$Ef%GowDA RFA No T2-1129}-.;’ZD’GE6O’:E{:1523TR) BETWEEN: VEEREEHK:g’_,_, vk, A S \/ o ‘LAT.E;\u00bb’_DU}1ZU_GA’PPA~’MEDAR […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVeeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-26T14:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-26T14:12:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1910,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-26T14:12:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-26T14:12:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-26T14:12:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009"},"wordCount":1910,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009","name":"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-26T14:12:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-vs-smt-mallamma-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Veeresh vs Smt Mallamma on 8 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}