{"id":238415,"date":"2011-06-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011"},"modified":"2016-05-19T11:05:41","modified_gmt":"2016-05-19T05:35:41","slug":"vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
E\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0%' KARLWATAKA AT BAE\u00a7\u00a7'{;;:'$LQ}:{:':E.v  _\n\nDATED THIS THE) 2% DAY C)?' JUNE. Cf .\nBEFORE-'   '\n\nTHE HQNBLE MR.JUS'I'i\u00a3CE K.i\u00a7f;K:a'\u00e9'HAv;5;N;5u*2;a:iA2\u00a7f;2&\n\nCRIMINM 1>E:T:T10;:;:g\u00a7ze. 212520? 20:1  \nBETWEEN:   V ' ' \n\n1. Vishwanath S \/Q\" :<3=;1j: 3\u00a7tea1fs,}   H \n\nBoth;  _  V V\n\nKaraiarria \ufb01gaia,' V i11a 'g=s:\u00a7 ' I\n\nPvi'adb;:Ij;HoBE:';-- Magadi T'a:uk.\n\nRamakha;;\u00a7a.:a'\u00abDi;e:.1;1'iC.t. . j  Petitioners\n\n[By M\/  Company, Advocates]\n\n       \n\n ' Sf\u00e9d:e_ of VK\u00e9;;i1\u00a7afaka,\n BVI'_Mag;e?\u00a3di P.C\u00a71i.::'\u20ac Station,\n\nRarizanagaija. District. , $ .Resp0nden1:\n\n [By \u00a73:i:\u20ac\u00a7.i\\\u00abi.S:*inivasa Raddy, HCGP}\n\nAA   Criminal Petition is filed under Section 43%\n\n prayirlg :0 \u00e9snlargs the peiitieners an 133%} Er:\n\nCrime No.;222\/2013 sf Magadi Poiics Statian.\n\n__\u00a7\u00a73.mar:aga:*a, for \u00a3316 effenc\u00e9s pumlshabis zzn\ufb01er\n\nS\u00e9ciiong EEC! {B} gmd 2392 read with Ssciierz 31% sf EEC'.\n\n{,  \/\n\n\n\n?  . V V.\nThis Criminal Petition Coming for or;eet__* \u00a7V'eertain properties beiengirig to Gepaiieh,\n\nfathee  CW1 and aeeused. No.3. it is the ease of the\n\n\"':V'_Ap:je_e\u00a7:eutioi1 that in the baekgground ef this iihviii in\n\n eeimeetier: with eivil dispute, the eeeueeei gsereene\n\niermieg themeeivee i}'}i{) am tiriiewfui eeseinbiy by\n\n ,1 M,,.\/\"\ni..;\u00ab\/\n\n\n\n3\n\nsharing common object and by hatching  V'\n\ncommitted the murder of Ran1aiah.i_'hu_eheii*1d'jV1., Kid\n\non 13.11.2010 in Kara1amaing.a13.f_\"vivildge df \n\nTaiuk. CWCI on coming  'i<Z\u00a71()'\\-VaAI~Lcv}'i;\u20ac3i{CVh\u20acig'Ah.:i1S}\u00a7)3}TiCi \n\nlying dead, went to the spotvd\u00e9dd\u00e9udd ,s,he'  ninfcirmed by\n\nCW2 \u00bb Narayanappaizijihat  VV8c'A'3VA.VE1SSau1{\u20acd\nby accused Nosii to   :r__C3n the basis of\nthe said ingfoihqeitioii  complaint on\n13.11.2015  police based on\nVVhiChv"C\u20aciS\u20acVUi:3fi' 'it; came to be registered\nand  up. During investigation,\nthe peti'vde.1j1ersVVVv'hefdeirzifwere apprehended and when\n\nprQCi\u00ab}1'i\u00a7\u00e9di be.fe:=@'...___\u00a7h;f3 learned Magistrate they were\n\n\u00bb$}VuhjVec.t:_e<i  _jL1diCia1 custody. A1; the instance of\n\naccused'  igduring investigation, iron rod said to have\n\nbeef'; liS\u20acC\u00a7',"f{}F cemmission of the efferice eame is be\n\n feceveredi Aecueeci N033 to 5 who were apprehended\n\n -.'s;:id_:*'suhjeeied \ufb01e judicial custody iziiitiaily, were later\n\n yfeieaeed err: bziii. During \u00a7I1V\u20acS\u00a7ig3'{,iOfL. it is revealed\n\ni\/he: ea heariiig {'E'i\u20acS ef Remaiahi \u00a7X\u00a7J'.2 wen: :6; {he\n\n \n\n\n\nplace where said Ramaiah was lying and whe_r:._a_ek_e\u00e9i \n\nC\\V.2, deceased Rarnaiah made an ""-Qra1V'rrV.ei3z1:1g 7\n\ndeelaratier: that he was assaruitcjtfby':1eeuee<i 'E'J.::,}'"$1\/'itI*;.\n\nan iron rod on the head. Dtirirrig .inve':s*;igaVtie1\u00a7-e;_""the,\n\nstatements of material xvitneesfes we;~e1...:ece:dea arncf\n\nafter investigation charge ;<\u00a7l1-eetv--c\u00e9;:1f1e tdbe. filed. The\nprayer made by bai} before the\nlearned Seesioreis_;Jud.ge"Ceirne' t\u00a7\u00bb.beV'-re};Ve'<u:ted. Therefore,\n\nthey are befcire  ('3Qju._rt..f0r--..'gr\u00a5:;:nt of bail.\n\n   learrred eourusel appearing for\nthe peiitroners  High Court Geverrrmerxt\n\nP1ea_C'.erL agrpeering rd:  Respondent "State. Perused<\/pre>\n
‘  _ th7C—- reeje~.rci’ez made’ \u00e9iiraiiabier<\/p>\n
 iearrred counsel fer the petitioners<\/p>\n
eeri’ter1:’ie(ii’ “that, since there are me direct witnesees tea<\/p>\n
 fhe ailege\u00e9 incident emf murder, the entire case of the<\/p>\n
‘rpreseeuiierr resets or: eireurrzstantiei esz\u00e9deriee arz\u00e9<\/p>\n
%  ..  ejbeeluteiy rhere is He rrzzzterizrl re ir\u00e9diriete the eemei\u00e9eirfg<\/p>\n
{sf  ;}\u20ac\ufb01'[,i{.”;i);\u20acr’$ in {he eernrrrieeierz 05 the efferree,<\/p>\n
therefora the peiiiieners ara entitlaad its be r.~r3\u00a7e2\u00e9;;.sj_e _<i',7f:.\u00a7;..A<\/p>\n
baii; that Si1'}C\u20ac three ather accused p\u20ac1f\u00a7;0?':1s '*{2g2*}';\u00a7  K <\/p>\n
sim\ufb01arly piace\ufb01 are aireaciy
\npeiiticeners are 3.159 entit1ec:1 i9  be g\u00e9xfzlhlz\u00e9zgged
\nprincipie of parity; that in    slang V'
\nstanding civii disput\u00e9\u00e9"p0ss;iEi:1it%\u00a7.jfalse 'iiiipiigzatien {if<\/p>\n
these petiticners cannot be   <\/p>\n
5.    iiq\u00e9 i\u00e9\u00e9rned High Court
\nGover:1:::\u00a7:IiVt.  grant of bail and
\ncontended _A\u00e9;i:5f  — .  ‘ v<\/p>\n
t}:ai .afthis\u00ab..V$taIg\u20ac:;”‘:1\ufb01i\u20ac%.re are reasonable gmunds to<\/p>\n
beiieve i}T1’a1t”*Zh\u20act._ petitibners herein pursuant to a<\/p>\n
  <29::$:pi: a;x::\u00a7f hai\u00e911\u20ac_{1,..\u20ac:0mmi\u00a3ted the murder of deceased<\/p>\n
 ' '2:?3Via;1:<2;g.ia\u00a71'~i;%;A.'\u00a7\u20act;–<\u00e9: background (sf the \ufb021–wi}1 and animosity<\/p>\n
as 'L%ecea:\u00a7:%::iA'Tand his Wife were seriously cantasting the<\/p>\n
Q Civii ..i\u00a7'iig1ai;::a::, therefore, at this stage, :here are<\/p>\n
 \u00bb fegag\ufb01\ufb01bie graurzcis to b\u20acii\u20acV\u20ac that the petitioners are<\/p>\n
U cf the Qff\ufb01fiii\ufb01 gmmishabie Wiih deaih 0:' life<\/p>\n
 imgrisanmsni as $:3.r::h ihggs' are :33: a:~::r:i\u00a7*\u00a3:}ed far @333; that<\/p>\n
thgzzgh '\u00a7:%1e:*\u20ac \u20ac:\u00a7f'\u20ac rm \u00e9\u00e9rsci 2\u00a5i1:I:\u20acs\u00a7\u20acs fez' EEK: egmmissisn<\/p>\n
5%<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
of the offence, the Circumstance prime  V.<\/p>\n
the complicity of these p\u20actitiDI1,\u20acI:’S”Vi:I;1 the  ”<\/p>\n
the offence.\n<\/p>\n
6. I have bestowed I11}\/_f””eeriotie.__<;::t;si\u00a7:Ee3:\u00e9\u00a7tic>ris :0″<\/p>\n
the submissions made  C.O.1:1’H.S{31J\u00a7OH both
\nsides. V ‘V \u00ab H .\n<\/p>\n
'2'. Of    ehe case of the\nproseeutic\ufb01i,    witnesses for the\n<\/pre>\n
COIHII},iSSHiUI1u.: D’f   “a”S suCh the case of the
\nprosee’\u00a71tio”f1 ‘  evidence. The
\nmaterialeeagfi  faeie indicates that there is<\/p>\n
eiviliei.e1iSputeV”b–eti\u00a7,jee:3 Accused No.3 and CW.1 being<\/p>\n
. b’\u00a70_therVa11.d ‘eister in respect of certain properties said to<\/p>\n
 ,\u00a5”_1.9:’:i_r_eTA  iieft behind by their father Gopaiah.<\/p>\n
Th’e-refQfe;v  is reasonable to infer that there was ieng<\/p>\n
 sta\ufb01diizgs illwwill and animosity between two families in<\/p>\n
‘ ‘eeglzieetiezz with Eand dispute. The {native being deubie<\/p>\n
 V. …_.ecig’ed weapon E’: eeuld be the basis fer eemmitteimg the<\/p>\n
e\ufb01me 932$ it eeui\ufb01 3381:; be basie {er fe\ufb01se i:::pEi\u00a3:a{:ie:1. A:<\/p>\n
7′
\nthis Stage, the materiais on record indicates that at<\/p>\n
about 10.30 am. on 13.11.2010 these petiti0:1erV_\u00e9\u00a7-..;\u00a7J-{C1<\/p>\n
ethers were found moving on the motor eyeie  ~<\/p>\n
scene of oeeurrenee where the deieeasecii R\u00e9{‘1:\u00e9.fai2ii:,’_”was_V <\/p>\n
iying with injuries. This fact ha\u00e9._i::’eefi*– jgirinia<\/p>\n
indicated in the ${at\u20acIU\u20acfitf:’%”Qf CW5. ‘   “The ” L’<\/p>\n
statement of CW2 pfii’I1a  having
\nheard screaming of  he went there,
\nhe saw Ramafiah; on his head
\nand on Ramaiah said that he
\nwas aieeeiuiteg\ufb02g  {accused No.1) with an
\niron revti. en   ,\u00a5)1′.iII1a faeie indicates that the<\/p>\n
deceasezi h’ar1v1:)5\u00e9_i1,;’~.\n<\/p>\n
N02 in the eemmiseien of the offence. Having regard to<\/p>\n
rnateriale availabie on record at this stage, this <\/p>\n
ef the opinien that they are no reasonabie.’gr0t;2:1\u00a3ii*ei  ~<\/p>\n
believe that accused N02 is.gui.1_ty’  ei’f4ene’eV uh’<\/p>\n
punishable with death or life  <\/p>\n
being had to the gravity 0fVth%e”~.QVffen”cee,’this   of  V<\/p>\n
the opinion that pet:ti.gner’V.Ne:..1_:’–ie”-not entitletiii for the
\nrelief of bail. Hoxxrexrehnh  entitled for the
\nrelief of bail he    footing as that
\nof the   have already been
\nenlarged”O1*::.:.:?3t:tt’:::f:’\u00a7V 1; is not entitled for the
\nprinei;:\u00a7}e ef  on a different footing<\/p>\n
thanthe ntftaei” a.C’euSved”‘\u00a73ersons who have been enlarged<\/p>\n
 8.’V”.In  View of the matter, the petition is<\/p>\n
e.1ie’We\u20act:Vin’?’t3art’ ‘Petitiener N02 (accused No.2) is<\/p>\n
V’  efdere\ufb01 te be enlarged on bail in ecxnneetien with<\/p>\n
;\u00a35.C’;Neg4}\/11 en the file of the Seesiene Jueige,<\/p>\n
Renianegarze etibjeet tie the f{)H{}’\u00a7~JiI1\u00a7 =f_7{)3″i\u00a7i\u00a7if\u00a7{\u00a7}’1\u00a3%:<\/p>\n
“M . ,, K
\nXE
\n&<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
Petitioner No.2 Shed} execute a persona}
\nbond for a sum of Rs.5C},0OO\/’-\n<\/p>\n
(me Surety’ fer the like sum <\/p>\n
Satisfaction of the learned  %<\/p>\n
Judge;\n<\/p>\n
Petitioner No.2 Sh-.:.:3_.11 n{3tV_ii:te:mie;i\u00e9;:e.VQr <\/p>\n
tamper with the 15’1*Q\u00e9e”n._i>vii:f1e$e;es<\/p>\n
in any mariner;\n<\/p>\n
Petitianer N0;\u00a7?.[f  v’i:V}:’V’_;ifi3C)S\u20ac of<\/p>\n
i1i_{Ies_}Eigatien,\u20ac_ShaI_I .a’p’peaz’ before the<\/p>\n
3: Iny4es{igatiri”g’i’.’: whenever Called
\n” -.;ip011a”f:0- C19 “so agnd-‘\u20ac:o~<:sperate in the<\/p>\n
-. ‘invesftigatidne-f the ease;\n<\/p>\n
 ‘Pef:it:i0:1ef’-N\u00e9.2 shah appear on all
\n heafitm-\u20ac;ates before, the court without<\/p>\n
A  *..f\u00e9:iI__;_<\/p>\n
* .}HTe shall not induige in any acts similar<\/p>\n
to the ene alieged in the ease;\n<\/p>\n
N0, 2 mark his<\/p>\n
with<\/p>\n
31331}
\nthe<\/p>\n
Petitioner
\natiendaenee jurisdietienai<\/p>\n
eeiiee an every IS?” sf ezseh eaiezzelar<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
month between \u00a30.00 am. and 2.0Q___ <\/p>\n
p.m. til} conclusian of ths tiria}.\n<\/p>\n
Petitiezm insofar as it reiates to P{:*’\u20ac~i:t:i(:>1f1\u00ab:::T1″=  <\/p>\n
N03 (accused No.1} is dismisssdfi  <\/p>\n
RS} *<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana E IN THE HIGH COURT 0%’ KARLWATAKA AT BAE\u00a7\u00a7'{;;:’$LQ}:{:’:E.v _ DATED THIS THE) 2% DAY C)?’ JUNE. Cf . BEFORE-‘ ‘ THE HQNBLE MR.JUS’I’i\u00a3CE K.i\u00a7f;K:a’\u00e9’HAv;5;N;5u*2;a:iA2\u00a7f;2& CRIMINM 1>E:T:T10;:;:g\u00a7ze. 212520? 20:1 BETWEEN: V ‘ ‘ 1. Vishwanath S \/Q” :<3=;1j: 3\u00a7tea1fs,} H Both; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-19T05:35:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-19T05:35:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":889,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-19T05:35:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-19T05:35:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-19T05:35:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011"},"wordCount":889,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011","name":"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-19T05:35:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vishwanath-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238415\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}