{"id":238473,"date":"2010-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-26T10:55:18","modified_gmt":"2015-05-26T05:25:18","slug":"mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010<\/div>\n
                                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                                    Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                                  Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                         Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                               Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001541\/8630Penalty\n                                                                             Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001541\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n
 emerging from the Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
Appellant                              :      Md. Tabrez Alam\n                                              Plot no 216, Rajpur ext\n                                              Maidan Garhi, New Delhi-68\n\nRespondent                             :      Mrs. Kunti Aswal,\n                                              Deemed PIO & Education Officer (Zone-24)\n                                       Directorate of Education Delhi,\n                                       Govt. of NCT of Delhi\n                                       C- Block, Defense Colony,\n                                       New Delhi\n\nRTI application filed on               :      05\/02\/2010\nPIO replied                            :      No reply\nFirst appeal filed on                  :      19\/05\/2010\nFirst Appellate Authority Ordered on   :      Not enclosed\nSecond Appeal received on              :      08\/06\/2010\n\n Sl.                                             Information Sought\n<\/pre>\n
 1.    I had filed for the admission of my son Arman with the caste certificate and other necessary details. But
\n       my son was not given admission. I want the following information:\n<\/p>\n
 2.    Kindly provide information regarding % of OBC & EWS Quota at FR Egnel School.\n<\/p>\n
 3.    Kindly provide the list of students who have enrolled in the school with OBC & EWS Quota.\n<\/p>\n
 4.    Under RTE do children have the right to get admission to any school?\n<\/p>\n
 5.    Since the school is minority school\n<\/p>\n
 6.    Kindly provide the recognition letter of the FR Egnel School Gautam Nagar.\n<\/p>\n
 7.    Kindly provide the list regarding the number of applications from the minorities & how many applications
\n       were accepted.\n<\/p>\n
Ground of First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
Not enclosed<\/p>\n
FAA Order:\n<\/p>\n
Not enclosed<\/p>\n
Ground for Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
No information received form PIO & FAA.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                   Page\u00a01\u00a0of\u00a04
\n Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing held on 21\/07\/2010:\n<\/p>\n
“The following were present:\n<\/p>\n
Appellant : Md. Tabrez Alam;\n<\/p>\n
Respondent : Ms. Anita Satia, Public Information Officer & DDE(S); Ms. Kunti Aswal, EO(Z-24);\n<\/p>\n
        “The RTI application has been made on 05\/02\/2010, no information was provided to the appellant and the
\ninformation has been provided to the appellant on 16\/06\/2010 which appears to be appropriate. The PIO states that
\nthe RTI application had been made at the PIO Head Quarter on 05\/02\/2010. PIO (HQ) Mr. Anjum Masood
\ntransferred the RTI application on 09\/03\/2010 to PIO(Act). PIO(Act) transferred to PIO(South) on 12\/03\/2010 which
\nreached PIO(South) on 16\/03\/2010. After this PIO (South) sought the assistance of Education Officer Zone-24 Mrs.
\nKunti Aswal on 18\/03\/2010 and the information was received from the Education Officer on 15\/06\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
Mr. Anjum Masood, PIO(HQ) has transferred the RTI application after considerable delay leading to the delay in
\nproving the information. Mrs. Kunti Aswal has not provided the information in time. Mrs. Kunti Aswal was asked to
\nexplain the reasons for the delay. She claims that she tried to get the information from the School and did not have
\nthe information. If information is not held by the public authority the appellant should have been informed
\nimmediately.”\n<\/p>\n
Decision dated 21\/07\/2010:\n<\/p>\n
The appeal was allowed.\n<\/p>\n
       “The information has been provided.\n<\/p>\n
The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the Mr. Anjum
\nMasood, PIO(HQ) and Mrs. Kunti Aswal deemed PIO within 30 days as required by the law. From the facts
\nbefore the Commission it is apparent that the PIO and deemed PIO are guilty of not furnishing information within the
\ntime specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI
\nAct. It appears that the deemed PIOs actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause notice is
\nbeing issued to them, and they are directed give their reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty should
\nnot be levied on them.\n<\/p>\n
Mr. Anjum Masood, PIO(HQ) and Mrs. Kunti Aswal deemed PIO will present themselves before the Commission at
\nthe above address on 19 August 2010 at 03.00PM alongwith their written submissions showing cause why penalty
\nshould not be imposed on them as mandated under Section 20 (1). They will also submit proof of having given the
\ninformation to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
If there are other persons responsible for the delay in providing the information to the Appellant the PIO is
\ndirected to inform such persons of the show cause hearing and direct them to appear before the Commission with
\nhim.”\n<\/p>\n
Relevant facts emerging during showcause hearing on 19\/08\/2010:
\nAppellant: Mr. Tabrez Alam;\n<\/p>\n
Respondent: Mr. Anjum Masood, PIO (HQ); Mrs. Kunti Aswal, Deemed & EO, Zone-24;\n<\/p>\n
         The PIO (HQ) Mr. Anjum Masood has submitted that the RTI application dated 05\/02\/2010 was received in
\nhis office on 08\/02\/2010. Since the postal order enclosed with was in the name of PIO, Directorate of Education, the
\nsame was given to the deemed PIO & UDC Mr. S.P. Mann by the PIO Mr. Masood for sending it back to the
\nAppellant with the request to furnish a fresh postal order in the name of Account Officer, Directorate of Education.
\nHowever, Mr. S.P. Mann had sent the above said information to the Appellant only on 26\/02\/2010, resulting which
\nthe Appellant personally approached the PIO on 05\/03\/2010 and deposited the requisite fee of Rs.10\/-\u00a0 in cash.
\nFurther, the RTI application was transferred to the PIO(Act) on 09\/03\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
        The APIO & EO, Zone-24 Mrs. Kunti Aswal has stated that the RTI application was received in her office
\nthrough the PIO & DDE(South) on 19\/03\/2010. A reply was submitted by Mrs. Aswal to the PIO & DDE(South) on
\n07\/04\/2010. Since the said reply was incomplete and unsatisfactory, the PIO & DDE(South) had returned the same to
\nher and directing her to furnish the complete reply. The PIO & DDE(South) had also sent a letter dated 07\/04\/2010 to
\nthe Appellant, stating that the information was awaited from the concerned EO. The APIO & EO, Zone-24 Mrs.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                    Page\u00a02\u00a0of\u00a04
\n Aswal has further stated that the information was not ready available with her and the same was to be collected from
\nthe Fr. Agnel School. The reply was received from the concerned School only on 11\/06\/2010 and the same was
\nprovided to the Appellant on 15\/06\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
        The Appellant has stated that the reply provided to him with respect to Query no. 3 is incomplete as the
\nnumber of students enrolled in the school with EWS Quota for the year 2010-11 should be 21 as per the table
\nprovided. However, the information about the name, father’s name and address was provided only for 17 students.
\nFurther, the Commission has observed that the information provided on 15\/06\/2010 by the concerned school was in
\nresponse of the letter dated 03\/06\/2010 from the APIO & EO, Zone-24. Hence, after 07\/04\/2010 the APIO & EO,
\nZone-24 had forwarded the RTI application to the concerned School for providing the information only on
\n03\/06\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
        When the Commission asked the APIO Mrs. Kunti Aswal, the reasons for not forwarding the RTI application
\nto the concerned School immediately after 07\/04\/2010. Mrs. Aswal states that she must have forwarded the RTI
\napplication immediately after 07\/04\/2010. However, Mrs. Aswal has not offered any proof of forwarding the same to
\nthe concerned School.\n<\/p>\n
       The APIO is directed to provide the names of the students who have been admitted in pre-school under the
\n5% quota. The PIO will also get an explanation form the school why only 21 students have been admitted under EWS
\nQuota instead of 24. This information will be provided to the appellant before 10 September 2010.\n<\/p>\n
        The deemed PIO Mrs. Kunti Aswal received the RTI application according to her own admission on
\n19\/03\/2010 and she gave an incomplete reply on 07\/04\/2010 to the PIO. The PIO immediately informed her that the
\nreply was incomplete on the same day and Mrs. Aswal does not appear to have taken any action on this. From the
\nevidence produced before the Commission it appears that she sought the additional information from the school only
\non 03\/06\/2010 and when she received it on 11\/06\/2010 she sent it to the PIO who has sent the information on
\n15\/06\/2010. Mrs. Kunti Aswal received the RTI application on 19\/03\/2010 and she should have been able to provide
\nthe information latest by 15\/04\/2010. Instead the information was provided to the appellant only on 15\/06\/2010. It is
\ntrue that even this information is not complete and part of the information has still to be provided. Thus Mrs. Kunti
\nAswal, Deemed PIO & Education Officer appears to be responsible for the delay of 60 days from 15\/04\/2010 to
\n15\/06\/2010. The Commission asked her to give reasons for this delay.\n<\/p>\n
         The deemed PIO Mrs. Kunti Aswal is able to offer no explanation for the delay. Section 20 (1) of the RTI
\nAct states,      “Where the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may
\nbe, at the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that the Central Public Information Officer or the
\nState Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has, without any reasonable cause, refused to receive an
\napplication for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of section
\n7 or malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading
\ninformation or destroyed information which was the subject of the request or obstructed in any manner in furnishing
\nthe information, it shall impose a penalty of two hundred and fifty rupees each day till application is received or
\ninformation is furnished, so however, the total amount of such penalty shall not exceed twenty five thousand rupees;\n<\/p>\n
Provided that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall
\nbe given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before any penalty is imposed on him:\n<\/p>\n
Provided further that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the Central Public
\nInformation Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be.”\n<\/p>\n
Section 19 (5) of the RTI Act has also stated that In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a
\nrequest was justified shall be on the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the
\ncase may be, who denied the request.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                       Page\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a04
\n Thus if without reasonable cause, information is not furnished within the time specified under sub-section (1) of
\nsection 7, the Commission is dutybound to levy a penalty at the rate of rupees two hundred and fifty each day till the
\ninformation is furnished. Once the Commission decides that there was no reasonable cause for delay, it has to impose
\nthe penalty at the rate specified in Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act and the law gives no discretion in the matter. The
\nburden of proving that the PIO or deemed PIO acted reasonably and diligently is clearly on the PIO.\n<\/p>\n
        The Deemed PIO has been able no give no reasonable cause for the delay of 60 days. The Commission finds
\nthis as a fit case for levy of penalty under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act. Since the Commission has come to the
\nconclusion that there was an unwarranted delay of 60 days which can be ascribed to Mrs. Kunti Aswal. The
\nCommission imposes a penalty at the rate of Rs.250\/- per day of delay i.e. Rs.250\/- X 60 days = Rs.15000\/-\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
       As per the provisions of Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act 2005, the Commission finds this
\na fit case for levying penalty on Mrs. Kunti Aswal, Deemed & EO. Since the delay in
\nproviding the correct information has been of 60 days, the Commission is passing an order
\npenalizing Mrs. Kunti Aswal Rs. 15,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n
       The Chief Secretary of GNCT of Delhi is directed to recover the amount of Rs.15,000\/-
\nfrom the salary of Mrs. Kunti Aswal and remit the same by a demand draft or a Banker’s
\nCheque in the name of the Pay & Accounts Officer, CAT, payable at New Delhi and send the
\nsame to Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, Joint Registrar and Deputy Secretary of the Central
\nInformation Commission, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, New Delhi – 110066. The
\namount may be deducted at the rate of Rs.5000\/ per month every month from the salary of
\nMrs. Kunti Aswal and remitted by the 10th of every month starting from October 2010. The
\ntotal amount of Rs.15,000 \/- will be remitted by 10th of December, 2010.
\nThis decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                             Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                                   Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                                              19 August 2010
\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(ARG)<\/p>\n
      1- The Chief Secretary
\n         GNCT of Delhi
\n         New Delhi
\n     2- Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar,
\n        Joint Registrar and Deputy Secretary
\n        Central Information Commission,
\n        2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan,
\n        New Delhi – 110066<\/p>\n
                                                                                                               Page\u00a04\u00a0of\u00a04\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001541\/8630Penalty Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001541 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Md. Tabrez Alam Plot no 216, Rajpur ext Maidan Garhi, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-26T05:25:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-26T05:25:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1971,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-26T05:25:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-26T05:25:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-26T05:25:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010"},"wordCount":1971,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010","name":"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-26T05:25:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tabrezalam-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-19-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Tabrezalam vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}