{"id":23865,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2014-09-27T13:47:08","modified_gmt":"2014-09-27T08:17:08","slug":"smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n
, E _\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 20\"' DAY OF OCTOBER 2010 \nBEFORE A it\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.V. sHYLENDR~p;:iiI\u00a7tJ:;4teAi\u00a7tr -\n\nWRIT PETITION No. 2s721,I.?.910 (L:&;i31)A\"i\u00bb  \"\n\nWRIT PETITION N0fm28726lg\"Q};_G \u00a7LALR%'1  \n\nIN WRIT PETITION NO. 2372i\/53:01.9 (LAVQBEA   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt. Lingamma\n\nW\/0 Sri Subbanna\n\nAged about 66 ye;;trsV._ _  _ \nNo.2O,3\"'CrOss     \n\nCh01ura._pa1y\u00e9i 22 \"  -A\n\nMagadi Road ' _ _  \n\nBangaiore \u00ab.5560 023  ,_  i  Petitioner\n(By Slri.-v\\{.arapra.s;1Vd; 'Adi\/.) \n\n .1   it 'ThiC\u00bb..VCOn:rnii,3siOner\n\nA ' '--..IBangaior'e Development Authority\n Kn..II1ar.-as Park West Extension\nBaiigaiore\n\nit it A  ' ._Tltie Special Land Acquisition Officer\n\n \n\nN _,Banga1Ore Development Authority\nKumara Park West Extension\nBangalore ... Respondents\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed under Articies 226 & 227 of\nthe Constitution of India with a prayer to direct the\n\n\n\n-2-\n\nRespondenis to allot a suitable site and to execute a registered\nabsolute sale deed in favour of the petitioner in lieu. o,f\"the\nacquisition of the residential house site No.2, formed\"in\"katha,\n\nNo.75, assessment old No.32\/2, presently No.33\/2\u00a7'_:sit'ua_t--ed_\" _\nSuggipalya village, Ullal Village Dhakale, Yes_yvant\u00bbhapu1'a._,'i \"\n\nHobli, Bangalore North Taluk and etc.__,  \n\n{N WRIT PETITION N0. 28726\/,Z010;\"\u20acLA'5lSI3Ali':_i  it    N\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri Nagarajegowda\n\nS\/o Channegowda\n\nAged about 58 years  '  \nlUatNo.-425\/A\/2    \n4\"' cross, K R Gardens 1\nMurugeshpalya-..  __ \u00ab   \nBangalore ,     Petitioner\n\n(By sir' Varapi\u00a7as,ad,i*;\u00e9l'di{.')sff[  \nAND:   .   , .\n\nl.  The Commissioner\n __ \u00b0i~B;_anga1ore Development Authority\n, .Kurriarai--Park West Extension\n2' .  'Bf5ng'\u00b0'~i03\u00a2ll:..\n\n2.'  The lS_p;ec.ial Land Acquisition Officer\nBangalore Development Authority\n\n_ _ Kufnara Park West Extension\n\"  Bangalore . . . Respondents\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of\n\n\"the Constitution of India with a prayer to direct the\n\nRespondents to allot a suitable site and to execute a registered\nabsolute sale deed in favour of the petitioner in lieu of the\nacquisition of the residential house site No.1, formed in katha\nNo.75, assessment old No.32\/2, presently No.33\/2 situated at\n\n\n\n..3..\n\nSuggipalya village, Ullal Dhakale, Yeswanthapura iflobli,\nBangalore North Taluk and etc., a \n\nThese Writ Petitions coming on for prelimin_ary'   u\nthis day, the Court made the following: --   \" N -- ' '\n\nORDER \n<\/pre>\n
RE WRIT PETITEON No. 2872.1(201ios{1in\u00a7BDA”>csvl:\u00a7 = i’
\nPetitioner claims to be  of  No.2
\nformed in Katha   present
\nNo.33\/2 situated ‘at. vSugg,i;pal.7?”\u00ab ‘hillage Dhakale,
\nYeswanthapstlrdi.  Bangalore, in
\nterms of   V25. 1 1.1998.\n<\/p>\n
  the petitioner that the respondents,<\/p>\n
particularlyhtheV’BD_A  Special Land Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n
‘ ‘~-,1:1ave. {notifiedcertain'”‘lands for acquisition for the formation of<\/p>\n
ias “Sir M. Vishveswaraiah Layout New<\/p>\n
Exte.nsio’n”..,llAlrehabilitation scheme had also been held out to<\/p>\n
it  .o.iitheland”ovvners, pursuant to the acquisition proceedings and the<\/p>\n
—  assurance was that such of those persons whose lands have<\/p>\n
 hiilheen acquired, will be allotted alternative sites by the BDA.<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
3. Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is..__that<\/p>\n
though the petitioner has lost her site due to accluisiitiioni<\/p>\n
proceedings and though she had made several reprles.entations’l_4’t <\/p>\n
for allotting alternative site, she  not he.en~:’al.l_ottedVand’.<\/p>\n
therefore, she is constrained tog,approae’h_th~is Cot1rtse’eking .forV”a<\/p>\n
the following relief 2\u00bb<\/p>\n
a. Issue a writ    _gMandamus,
\ndireetingthe responderivrsl  ctiiloitjvsnitable site
\nand to ‘exeente in registered Sale Deed
\nin  lieu of the<\/p>\n
it..a’6qiii~5iitioiz\u00a7:’3egf  Site No.2, formed
\n in ‘ Kailza.,:1K'(gl7.7i;’~.Assessment Old No.32\/2,
\nllpresentlyvll’hlr;.33;\/\u00e9lililhsitnated at Snggipalya<\/p>\n
 _Villag–e,a ‘Ullal’Village Dhakale, Yeswanthapura<\/p>\n
A  a.”~Hobli, B;ang’alore North Talulc, measuring East-
\n  ft and North–Sonth 27 fr, having
\n  the same from its earlier owner,<\/p>\n
a  the registered Absolute Sale Deed dated<\/p>\n
25.11.1998 vide document No.7634\/1998-99
\nregistered in the office of the Sub–Registrar,
\nBangalore North Talak, Bangalore as per
\n\/lnnexure–A.\n<\/p>\n
b. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus,<\/p>\n
directing the respondents to Consider the<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
represerzrarions dated 05.06.2008 and
\n16.12.2009 made by the petitioner vza\u00a2_’iaan_
\nArmexure–EcmdE]. 0′  it<\/p>\n
4. Appearing on behalf of the
\nof Sri. Varaprasad, learned counseliijs
\nallotted alternative sites in favour-~._of  par
\nwith the petitioner and that  cannot…’disi:riminate
\nagainst the petitioner.   are not even
\nheeding to the   for allotment of<\/p>\n
alternative site, iiti”has”bfeeotne’;nec’essary to seek for issue of
\na writ’-._of._  Cofnpel-ling the respondents to allot
\nalternativesite tol”theV petitioner also as per the rehabilitation
\nscherjnei} <\/p>\n
  5..rV_vUnfoftt1_nately, nothing is placed on record before the<\/p>\n
C’ourti eveniftoiai’indicate that the petitioner’s land has been<\/p>\n
isacquiredi for the formation of “Sir M. Visweshwaraiah Layout”<\/p>\n
 respondents. In the absence of such basic and necessary<\/p>\n
 _p_:r_iaterial, nothing further can be inferred in favour of the<\/p>\n
petitioner, as to whether it is otherwise subject matter of<\/p>\n
acquisition and for enabling the petitioner to place material<\/p>\n
_ 5 _
\nbefore court and for such purpose, time had been granted to the
\nlearned counsel for the petitioner and the case
\nadjourned on 27.9.2010, 28.9.2010 and s.10.20iot%’.:;}iia.l. .<\/p>\n
listed today. ‘ A V V ‘ V\n<\/p>\n
6. Mr. Varaprasad, learned lfori
\nrequests for some more time to tlie  lbeforelllthis ii
\nCourt. This court cannot wa\u00e9it end’Iess}ytoe\u00e9nable ‘tiie”iawyer to
\nproduce the requisite matelriaiiyyat to pass orders
\nthereafteri While   of an incomplete
\nor  such possibilities can not<\/p>\n
be avoidedaif the advocate”‘representing a litigant is careless or<\/p>\n
__ inactij\/ell! be<\/p>\n
 7. tliepresent circumstances, and in the absence of any<\/p>\n
i’e.le*4!_ant”1nat,erial~and more over allotment of alternative sites<\/p>\n
V . bein\u00a7”no’t’:in”t’be nature of legal right or entitlement no writ of<\/p>\n
llgII1ar’1damus can be issued by this Court.<\/p>\n
  Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n
-7-<\/span><\/p>\n
RE WRIT PETITION NO. 28726\/2010 (LA–BDA) :<\/p>\n
Sri. Varaprasad, learned counsel for the petit\u00a7ofieAr<\/p>\n
submits that the case of the petitioner in this w.r’:it pCIVitii’\\i3ifl <\/p>\n
similar to the case of the petiti0nerjiriit’he\u00ab abaove \\5vrit_pet-it’io\ufb01’.<\/p>\n
viz., W.P.No.2872 1\/2010 (LA.-BDAii);..A i”–Ti’heref0re; i this  <\/p>\n
petition is also dismissed for the  reast5’n._  <\/p>\n
NG*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar , E _ IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 20″‘ DAY OF OCTOBER 2010 BEFORE A it THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.V. sHYLENDR~p;:iiI\u00a7tJ:;4teAi\u00a7tr – WRIT PETITION No. 2s721,I.?.910 (L:&;i31)A”i\u00bb ” WRIT PETITION N0fm28726lg”Q};_G \u00a7LALR%’1 IN […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-27T08:17:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-27T08:17:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":651,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-27T08:17:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-27T08:17:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-27T08:17:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":651,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010","name":"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-27T08:17:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lingamma-vs-the-commissioner-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Lingamma vs The Commissioner on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23865\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}