{"id":238808,"date":"2007-07-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007"},"modified":"2017-11-30T07:57:14","modified_gmt":"2017-11-30T02:27:14","slug":"c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nBail Appl No. 4501 of 2007()\n\n\n1. C.S.VINOD, AGED 34 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SHAJU, AGED 36 YEARS,\n3. JOJI, AGED 30 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE- REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.B.PRAJITH\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :26\/07\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n\n\n\n\n\n\n                              R. BASANT, J.\n\n              -------------------------------------------------\n\n                       B.A. NO. 4501  OF  2007\n\n              -------------------------------------------------\n\n              Dated this the  26th    day of July, 2007\n\n\n\n                                  ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Application   for   anticipatory   bail.     The   petitioners   are<\/p>\n<p>accused   1   to   3.       They   face   allegations   along   with   the   co-\n<\/p>\n<p>accused under Sec.304 of the IPC.   The crux of the allegations<\/p>\n<p>against   the   petitioners   is   that   they   physically   assaulted   the<\/p>\n<p>deceased.     The   deceased   was   an   insane   person   who   was<\/p>\n<p>brought to the  hospital  for  treatment.     He had escaped from<\/p>\n<p>the   hospital   and   had   allegedly   misbehaved   to   the   petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>The   deceased   was   in   an   aggressive   mood   and   the   petitioners<\/p>\n<p>had deterred him allegedly by beating him.    The deceased had<\/p>\n<p>run away.    He ultimately got drowned in water and eventually<\/p>\n<p>met   with   his   death.     Subsequently,       allegations   have   been<\/p>\n<p>raised   against   the   petitioners   and   a   host   of   others   who   had<\/p>\n<p>roles   in   deterring   the   deceased   person.       Investigation   is   in<\/p>\n<p>progress.   The petitioners apprehend imminent arrest.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A. NO. 4501  OF  2007                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       2.   The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, by<\/p>\n<p>no stretch of imagination, can it be held that the petitioners had<\/p>\n<p>any intention, even accepting the entire case of the prosecution<\/p>\n<p>to   cause   the   death   of   the   deceased.         The   allegation   will   also<\/p>\n<p>only reveal that the petitioners, who did not know the deceased<\/p>\n<p>who was behaving in aggressive and unruly manner, only tried to<\/p>\n<p>deter him.    Even if the allegations were accepted in toto, it will<\/p>\n<p>not reveal  any offence beyond the one punishable under Sec.323<\/p>\n<p>of   the   IPC.       Beating   with   hands   is   the   allegation   raised.       A<\/p>\n<p>serious injury is allegedly suffered on the cheek.   Even assuming<\/p>\n<p>the worst, that can  constitute only  an offence under Sec.325 of<\/p>\n<p>the IPC.  In these circumstances, the allegation under Sec.304 of<\/p>\n<p>the   IPC   has   been   unnecessarily   included.     It   cannot   at   all   be<\/p>\n<p>assumed that the petitioners caused the death  of the deceased.\n<\/p>\n<p>The inclusion of that would compel the petitioners to remain in<\/p>\n<p>custody unnecessarily as the offence being triable by a Court of<\/p>\n<p>Session,   the   Magistrate   is   not   likely   to   grant   bail.       In   these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances,   this   is   a   fit   case   to   invoke   the   powers   under<\/p>\n<p>Sec.438   of   the   Cr.P.C.,   submits   the   learned   counsel   for   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.    The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application.\n<\/p>\n<p>The learned Public Prosecutor points out that there was no overt<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A. NO. 4501  OF  2007               -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>acts committed by the deceased against the petitioners.  At worst<\/p>\n<p>he was only behaving in an unruly manner because of his illness<\/p>\n<p>and the conduct of the petitioners is not justified.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.   I   have   considered   all   the   relevant   inputs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notwithstanding   the   opposition   by   the   learned   Public<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor,   I   am   satisfied   that   this   is   a   fit   case   where   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail in the circumstances<\/p>\n<p>to which I have already made brief reference above.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.    In   the   result,   this   petition   is   allowed.     Following<\/p>\n<p>directions are issued under Sec.438 of the Cr.P.C:\n<\/p>\n<p>      (i)   The   petitioners   shall   appear   before   the   learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m. on 2\/8\/07.   They   shall<\/p>\n<p>be   released   on   regular   bail   on   their     executing     bonds   for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,000\/- each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum<\/p>\n<p>to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>      (ii)   The   petitioners   shall   make   themselves   available   for<\/p>\n<p>interrogation before the  Investigating Officer  between 10 a.m.<\/p>\n<p>and 3 p.m. on  3\/8\/07  and 4\/8\/07  and thereafter  on all  Mondays<\/p>\n<p>and   Fridays   between   10   a.m.   and   12   noon   for   a   period   of   two<\/p>\n<p>months.   Subsequently, they shall so make themselves available<\/p>\n<p>for interrogation before the  Investigating Officer  as and when<\/p>\n<p>directed by the Investigating Officer in writing to do so.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A. NO. 4501  OF  2007                -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      (iii)       If   the   petitioners   do   not   appear   before   the   learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate as directed in clause (i),  directions issued above shall<\/p>\n<p>thereafter   stand   revoked   and   the   police   shall   be   at   liberty   to<\/p>\n<p>arrest the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law<\/p>\n<p>as if those directions were not issued at all;\n<\/p>\n<p>      (iv)  If the petitioners were arrested prior to their surrender<\/p>\n<p>on 2\/8\/07 as directed in clause (i) above,   they shall be released<\/p>\n<p>on   their   executing   bonds   for   Rs.25,000\/-   each   without   any<\/p>\n<p>sureties undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on<\/p>\n<p>2\/8\/07.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                     Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                      (R. BASANT, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>Nan\/<\/p>\n<p>                    \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n<p>                                                  P.S. to Judge<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A. NO. 4501  OF  2007    -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Bail Appl No. 4501 of 2007() 1. C.S.VINOD, AGED 34 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner 2. SHAJU, AGED 36 YEARS, 3. JOJI, AGED 30 YEARS, Vs 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE- REPRESENTED [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-30T02:27:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-30T02:27:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":705,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\",\"name\":\"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-30T02:27:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-30T02:27:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-30T02:27:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007"},"wordCount":705,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007","name":"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-30T02:27:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-s-vinod-vs-the-station-house-officer-on-26-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C.S.Vinod vs The Station House Officer on 26 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}