{"id":238999,"date":"2010-08-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-06-26T04:37:31","modified_gmt":"2018-06-25T23:07:31","slug":"vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1004 of 2005()\n\n\n1. VINOD, S\/O.KUTTAPPAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. M.V.RAHMATH BASHA, S\/O.MUHAMAMED USMAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. M.K.MACHIAN, S\/O.KUTTAPPA,\n\n3. UNITED INDIA  INSURANCE CO LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.A.GEORGE\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :13\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                        M.A.C.A.No.1004 OF 2005\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                  Dated this the 13th day of August, 2010\n\n                                JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant is the claimant in O.P.(MV)No.1499\/2000 on the file<\/p>\n<p>of    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal ( Addl.District Judge),<\/p>\n<p>Thalassery. He sustained the following injuries in a motor accident<\/p>\n<p>that occurred on May 1, 2000 at about 1.30 p.m. near Madathil L.S.<\/p>\n<p>school at Payam:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                Pain and swelling on left elbow, fracture on<br \/>\n          right elbow, he was conscious, oriented, PEARL,<br \/>\n          abrasion on the right wrist 2 x 1 cm. size, contusion<br \/>\n          over right elbow 10 x 8 cm. size.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     2.    The accident happened while the claimant was driving the<\/p>\n<p>jeep bearing Reg.No.KL- 13 B 4008, it collided head on with the mini<\/p>\n<p>lorry bearing Reg.No.KL-12\/3096 driven by the first respondent.<\/p>\n<p>Alleging negligence against the first respondent, the claimant filed the<\/p>\n<p>O.P. before the Tribunal under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act<\/p>\n<p>claiming a compensation of Rs. 1,10,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.    Respondents 1 and 2, the driver and the owner of the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A.No.1004\/2005                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>offending mini lorry filed a written statement admitting the accident,<\/p>\n<p>but denied the liability.    The third respondent, the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>offending mini lorry filed a written statement admitting the policy.<\/p>\n<p>     4.      Claimant was examined as PW1 and Exts.A1 to A10 were<\/p>\n<p>marked on his side before the Tribunal. No evidence was adduced by<\/p>\n<p>the contesting respondents.      The Tribunal on an appreciation of<\/p>\n<p>evidence found that the accident occurred due to the negligence of both<\/p>\n<p>the drivers and assessed a compensation of Rs. 32,500\/- and awarded<\/p>\n<p>only Rs. 16,225\/- as compensation with interest @ 9% per annum<\/p>\n<p>from the date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost. The<\/p>\n<p>claimant has now come up in appeal challenging the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the Tribunal as well as the finding of the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal regarding alleged contributory negligence on his part.<\/p>\n<p>     5.     Heard the counsel for the appellant\/claimant and the<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.     The following points arise for consideration :<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               1)   Whether the finding of the Tribunal that<br \/>\n         there was also contributory negligence on the part<br \/>\n         of the claimant in causing the accident can be<br \/>\n         sustained ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A.No.1004\/2005                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               2) Whether the claimant is entitled to any<br \/>\n         enhanced compensation ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      7.    The Tribunal presumed contributory negligence on the part<\/p>\n<p>of the claimant as it was a collision between the two vehicles. But,<\/p>\n<p>PW1 the claimant testified in a convincing manner before the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the first respondent,<\/p>\n<p>the driver of the mini lorry. Nothing was brought out during his cross<\/p>\n<p>examination to discredit his evidence. There is no contra evidence on<\/p>\n<p>the side of the respondents to show that there was any negligence on<\/p>\n<p>the part of the claimant.   Therefore, the finding of the Tribunal that<\/p>\n<p>there was 50% contributory negligence on the part of the claimant<\/p>\n<p>cannot be sustained. That being so, we hold that the accident occurred<\/p>\n<p>due to the negligence of the first respondent. Therefore, the claimant is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to the entire compensation assessed by the Tribunal i.e.<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 32,500\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Point No.2<\/p>\n<p>      8.    The next question for consideration is whether the claimant<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to any enhanced compensation.        The break up of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation assessed by the Tribunal is as under :<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A.No.1004\/2005                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<pre>      Transportation                 - Rs. 600\/-\n      Bystander expenses             - Rs. 500\/-\n      Extra nourishment              - Rs. 250\/-\n      Damage to clothing             - Rs. 500\/-\n      Treatment expenses             - Rs.9,100\/-\n      Loss of earnings               - Rs.4,500\/-\n      Discomforts and other\n      inconvenience                  - Rs.5,000\/-\n      Pain and suffering             - Rs.12,000\/-\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      9.     Counsel for the claimant sought enhancement of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the loss of amenities and enjoyment in life and for<\/p>\n<p>pain and suffering etc.<\/p>\n<p>      10.    Taking into consideration the nature of the injury sustained<\/p>\n<p>by the claimant, we feel that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>is just and reasonable.\n<\/p>\n<p>      11.    There is another aspect in this case. The Tribunal took the<\/p>\n<p>monthly income of the claimant as Rs. 1500\/- and awarded Rs. 4,500\/-<\/p>\n<p>towards loss of earnings        for three months . The claimant was<\/p>\n<p>admittedly a driver. Therefore, we feel that his monthly income can be<\/p>\n<p>reasonably fixed at Rs. 2,000\/-. Therefore, towards loss of earnings, he<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to a compensation of Rs. 6,000\/-.    Thus on this count, the<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs. 1500\/-.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A.No.1004\/2005               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      12.  In the result, the claimant is found entitled to the entire<\/p>\n<p>compensation assessed by the Tribunal i.e. Rs. 32,500\/-. He is also<\/p>\n<p>entitled to an additional compensation of Rs. 1,500\/- with interest<\/p>\n<p>@ 9% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and<\/p>\n<p>proportionate cost.  The third respondent being the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle shall deposit the amount before the Tribunal within<\/p>\n<p>two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The<\/p>\n<p>award of the Tribunal is modified to the above extent.<\/p>\n<p>      The Appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                       P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.A.C.A.No.1004\/2005    6<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1004 of 2005() 1. VINOD, S\/O.KUTTAPPAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. M.V.RAHMATH BASHA, S\/O.MUHAMAMED USMAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. M.K.MACHIAN, S\/O.KUTTAPPA, 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN For Respondent :SRI.M.A.GEORGE The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-238999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-25T23:07:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-25T23:07:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":784,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-25T23:07:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-25T23:07:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-25T23:07:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010"},"wordCount":784,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010","name":"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-25T23:07:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vinod-vs-m-v-rahmath-basha-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vinod vs M.V.Rahmath Basha on 13 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}