{"id":239013,"date":"2010-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-16T07:00:29","modified_gmt":"2016-09-16T01:30:29","slug":"bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nSA.No. 721 of 1995()\n\n\n\n1. BHARGAVY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. KUNCHAMMAL\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.O.JOSEPH\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :20\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                       HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.\n                        ------------------------\n                        S.A.No.721 Of 1995\n                         ----------------------\n           Dated this the 20th day of September, 2010.\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      Plaintiffs in O.S.No.309 of 1987 on the file of the Sub Court,<\/p>\n
Palakkad, are the appellants. The appeal is directed against the<\/p>\n
judgment and decree in A.S.No.209 of 1990 of the District Court,<\/p>\n
Palakkad.    Suit was filed for partition and other consequential<\/p>\n
reliefs. Trial court held that the plaint schedule properties are<\/p>\n
not available for partition and therefore the plaintiffs are not<\/p>\n
entitled to any reliefs claimed in the suit. The lower appellate<\/p>\n
court confirmed the decree and judgment of the trial court.<\/p>\n
Parties hereinafter are referred to as the plaintiffs and defendants<\/p>\n
as arrayed in the suit.\n<\/p>\n
      2.   Plaintiffs are the legal heirs of one Sri.Damodaran,<\/p>\n
who is a member of the joint family consisting of Damodaran, his<\/p>\n
father Chami and defendants 1 to 8. The first plaintiff is the wife<\/p>\n
of deceased Damodaran and plaintiffs 2 to 7 are his children.<\/p>\n
The father of Damodaran is one Chami. The first defendant is the<\/p>\n
wife of Chami and defendants 2 to 8 are the other children of<\/p>\n
Chami.\n<\/p>\n
S.A.No.721 Of 1995<\/p>\n
                                  ::2::\n<\/p>\n
     3.     Plaintiffs’ case is that Chami left the country some 16<\/p>\n
years back and his whereabouts are unheard of since 1971.<\/p>\n
Therefore it has to be presumed that he is dead for all purposes.<\/p>\n
Plaint A schedule items 1 to 7 belonged to the joint family of the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs and defendants, that as per Ext.B1 partition deed dated<\/p>\n
27.5.1963, the said items were allotted to the sakha consisting of<\/p>\n
Chami and the defendants. It is recited in Ext.B1 partition deed<\/p>\n
that the deceased Damodaran got his share separated. It is the<\/p>\n
case of the plaintiffs that Chami had 1\/6 share over plaint items 1<\/p>\n
to 7 and the said share devolved on the plaintiffs and defendants.<\/p>\n
Plaintiffs claimed 1\/9 share over the said right at the time of his<\/p>\n
presumed death. The plaintiffs also claimed share over items 8<\/p>\n
to 20 stating that in Ext.B1 partition deed these properties were<\/p>\n
not included as there were some disputes outstanding to be<\/p>\n
settled with the landlords. The plaintiffs also claimed share over<\/p>\n
items 21, 22 and 23 stating that these items were acquired by<\/p>\n
the defendants with the income from the joint family properties.<\/p>\n
The last item is item No.24 which according to the plaintiff was<\/p>\n
purchased by Chami and that it is a self acquired property.<\/p>\n
     4.     The defendants denied the allegations in the plaint<\/p>\n
and prayed for dismissal of the suit. According to them plaint<\/p>\n
S.A.No.721 Of 1995<\/p>\n
                                 ::3::\n<\/p>\n
items 1 to 7 alone originally belonged to the joint family and<\/p>\n
those items were partitioned between the plaintiffs and<\/p>\n
defendants, that the plaintiffs’ predecessor got separate share<\/p>\n
under Ext.B1 partition deed, and that the contentions of the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs regarding the rest of items are not correct. Items 8 to<\/p>\n
24 are not available for partition and therefore the suit has to be<\/p>\n
dismissed as not maintainable.\n<\/p>\n
      5.    The trial court and the lower appellate court examined<\/p>\n
the contentions of the plaintiff.       Admittedly, items 1 to 7<\/p>\n
properties belonged to the joint family consisting of Chami,<\/p>\n
Damodaran and the defendants. It is also an admitted case that<\/p>\n
there was a partition in 1963. Ext.B1 is the partition. A reading<\/p>\n
of Ext.B1 would show that the members entered into a division<\/p>\n
and deceased Damodaran got his share over items 1 to 7. The<\/p>\n
trial court as well as the lower appellate court relied on the<\/p>\n
specific recital in Ext.B1 that all the movable items belong to the<\/p>\n
joint family such as seeds, cattle, vessels etc. have already been<\/p>\n
divided among the sharers and that the properties scheduled in<\/p>\n
Ext.B1 partition deed only were available for partition. The court<\/p>\n
below also taken note of the other recital in Ext.B1 partition deed<\/p>\n
that as per the partition deed division of joint family property<\/p>\n
S.A.No.721 Of 1995<\/p>\n
                                ::4::\n<\/p>\n
were finally effected and there is no relationship whatsoever<\/p>\n
between them regarding the properties. The court below also<\/p>\n
examined in detail the contentions raised by the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
regarding the partibility of items 8 to 20 separately. The plaint<\/p>\n
allegation is that those items belonged to the family as tenant<\/p>\n
and had fixity of tenure, that it was not divided in 1963 partition<\/p>\n
as there were some disputes outstanding to be settled with the<\/p>\n
landlords. The court below examined the contention on the basis<\/p>\n
of Exts.B1 & B2. Ext.B2 is the sale deed dated 15.5.1965 as per<\/p>\n
which plaint items 8 to 20 were purchased in the name of Chami<\/p>\n
and some of the defendants. The recitals in Ext.B2 is that Chami<\/p>\n
and others were having oral lease of the properties. The court<\/p>\n
below noticed that there is no recital in Ext.B2 to the effect that<\/p>\n
the oral lease was in favour of Damodaran also or oral lease was<\/p>\n
granted earlier to the execution of Ext.B1 partition deed.     The<\/p>\n
court found that there is no evidence to show that oral lease of<\/p>\n
the properties was given to Chami and others earlier to Ext.B1<\/p>\n
partition deed and that explanation 2 to Section 6 of the Hindu<\/p>\n
Succession Act would directly apply in the case of plaint schedule<\/p>\n
items 8 to 20 acquired after the execution of Ext.B1 partition<\/p>\n
deed and the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of Damodaran, a<\/p>\n
S.A.No.721 Of 1995<\/p>\n
                                 ::5::\n<\/p>\n
member of the joint family separated from the family, will not be<\/p>\n
entitled to any share over the said items.\n<\/p>\n
       6.   The court below also examined as to whether the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs are entitled to share in the plaint items 21, 22 and 23.<\/p>\n
The case of the plaintiffs is that those items were purchased by<\/p>\n
utilising the income from the joint family properties. The court<\/p>\n
below on evidence found that the plaint items 21 to 23 are<\/p>\n
individual properties of the second defendant and that there is no<\/p>\n
evidence to prove that the said items were purchased by the<\/p>\n
defendants by investing the income from the joint family<\/p>\n
properties. The last item in the plaint schedule is item No.24.<\/p>\n
Plaintiffs claimed share over that item also. The first defendant<\/p>\n
claimed that it is her self acquired property. Ext.B16 is produced<\/p>\n
to show that the plaint item No.24 is not the self acquired<\/p>\n
property of the first defendant. The said documents stands in the<\/p>\n
name of the first defendant and her minor children. The court<\/p>\n
below found that there is no basis for the claim that plaint<\/p>\n
schedule item No.24 is the self acquired property of Chami and<\/p>\n
the plaintiffs are not entitled to claim share on that basis. Thus,<\/p>\n
each and every contentions raised by the parties were examined<\/p>\n
by both courts and found that the plaintiffs are not entitled to any<\/p>\n
S.A.No.721 Of 1995<\/p>\n
                                 ::6::\n<\/p>\n
reliefs. The contentions of the plaintiffs were considered in detail<\/p>\n
by the fact findings courts.      The courts on the basis of the<\/p>\n
materials, facts and evidence found that the plaintiffs are not<\/p>\n
entitled to any relief sought for in the plaint.     The questions<\/p>\n
raised in the second appeal are pure questions on facts which<\/p>\n
was decided by the fact finding courts on merits.        In these<\/p>\n
circumstances, this Court is of the view that the appellants have<\/p>\n
not succeeded in raising valid grounds for interference by this<\/p>\n
Court in exercise of powers under Section 100 of the Code of Civil<\/p>\n
Procedure. No question of law muchless any substantial question<\/p>\n
of law arises for consideration in this second appeal.<\/p>\n
      In the result, the appeal fails and accordingly, dismissed.<\/p>\n
No order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                              HARUN-UL-RASHID,
\n                                                     Judge.\n<\/p>\n
bkn\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM SA.No. 721 of 1995() 1. BHARGAVY … Petitioner Vs 1. KUNCHAMMAL … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM (SR.) For Respondent :SRI.P.O.JOSEPH The Hon’ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID Dated :20\/09\/2010 O R D E R HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ———————— S.A.No.721 Of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-239013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-16T01:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-16T01:30:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1230,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-16T01:30:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-16T01:30:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-16T01:30:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010"},"wordCount":1230,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010","name":"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-16T01:30:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhargavy-vs-kunchammal-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhargavy vs Kunchammal on 20 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}