{"id":239434,"date":"2011-01-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011"},"modified":"2016-03-14T04:20:38","modified_gmt":"2016-03-13T22:50:38","slug":"mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011<\/div>\n
                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                      File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000605\u00adAD\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a015,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a015,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Ankur\u00a0Mutreja\n           Unit\u00a0I\n           Ground\u00a0Floor\n           156,\u00a0Gagan\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Extension\n           Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0051\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           University\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Registrar\u00a0(Info)\n           Main\u00a0Campus\n           Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0007\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jay\u00a0Chanda,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0&\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Registrar,\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shankar\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Paul,\u00a0PA\u00a0to\u00a0\n           CPIO.\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner               :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000605\u00adAD\n\n\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.3.3.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0University\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0<\/p>\n
       information:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       i)        Date\u00a0 on\u00a0 which\u00a0 examined\u00a0and\u00a0evaluated\u00a0answer\u00a0scripts\u00a0of\u00a0Advanced\u00a0Diploma\u00a0French\u00a0–\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 Paper \u00a0 II \u00a0 (literature) \u00a0 Serial \u00a0 No.7467 \u00a0 for \u00a0 Roll \u00a0 No.33003, \u00a0 Advanced \u00a0 Diploma \u00a0 in \u00a0 French\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 Examination\u00a02009\u00a0were\u00a0destroyed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       ii)       Inspection\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0and\u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0order\u00a0for\u00a0destruction\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 and \u00a0 execution \u00a0 of \u00a0 destruction \u00a0 of \u00a0 examined \u00a0 and \u00a0 evaluated \u00a0 answer \u00a0 scripts \u00a0 of \u00a0 Advanced\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 Diploma\u00a0French\u00a0–\u00a0Paper\u00a0II\u00a0(literature)\u00a0Serial\u00a0No.7467\u00a0for\u00a0Roll\u00a0No.33003,\u00a0Advanced\u00a0Diploma\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 in\u00a0French\u00a0Examination\u00a02009.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.     Shri \u00a0 Jay \u00a0 Chanda, \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 31.3.10 \u00a0 enclosing \u00a0 the \u00a0 noting \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 by \u00a0 Section \u00a0 Officer\u00a0<\/p>\n
       (Marksheet) \u00a0 who \u00a0 in \u00a0 his \u00a0 note \u00a0 dt.29.3.10\u00a0 stated \u00a0 that\u00a0 since \u00a0 the \u00a0 answer\u00a0 scripts\u00a0 have\u00a0 already \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       destroyed,\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0examined\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0provided.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a0(ii),\u00a0<\/p>\n
       he\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0separate\u00a0file\u00a0maintained\u00a0for\u00a0this\u00a0purpose.\u00a0\u00a0Since\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0an\u00a0EC\u00a0resolution\u00a0<\/p>\n
       as\u00a0mentioned\u00a0above,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0need\u00a0to\u00a0obtain\u00a0periodical\u00a0approval\u00a0on\u00a0this\u00a0matter.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n
       an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.4.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n
       point\u00a0(i).\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0order\u00a0dt.26.5.10\u00a0upheld\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0<\/p>\n
       aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0preferred\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.29.5.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
3.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0received\u00a0an\u00a0addendum\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0dt.15.1.11\u00a0\u00a0stating\u00a0the\u00a0following:\n<\/p>\n
      i)         The\u00a0original\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0dated\u00a03.3.10\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0appeal\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n
     was \u00a0 motivated \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 letter \u00a0 dt.25.2.10 \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 Delhi \u00a0 University \u00a0 (DU) \u00a0 addressed \u00a0 to \u00a0 him \u00a0 in\u00a0<\/p>\n
     compliance\u00a0with\u00a0an\u00a0earlier\u00a0decision\u00a0No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/003206\/6807\u00a0of\u00a0CIC\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0another\u00a0<\/p>\n
     second\u00a0appeal\u00a0in\u00a0another\u00a0matter\u00a0against\u00a0Delhi\u00a0University.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/blockquote>\n
     ii)        That\u00a0CPIO\u00a0DU\u00a0through\u00a0Section\u00a0Officer\u00a0(marksheet)\u00a0deliberately\u00a0misread\u00a0and\u00a0misconstrued\u00a0<\/p>\n
     the\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0made\u00a0in\u00a0Para\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0requested\u00a0and\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
     relevant\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0requested\u00a0in\u00a0Para\u00a02\u00a0which\u00a0prompted\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0<\/p>\n
     the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/blockquote>\n
     iii)       That\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0DU\u00a0holding\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n
     disposed\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0without\u00a0granting\u00a0any\u00a0relief.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/blockquote>\n
     iv)        That\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0sent\u00a0a\u00a0contempt\u00a0notice\u00a0dt.4.8.10\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0DU\u00a0\u00a0with\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0CIC\u00a0<\/p>\n
     decision\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Dean\u00a0(Examinations)\u00a0DU\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.28.8.10\u00a0informed\u00a0him\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
     his\u00a0answer\u00a0scripts,\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0subject\u00a0matter\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0<\/p>\n
     CIC \u00a0 decision, \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 destroyed \u00a0 and \u00a0 were \u00a0 being \u00a0 kept \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 revaluation \u00a0 section \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Examination\u00a0office\u00a0DU.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/blockquote>\n
     v)         That\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0of\u00a0destruction\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0answer\u00a0scripts\u00a0are\u00a0the\u00a0subject\u00a0<\/p>\n
     matter\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0appeal\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0RTI\u00a0request,\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0<\/p>\n
     dt.28.8.10\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Dean\u00a0(Examinations)\u00a0DU\u00a0needs\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0confirmed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0DU\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0<\/p>\n
     proceedings\u00a0which\u00a0would\u00a0satisfy\u00a0his\u00a0original\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0proceedings.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
4.   During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0answer\u00a0scripts\u00a0of\u00a0those\u00a0candidates\u00a0who\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
     apply \u00a0 for \u00a0 revaluation \u00a0 within \u00a0 15 \u00a0 days \u00a0 of \u00a0 declaration \u00a0 of \u00a0 result \u00a0 are \u00a0 destroyed. \u00a0 \u00a0 He \u00a0 added \u00a0 that\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Examination\u00a0section\u00a0and\u00a0Revaluation\u00a0section\u00a0are\u00a0different\u00a0and\u00a0as\u00a0\u00a0far\u00a0as\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0examination\u00a0section\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
     concerned \u00a0 \u00a0 their \u00a0 involvement \u00a0 in \u00a0 any\u00a0 further\u00a0 activity\u00a0 \u00a0 subsequent\u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0 declaration\u00a0 of\u00a0 results\u00a0 is\u00a0<\/p>\n
     minimal.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0mechanism\u00a0to\u00a0check\u00a0whether\u00a0a\u00a0particular\u00a0answer\u00a0sheet\u00a0<\/p>\n
     has\u00a0been\u00a0destroyed\u00a0or\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0for\u00a0evaluation\u00a0until\u00a0the\u00a0candidate\u00a0himself\u00a0requests\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0same.\u00a0<\/p>\n
     The \u00a0 Appellant, \u00a0 not \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 explanation \u00a0 provided \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 contended \u00a0 that\u00a0<\/p>\n
     contradictory\u00a0information\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0availability\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0his\u00a0answersheet\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
     malafide\u00a0intention\u00a0\u00a0while\u00a0referring\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Section\u00a0Officer\u00a0(Marksheet)\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Dean\u00a0(Examinations).\n<\/p>\n
 5.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0made\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Dean\u00a0(Examinations)\/concerned\u00a0<\/p>\n
         PIO\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0the\u00a0process\u00a0of\u00a0conducting\u00a0the\u00a0examination\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0evaluation\u00a0of\u00a0answer\u00a0sheets\u00a0<\/p>\n
         and\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0providing\u00a0 \u00a0false\u00a0<\/p>\n
         information\u00a0the\u00a0second\u00a0time\u00a0with\u00a0ostensibly\u00a0malafide\u00a0intention\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0his\u00a0written\u00a0<\/p>\n
         response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a025.2.11.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0<\/p>\n
         a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0Dean\u00a0(Examinations)\u00a0and\u00a0Section\u00a0Officer\u00a0(Marksheet).<\/p>\n
6.       Now\u00a0that\u00a0is\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0evident\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0answer\u00a0sheets\u00a0are\u00a0available,\u00a0the\u00a0required\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n
         to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a025\u00a0February,\u00a02011\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0PIO.\u00a0<\/p>\n
7.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                             \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Ankur\u00a0Mutreja
\n         Unit\u00a0I
\n         Ground\u00a0Floor
\n         156,\u00a0Gagan\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Extension
\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0051<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         University\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi
\n         O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Registrar\u00a0(Info)
\n         Main\u00a0Campus
\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0007<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n         University\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi
\n         O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Registrar
\n         Main\u00a0Campus
\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0007\n<\/p>\n
 4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000605\u00adAD Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a015,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a015,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Ankur\u00a0Mutreja Unit\u00a0I Ground\u00a0Floor 156,\u00a0Gagan\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Extension Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0051 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents University\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Registrar\u00a0(Info) Main\u00a0Campus Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0007 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jay\u00a0Chanda,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0&\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Registrar,\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Shankar\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Paul,\u00a0PA\u00a0to\u00a0 CPIO. Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000605\u00adAD ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.3.3.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0University\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0 information: i) Date\u00a0 on\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-239434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-13T22:50:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-13T22:50:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":826,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-13T22:50:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-13T22:50:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-13T22:50:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011"},"wordCount":826,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011","name":"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-13T22:50:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ankur-mutreja-advocate-vs-university-of-delhi-on-15-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Ankur Mutreja Advocate vs University Of Delhi on 15 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}