{"id":239472,"date":"2009-01-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-09-15T03:21:47","modified_gmt":"2014-09-14T21:51:47","slug":"lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 352 of 2009()\n\n\n1. LEKSHMANAN, AGED 41 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. RATHEESAN, AGED 41, S\/O.BALAN PILLAI,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :30\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n          ===========================\n         Crl.R.P.  NO. 352    OF 2009\n          ===========================\n\n    Dated this the 30th day of January,2009\n\n                     ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Revision  petitioner  is  the  accused  and<\/p>\n<p>first    respondent    the    complainant    in<\/p>\n<p>C.C.108\/2005 on the file of Judicial First<\/p>\n<p>Class    Magistrate-I,     Haripad.    Revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the<\/p>\n<p>offence  under   section   138  of   Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments   Act.        Revision   petitioner<\/p>\n<p>challenged  the  conviction  before  Additional<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Court, Mavelikara in Crl.A.59\/2007.<\/p>\n<p>Learned   Additional    Sessions    Judge    on<\/p>\n<p>reappreciation  of   evidence   confirmed   the<\/p>\n<p>conviction and  modified the sentence to simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment   for    three   months   and    a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.1,00,000\/- and in default<\/p>\n<p>simple imprisonment for two months.    Revision<\/p>\n<p>is filed challenging the conviction.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 352\/2009               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     2.      Learned counsel appearing for revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was heard.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.     Learned counsel submitted that in view of<\/p>\n<p>the evidence on record and the concurrent findings<\/p>\n<p>of fact     revision petitioner is not challenging the<\/p>\n<p>conviction but sentence may be modified and time<\/p>\n<p>may be granted to the revision petitioner to pay<\/p>\n<p>the amount.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.      On going through the judgments of the<\/p>\n<p>courts below, I find no reason to interfere with<\/p>\n<p>the conviction.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.    The evidence of DW1 who was examined by the<\/p>\n<p>revision     petitioner   himself     establish   that<\/p>\n<p>revision     petitioner  borrowed  Rs.1,00,000\/-  from<\/p>\n<p>first respondent and towards its repayment issued<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 cheque which was dishonoured for want of<\/p>\n<p>sufficient funds.      It is also proved that first<\/p>\n<p>respondent     had  complied   with  all     statutory<\/p>\n<p>formalities provided under section 138 and 142 of<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act.     Conviction of revision<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 352\/2009              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner for the offence under section 138 of<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act is perfectly legal.<\/p>\n<p>     6.     Then the only question is regarding the<\/p>\n<p>sentence.     The sentence modified by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Judge is simple imprisonment for three<\/p>\n<p>months and compensation which was        the amount<\/p>\n<p>covered by the dishonoured cheque with a default<\/p>\n<p>sentence.     So long as the sentence is not altered<\/p>\n<p>or    modified    against  the  interest  of   first<\/p>\n<p>respondent, it is not necessary to issue notice to<\/p>\n<p>first respondent.     As per   the modified sentence<\/p>\n<p>first respondent is entitled to a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7.       Considering  the   entire  facts   and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances of the case, interest of justice will<\/p>\n<p>be met if the sentence is modified to imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>till rising of court     with a direction to pay the<\/p>\n<p>fine    on   realisation   to  first  respondent  as<\/p>\n<p>compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Revision is allowed in part.      Conviction of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRRP 352\/2009             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner for the offence under section<\/p>\n<p>138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is confirmed.<\/p>\n<p>Sentence     is modified.  Revision  petitioner  is<\/p>\n<p>sentenced to imprisonment till rising of court and<\/p>\n<p>a fine of Rs.1,05,000\/- and in default simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for two months.     On realisation of<\/p>\n<p>fine, Rs.1,00,000\/- to be paid to first respondent<\/p>\n<p>as compensation under section 357(1)(b) of the Code<\/p>\n<p>of Criminal Procedure.     Revision petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>directed to appear before the Judicial First Class<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate-I, Haripad on 1.6.2009.<\/p>\n<p>                               M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR<br \/>\n                                        JUDGE<br \/>\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>      W.P.(C).NO. \/06\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>     SEPTEMBER,2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 352 of 2009() 1. LEKSHMANAN, AGED 41 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. RATHEESAN, AGED 41, S\/O.BALAN PILLAI, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE For Petitioner :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN For Respondent : No Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-239472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-14T21:51:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-14T21:51:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":470,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-14T21:51:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-14T21:51:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-14T21:51:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009"},"wordCount":470,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009","name":"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-14T21:51:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lekshmanan-vs-ratheesan-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lekshmanan vs Ratheesan on 30 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}