{"id":239548,"date":"2010-08-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-05T13:44:09","modified_gmt":"2016-10-05T08:14:09","slug":"no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S.A. Bobde, A. B. Chaudhari<\/div>\n<pre>                                                                                 1\n\n                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                                  \n                                    NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                          \n                              WRIT PETITION  NO. 484 OF 2010.\n\n     Dr. Rakesh s\/o Jagdish Ramteke,\n     aged about 38 years, R\/o Quarter\n\n\n\n\n                                                                         \n     No. A-1, Staff Quarters, North\n     Maharashtra University Campus,\n     Umavi Nagar, Post Box No. 80,\n\n\n\n\n                                                     \n     Jalgaon.                        ....                                                     PETITIONER.\n                          \n                   ....Versus....\n                         \n     1] Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj\n        Nagpur University, Nagpur,\n        through its Vice Chancellor,\n        Near Maharajbagh, Nagpur,\n      \n\n\n     2] Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj\n   \n\n\n\n        Nagpur University, Nagpur,\n        through its Registrar,\n        Near Maharajbagh, Nagpur,\n\n\n\n\n\n     3] Principal Secretary, Government of\n        Maharashtra, Higher and Technical\n        Education Department, Mantralaya,\n\n\n\n\n\n        Mumbai.                                                                  ......        RESPONDENTS\n\n     Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner,\n     Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 &amp; 2,\n     Mr. T.R. Kankale, A.G.P. for respondent no. 3,\n\n\n                               CORAM :   S.A. BOBDE &amp; A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.\n<\/pre>\n<p>                               DATED  :   AUGUST 6, 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                          ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                 2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      ORAL JUDGMENT (PER S.A. BOBDE, J.)<\/p>\n<p>     1]           Rule.   Rule   returnable   forthwith.     Heard   the   learned <\/p>\n<p>     Counsel for the rival parties by consent.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2]           The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to <\/p>\n<p>     the respondent No.1 to forthwith issue an appointment order in the <\/p>\n<p>     petitioner&#8217;s   favour   for   the   post   of   Reader   in   the   department   of <\/p>\n<p>     Computer Science in Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University <\/p>\n<p>     in pursuance of the selection process initiated under advertisement <\/p>\n<p>     dated 13.7.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3]           In brief, the petitioner&#8217;s case is that the petitioner appeared <\/p>\n<p>     for interview in pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement for the said <\/p>\n<p>     post and was selected by the Selection Committee.  At selection, one <\/p>\n<p>     Shri Pradip Kawaduji Bute was shown at serial no.1 and the petitioner <\/p>\n<p>     was shown at serial no.2.   Eventually, the said Bute&#8217;s appointment <\/p>\n<p>     was   challenged   before   the   Hon&#8217;ble   Chancellor   of   the   Nagpur <\/p>\n<p>     University, who on 7.8.2009 held that his appointment was not legal <\/p>\n<p>     and directed the Vice Chancellor of the respondent no.1 University to <\/p>\n<p>     terminate   his   services   as   a   Reader   after   giving   him   one   month&#8217;s <\/p>\n<p>     notice.     Bute&#8217;s   Writ   Petition   against   the   order   of   the   Hon&#8217;ble <\/p>\n<p>     Chancellor was dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                         ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     4]          The short contention of the petitioner is that since he was <\/p>\n<p>     at serial no.2 in the select list, Bute&#8217;s appointment who was at serial <\/p>\n<p>     no.1 having been set aside, he should be appointed to the said post <\/p>\n<p>     without  fresh  selection.   It  is,  therefore,  necessary  to  examine the <\/p>\n<p>     relevant provision under which the selections and appointments by <\/p>\n<p>     the University are made.  Section 76 to the extent it is relevant reads <\/p>\n<p>     as follows :\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                     &#8220;76. Selection and appointment of university <\/p>\n<p>                     teachers:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                     (1)                  Subject   to   the   provisions   of   this   Act, <\/p>\n<p>                     Statutes   and   Ordinances,   the   Vice-Chancellor <\/p>\n<p>                     shall,   till   the   University   Grants   Commission&#8217;s <\/p>\n<p>                     scheme   or   recruitment   becomes   operative, <\/p>\n<p>                     appoint   according   to   the   order   of   merit   and <\/p>\n<p>                     recommendations   made   by   the   selection <\/p>\n<p>                     committee, a university teacher.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                     (2)                  .................\n\n                     (3)                  .................\n\n\n\n\n\n                     (4)                  .................\n\n                     (5)                  .................\n\n                     (6)                  .................\n\n                     (7)                 If, on a petition by any person directly \n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>                     affected   or  suo   motu,   the   Chancellor,   after <\/p>\n<p>                     making,   or   having   made   such   inquiries   or <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                        ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                     obtaining or  having  obtained  such explanations, <\/p>\n<p>                     including   explanations   from   the   teachers   whose <\/p>\n<p>                     appointments are likely to be affected, as may be <\/p>\n<p>                     or may have been necessary, is satisfied that the <\/p>\n<p>                     appointment of a teacher of the university, made <\/p>\n<p>                     by any authority or officer of the university at any <\/p>\n<p>                     time was  not in accordance with the law  at the <\/p>\n<p>                     time   in   force,   the   Chancellor,   may,   by   order, <\/p>\n<p>                     notwithstanding   anything   contained   in   the <\/p>\n<p>                     contract   relating   to   the   conditions   of   service   of <\/p>\n<p>                     such   teacher,   direct   the   Vice-Chancellor   to <\/p>\n<p>                     terminate   his   appointment   after   giving   him   one <\/p>\n<p>                     month&#8217;s   notice   or   one   month&#8217;s   salary   in   lieu   of <\/p>\n<p>                     such   notice,   and   the   Vice-Chancellor   shall <\/p>\n<p>                     forthwith   comply   and   take   steps   for   a   fresh <\/p>\n<p>                     selections   to   be   made.     The   person   whose <\/p>\n<p>                     appointment   has   been   so   terminated   shall   be <\/p>\n<p>                     eligible to apply again for the same post.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     The   question   is,   when   an   appointment   made   in   pursuance   of   a <\/p>\n<p>     selection when set aside by the Chancellor of the University, the next <\/p>\n<p>     candidate on the selection list is entitled to be appointed without a <\/p>\n<p>     fresh selection ?\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                        ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     5]             Shri   S.P.   Bhandarkar,   the   learned   Counsel   for   the <\/p>\n<p>     petitioner, relied on Section 76(1) in support of the proposition that <\/p>\n<p>     the   next   person   should   be   appointed.     According   to   the   learned <\/p>\n<p>     Counsel,   the   sub-section   requires   the   appointment   to   be   made <\/p>\n<p>     according to the order of merit and, therefore, it is necessary for the <\/p>\n<p>     Vice-Chancellor to make an appointment of the next person in order <\/p>\n<p>     of merit after the appointment of the earlier candidate higher in merit <\/p>\n<p>     is set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6]             We see no merit in this contention since Section 76(1) of <\/p>\n<p>     the   Act   which   undoubtedly   requires   appointments   to   be   made <\/p>\n<p>     according to the order of merit and recommendation made by the <\/p>\n<p>     Selection Committee, applies to the initial appointment only and not <\/p>\n<p>     to a situation where the said appointment is set aside by an authority <\/p>\n<p>     and a fresh appointment is made.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7]            We find that, on the other hand, sub-section (7) provides <\/p>\n<p>     the modus operandi to be employed after the services of a teacher <\/p>\n<p>     are terminated in pursuance of the direction of the Chancellor.   The <\/p>\n<p>     prescribed   procedure   is   that   where   a   Chancellor   directs   the   Vice-\n<\/p>\n<p>     Chancellor to terminate &#8220;the Vice-Chancellor shall  forthwith comply <\/p>\n<p>     and   take   steps   for   a   fresh   selection   to   be   made&#8221;.         This   clearly <\/p>\n<p>     indicates that it is not permissible to appoint the teacher next in the <\/p>\n<p>     order   of   merit   and   that   sub-section   (1)   applies   to   the   initial <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                          ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     appointment.\n<\/p>\n<p>     8]             Shri   S.P.   Bhandarkar,   the   learned   Counsel   for   the <\/p>\n<p>     petitioner, relied on a decision of this Court in Syed Iftekhar Ali .vs.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Vice Chancellor, Nagpur University &amp; another : Writ Petition No. <\/p>\n<p>     588\/86   decided   on   26.6.1987  in   support   of   the   contention   of   the <\/p>\n<p>     petitioner.    However, that decision is not rendered under the existing <\/p>\n<p>     Act   and   can   be   of   no   assistance   to   the   petitioner.     In   the <\/p>\n<p>     circumstances, we see no merit in the petition, which is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>     9]          We  find   from   the   facts   of   the   case   that   Bute&#8217;s   services <\/p>\n<p>     were terminated by the University on 14.9.2009 in pursuance of the <\/p>\n<p>     direction of the Chancellor dated 7.8.2009.  The University does not <\/p>\n<p>     appear to have issued an advertisement for making a fresh selection <\/p>\n<p>     till date.  It is highly improper for the University not to have done so.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Shri   S.P.   Bhandarkar,   the   learned   Counsel   for   the   petitioner, <\/p>\n<p>     submitted that this is due to the fact that the Vice-Chancellor of the <\/p>\n<p>     respondent University who was holding charge till July, 2010 is the <\/p>\n<p>     same Vice-Chancellor against whom Hon&#8217;ble Chancellor had passed <\/p>\n<p>     severe strictures while setting aside Bute&#8217;s appointment.   According <\/p>\n<p>     to Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, it is <\/p>\n<p>     purely due to this fact that steps have not been taken.  The petitioner <\/p>\n<p>     has not joined the said Vice-Chancellor as a party by name.  Hence, <\/p>\n<p>     we are not inclined to go into the allegations of mala fide inaction.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                        ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                               7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     We, however, consider it appropriate to direct that immediate steps <\/p>\n<p>     should be taken to initiate and complete the selection process at the <\/p>\n<p>     earliest and not later than six months from today.\n<\/p>\n<p>     10]         With   the   above   observations,   the   Writ   Petition   stands <\/p>\n<p>     dismissed.  Rule stands discharged with no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>                    JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<pre>                        ig                                                                 JUDGE.\n\n     J. \n                      \n      \n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                       ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 16:14:57 :::<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 Bench: S.A. Bobde, A. B. Chaudhari 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2010. Dr. Rakesh s\/o Jagdish Ramteke, aged about 38 years, R\/o Quarter No. A-1, Staff Quarters, North Maharashtra University Campus, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-239548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-05T08:14:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-05T08:14:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1042,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\",\"name\":\"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-05T08:14:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-05T08:14:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-05T08:14:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010"},"wordCount":1042,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010","name":"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-05T08:14:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/no-a-1-vs-nagpur-university-on-6-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No. A-1 vs Nagpur University on 6 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239548"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239548\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}