{"id":239921,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2014-04-04T05:16:45","modified_gmt":"2014-04-03T23:46:45","slug":"sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>IN THEL&#8217; H1&#8217;f\u00a7&#8217;rH COURT GP&#8217; KARNA&#8217;I&#8217;AEiA AT&#8217; BAN CEALORE<\/p>\n<p>i:3A&#8217;1&#8242;}:1:&gt; -&#8216;1&#8217;m3 &#8216;mg izoth DAY &lt;39 c)&lt;:*1&#039;z:n23;&amp;:}~2, 2010 <\/p>\n<p>BEP&#039;{}RE<\/p>\n<p>TEE HOFPBLE mR..IUsTIc:E H.BzLLA?m    %<\/p>\n<p>I~2}\u00a3:{?&#039;rULAR $:3:c:&#039;;:m3 AE&#039;P\u00a3\u00a7A.L  2 13i5;i\u00a7T2c:;;5_&#039;: &#039;-   &#039;  _ <\/p>\n<p>BETWEEK:<\/p>\n<p>E%\u00a71i.M.M.}3I1oo(i\u20acsha,<br \/>\nS\/c;.Ma11j\u20ac iiowcia,<br \/>\nAged 36 fJ\u20ac\u00a3&#8221;:1}&#8221;&#8216;S, V<\/p>\n<p>Resitling at Madagaddanah:;i]1i%&#8221; T -A <\/p>\n<p>Viiiage, Bagur Hobli,<br \/>\nChannasfayapatna Taiuig,<br \/>\nH,8.SS8I1 \ufb02istxict &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Pin. 373116  &#8221;&#8221; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>(E33; Sri Viskzz\ufb02t Bf_13t,_,&#8211;   ~ .\n<\/p>\n<p>AND:\n<\/p>\n<p>  A  . . . . . .. N<br \/>\nS \/Q. I\\Ei11g,\u00a2 Gpwgi 3,&#8217; A ._ V<br \/>\nAge:=.111ajor, TAI~\u20aca:fs1&lt;ie:3t. &#039;-:21<br \/>\nMacEaga&lt;i~tT\u00a3a11ah&quot;a1li Viiiage,<\/p>\n<p> L&#039;-Bagur Hiobii, _ .\n<\/p>\n<p>V i;  C11z:=-._nnarayap&#8211;ama&#8221; Taluk,<br \/>\n_ _jj{ia\u00a7_.sa_1&#8217;1 Dist:f,\u00a7xji:&#8211;;Jiz1 .5731 16.<\/p>\n<p>c  5~_-&#8216;{_&#8217;1&#8217;*i Sfif, Raja$i&#8221;1e::ka1&#8217;a, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>1fnh\u00a7&#8221;z\u00a7\u00b0?t17r<\/p>\n<p> VT  -Z!-&#8216;iiis Regt\ufb01m&#8217; Seco\ufb01d Appeal i&#8221;ii&lt;::d_<br \/>\n=\u20ac3:E;.C. agairmt the J1.:zdg11zc:nt and Dccrcc d.ated &#039;22\/{)4\/2006<\/p>\n<p>L1\/\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>. , .APPELLAE\\3&#8243;I&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;i&lt;3ESPON DENT<\/p>\n<p>uI1(;&#039;\u00a3e1* Sec. M; of<\/p>\n<p>passrzci in R.A.N&#039;0.99\/2002 on the file of the Civii Judge (Sr.<br \/>\nD11.) Chammraypatna, dismissing the appeai and cozifrinixag<br \/>\nthe Judg:me:11t and D\u20ac3CI&#039;\u20ac&lt;f: dated 8\/8\/200} passed in_ OS.<\/p>\n<p>r\u00ab1442\/1993 (M1 the inc :5 the cam; Judge p;\ufb01.d3\ufb01J<\/p>\n<p>sfjihanxaarayapatxla.\n<\/p>\n<p>This Regular Secorlti Appeal comizxg on ..\u00a3.&#8217;0r_: &#8216;*:a;(&#8216;m.:1}.5s.s1cx1V*1&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>this day, U363 Court deiivered the f013owi11g:&#8211;.. A<br \/>\nJUBGmENf  <\/p>\n<p>This is pIair1I:,ifi&#8221;&#8216;s srszconci a~}3\u00a73c3v;,\u00a7&#8217;;:&#8217;i&#8217;:~<\/p>\n<p> The appe1iar1&#8211;t_;f;i;3j\u00a7ij1ti?\u00a71&#8242;  &#8221; suit in<\/p>\n<p>&lt;Z).S.No.44\u00a32\/1993 i&quot;or .p6:r,t11an31;s.&quot;;:-inj&#8211;1;;11;:i;ib:1g {.&#039;i&#039;1J1e case 0ft&quot;1&#039;1e<\/p>\n<p>appei1aI1i:&#8211;p1a\u00a71V1&#8211;ti1fV&#039;A3a%;:s;&#039;:&#039;: 20 guntas of Eand in<br \/>\nS\u00a7.I.N&#039;z:1(;\u00a7&#8217;1\u00e9(\u00a72&#8217;tiipia-&#8216;_E&#8217;aI&#8217;1si1&lt;ia3:&#039; 1191&#039; grazri of tliata 1al&quot;1(l and<\/p>\n<p>H163&#039;.&#039;1TE:\u00a7h$ild\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7Z&#039;_ &#039;gTi3:l;1&#039;\u00a7\u00a7(\u00a7 the lajrnji and issuz-:r:i {ha grant<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;*~*&quot;..:*.v:ftV1&#039;tii&#039;1(:::tz\u00ab;=_,.&quot;M &#039;1&quot;_&#039;t1 e~&#039;\u00a7g1],3pe11a1&quot;1t. is in possessicm and enjoylzzmlt; of<\/p>\n<p> &#039;Suit \u00e9sciis-;\u00e9i;\u00a3L1i6 property&#039; and the I*espo:1ci::1&#039;1t: tr_i\u20ac:(i &#039;to<\/p>\n<p>  i,i&#039;&quot;&lt;&#8211;&quot;::?1;1\u00a7:i_:&quot;s3_\u00bb es\u00e9ild (iis;30ss&lt;::s$ that appe=:ii3:&quot;1t. fmzra suit; s&lt;:1&quot;1\u20ac:duie:<\/p>\n<p>&#039;\u00a73r@p;\u00bb::&#039;:f\u00e9&#039;. T}1fi&#039;}f&#039;\u20ac\ufb01f}I&#039;\u20acJ appc:1i3;ut. \ufb02ied the suit: for paI*1:11a1T1eI:ii<\/p>\n<p>1\/ \/I . &#039;V &#039;T &#039; T .._ i1&#039;1j-1t1*:\u00a3:{io1&#039;3.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The resp0ncie:&lt;1t resieted the SE12&#039;; C()I&#039;1i.\u20acI1{iiI1g mat.<\/p>\n<p>he has been &lt;&#039;:uEtjvati1&quot;1g the suit 1312.221 si.11c::e 1982 {iI1f::i?&quot;&#039;;i71\u00e9:1S<\/p>\n<p>cieveioped the propertgsz by investirlg huge a5;&#039;i~;;c:&#039;_t;;~1&#039;e._1_&#039;;:&#039;  {J17<\/p>\n<p>?.:20,00\u20ac}\/- and he is \ufb02owing crops like Ragi,   &#039; <\/p>\n<p>It is also sI:at.ed, the res_p0nde\u00a31t \u00a31235  &quot;app_1.ie\u00a7;itir;v1i1  <\/p>\n<p>regixlarisation. cf the laud ami thehas    L.\n<\/p>\n<p>suit scheduie property and has  t11e~si\u00a7et:ch:&#8217;a1&#8217;1d \ufb01ne<br \/>\na1110t.1I1t has been 1*eceive\u00a7l,_._&#8221;&#8216;:f&#8217;r01:&#8211;\u00e9;1 3:215 ~ ..w_;=es&#8221;pQI1cie11t. and the<br \/>\nappeliam: with the poiitical infiuexieei.he;\u00e9&#8221;,\u00a7:1e1j19:ged to get the<\/p>\n<p>grant certi\ufb01cate  \ufb01asi   1. e\ufb01aiieiaged before the<\/p>\n<p>Assistax\ufb01 (i&#8217;,fz:w_111:I4&#8217;1i.ss:i_ci&gt;&#8217;;&#8217;:1VI\u00a7;.re\u00a7g_ &#8220;}T1:ie:jef2)re, the respo1&#8217;1de11i: has<\/p>\n<p>prayed for dis11&#8217;i&#8217;ies:sz11vQi&#8217;\u00a7}1e._S11i.&#8217;s\u00a7;<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;I&#8217;i%\u00a7e t\ufb01al Court c0nsicie1*i11g the mateeriai on record<\/p>\n<p>has \ufb01el{i.e&#8217;_iIia;t.4}:\u00a71v\u00a7: z\u00a31:~pe\ufb02a1&#8217;1E: has \ufb01aileci to &#8220;prove his possessicm<\/p>\n<p> kjif i_11i.eI&#8217;ie:fe11r:\u00e9:&#8217; zmiti the 1*es:apo1&#8217;1dent; is in possessi&lt;;)11 amii has<\/p>\n<p>&quot; \u00e9;1\u00a7$i1\u00a3;i&#039;ssec1 the= $1111..\n<\/p>\n<p>  Eff _.u\u00bb&#8221;&#8216;1&#8217;}1e a.ppella11t has filed appeal in RA No.99\/()2.<\/p>\n<p>   ..a3\u00a7pe\ufb02ate (tour: by its jmigzxient arid decree dated<\/p>\n<p>[\/,<\/p>\n<p>224-2066 has dismissed {he appeai, co1&#8217;1I11:mi41i1g? }&#8217;_3__c:<\/p>\n<p>J L1dg111e;m; arlci Dec.r&lt;~;:c=: passed by the: trial Court.<\/p>\n<p>6. &#8216;I&#8217;l1erei&#8221;1&#8217;e, this second appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. &#8216;I&#8217;1&#8243;1t&#8217;*: learnsd counsel 1316  <\/p>\n<p>that 1111:: Courts below have_e1*red i_1f_1_V}:&#8217;xvism._ivssi1&#8217;ig &#8216;E116 Hsixit. He<\/p>\n<p>alsa sL:.bn1it:{ed that the  }is&#8221;&#8211;i;\u00a7:_ p(;ss\u20ac-ssiorl and<br \/>\n&#8216;  V &#8216; &#8216;Lin 2<br \/>\nS\/\\autho1&#8217;1sed<br \/>\ncuItivatio11 was __1v:gi.1_Ia3ti.sfrf:d .i.f;agiC4:  fjjexeibre, the (fiourts<\/p>\n<p>enj0yn1e1&#8217;1t of the sui_t:&#8221;s(:I1ed{1Ie&#8217;  hi<\/p>\n<p>below wezm Jiitii &#8221;  the suit. He also<br \/>\nsubzI1itteci  \u00a5&#8217;:.I&#8217;:\u00e9  ~p1&#8217;0w that  {E16 \u00e9pb\u00e9iiarlt is in possession and<br \/>\ne,1?;;ji\u00a7j\u00bbf111cf:I&#8217;1;::j  \u00e9\u00e9\u00e9ii\u00e9dtxie propexty and ti&#8217;;:er&lt;.~:ibre, the<\/p>\n<p>Eouris b;~:.16u&#039;*,,\u00a7V\u00a7rcj11.st\ufb01ied in dismissi1*1g the suit.<\/p>\n<p>[V8,  ;&quot;a,.s:&quot;, $g$,ai1&#039;1st: this, the Iear\ufb01ed counsei for<\/p>\n<p>:;&quot;&lt;\u00a7S4p\u00a7:\u00a3I3dVeii*t._ siibnaitted that the Courts below on proper<\/p>\n<p>&quot; \u00e9yagz\ufb01ideigatioix of the materiai on record have riglltiy dismissed<\/p>\n<p> &quot;tI:1_c\u00a7 Suiii arxd thc=:I&#039;ef0re, the ir;1pugned Judgments atlzii Decrees<\/p>\n<p>L\/,.\n<\/p>\n<p>d(} 110: Cal} \u00a3131&#8242; i11t.e1&#8217;fe1&#8217;\u20ac:I1Ce. He also s11bInit1.ed that <\/p>\n<p>&lt;&#039;3oLzI&#039;ts beiow ixave co:1C1Nure11t1y held that: the respom;i$1f;&#039;ti;j <\/p>\n<p>possessi0I1 and e:njoyme:&#039;1&#039;t of the suit. scheduie pi&#039;e:;Vpc:jIV&#039;t;y <\/p>\n<p>the suit. is for bear injt.11&#039;1ct:ion and thefefb1*e,&#8211;&#039;_4tI1_e jimpugrleciv-VA<\/p>\n<p>J&#039;t.IdgII1\u20ac.I1?ZS and Decrees do 1&#039;1()&#039;i. call f&#039;0i=\u00e9;i.r1:\u00e9T\u00a7\u00a7ri%:1&#039;\u00e912&lt;\u00a7\u00e9&#8230; &#039;V Ha&#039;<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the gant made i1&quot;.&#039;. 1}&#039;;i._&#039;_\u00a3\u00e9&#039;O&quot;El1: \u00ab;1_f r.E&#039;1e  <\/p>\n<p>b\u20ac\u20ac11 ca11C&lt;~:l}ed and the ma.1:1&#039;:er is\u00a7*3j1&#039;cn.v &#039;;3e:f1~dif1gV&#039; bef01&quot;e the<\/p>\n<p>Karxlataka Appe\ufb02at\ufb01: &#039;\u00a3&#039;rib1m\u00e9\u00a3.V_ A:-;11&#039;1c\u00a7* i\u00a7o?&#039;  $\u00a7y:i\u00a7\u00a7s!;a11t&#039;iaiVVq11E:stioI1 of<\/p>\n<p>iaw a1&#039;ises \u00a3101&#039; COI1Si,d\u20ac:I&#039;a&#039;ti0I1 iii _\u00a7iI;is-&#8230;\u00a7:i&#039;p1}3_3\u00a7_-.a:&#039;1Ci-.tj&#039;1e1&#039;*eib1&quot;e, the<\/p>\n<p>appea} is li\u00a33.bi&#039;\u20ac&quot;&quot;t0.  di\u00a7;:{1\u00a7s\u00e9;::(i;-<\/p>\n<p>9. I fzave Car\u00e9i\ufb01iigs &#8216;Tc&lt;;i1s3}d:eret:1 the submis:~::i0I1s made:<\/p>\n<p>by learned C{}LlI1S\u20ac\u00a7 \u00a3232&#039;. E3&quot;-a1&quot;t1$S;* &quot;<\/p>\n<p>  Edi) not  merii: in the submission Qt&#039;<\/p>\n<p>Eea1&#039;Iii:_d&quot;1;;&lt;31;1;i&#039;1$&lt;:1% i1$I~T.ax;.;;3elIa11t.. it is reievant. \u00a30 Imte, the suit<\/p>\n<p>7 , i:\u00bb;;V)\u00a7&#039;0r&#039; pei&#039;:1}a;r;:::e:&quot; j;njLn&#039;1ci:i011. Thr: ap;_J&lt;:11aI1t claims that he is<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#039;:%i5t&#039;v&quot;;f;o&amp;;s&lt;::ssi:\u00a7Iv:V..and erijoyxxzerzi; of the Suit scrheduie pmp&lt;~*:1&#039;t:\u00a7,r&#039;<\/p>\n<p> &#8211; &#8216;aI1&#8217;c&#8217;ii _ 1&#8217;16?&#8217; iS_.A*&#8217;C1_1itivati;:1g i:h&lt;~:: izmci m1at1t\u00a3&quot;3&lt;);&#039;isediy a\ufb01d it was<\/p>\n<p>  V  gr&#039;;\u00a7i1&#039;:~t.5{i: in his favauzf. &#039;1_&quot;&#039;i1e r&lt;~:sp01}de:&#039;1E: ciaims that he is in<\/p>\n<p>[\/4<\/p>\n<p>p0Sst:ssi01&#039;1 311:1 \u20ac1}._3&quot;()y1:_11t3I11; of thfi: Suit Sc:i1eduEe g31&#039;0p\u20ac:*\u00a7y_44atV1(i<\/p>\n<p>he is cL1ii;ivati11g the iami Lu&#039;1aut}:1orise(iijv axld t;E&#039;3.&lt;\u00ab: ;1T.1;\u00a7\u00ab;f\u00a7-53&quot;&#039; _<\/p>\n<p>in favour 0ft;}:1e. appeliaxlt has D6611 c}&#039;1a}1\u00a21&#039;1geci._&#039; &quot;  ~ &#8211;&#039;X &#039;V .<\/p>\n<p>11. 11; ES I1(}t in ciisputtz that the glfaili. 1i1:?ad&#8217;\u20ac_.&#8217;i;i1.uikiugiiiifi<\/p>\n<p>:21&#8242; th@ appeilmxt has been caI1c{\u00e9Il_\u00e9d_ a11(i~ th-:3  \ufb02ow&#8217; = L<\/p>\n<p>prgznding befbre the Km:1ataj&lt;a = $30!}: the<br \/>\nCourts below have C0\ufb02CLu&#039;f\u00e9f1gi}?&#8211;  rgspoxldexlt is in<br \/>\npossessicm of the \u00a7:_*;1Vi3:__&#039;sc\u00a7&#039;1i\u00e9tii&#039;z;1Vi\u00a7;   &quot; I.&#039;hemfore, the<br \/>\nimpugned     I231&#039; i1&#039;;:te1&#039;fe1&#039;e11ce.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;F}f:z6re is I&#8217;10:.:11e1&#8243;i\u00a3:TA&#8217;i.:3._-,t:1;i&#8217;s.Vap\u00a75eaj a\ufb01si no substaz\ufb01iaj qu&amp;s&#8221;\u00a3;io3:1<br \/>\nof law arises  (:or1side1re1i_i&#8217;:;1: 1&#8243;&#8216;ii*i this \u00e9mpeai and t1&#8217;1e1&#8243;ef::3re,<br \/>\nthe appeal; is Iiaiai\u00e9 ix}  :;iiS1&#8217;z1issci&#8217;:d.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;V -1316 appeal is dismissed. No (303115.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 Author: H.Billappa IN THEL&#8217; H1&#8217;f\u00a7&#8217;rH COURT GP&#8217; KARNA&#8217;I&#8217;AEiA AT&#8217; BAN CEALORE i:3A&#8217;1&#8242;}:1:&gt; -&#8216;1&#8217;m3 &#8216;mg izoth DAY &lt;39 c)&lt;:*1&#039;z:n23;&amp;:}~2, 2010 BEP&#039;{}RE TEE HOFPBLE mR..IUsTIc:E H.BzLLA?m % I~2}\u00a3:{?&#039;rULAR $:3:c:&#039;;:m3 AE&#039;P\u00a3\u00a7A.L 2 13i5;i\u00a7T2c:;;5_&#039;: &#039;- &#039; _ BETWEEK: E%\u00a71i.M.M.}3I1oo(i\u20acsha, S\/c;.Ma11j\u20ac iiowcia, Aged 36 fJ\u20ac\u00a3&#8221;:1}&#8221;&#8216;S, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-239921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-03T23:46:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-03T23:46:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1403,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-03T23:46:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-03T23:46:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-03T23:46:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":1403,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010","name":"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-03T23:46:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-m-bhoodesha-vs-m-n-venkatrama-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri M M Bhoodesha vs M N Venkatrama on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239921\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}