{"id":240158,"date":"2008-05-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008"},"modified":"2016-03-30T20:56:24","modified_gmt":"2016-03-30T15:26:24","slug":"madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
'1\n1.\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 26TH \"DAY 0? MAY 2c::)'03Cf     _\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HGNBLE l\\\u00a2\u00a3R.JU8T':IAC1i):\"E?\u00a3!L:'4I;f.II--.i \"   X  J. [ 'T\n\nWRIT P\u00a7j\u00a7'I'l'ION Nq.518{3 \u00e9mf\u00e9oos  A'  \nsmrwsmr:   V' .' t \n\n1. Madan Lal\ufb02othra,  j\nS \/ o.Pu;nam Chand B0f1?:ra.,. '\nAged about 52 years, T V j '\nR] at C-302, Osizar ()1ft;i3;a:-\u20ac163, \" . \nSahakar Naga1';\u00ab\u00ab.l3 %'mga\u00a7org2. .. \n2. Piyush Bcithray  --. ,   ;\nS\/o.Madar1.VLa13E3Qthra','V  *\nAged *a\u00a7\u00e9'ut  yt:L\u00e9=;r'::_. ' \nR] at'-.C-3_(}2,  I\nSahakar Nag-clr, Bas:1ga1o'r-r;, \n3. Mantu Ag\u00e9uwal,  V \nS\/9'.K::sa_r Deon Agazwal,\nzx._.g\u00abi.':<3 abeut 52 \n\n " A VRVf.:at Miizxm:-:_swa1*a indusuial Estate,\n\n'  \u00a7\u00a7ea,d,--. _Pecx1ya,\ngsgggaicrg --we 053.  PETITIONERS\n\n(B}rAEvf\u00a3_'V\/ 3.  I11c., Advs.)\n\n_' \u00bb_'I'h_t9:"Ba'nga1o1t Qevelopment Authority,\n  Bygits Cemmissioner,\n.4  Dr; Tchowdaiah Roaci,\n Kumara Park West,\n" Bangalore - 569 020.  RESPDHDENT\n\n\n\n;-,\n_. 3\/ _\n\nThis Writ Petition is \ufb01ieei under Articles 226 85 22?\u00bb-ot'.the\nConstitution of India praying to direct the Ieepoodeot"to"-a\u00a7.iot'=.a\n\nsite measuring 40 X 60' each to the petitioners in   _\nLayout, Bangalore or any other developed Layout 'a:-.=-per the ' \nresolution 26.06.1984 vide Subject No.384_.~pa.$eed"\u00bb.by them. i\n\nrespondent.<\/pre>\n
This Petition coming on for   <\/p>\n
the Court made the fo]1owi:ng:~ V <\/p>\n
oaoe\ufb01\u00bb\n<\/p>\n
3.. Petitioners are    in the
\nnature of mandamus  the”.1ivre’e1%oi1deet~Ba11ga1ore
\nDevelopment   oliiot a site measuring
\n40 X 60′ to eaeh  {I Stage, Bangalore or in
\nany otheriitieeeloiigd  peritheiiresolution passes} by the
\nem on 2\u00a3$’..oe…1934VVViei<\/p>\n
2. It is the  of. theiipetitioners that the EDA acquired vast<\/p>\n
iiex\u00a3enti:.oii’1:a:1d”for rofmaecn of Layout called ‘Raj Mahal Vilas’ Ii<\/p>\n
 “2335; the owners of the land obstructed for the<\/p>\n
i   acq1iieitio11v_ geroeeedings and for carrying out the work of<\/p>\n
i”o1fmatioz1Vvo’f Layout on the grounci that the compensation<\/p>\n
  was totally inadequate. When the BDA found it<\/p>\n
  to proceed with the formation of Layout, there was a<\/p>\n
  eet\ufb02ement arrived at between the BDA and the Government on<\/p>\n
the one hand and the owners of the land on the other. The<\/p>\n
()5\/.\u00bb<\/p>\n
__:\u00a7__<\/p>\n
dispute, it is urged, was resolved by passing a reso1uVtio!n._Von<\/p>\n
26.05.1984 by the EDA to the effect that the ownersoi’  _<\/p>\n
will hand over possession of the Iand to the   2. <\/p>\n
the compensation already \ufb01xed anci::.A_the:..i3A{T3A’  <\/p>\n
measuring 40 X 60′ free of cost to t1i\u20ac2._if:i.’1d owiiexs  ,<\/p>\n
representatives for each acne of  – .   urged by the
\npetitioners that more   jlettem wereiiissued by
\nthe EDA to various   the resolution
\npassed. It is    that one
\nMr. Krishna    of the land owners had
\n  to the respondent-\n<\/p>\n
BDA    letters in favour of the<\/p>\n
petitioners  fwere. hisihominees. A copy of the said<\/p>\n
J”1epresieiit2;tio:i.i. is  produced at Annexure-A. As this<\/p>\n
  not cohsidered, the petitioners have<\/p>\n
i it   appioaiehedi   seeking a Writ of mandamus.<\/p>\n
 Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that in<\/p>\n
   circumstances several aggrieved persons had<\/p>\n
i’ ,..,jiVieippi?oaehed this Court and a Division. Bench of this Court was<\/p>\n
 ipleased to dismiss their prayer holding that the resolution<\/p>\n
passed by the EDA was ineffective. However, the said persons<\/p>\n
had approached the Apex Court and the Apex Court by order<\/p>\n
….,5\u00a7…..\n<\/p>\n
dated 23.09.1996 allowed the appeals and the<\/p>\n
EDA shall deliver the possession of sites to <\/p>\n
therein and to those sim\ufb02axly situated persons…  <\/p>\n
order passed by the Apex Court is ptfodueed at 2b!’L3C.1′}’CtC’)'(‘i3tVI’f3__”-V(‘;,:: o it i<\/p>\n
is also further submitted thatswrheri ‘t’*oe”‘BDA  <\/p>\n
with the directions issued, a   which
\ncame to be dismissed after  \ufb02eiiegs\u00e9ry affidavit
\nstating that the order was’ case of the
\npetitioners is  VGPA holder of the
\nland owners.’   after his death the
\n  nominees nominated by
\nthe saidiolia  allotment from the em have<\/p>\n
pusued _tl:1e ti.zatterpV\u00a73efo_re”~’fl1e EDA and when {to action was<\/p>\n
 V’  apptoaels-ed their Advocate in the month. of<\/p>\n
  for legal advice, whereupon, they were<\/p>\n
  similar matters were disposed of by this Court<\/p>\n
lvxgsihereixz ditee\ufb01ons were issued to the respoI1dent~BDA to aiiot<\/p>\n
A ~._Henee, they contend that they have taken steps to \ufb01ie<\/p>\n
this vsrit petition. \u00a311 support of the said plea, they have<\/p>\n
u”,pi”oduced the copy of the order passed by this Court in Writ<\/p>\n
 on Nos.6763-6?65\/ 2002 disposed ofon 16.09.2084.<\/p>\n
*5-\n<\/p>\n
43\u00bb. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the <\/p>\n
on careful peruse} of the materiais placed on reco1\u00a7;\u00a7,”itA_<\/p>\n
that the petitioners have approached this so   “tee <\/p>\n
enforce their rights, if any, which ate   ‘at <\/p>\n
dated 26.06.1984 and on the ;ass_ertio1ii._ttIat  <\/p>\n
holder from the original owners  _V1a11t’i’-1:::s_Vii’ii1oii2;inated the
\nFeti\ufb01oners herein to sec1ife..  under
\nthe said resolutiori. No fV:vpro1iiie\u00a7e;ii.Vbefore this Couxt
\nto show that   iGPA holder of the
\noriginal    to get the bene\ufb01t
\nunder  traeiiig\ufb02ihis right under such GPA,
\nhe had  the BDA seeking allotzeent<\/p>\n
of sites._  his Iifetiiitie, Mniitishna had not taken any<\/p>\n
 ;”to:_—asseArt  Petition avennents disclose that<\/p>\n
 ‘ifa the year 2005. Though it is urged that a<\/p>\n
m.15re’\u00e9ents:io\ufb01_ teas given on 21.01.2003 by Mr. Krishna, Why he<\/p>\n
“did not take any steps to pursue the said representation or<\/p>\n
A  his right, if any, dunlng his \ufb01fe time by approaching this<\/p>\n
  Within a reasonable time is not expiajned in the writ<\/p>\n
it petition. The petitioners who claim that they were nominated by<\/p>\n
deceased Mr. Krishna to secure the bene\ufb01t otherwise available<\/p>\n
under the resolution gassed in the year 1984, to have also not<\/p>\n
tr<\/p>\n
….6….\n<\/p>\n
approached this Court Within a reasonable time <\/p>\n
nomination. Though it is urged that the petitio_iie1*e.V_’vu\u00a7etn; “so<\/p>\n
nominated as back as in the year 2003, the  petition b <\/p>\n
is \ufb01led only on 10.04.2008 seeking  dieeoiioe  …a0A ”<\/p>\n
to consider the xepresentation   sites;”V’i-   l\n<\/p>\n
5. No such direction can be at  of time to
\nthe BDA. The judgment—-tfende;ted.V– “Court in Writ Petition<\/p>\n
Nos.6763~6765\/2902 diepoe_e–d  on””’15’.’09;20o4 produced in<\/p>\n
Annexure-F     petitioners who are’<\/p>\n
not diligent 1:e,;ici:_:”i;iieioieei:”iei_e  rights. Petitioners
\ntherein   in the year 2002 and the
\nWrit petieoe’–iteee,eeis_lloie\u00a7oeeo of 013. 26.09.2004. Petitioners<\/p>\n
are appmactiing   decades after the alleged \ufb01ght<\/p>\n
 ‘*accr*i1ed its their nreiieoessors for allotment of sites. If any<\/p>\n
  eoiigigt is issued, it will certainiy have a far reaching<\/p>\n
e\ufb01”eC:__t’li11a*\u00bb.Vr:in.gl: to the long lapse of time, as the BDA may<\/p>\n
 .  “not be in la position to allot any such sites having regard to the<\/p>\n
 of the sites soaring sky high during this period.<\/p>\n
 T\ufb01erefore, this writ petition is Iiable to be dismissed solely on<\/p>\n
it the ground of delay and latches on the part of the petitioners.<\/p>\n
There is absolutely no acceptable expianation for such delay in<\/p>\n
0*<\/p>\n
“2<\/p>\n
approaching this Court. Hence, the m\ufb01ef sought  be<\/p>\n
granted. Writ ?sti%;ioI1 is therefore dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008 Author: B.S.Patil ‘1 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 26TH “DAY 0? MAY 2c::)’03Cf _ BEFORE THE HGNBLE l\\\u00a2\u00a3R.JU8T’:IAC1i):”E?\u00a3!L:’4I;f.II–.i ” X J. [ ‘T WRIT P\u00a7j\u00a7’I’l’ION Nq.518{3 \u00e9mf\u00e9oos A’ smrwsmr: V’ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-240158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMadan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand ... vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand ... vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-30T15:26:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madan Lal Bothra S\\\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-30T15:26:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":977,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Madan Lal Bothra S\\\/O Punam Chand ... vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-30T15:26:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madan Lal Bothra S\\\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand ... vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand ... vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-30T15:26:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-30T15:26:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008"},"wordCount":977,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008","name":"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand ... vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-30T15:26:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madan-lal-bothra-so-punam-chand-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madan Lal Bothra S\/O Punam Chand … vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240158\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}