{"id":24016,"date":"2008-03-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008"},"modified":"2014-11-19T20:22:32","modified_gmt":"2014-11-19T14:52:32","slug":"sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
I-I\n\nno mm mm! noun? or KARIIATAKA AT \n\nTHE HOIPBLE mRc..gus*H_\u00a2E 1;   M\n\n13 ct A ll.-.._t1._iIi\"'\\? '.;fnnn_::'\".\nHm:-un. 11 .-\u00bb 31:? ~11 '~\u00a3UULJ\n\nS10  Sliintzi    'V \nDani: Ag:it:*._n_l!1_':1B  \n\nE10 v'!?%%  '    \n\n\"I:).-..I&u.\"; n...:\"-_\nTq. is Dist.'  _ \n\n_ N:igappa._  V \n\" S10 Yaiiappa Shintri\n\nA Agetl about sgyeam\n\n ;1._gI_ir.:u1t1.I._re\n'V Rio\u00bb 'JPC3 _ No. 176\n\n\" _1:r-.\u00bb.-,.A':....am nu:\n\n:3'-q.  Dist. Bcigaum\n\n Bhimappa\n\nS10 Yallappa Shintti\nAged about 50 years\nOnce: Ag.1'.icI.\ufb02tm'e\n\nR\/0 VPC No.176\n\nD r\\ A : li\ufb01ti G1. I\nI-.NIA.l.l5C.l\u00bb LIL\nM utnal\nTq. 85 Dist. Beigaum\n\n...AppcIiants\\\\L\/\n\n\n\nIE3\n\nSri Lingappa\n\nSfo Yallappa Ganganayak\n\nAged about '70 years\n\nR [0 VPC No. 1'75\n\nBadiger Oni\n\nTq. an Dist. Belgaum ' _ V _ _ p  Respondent<\/pre>\n
 1  <\/span><\/p>\n
This BSA “under-‘   of CPC against the
\njudgment _  anc\ufb01f   dated ,8-9–2005 passed in
\nRA No.28′?! 1999″on. file. ef then’ 11 Aeeitjoeai (3:vi_1 .,l11,\u00a2.1ge
\n(Sr.Dn_._)p,_vBe!gea:1:m_, digsizlieeirlg the? appeal and con\ufb01rming the
\njudgment  teem\u00bb;-.AV”~ea:edeeee’1?-7-1999 r-,………r-cm-{.1 in as
\nNo.69!-5\/1995′ 9′-:.m.__ai.heV.\ufb011e..__ off the W’ Additional Civil Judge<\/p>\n
 en fer admission this day, the Court
\ndelivered the following’:\n<\/p>\n
r:-h’,..:e.'”:_… – .1_1.-._…:_.__z._.9 _-_..___._I ._..___.._1 ____-__;_ _ _________.n.
\n.1′  . B H. U 13 uuuui BCLXJIICI  HKHIHBL H. I1l?ulI Ill<\/p>\n
 p\ufb01ndingiemuied by the C’ourt.s beiow that the piaintifI”‘ is the
\n  of the suit schedule property, the defendants have
\nx  ” Fencmae. hed upon the plaint:i\ufb02’s property to an extent of 3′ width<\/p>\n
30’ in length which is marked by letters ‘ABGH’ in the sketch<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
\\|\\\/<\/p>\n
L0<\/p>\n
and as the construction was put up . the
\ninstitution of the suit. the same is liable to  h3%ee,vn%<\/p>\n
of a decree of mandatory i11j1me\ufb01on;”” .<\/p>\n
2. For the purpose –pf~e.eonvenience;  <\/p>\n
referred to _a._ they :1…  the <\/p>\n
3. The Q-ease ofiihh.  he is the owner of
\nhouse     at Budiger Oni,
\n   same under a gift deed
\n1*? his mother in his favour. The
\npmpeiff   to him measures 138′ in length<\/p>\n
Norj&h~-\u00a7’gputh,v-;VEiast\u00a5WestTwidth is 21′ 6″. It is an old building<\/p>\n
‘  .,  ifmjgaiets  \ufb02oor only. The eastern part of<\/p>\n
 i’;,a1h__ih:jh*e  he, we .r_-\u20ac175 mm or at. -.-.1 n<\/p>\n
   and the same is shown by ietters ABGH in the<\/p>\n
  sketch annexed with the plaint. The part of the eastern<\/p>\n
   of the plainti\ufb01’s house collapsed long back and it was<\/p>\n
repaired and constructed by the plain\ufb01\ufb01i M \/
\nW<\/p>\n
4. The defendants are the owners of  <\/p>\n
VPC No.1’76 of Mutual. This    l j
\nL… p_i_n\ufb01_li’s house and faces A’
\n‘”‘n*’iste-‘1 of \ufb01n-and floor  have it
\nconstructed the” h”‘se h   ‘.l.’hLe
\nconstructing they   shown ‘oy
\nletters ‘ABEF’ injithe  the plaint. The
\ndefendants\u20ac.arh   over the plaintiff’s<\/p>\n
 1 W in width which is
\n in the sketch annexed to the plaint.
\nFurtherltheg  putting up the construction of<\/p>\n
srestem  the southern part of the suit properly and<\/p>\n
, tzjyjing \u00abtip Chan”-=’ ~””-4-=1 auuttllng L… pla…i11tZEs ehtern<\/p>\n
 want itis. ~11 *–.-.ge–. —-.-1 9* “1  –has is .=..-….,….<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
by”!ette__i’s  in the hand sketch annexed to the plaint. ‘l’h”l<\/p>\n
 defendants are also twin’ g to dig up foundation in the ttnth’ ” er<\/p>\n
  part. of the suit property which is an open space<\/p>\n
    is 90-50′ in length and 3′ in width which is shown by<\/p>\n
letters EFGH in the hand sketch. When the plaintiffs request<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
5. The defendants \ufb01led a
\ndenying the claim of the plainti\ufb02Z”tV1u’hey   Vt
\nplaintiff over the suit    t_ the
\nallegation of enmoachmentaznti  up by them
\nin the plainti\ufb01”s ii:  case that,
\noriginallgr, house  twee  \u00abwall roofed with<\/p>\n
Many n.-. 11.3,   No. 176 is also<\/p>\n
.- K’ * 5*-1 T 7 .\n<\/p>\n
man: up urmuu wan.  western wall of VPC No. 1175 wee m<\/p>\n
._n. -. ‘E’he-.,_ defendant<\/p>\n
the neoeeeery   they havg-r:arnet1’ ‘ out mm” or<\/p>\n
  Wall year 1994. Since beginning the<\/p>\n
 ‘v4VP:C_.No.176 and eastern wall of VPC No.175<\/p>\n
‘ Vt   appear to be closed on the northern side<\/p>\n
mcmg  the road. Defendant No.1 produced a separate<\/p>\n
  altetch along with the written statement showing the<\/p>\n
V”  location of VPC’: 140.175 and 176 and the existence of<\/p>\n
 passage in between the said VPC numbers. The<\/p>\n
\\\\.\/<\/p>\n
properly bearing we No.176 is measuring ‘the<\/p>\n
northern side and 24′ on the southern side. Effie 2 <\/p>\n
the defendants measure 24’ on  ‘iiort!1tf315t1  ‘ ; i<\/p>\n
the soI.1t11_..rn _ide. Therefore,  :i:.’:1.e<\/p>\n
4-\n<\/p>\n
I..-\n<\/p>\n
6. The trial  onff   framed
\nissues. Plainti\ufb02 was   also examined a
\nt.-.2-‘.tness as    which were
\nmark”: as we…  as DW1.\n<\/p>\n
He fa  “-5 i”{}”w’2. 8 dmuments were<\/p>\n
pmduoed which  as Exs. D1 to D3. At the<\/p>\n
instance  the “V-.deFen-dents a Court Commissioner was<\/p>\n
~ .  _  who inspection has \ufb01led his report which<\/p>\n
  is ;\u00a3ts.::I:1x.C–1. He was also examined.<\/p>\n
2 ..  ‘l’l1e trial Court on consideration of the aforesaid oral<\/p>\n
* llVs.n:!..\u00abd.–u.__.nta_ry _.videnoe on record held that the plaintiff is<\/p>\n
“the war of the lions-.; p…per!_y UPC) No. 175. He acquired the<\/p>\n
‘same 1111:’:\n<\/p>\n
T’ a r'””‘u’3r”” “W. d\ufb01 d”t’.’;:J. 2′?.5.195′.7 13…<\/p>\n
residing there with his faiml members. ‘i'”e do-* ——i-tion ef the<\/p>\n
‘<'.\n<\/p>\n
pnoperty given by  is correct. He has proved has
\nlc\ufb01. some open space on the eastem side of
\nwall which is his house property.
\ntheir house in place of old one
\none they have encroached  the”sni’t
\nnew wall on the plainti\ufb02’s as   has
\nproved tha- -_.e d_fendhntis  dig up a foundation in
\n U1   hm’ ‘ffeeteii r”pa:iIs
\nto the said  i994 itseif and the western
\nwall     of VPC 175 are di\ufb01elent as
\ncontended” hy’  ;’PheIe’fo1’e, it decreed the suit of the<\/p>\n
     — :8..:V:At\u00a7.gg1tfVI\u00a2\u00a5ed by the said judgment and decree of the trial<\/p>\n
 . th’;;’3\u00ab.V;ie-fendants pxefened a regular appeal. The lower<\/p>\n
, I I I
\nup -hut: wt”. on meapp1\u00b0m._me-.303 of the w<\/p>\n
  and after formuiaiing the points for  in ‘ n has<\/p>\n
Vdgagreed with the \ufb01ndings moonieci by the tm * ‘ cunt and<\/p>\n
‘ accordingly dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by these two<\/p>\n
M2\/’
\n‘L\/’<\/p>\n
eonmment \ufb01ndings, the defendants have pmfengjt\u00e9 ‘gecqnd
\nap I  _ .. . 1<\/p>\n
did He m-as-Im * e d-=4’-=-n -mt-=~ ‘7.-“‘v’n-“-‘=”**.” at  %’v’i’.:uGut *”\n<\/p>\n
S ‘ t  V     V defendants have
\nencmaehed 11p9i1__the  hi; incorrect and the
\nCourts   in acting on the said
\n  the impugned judgment
\nand   that, the plainti\ufb01’ has not
\nestabheheti hie  as he has not proved the gift.
\n ‘on the bntstisvttof  he is claiming title to the property<\/p>\n
 ”   he \ufb01ns not entitled to any  l_ . tlv it w,._<\/p>\n
  any portion of the plainti\ufb01’s property and,<\/p>\n
  ‘thefefom, the plain\ufb01tfwas not entitled to any relief. \/
\n= 1.\n<\/p>\n
\\I\\\/<\/p>\n
‘ID<\/p>\n
10. I do not \ufb01nd any substance in ‘these<\/p>\n
contentions.\n<\/p>\n
11. The material on mould   2<\/p>\n
No. 175 and vpc: No. 176″tg;fe..y\u00a7siuiatee % :i\u00a7y”-aide. The<\/p>\n
ft<\/p>\n
\\ltInrauJ -5. -.r .. ., 7.\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
defendaete’ pr”-“WW  N;-.: ”  -trey  e;1._t
\npiai\ufb01’:i\ufb01”s ‘prrrperty.  N-e._   hebnged ta Luv
\npiainiziff-3 mother,  Uncie’1′”a–  daiseci 27-.5.19′—7
\nshe hequeethegl   the plainti\ufb01’. The
\n9’11  years old and, therefore,
\neven the  ‘oi evidence, the Court can pmsume
\nthat the duly executed and registered. In<\/p>\n
fae’-\u00a7. ‘even \\yithotit”‘do.eu1t1ent the plaintiff being the son of the<\/p>\n
    he is entitled to the said property.<\/p>\n
a\u00ab;.\n<\/p>\n
‘..–…D_<\/p>\n
     1′ 1I:1.’.e-zderj by the (_’.x_m_1.r’t.:_s_  that the<\/p>\n
..L. ._.-_. ‘1:-‘ :.”.= L- ……………… .. .. …..’ …-. ‘
\np*;u.I’l..’l!.I’ 1_aI_.I’l’.uI: uwucl uf t}’.l.G rust   l’.:’c”‘:’\\r’31l’5’<\/p>\n
In. 1 I 1 __1 __<\/p>\n
  title under a gut deed dated 27.5.19″? is xegm d<\/p>\n
1\/ f:   and do not call for any interfeznenee. V<\/p>\n
12. The said gift deed contains the  the<\/p>\n
property VPC No.175. Strangely the defendnntsit
\nproduced any document showrn’ g: the’   f <\/p>\n
property. They did not produce  ,!:ii:’ifact <\/p>\n
it is at their instance the ooiQ:i!1.iesioncr_’wasi’
\nthe p:_ar1_:Les \ufb02ed Q,I_l1Q of msunetions. l?’ori–tlreVA,r5easons best
\nLl..l.I.4 t..,..,….s-,….,.;\u00a7-…..  g;-‘.-ails.-as the ‘clue am
\nunder which    ”  is not open ‘o the
\ndefendants,   1:    it ieornmissioner has not
\n not give him any title
\n  th.e”eommissioner’s report and the sketch
\npmdueed._   oommissionefs report the suit
\nschedule  at Anna belongs to the plaintiff. The<\/p>\n
 .  havewmencroached upon and put up some<\/p>\n
   are all illegal and they have no right over<\/p>\n
“\\\ufb02’l’III’I l’\\’l’I<\/p>\n
II’-IIIFIIIIUI fauna +I’|.n (‘turn-Ilitn n
\n‘LA.l’I.l.J.l.I’.l IJ|.nI1.l\\’V U11 1::<\/p>\n
Ilia; B\u00a2l.I.r.r1:.  1}’: Luum.’ ‘Ln’ uuhI.Lu.|3I.n.uuu, u.u..<\/p>\n
 eonsideraiion of the oral and  evidence
\n   have rightly held that plairrtiif is the owner of the<\/p>\n
i  i\ufb01schedule property, defendants have no manner right over the<\/p>\n
suit schedule property, defendants have illegally put up
\n1,<\/p>\n
\/,<\/p>\n
\\M\/<\/p>\n
oonstmc\ufb01on in the plaint schedule ” the<\/p>\n
constructions be removed. Then: is an L” <\/p>\n
defendants to put up oonst111c:tion”<in 'i,the\u00ab   7. <\/p>\n
property for which they have ,
\neats-.. 112- her'… the  to 'a
\nd""'T:':i.=. fo" i-.–.=——.:;.=–.–.. V  den  eonsideraiion
\nof the entire orai  on record have
\noonctutnently V 'held   ii 'to the property,
\nencroachxneiit   thc decree as
\nprayed__fon in  calls for interference. No
\naubsfan\ufb01al   do arise for consileration in this
\nsecond    Hence, the appeal is<\/p>\n
disinisaeci ai: fhei\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01ei of admission.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008 Author: N.Kumar I-I no mm mm! noun? or KARIIATAKA AT THE HOIPBLE mRc..gus*H_\u00a2E 1; M 13 ct A ll.-.._t1._iIi”‘\\? ‘.;fnnn_::'”. Hm:-un. 11 .-\u00bb 31:? ~11 ‘~\u00a3UULJ S10 Sliintzi ‘V Dani: Ag:it:*._n_l!1_’:1B E10 v’!?%% ‘ “I:).-..I&u.”; n…:”-_ Tq. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24016","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-19T14:52:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Jinnappa S\\\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\\\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-19T14:52:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1479,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Jinnappa S\\\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\\\/O Yallappa ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-19T14:52:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Jinnappa S\\\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\\\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-19T14:52:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-19T14:52:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008"},"wordCount":1479,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008","name":"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa ... on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-19T14:52:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-jinnappa-so-yallappa-shintri-vs-sri-lingappa-so-yallappa-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Jinnappa S\/O Yallappa Shintri vs Sri Lingappa S\/O Yallappa … on 20 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24016","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24016"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24016\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}