{"id":240481,"date":"2011-02-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011"},"modified":"2018-01-20T14:00:15","modified_gmt":"2018-01-20T08:30:15","slug":"state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                                 Govt.\u00a0Appeal\u00a0(S.J.)\u00a0No.\u00a01\u00a0of\u00a02001\n\n      Against\u00a0the\u00a0judgment\u00a0of\u00a0acquittal\u00a0dated\u00a029th\u00a0 November,\u00a02000\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0Shri \u00a0\nRaj\u00a0Narain\u00a0Prasad\u00a0Singh,\u00a0learned\u00a0 \u00a0Special\u00a0 Judge,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0in\u00a0R.C.\u00a0Case\u00a0No. \u00a0\n11(A)\u00a0of\u00a091(D)\n                                        ......................\n<\/pre>\n<p>State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0through\u00a0Superintendent\u00a0of\u00a0Police,\u00a0SPE,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad<br \/>\n                                             &#8230;.    &#8230;.     &#8230;.     Appellant\/Prosecutor<\/p>\n<p>                                 \u00adVersus\u00ad<br \/>\nMadan\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Singh                                      &#8230;.    &#8230;.       &#8230;.      Respondent\/Accused<br \/>\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant                :\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Md.\u00a0Mokhtar\u00a0Khan,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent               :\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Mahesh\u00a0Tiwari,\u00a0Advocate<\/p>\n<p>                                        &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>                     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0PRESENT<br \/>\n                     THE\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MRS.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0JAYA\u00a0ROY<br \/>\nBy\u00a0Court:            The \u00a0 State \u00a0 of \u00a0 Jharkhand, \u00a0 through \u00a0 Superintendent \u00a0 of \u00a0 Police, \u00a0 C.B.I.,\u00a0<br \/>\n             Dhanbad \u00a0 has \u00a0 filed \u00a0 this \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 judgment \u00a0 dated \u00a0 29.11.2000\u00a0<br \/>\n             passed\u00a0by\u00a0Special\u00a0Judge,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0in\u00a0R.C.\u00a0Case\u00a0No.\u00a011(A)\u00a0of\u00a091(D)\u00a0<br \/>\n             whereby \u00a0 the \u00a0 Special \u00a0 Court \u00a0 has \u00a0 acquitted \u00a0 the \u00a0 sole \u00a0 accused\u00adrespondent,\u00a0<br \/>\n             namely\u00a0Madan\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Singh\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0under\u00a0Sections\u00a07\u00a0and\u00a013(2)\u00a0<br \/>\n             read\u00a0with\u00a0Section\u00a013(1)(d)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Prevention\u00a0of\u00a0Corruption\u00a0Act,\u00a01988.\n<\/p>\n<p>             2.      Prosecution\u00a0case,\u00a0in\u00a0short,\u00a0is\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0L.B.P.\u00a0Shrivastav,\u00a0<br \/>\n             Contractor\u00a0of\u00a0BCCL\u00a0lodged\u00a0a\u00a0written\u00a0complaint\u00a0dated\u00a027.06.1991\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n             S.P.,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0stating\u00a0therein\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00adrespondent\u00a0demanded\u00a0<br \/>\n             a\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.\u00a0500\/\u00ad\u00a0from\u00a0him\u00a0as\u00a0illegal\u00a0gratification\u00a0for\u00a0preparation\u00a0of\u00a0bills\u00a0<br \/>\n             relating \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 civil \u00a0 works\u00a0done \u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0 Mr.\u00a0 R.S. \u00a0Kuril,\u00a0Sub \u00a0Inspector \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n             Police,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0verified\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0S.P.,\u00a0<br \/>\n             C.B.I., \u00a0 Dhanbad \u00a0 and \u00a0 on \u00a0 such \u00a0 verification, \u00a0 the \u00a0 allegation \u00a0 made \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n             complainant\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0respondent\u00adaccused\u00a0was\u00a0found\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0correct\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n             well\u00a0founded.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0complaint\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0<br \/>\n             of\u00a0the\u00a0verification\u00a0report\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0registered\u00a0under\u00a0Sections\u00a07\u00a0<br \/>\n             and\u00a013(2)\u00a0read\u00a0with\u00a0Section\u00a013(1)(d)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0P.C.\u00a0Act,\u00a01988\u00a0and,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0<br \/>\n             investigation \u00a0 was \u00a0 taken \u00a0 up \u00a0 by \u00a0 one \u00a0 B.K. \u00a0 Birdi, \u00a0 Inspector \u00a0 of \u00a0 Police, \u00a0 C.B.I.,\u00a0<br \/>\n             Dhanbad\u00a0who\u00a0arranged\u00a0an\u00a0assembly\u00a0of\u00a0two\u00a0independent\u00a0witnesses,\u00a0Mr.\u00a0S.K.\u00a0<br \/>\n             Choudhary,\u00a0Group\u00a0Clerk,\u00a0Region\u00a0No.\u00a01,\u00a0D.G.M.S.,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0and\u00a0Jagannath\u00a0<br \/>\n             Roy,\u00a0L.D.C.,\u00a0Examination\u00a0Section,\u00a0D.G.M.S.,\u00a0Dhanbad.\u00a0Then\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0<br \/>\n             was \u00a0 introduced \u00a0 to \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 members. \u00a0 The \u00a0 purposes \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 assembly \u00a0 was\u00a0<br \/>\n             explained\u00a0to\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0trap\u00a0team.\u00a0All\u00a0the\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0C.B.I.\u00a0<br \/>\n             Trap\u00a0Team\u00a0and\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0witnesses\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0were\u00a0introduced\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\n             each\u00a0other.\u00a0After\u00a0following\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0Pre\u00a0Trap\u00a0Proceeding\u00a0procedure\u00a0the\u00a0Pre\u00a0<br \/>\n             Trap\u00a0Memorandum\u00a0was\u00a0prepared.\u00a0The\u00a0contents\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0were\u00a0read\u00a0over\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n             explained\u00a0to\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0team\u00a0who\u00a0put\u00a0their\u00a0signatures\u00a0thereon.\u00a0<br \/>\n             The \u00a0 independent \u00a0 witness, \u00a0 Jagannath \u00a0 Roy \u00a0 was \u00a0 instructed \u00a0 to \u00a0 follow \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n             complainant \u00a0 as \u00a0 shadow \u00a0 witness \u00a0 so \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 could \u00a0 hear \u00a0 the \u00a0 conversation\u00a0<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>between\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0and\u00a0see\u00a0the\u00a0transaction\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncomplainant \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused. \u00a0 He \u00a0 was \u00a0 further \u00a0 advised \u00a0 to \u00a0 give \u00a0 a \u00a0 signal \u00a0 by\u00a0<br \/>\nstratching\u00a0back\u00a0portion\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0neck\u00a0as\u00a0soon\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0tainted\u00a0amount\u00a0was\u00a0handed\u00a0<br \/>\nover\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0accused.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      Further\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0prosecution\u00a0is\u00a0that\u00a0after\u00a0holding\u00a0Pre\u00a0Trap\u00a0Proceeding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0C.B.I.\u00a0Raiding\u00a0Party\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0independent\u00a0witnesses\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncomplainant\u00a0went\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Dy.\u00a0C.M.E.,\u00a0E.K.O.C.P.,\u00a0Dhansar\u00a0Colliary,\u00a0<br \/>\nBCCL,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0day\u00a0at\u00a0about\u00a013\u00a0hours.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nraiding \u00a0 party \u00a0 took\u00a0 their \u00a0 suitable \u00a0 position.\u00a0 The \u00a0 complainant\u00a0 L.B.P. \u00a0 Shrivastav\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0the\u00a0witness\u00a0Jagannath\u00a0Roy\u00a0went\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0room\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00adrespondent\u00a0<br \/>\nwhere\u00a0he\u00a0used\u00a0to\u00a0sit\u00a0but\u00a0they\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0find\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0there\u00a0and\u00a0they\u00a0came\u00a0<br \/>\nto \u00a0 know \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused \u00a0 respondent \u00a0 had \u00a0 already \u00a0 left \u00a0 the \u00a0 office \u00a0 for \u00a0 his\u00a0<br \/>\nresidence\u00a0at\u00a0about\u00a015\u00ad20\u00a0minutes\u00a0earlier.\u00a0Then,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0go\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nresidence\u00a0situated\u00a0at\u00a0Hirapur.\u00a0Accordingly,\u00a0the\u00a0team\u00a0proceeded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0residence\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0situated\u00a0at\u00a0Professors\u00a0Colony,\u00a0Chiragora,\u00a0Hirapur,\u00a0Dhanbad.\u00a0On\u00a0<br \/>\narrival \u00a0 there, \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 members \u00a0 took \u00a0 their \u00a0 position \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 side \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 road\u00a0<br \/>\npassing\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0boundary\u00a0wall\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused.\u00a0As\u00a0instructed,\u00a0the\u00a0complainant,\u00a0<br \/>\nL.B.P.\u00a0Shrivastav\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0shadow\u00a0witness\u00a0Jagannath\u00a0Roy\u00a0entered\u00a0through\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0boundary\u00a0gate\u00a0and\u00a0went\u00a0up\u00adstairs\u00a0where\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0was\u00a0living\u00a0with\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nfamily.\u00a0When\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0saw\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0at\u00a0his\u00a0door,\u00a0he\u00a0came\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nroom.\u00a0The\u00a0complainant\u00a0wished\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0and\u00a0informed\u00a0him\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\nlittle\u00a0late\u00a0in\u00a0reaching\u00a0at\u00a0Dhansar\u00a0K.O.C.P.\u00a0Office\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0ascertaining\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\naccused\u00a0had\u00a0left\u00a0for\u00a0his\u00a0house\u00a0to\u00a0meet\u00a0him\u00a0at\u00a0his\u00a0residence.\u00a0At\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0<br \/>\nasked \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant \u00a0 to \u00a0 come \u00a0 inside \u00a0 the \u00a0 room. \u00a0 The \u00a0 shadow \u00a0 witness,\u00a0<br \/>\nJagannath\u00a0Roy\u00a0too\u00a0followed\u00a0the\u00a0complainant.\u00a0Both\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nshadow\u00a0witness\u00a0who\u00a0were\u00a0introduced\u00a0as\u00a0&#8216;Gumasta&#8217;\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0complainant,\u00a0were\u00a0<br \/>\nmade \u00a0 to \u00a0 sit \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 wooden \u00a0 cot. \u00a0 Immediately, \u00a0 thereafter, \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant\u00a0<br \/>\nrequested\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0to\u00a0expedite\u00a0the\u00a0preparation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0bills\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nBarbad\u00a0wire\u00a0fancing\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0East\u00a0Basuria.\u00a0At\u00a0this\u00a0request\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0complainant,\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\naccused\u00a0Madan\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Singh\u00a0asked\u00a0&#8220;500\/\u00ad\u00a0RUPYE\u00a0HUM\u00a0JO\u00a0AAPKO\u00a0LANE\u00a0KE\u00a0<br \/>\nLIYE\u00a0BOLE\u00a0THE,\u00a0LAYE\u00a0HO?&#8221;\u00a0:\u00a0The\u00a0complainant\u00a0replied,\u00a0JI,\u00a0SIR,\u00a0AAPKE\u00a0KAHE\u00a0<br \/>\nMUTABIK\u00a0RUPYA\u00a0LE\u00a0AAYE\u00a0HAIN&#8217;.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0accused\u00a0then\u00a0stretched\u00a0his\u00a0hand\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\nsaid\u00a0&#8220;LAO\u00a0DE\u00a0DO&#8221;.\u00a0On\u00a0this,\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0took\u00a0out\u00a0the\u00a0tainted\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nRs.\u00a0500\/\u00adfrom\u00a0the\u00a0left\u00a0upper \u00a0chest\u00a0pocket\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0shirt\u00a0and\u00a0handed \u00a0over \u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nsame \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused \u00a0 who \u00a0 accepted \u00a0 the \u00a0 same \u00a0 by \u00a0 his \u00a0 right \u00a0 hand \u00a0 and \u00a0 after\u00a0<br \/>\ncounting\u00a0the\u00a0bribed\u00a0amount\u00a0with\u00a0both\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0hand\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0kept\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<br \/>\non\u00a0the\u00a0cot\u00a0beneath\u00a0the\u00a0papers\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0agreement\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0work\u00a0which\u00a0had\u00a0<br \/>\nbeen \u00a0 just \u00a0 then \u00a0 taken \u00a0 by \u00a0 him \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant. \u00a0 Soon \u00a0 after \u00a0 money\u00a0<br \/>\ntransaction\u00a0was\u00a0over,\u00a0the\u00a0shadow\u00a0witness\u00a0Jagannath\u00a0Roy\u00a0came\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0room\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0gave\u00a0a\u00a0signal\u00a0by\u00a0scratching\u00a0the\u00a0back\u00a0portion\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0neck\u00a0with\u00a0his\u00a0left\u00a0hand.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>On \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 signal, \u00a0 the \u00a0 I.O. \u00a0 along \u00a0 with \u00a0 other \u00a0 witness \u00a0 S.K. \u00a0 Choudhary\u00a0<br \/>\nreached\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0spot\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0disclosing\u00a0his\u00a0identity\u00a0the\u00a0I.O.\u00a0challenged\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\naccused\u00a0about\u00a0his\u00a0having\u00a0demanded\u00a0and\u00a0accepted\u00a0a\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.\u00a0500\/\u00ad\u00a0as\u00a0illegal\u00a0<br \/>\ngratification\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0for\u00a0showing\u00a0him\u00a0favour\u00a0in\u00a0preparation\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nbill.\u00a0On\u00a0being\u00a0thus\u00a0challenged,\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0became\u00a0perplexed\u00a0and\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0<br \/>\noffer\u00a0any\u00a0explanation.\u00a0After\u00a0a\u00a0few\u00a0moments,\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0however\u00a0confessed\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\nhave\u00a0accepted\u00a0illegal\u00a0gratification\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.\u00a0500\/\u00ad\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0complainant.\u00a0By\u00a0then,\u00a0<br \/>\nall\u00a0the\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0raiding\u00a0party\u00a0had\u00a0reached\u00a0the\u00a0spot.\u00a0On\u00a0being\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0by\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complainant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0shadow\u00a0witness,\u00a0the\u00a0tainted\u00a0money\u00a0was\u00a0recovered\u00a0<br \/>\nfrom \u00a0 beneath \u00a0 the \u00a0 paper. \u00a0 The \u00a0 numbers \u00a0 and \u00a0 denomination \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 recovered\u00a0<br \/>\ntainted \u00a0 money \u00a0 were \u00a0 compared \u00a0 with \u00a0 that \u00a0 of \u00a0 G.C. \u00a0 Notes \u00a0 recorded \u00a0 in \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nPreliminary\u00a0Memorandum\u00a0prepared\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0C.B.I.\u00a0Office.\u00a0On\u00a0comparison,\u00a0all\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthem\u00a0tallied\u00a0in\u00a0toto.\u00a0Then\u00a0the\u00a0recovered\u00a0tainted\u00a0G.C.\u00a0Notes\u00a0were\u00a0preserved\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\nsmall \u00a0 envelope \u00a0 which \u00a0 was \u00a0 sealed \u00a0 and \u00a0 signed \u00a0 by \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 members.\u00a0<br \/>\nSubsequent\u00a0to\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0solution\u00a0of\u00a0Sodium\u00a0Carbonate\u00a0with\u00a0water\u00a0was\u00a0prepared\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\na\u00a0glass\u00adtumbler\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0on\u00a0being\u00a0asked,\u00a0dipped\u00a0his\u00a0right\u00a0hand\u00a0<br \/>\nfingers.\u00a0Consequently,\u00a0milky\u00a0solution\u00a0became\u00a0pink\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0preserved\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\nclean\u00a0glass\u00a0phial\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0sealed\u00a0and\u00a0signed\u00a0by\u00a0all\u00a0of\u00a0them.\u00a0Another\u00a0alike\u00a0<br \/>\nsolution\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0prepared\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0dipped\u00a0his\u00a0left\u00a0hand\u00a0finger\u00a0as\u00a0<br \/>\na\u00a0result\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0milky\u00a0solution\u00a0turned\u00a0pink.\u00a0That\u00a0solution\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0preserved\u00a0<br \/>\nin\u00a0another\u00a0glass\u00a0phial\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0sealed\u00a0and\u00a0signed\u00a0by\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nraiding\u00a0party.\u00a0All\u00a0these\u00a0materials\u00a0were\u00a0marked\u00a0as\u00a0Exhibits.\u00a0The\u00a0accused\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\nthen \u00a0 put \u00a0 under \u00a0 arrest \u00a0 and \u00a0 thereafter \u00a0 his \u00a0 personal \u00a0 search \u00a0 was \u00a0 made \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\ninvestigation\u00a0officer.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0the\u00a0arrest\u00a0memo\u00a0was\u00a0prepared\u00a0separately.\u00a0On\u00a0<br \/>\nsearch\u00a0certain\u00a0incriminating\u00a0documents\u00a0were\u00a0recovered\u00a0and\u00a0for\u00a0that\u00a0seizure\u00a0list\u00a0<br \/>\nwas\u00a0prepared\u00a0separately.\u00a0Thereafter\u00a0the\u00a0memo\u00a0of\u00a0recovery\u00a0was\u00a0was\u00a0prepared\u00a0<br \/>\nand \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 members \u00a0 of \u00a0 raiding \u00a0 party \u00a0 put \u00a0 their \u00a0 signatures. \u00a0 A \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nmemorandum \u00a0 of \u00a0 recovery \u00a0 was\u00a0 handed \u00a0 over \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused. \u00a0 After \u00a0 obtaining\u00a0<br \/>\nsanction\u00a0order\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0authority,\u00a0the\u00a0I.O.\u00a0submitted\u00a0charge\u00adsheet\u00a0<br \/>\nunder \u00a0 the \u00a0 aforesaid \u00a0 Sections \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 P.C. \u00a0 Act, \u00a0 1988 \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondent\u00ad<br \/>\naccused.\u00a0Cognizance\u00a0was\u00a0taken\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0trial\u00a0proceeded.\u00a0The\u00a0accused\u00a0pleaded\u00a0<br \/>\nnot\u00a0guilty\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0framed\u00a0against\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0claimed\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0tried.\u00a0He,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nexamination \u00a0 under \u00a0 Section \u00a0 313 \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Code \u00a0 of \u00a0 Criminal \u00a0 Procedure, \u00a0 clearly\u00a0<br \/>\ndenied\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0allegation\u00a0brought\u00a0against\u00a0him.\u00a0He\u00a0very\u00a0categorically\u00a0stated\u00a0<br \/>\nthat \u00a0 without \u00a0 doing \u00a0 the \u00a0 contract \u00a0 work \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant \u00a0 L.B.P. \u00a0 Shrivastav\u00a0<br \/>\npressurised \u00a0 him \u00a0 (accused) \u00a0 to \u00a0 prepare \u00a0 his \u00a0 favourable \u00a0 bill. \u00a0 On \u00a0 22.06.1991 \u00a0 at\u00a0<br \/>\nabout\u00a012.30\u00a0P.M.\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0came\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0asked\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0prepare\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nbill.\u00a0In\u00a0reply\u00a0thereto,\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0told\u00a0him\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0even\u00a0less\u00a0than\u00a0half\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncontract\u00a0work\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0done\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0he\u00a0would\u00a0not\u00a0prepare\u00a0the\u00a0complete\u00a0<br \/>\nbill. \u00a0 On \u00a0 that, \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant \u00a0 abused \u00a0 him. \u00a0 Thereupon, \u00a0 it \u00a0 is \u00a0 said \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>accused\u00a0pushed\u00a0him\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0house.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0went\u00a0away\u00a0<br \/>\nfrom \u00a0 there \u00a0 grumbling \u00a0 and \u00a0 holding \u00a0 out \u00a0 threat \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 would \u00a0 take \u00a0 revenge\u00a0<br \/>\nagainst\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0and\u00a0spoil\u00a0his\u00a0life.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      In \u00a0 order \u00a0 to \u00a0 prove \u00a0 its \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 prosecution \u00a0 examined \u00a0 altogether \u00a0 nine\u00a0<br \/>\nwitnesses.\u00a0Out\u00a0of\u00a0them\u00a0S.K.\u00a0Choudhary\u00a0is\u00a0P.W.\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a0Jagannath\u00a0Roy\u00a0is\u00a0P.W.\u00a02.\u00a0<br \/>\nThey \u00a0 are \u00a0 the \u00a0 independent \u00a0 witnesses \u00a0 who \u00a0 claimed \u00a0 to \u00a0 have \u00a0 participated \u00a0 and\u00a0<br \/>\nwitnessed\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0Pre\u00a0Trap\u00a0and\u00a0Post\u00a0Trap\u00a0proceedings.\u00a0They\u00a0have\u00a0also\u00a0adduced\u00a0<br \/>\nevidence\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same.\u00a0\u00a0P.W.2\u00a0acted\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0shadow\u00a0witness.\u00a0P.W.\u00a03\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nC.F.S.L.\u00a0Expert\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0chemically\u00a0examined\u00a0the\u00a0wash\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0hands\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\naccused\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0portion\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0bed\u00adsheet\u00a0taken\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0Post\u00a0Trap\u00a0<br \/>\nMemorandum.\u00a0P.W.\u00a08\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0complainant.\u00a0P.W.\u00a04\u00a0verified\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0petition\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0complainant.\u00a0P.W.\u00a09\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0I.O.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      Mr. \u00a0 Mokhtar \u00a0 Khan, \u00a0 learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 appearing \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 C.B.I. \u00a0 has\u00a0<br \/>\nsubmitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 trial \u00a0 court, \u00a0 without \u00a0 considering \u00a0 the \u00a0 evidence \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nwitnesses\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0shadow\u00a0witness,\u00a0acquitted\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0respondent.\u00a0He\u00a0has\u00a0<br \/>\nfurther \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 witnesses \u00a0 have \u00a0 stated \u00a0 clearly \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 aforesaid\u00a0<br \/>\nmoney\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0accepted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0and\u00a0recovery\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0made.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      Mr. \u00a0 Mahesh \u00a0 Tewari, \u00a0 learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 appearing \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused\u00ad<br \/>\nrespondent \u00a0 has \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 according \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 prosecution \u00a0 case \u00a0 only \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\ncomplainant\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0shadow\u00a0witness\u00a0went\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0up\u00adstairs\u00a0and\u00a0entered\u00a0into\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nroom\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0respondent.\u00a0Other\u00a0witnesses\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0alleged\u00a0incidence\u00a0near\u00a0the\u00a0boundary\u00a0wall\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0residence\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused.\u00a0<br \/>\nNowhere\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0come\u00a0that\u00a0from\u00a0that\u00a0position\u00a0they\u00a0could\u00a0have\u00a0heard\u00a0or\u00a0seen\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nalleged \u00a0 incidence. \u00a0Furthermore, \u00a0 Mr. \u00a0 Tewari \u00a0 has \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 as \u00a0 the \u00a0 other\u00a0<br \/>\npersons\u00a0were\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0floor,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0possible\u00a0for\u00a0them\u00a0either\u00a0to\u00a0hear\u00a0or\u00a0<br \/>\nto \u00a0 see \u00a0 the \u00a0 alleged \u00a0 incidence. \u00a0 Therefore, \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 shadow\u00a0<br \/>\nwitnesses\u00a0are\u00a0only\u00a0the\u00a0most\u00a0important\u00a0witnesses.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Tewari\u00a0has\u00a0also\u00a0pointed\u00a0<br \/>\nout\u00a0that\u00a0P.W.\u00a08,\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0evidence\u00a0has\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0had\u00a0<br \/>\nasked\u00a0him,\u00a0&#8220;AAP\u00a0PAISA\u00a0LAYE\u00a0HAI.&#8221;\u00a0On\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0had\u00a0replied,\u00a0&#8220;JI,\u00a0<br \/>\nSIR, \u00a0 AAPKE \u00a0 KAHE \u00a0 MUTABIK \u00a0 RUPYA \u00a0 LE \u00a0 AAYE \u00a0 HAIN&#8221; \u00a0 and \u00a0 handed \u00a0 over \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nsame\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0accused.\u00a0After\u00a0getting\u00a0the\u00a0same,\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0kept\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0amount\u00a0<br \/>\nbeneath \u00a0 the \u00a0 bed \u00a0 of \u00a0 his \u00a0 chowki \u00a0 in \u00a0 a \u00a0 newspaper. \u00a0 In \u00a0 this \u00a0 regard, \u00a0 the \u00a0 shadow\u00a0<br \/>\nwitness, \u00a0 P.W. \u00a0 2, \u00a0 has \u00a0 simply \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused, \u00a0 Madan \u00a0 Mohan \u00a0 Singh,\u00a0<br \/>\ndemanded\u00a0a\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Rs.\u00a0500\/\u00ad\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0had\u00a0given\u00a0Rs.\u00a0500\/\u00ad\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0G.C.\u00a0currency\u00a0notes\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0kept\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0newspaper\u00a0under\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\nBed.\u00a0P.W.\u00a02,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0cross\u00a0examination\u00a0has\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0remember\u00a0<br \/>\nwhether \u00a0 the \u00a0 said \u00a0 amount \u00a0 were \u00a0 kept \u00a0 under \u00a0 the \u00a0 bed\u00adsheet \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 cot \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\naccused\u00adrespondent\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0To\u00a0this,\u00a0he\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0say\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0C.B.I.\u00a0<br \/>\nteam\u00a0counted\u00a0and\u00a0compared\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0notes\u00a0with\u00a0their\u00a0list\u00a0regarding\u00a0G.C.\u00a0notes\u00a0<br \/>\ngiven \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 Pre\u00adTrap \u00a0 proceeding. \u00a0 Though \u00a0 he \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that, \u00a0 thereafter, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           recovered\u00a0notes\u00a0were\u00a0compared\u00a0and\u00a0kept\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0envelope.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Tewari\u00a0has\u00a0further\u00a0<br \/>\n           pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0P.W.\u00a08,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0evidence\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0stated\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\n           who\u00a0said\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0C.B.I.\u00a0party\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0accepted\u00a0money\u00a0kept\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0bed.\u00a0<br \/>\n           Therefore,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0very\u00a0doubtful\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0how\u00a0the\u00a0C.B.I.\u00a0party\u00a0came\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n           accepted\u00a0money\u00a0was\u00a0kept\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0bed.\u00a0He\u00a0has\u00a0further\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0<br \/>\n           also\u00a0come\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0evidence\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0P.Ws\u00a0\u00a02\u00a0&amp;\u00a08\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0bribed\u00a0money\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\n           kept\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0newspaper\u00a0and\u00a0thereafter\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0thing\u00a0was\u00a0kept\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0bed\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n           a\u00a0cot\u00a0but\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0prosecution\u00a0case\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00adrespondent\u00a0had\u00a0kept\u00a0<br \/>\n           the\u00a0said\u00a0money\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0measurement\u00a0book\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0agreement.\u00a0Furthermore,\u00a0it\u00a0<br \/>\n           has\u00a0come\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0evidence\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0G.C.\u00a0notes\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0tally\u00a0<br \/>\n           with\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0notes\u00a0incorporated\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0preliminary\u00a0memorandum.\u00a0<br \/>\n           P.W.\u00a09,\u00a0the\u00a0I.O.\u00a0has\u00a0admitted\u00a0these\u00a0facts\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0evidence.\u00a0P.W.\u00a01\u00a0has\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0<br \/>\n           and\u00a0accepted\u00a0this\u00a0fact\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0evidence\u00a0that\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0recovered\u00a0G.C.\u00a0notes\u00a0did\u00a0<br \/>\n           not \u00a0 tally \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 any \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 G.C. \u00a0 notes \u00a0 mentioned \u00a0 in \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n           preliminary \u00a0 memorandum. \u00a0 Mr. \u00a0 Tewari \u00a0 has \u00a0 further \u00a0 pointed \u00a0 out \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n           evidence\u00a0of\u00a0P.W.\u00a07\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0Civil\u00a0Engineer\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0department\u00a0has\u00a0admitted\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0<br \/>\n           statement\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0measurement\u00a0book\u00a0from\u00a0Pages\u00a0176\u00a0to\u00a0184\u00a0entries\u00a0were\u00a0<br \/>\n           made \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 the \u00a0 work \u00a0 of \u00a0 barbed \u00a0 wire \u00a0 fencing \u00a0 which \u00a0 was \u00a0 given \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n           complainant.\u00a0He\u00a0has\u00a0further\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0contractor\u00a0had\u00a0any\u00a0grievance\u00a0<br \/>\n           regarding\u00a0any\u00a0measurement,\u00a0the\u00a0procedure\u00a0is\u00a0to\u00a0make\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n           Civil\u00a0Engineer\u00a0but\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0lodge\u00a0any\u00a0complaint\u00a0either\u00a0before\u00a0<br \/>\n           him\u00a0nor\u00a0before\u00a0any\u00a0officer\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0department\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0measurement.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0<br \/>\n           Tewari \u00a0 has \u00a0 further \u00a0 pointed \u00a0 out \u00a0 that \u00a0 if \u00a0 the \u00a0 complainant \u00a0 had \u00a0 any \u00a0 grievance\u00a0<br \/>\n           regarding\u00a0measurement\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0work,\u00a0he\u00a0could\u00a0have\u00a0very\u00a0well\u00a0complained\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n           same\u00a0to\u00a0P.W.\u00a07.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Tewari\u00a0has\u00a0further\u00a0contended\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0<br \/>\n           had\u00a0not\u00a0completed\u00a0the\u00a0contractual\u00a0work\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0contract,\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0no\u00a0<br \/>\n           courage\u00a0to\u00a0complain\u00a0about\u00a0it\u00a0to\u00a0P.W.\u00a07.\n<\/p>\n<p>           7.      All\u00a0these\u00a0evidences\u00a0also\u00a0support\u00a0the\u00a0defence\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00adrespondent\u00a0<br \/>\n           which\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00adrespondent\u00a0had\u00a0very\u00a0specifically\u00a0mentioned\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0statement\u00a0<br \/>\n           recorded\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a0313\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Code\u00a0of\u00a0Criminal\u00a0Procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p>           8.      Considering \u00a0 the \u00a0 entire \u00a0 submissions \u00a0 of \u00a0 both \u00a0 the \u00a0 parties \u00a0 as \u00a0 discussed\u00a0<br \/>\n           above, \u00a0 in \u00a0 my \u00a0 opinion \u00a0 the \u00a0 prosecution \u00a0 has \u00a0 failed \u00a0 to \u00a0 prove \u00a0 its \u00a0 case \u00a0 against\u00a0<br \/>\n           accused\u00adrespondent\u00a0beyond\u00a0all\u00a0reasonable\u00a0doubt.\u00a0I,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0find\u00a0any\u00a0<br \/>\n           reason\u00a0to\u00a0interfere\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0judgment\u00a0of\u00a0acquittal.\u00a0This\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0<br \/>\n           dismissed.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                    (Jaya\u00a0Roy,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\nJharkhand\u00a0High\u00a0Court,\u00a0Ranchi<br \/>\nThe\u00a025th\u00a0February,\u00a02011<br \/>\nB.N.O.\/N.A.F.R.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 Govt.\u00a0Appeal\u00a0(S.J.)\u00a0No.\u00a01\u00a0of\u00a02001 Against\u00a0the\u00a0judgment\u00a0of\u00a0acquittal\u00a0dated\u00a029th\u00a0 November,\u00a02000\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0Shri \u00a0 Raj\u00a0Narain\u00a0Prasad\u00a0Singh,\u00a0learned\u00a0 \u00a0Special\u00a0 Judge,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad\u00a0in\u00a0R.C.\u00a0Case\u00a0No. \u00a0 11(A)\u00a0of\u00a091(D) &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0through\u00a0Superintendent\u00a0of\u00a0Police,\u00a0SPE,\u00a0C.B.I.,\u00a0Dhanbad &#8230;. &#8230;. &#8230;. Appellant\/Prosecutor \u00adVersus\u00ad Madan\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Singh &#8230;. &#8230;. &#8230;. Respondent\/Accused For\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant :\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Md.\u00a0Mokhtar\u00a0Khan,\u00a0Advocate For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent :\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Mahesh\u00a0Tiwari,\u00a0Advocate &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0PRESENT THE\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MRS.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0JAYA\u00a0ROY By\u00a0Court: The \u00a0 State \u00a0 of \u00a0 Jharkhand, \u00a0 through \u00a0 Superintendent \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-240481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-20T08:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-20T08:30:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":2425,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\",\"name\":\"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-20T08:30:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-20T08:30:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-20T08:30:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011"},"wordCount":2425,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011","name":"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-20T08:30:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-jharkhand-vs-madan-mohan-on-25-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Jharkhand vs Madan Mohan on 25 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240481"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240481\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}