{"id":24091,"date":"2010-03-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010"},"modified":"2014-04-25T13:35:23","modified_gmt":"2014-04-25T08:05:23","slug":"n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 29 of 2010(C)\n\n\n1. N.RAMAKRISHNAPILLAI,RADHA NIVAS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR,DIARY DEVELOPMENT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. DIARY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,DIARY\n\n3. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE\n\n4. P.GOPALAKRISHNAN,VIJAYA BHAVANAM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.G.ARUN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.ANAND (A.201)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN\n\n Dated :30\/03\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                          K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.\n                ------------------------------------------------------------\n                          W.P(C) NO: 29 OF 2010\n                -----------------------------------------------------------\n                   Dated this the 30th March, 2010.\n\n                                    JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner is a dairy farmer and a resident of<\/p>\n<p>Kurunagappally Ward (Ward No:7 of Kulashekarapuram Panchayat).<\/p>\n<p>Earlier, Ward No:7 of Kulashekarapuram Panchayat fell within the<\/p>\n<p>area of operation of Kadathoor Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana<\/p>\n<p>Sangham No:Q 167(D) APCOS.                     Since the office as well as the<\/p>\n<p>collection centre of such society was situate far away, the dairy<\/p>\n<p>farmers of the petitioner&#8217;s ward found it very difficult to sell their<\/p>\n<p>milk and dairy products to the existing society.                            Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>society itself amended its bye laws deleting ward No:7 from its area<\/p>\n<p>of operation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. After deletion of Ward No:7 from the area of operation of<\/p>\n<p>the existing society, the petitioner along with other 24 dairy<\/p>\n<p>farmers in ward No:7 submitted an application for the registration<\/p>\n<p>of a new dairy co-operative society with Kurunagappally as its area<\/p>\n<p>of operation. The first respondent issued a letter permitting the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to convene a meeting for the formation of a new dairy<\/p>\n<p>society as proposed by him. The said communication is Ext.P3.<\/p>\n<p>Pursuant to Ext.P3 the petitioner had approached the respondents<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 29\/2010                       2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>requesting for the convening of a meeting of the persons who were<\/p>\n<p>willing to join the new co-operative society. But, nothing was done.<\/p>\n<p>In the above circumstances the petitioner has come to know that<\/p>\n<p>another application for the registration of a new dairy society with<\/p>\n<p>Kurunagappally area      itself as the area of operation was under<\/p>\n<p>consideration. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this writ petition<\/p>\n<p>challenging the action of the respondents in proceeding with the<\/p>\n<p>registration of a new society in the area of operation to which the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had submitted an earlier application.<\/p>\n<p>      3. This writ petition was admitted on 5.1.2010 and an interim<\/p>\n<p>order of stay of further proceedings for registration of the new<\/p>\n<p>society proposed by the fourth respondent was also granted.<\/p>\n<p>      4.   On receipt of notice, the fourth respondent appeared<\/p>\n<p>through counsel.    A counter affidavit has been filed by the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent as well as the first respondent.        I have heard Mr.<\/p>\n<p>V.G.Arun for the petitioner, Smt. P.A. Anitha for the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent and the learned Senior Govt. Pleader for the first<\/p>\n<p>respondent. I have also considered the rival contentions anxiously.<\/p>\n<p>      5.   According to the respondents a new society by name<\/p>\n<p>Kurunagappally Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangham No:Q.342(D)<\/p>\n<p>APCOS has been registered on 22.12.2009.            The registration<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 29\/2010                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>certificate is produced as Exts.R4(e) by the fourth respondent and<\/p>\n<p>as R1(5) by the first respondent. The Registration Certificate shows<\/p>\n<p>that the said society had been registered even before the filing of<\/p>\n<p>this writ petition. However, it is pointed out by the counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner that since the process of registering a society as<\/p>\n<p>proposed by him was in progress, the authorities had a duty to at<\/p>\n<p>least hear him before permitting the registration of a new society<\/p>\n<p>with the very same area of operation.           The learned Senior<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader as well as the counsel for the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent meets this contention by pointing out that though the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had been granted permission to convene a meeting of<\/p>\n<p>the persons who were desirous of becoming members of the society<\/p>\n<p>proposed by him, he did not convene such a meeting and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>when the application submitted by the fourth respondent was<\/p>\n<p>received, the same was processed and a new society was permitted<\/p>\n<p>to be registered. He submitted that there is no irregularity in the<\/p>\n<p>procedure that was adopted.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.   In view of the fact that a society has already been<\/p>\n<p>registered as evidenced by the registration certificate well before<\/p>\n<p>even the filing of this writ petition the substantial reliefs that are<\/p>\n<p>prayed for in this writ petition have become infructuous.        It is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 29\/2010                       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>submitted that the new society has not started functioning for the<\/p>\n<p>only reason that the interim order granted by this Court prevented<\/p>\n<p>it from functioning.      Therefore, there is no justification for<\/p>\n<p>continuing the interim order any longer. In view of the above, it is<\/p>\n<p>made clear that the society that has been registered as per Exts.R4<\/p>\n<p>(e) and R1(5) registration certificate is free to start functioning.<\/p>\n<p>       7. At the same time, I notice that the petitioner had been<\/p>\n<p>granted permission to convene a meeting of the persons who were<\/p>\n<p>desirous of becoming members of the proposed society, but that no<\/p>\n<p>further action has been taken in the matter thereafter.        Though it<\/p>\n<p>is stated in the counter affidavit of the first respondent that it is<\/p>\n<p>because the petitioner had not convened the meeting that he had<\/p>\n<p>been directed to convene, it is not in dispute that no proceedings<\/p>\n<p>have been issued rejecting his proposal also.             Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>proposal that was submitted by the petitioner supported by a<\/p>\n<p>project report and other documents necessarily has to be processed<\/p>\n<p>further in the light of the subsequent developments including the<\/p>\n<p>registration of the new society. If necessary, the petitioner can<\/p>\n<p>submit suitable modifications to his proposal. If he does so, the<\/p>\n<p>first respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law and<\/p>\n<p>shall take necessary action in the matter as expeditiously as<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 29\/2010                     5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>possible and at any rate within a period of two months. The writ<\/p>\n<p>petition is disposed of as above. No costs.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n\n                                          K. SURENDRA MOHAN\n                                                 Judge\njj\n\nWPC 29\/2010    6\n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 29 of 2010(C) 1. N.RAMAKRISHNAPILLAI,RADHA NIVAS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR,DIARY DEVELOPMENT &#8230; Respondent 2. DIARY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,DIARY 3. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE 4. P.GOPALAKRISHNAN,VIJAYA BHAVANAM, For Petitioner :SRI.V.G.ARUN For Respondent :SRI.K.ANAND (A.201) The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-25T08:05:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-25T08:05:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":877,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\",\"name\":\"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-25T08:05:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-25T08:05:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-25T08:05:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010"},"wordCount":877,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010","name":"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-25T08:05:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-ramakrishnapillai-vs-deputy-director-on-30-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N.Ramakrishnapillai vs Deputy Director on 30 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24091\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}