{"id":241460,"date":"2010-09-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-02-04T18:30:46","modified_gmt":"2018-02-04T13:00:46","slug":"v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1381 of 2004()\n\n\n1. V.L.KISHORE,AGED 23 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. RAJENDRAN.K. THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SHAJI.P. LAILA MANZIL,\n\n3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,\n\n4. J.C.K.NAIR, AIR FORCE STATION, NAL,\n\n5. VISHNU, PADMA SADHANAM, KAKKAKONAM,\n\n6. M\/S.ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.A.R.GEORGE\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :13\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                         M.A.C.A.No.1381 OF 2004\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                 Dated this the 13th day of September, 2010\n\n                                JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant is the claimant in O.P.(MV)No.1143\/1998 on the file<\/p>\n<p>of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,Neyyattinkara. He sustained the<\/p>\n<p>following injuries in a motor accident that occurred on August 5, 1998<\/p>\n<p>at about 11.20 A.M.\n<\/p>\n<p>           Tenderness on the lumbo sacral region, upper ( L)<\/p>\n<p>     central and lateral incisors broken, fracture L4 vertebra,<\/p>\n<p>     abrasion over forehead.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.     The accident happened while the claimant was pillion<\/p>\n<p>riding on a scooter bearing Reg.No.KL-01-M-1965 ridden by the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent along Kattakada-Malayinikil public road and reached near<\/p>\n<p>Kottapuram bus stand, the fifth respondent tried to overtake a<\/p>\n<p>K.S.R.T.C. bus going in front and he lost his control and the scooter<\/p>\n<p>dashed against a car bearing Reg.No.KL-01-G-4334 driven by the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent. First respondent is the owner, second respondent is<\/p>\n<p>the driver and third respondent is the insurer of the car. Fourth<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent is the owner, fifth respondent is the rider and sixth<\/p>\n<p>respondent is the insurer of the scooter. Alleging negligence against<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent, the claimant filed the O.P. before the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act claiming a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 2,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    Respondents 1, 2, 4, and 5 remained absent before the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. Respondents 3 and 6, the Insurance Companies, filed written<\/p>\n<p>statements admitting the policy of the vehicles , but attributed<\/p>\n<p>negligence to the driver of the other vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    Pw 1 was examined and Exts.A1 to A7 were marked on the<\/p>\n<p>side of the claimant before the Tribunal. No evidence was adduced by<\/p>\n<p>the   contesting respondents.     The Tribunal on an appreciation of<\/p>\n<p>evidence found that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the<\/p>\n<p>drivers of both vehicles and awarded a compensation of Rs. 32,650\/-<\/p>\n<p>with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of petition till realisation .<\/p>\n<p>The claimant has now come up in appeal challenging the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      5.     Heard the counsel for the appellant\/claimant and the<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.     The accident is not disputed. The finding of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>drivers of both the vehicles is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the only question which arises for consideration is whether the claimant<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to any enhanced compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.      The break up of the compensation awarded is as under :<\/p>\n<pre>             Transportation         - Rs. 1,000\/-\n             Treatment exp.         - Rs 1,000\/-\n             Damage to clothing     - Rs. 250\/-\n             Disability             - Rs.14,400\/-\n             Loss of amenities      - Rs. 6,000\/-\n             Pain and suffering     - Rs.10,000\/-\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      8.     Counsel   for the claimant sought enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the disability caused and for loss of amenities and<\/p>\n<p>enjoyment of life.\n<\/p>\n<p>       9.    The Tribunal took the monthly income of the claimant as<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,250\/-, took the percentage of disability as 6%, adopted           a<\/p>\n<p>multiplier of 16 and awarded Rs. 14,400\/- for the disability caused. the<\/p>\n<p>claimant was aged only 17 at the time of the accident. Therefore we<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>feel that the notional monthly income of the claimant can be reasonably<\/p>\n<p>fixed at Rs. 1500\/-. The Tribunal took the percentage of disability as<\/p>\n<p>6% which appears to be on the lower side.           In Ext.A7 disability<\/p>\n<p>certificate    issued    from      the   Medical     College     Hospital,<\/p>\n<p>Thiruvananthapuram, the doctor assessed his disability as 15%. Taking<\/p>\n<p>into consideration the above aspect, we feel that the percentage of<\/p>\n<p>disability can be reasonably fixed at 10%. The multiplier adopted by<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal as 16 is not seriously challenged.        Thus calculated for<\/p>\n<p>the disability caused, the claimant is entitled to a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 28,800\/- ( 10% x 1500 x 12 x 16). Thus on this count, the claimant<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.14,400\/-.<\/p>\n<p>      10.    The Tribunal awarded Rs.6,000\/- for loss of amenities and<\/p>\n<p>enjoyment in life which is very low. Taking into consideration the<\/p>\n<p>nature of the injuries sustained by the claimant, we feel that a<\/p>\n<p>compensated of Rs. 10,000\/- would be reasonable on this count. As<\/p>\n<p>regards the compensation awarded under other heads, we find the same<\/p>\n<p>to be reasonable and therefore are not disturbing the same.<\/p>\n<p>      11.    In the result, the claimant is found entitled to an additional<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 18,400\/-. He is entitled to interest @ 9% per<\/p>\n<p>annum from the date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost.<\/p>\n<p>The third respondent being the insurer of the offending vehicle shall<\/p>\n<p>deposit the amount before the Tribunal within two months from the<\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The award of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>is modified to the above extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                      P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004    7<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1381\/2004    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1381 of 2004() 1. V.L.KISHORE,AGED 23 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. RAJENDRAN.K. THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, &#8230; Respondent 2. SHAJI.P. LAILA MANZIL, 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, 4. J.C.K.NAIR, AIR FORCE STATION, NAL, 5. VISHNU, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-241460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu ... on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu ... on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-04T13:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-04T13:00:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":752,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\",\"name\":\"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu ... on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-04T13:00:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu ... on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu ... on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-04T13:00:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-04T13:00:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010"},"wordCount":752,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010","name":"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu ... on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-04T13:00:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-l-kishore-vs-rajendran-k-thadatharikathu-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.L.Kishore vs Rajendran.K. Thadatharikathu &#8230; on 13 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241460\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}