{"id":241485,"date":"2009-05-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-29T23:03:38","modified_gmt":"2017-12-29T17:33:38","slug":"state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL.A.No. 513 of 2002()\n\n\n1. STATE REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K. RAJESH, S\/O. SADANANDAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :21\/05\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n                    ---------------------------\n                    CRL.A.NO.513 OF 2002-B\n                    ------------------------------\n               Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009\n\n                           JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>     This appeal is     preferred    against     the  judgment of<\/p>\n<p>acquittal in S.C.No.48\/1996 of the Assistant Sessions       Judge,<\/p>\n<p>Thalassery.   The accused was charge sheeted by the police<\/p>\n<p>for having committed the offences punishable under Sections<\/p>\n<p>498 (A) and 306 of   the Indian Penal Code.       The brief history<\/p>\n<p>of the case would reveal that the deceased Shilaja             was<\/p>\n<p>married by the accused on 26.5.1994.              On 19.10.1994 at<\/p>\n<p>about 9.30 a.m she had committed suicide by setting ablaze<\/p>\n<p>her body by pouring kerosene after closing        the door.    The<\/p>\n<p>prosecution would contend that the death is on account of<\/p>\n<p>the cruelty meted out to her by the husband.          The accused<\/p>\n<p>denied everything and the trial court on appreciation of<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P1 to P18 and the evidence of PWs 1 to 25 came to the<\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt<\/p>\n<p>of the accused. It is against that decision, State has come<\/p>\n<p>up in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. The point arises for determination is whether the court<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.513\/02                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>below has erred in arriving at a decision that the accused is<\/p>\n<p>not guilty.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Point:\n<\/p>\n<p>       3. The unfortunate couple got married on 26.5.1994. At<\/p>\n<p>the time of the marriage, the husband was aged 21 years<\/p>\n<p>and the wife was aged 19 years.       The matrimonial life did<\/p>\n<p>not last long and within a period of five months, the wife had<\/p>\n<p>committed suicide,     for which the husband is now charge<\/p>\n<p>sheeted under Section 498(A) and 306      of the I.P.C.   The<\/p>\n<p>reason projected by the prosecution for the suicide is that<\/p>\n<p>the husband had pledged or sold the gold ornaments given<\/p>\n<p>to the wife at the time of her marriage and that has resulted<\/p>\n<p>in the mishap.   The defence is totally a denial of the same.<\/p>\n<p>Pw1 is the first informant and his evidence does not implicate<\/p>\n<p>anything against the accused. PWs 2 and 4 are the parents<\/p>\n<p>of the deceased and,     according to them, 8 = soverings of<\/p>\n<p>gold, which was given at the time of the marriage, had been<\/p>\n<p>either pledged or sold by the accused and the newly married<\/p>\n<p>couple came to their house with a demand of Rs.5,000\/= and<\/p>\n<p>as the parents could not    do it,  husband of the deceased&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.513\/02                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sister   gave them a     gold  chain of 1 =   soverings,  which,<\/p>\n<p>according to them, was also sold. PW4 also speaks         on the<\/p>\n<p>very same line. PW3, who is examined to prove the reason<\/p>\n<p>for the suicide of Shilaja,     did not support the prosecution<\/p>\n<p>and he had turned hostile to the prosecution.       PW5,   elder<\/p>\n<p>sister of the deceased speaks about giving of gold chain of<\/p>\n<p>1 = soverings. PWs 6 and 7, who were examined with an<\/p>\n<p>intend to prove      guilt of the accused, did not support the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution at all and they did not depose that the accused<\/p>\n<p>was a drunkard or player of cards. The trial court had<\/p>\n<p>elaborately    considered the evidence of     PWs 2, 4 and 5,<\/p>\n<p>who had       supported the  prosecution case. The   trial court<\/p>\n<p>observed that Shilaja      at no point of time had   complained<\/p>\n<p>to PWs 2, 4 or 5        that her husband had treated her with<\/p>\n<p>cruelty.   It has also come out in evidence that there was no<\/p>\n<p>demand for dowry or gold ornaments at the time of the<\/p>\n<p>marriage and it was given only voluntarily      by the parents<\/p>\n<p>to the daughter. The only piece of evidence which may militate<\/p>\n<p>against the accused is that the materials that are available<\/p>\n<p>according to the court below is that the husband had       dealt<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.513\/02                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>with the gold ornaments of the wife after the marriage. It<\/p>\n<p>has also come out in evidence from DW1, who is the uncle of<\/p>\n<p>the accused, that amount has been borrowed for the purpose<\/p>\n<p>of conducting the marriage.    But there is no iota of evidence<\/p>\n<p>even from the parents of the deceased to the effect that<\/p>\n<p>the deceased Shilaja had at any point of time complained<\/p>\n<p>them     about the misappropriation of the gold ornaments or<\/p>\n<p>that the husband has treated her with cruelty. Not only that,<\/p>\n<p>the evidence in this case is to the effect that the mother of the<\/p>\n<p>accused as well as uncle and wife of the accused along with<\/p>\n<p>whom Shilaja lived had at no point of time harassed the<\/p>\n<p>deceased Shilaja. It is also found by the trial court that<\/p>\n<p>even after selling or pledging her gold ornaments, Shilaja did<\/p>\n<p>not make any accusation against the accused when she<\/p>\n<p>visited her house.    The court below also pointed out that<\/p>\n<p>when she was under treatment of the doctor after the<\/p>\n<p>incident, then also she had not stated before the doctor that<\/p>\n<p>her husband is responsible for the death.\n<\/p>\n<p>       4. So, on an overall analysis of the entire materials,<\/p>\n<p>the trial court    came to the conclusion that there is no<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.513\/02                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>evidence to show that the husband has treated the wife with<\/p>\n<p>cruelty so as to attract Section 498 (A) of the Act and in the<\/p>\n<p>absence       of proof of   guilt under Section 498 (A), the<\/p>\n<p>presumption under Section 113 A of the Act         could not be<\/p>\n<p>drawn. So, an analysis of the entire materials only leads me<\/p>\n<p>also to the conclusion that the trial court had appreciated<\/p>\n<p>all the facts in the correct perspective and had arrived at a<\/p>\n<p>decision that the prosecution had not succeeded in proving the<\/p>\n<p>guilt of the accused. Therefore, I do not find any error<\/p>\n<p>committed by the trial court which requires interference     at<\/p>\n<p>the hands of this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Therefore, the Criminal Appeal fails and the same<\/p>\n<p>is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>cl<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.513\/02    6<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL.A.No. 513 of 2002() 1. STATE REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. K. RAJESH, S\/O. SADANANDAN, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR For Respondent :SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-241485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Rep.By The Public ... vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Rep.By The Public ... vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-29T17:33:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-29T17:33:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":932,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\",\"name\":\"State Rep.By The Public ... vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-29T17:33:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Rep.By The Public ... vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Rep.By The Public ... vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-29T17:33:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-29T17:33:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009"},"wordCount":932,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009","name":"State Rep.By The Public ... vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-29T17:33:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-rep-by-the-public-vs-k-rajesh-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Rep.By The Public &#8230; vs K. Rajesh on 21 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}