{"id":241597,"date":"2003-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003"},"modified":"2015-07-22T08:51:29","modified_gmt":"2015-07-22T03:21:29","slug":"ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003","title":{"rendered":"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: 2004 CriLJ 3617<\/div>\n
Author: M Kumar<\/div>\n
Bench: M Kumar<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
M.M. Kumar, J.<\/p>\n
1. This petition filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity the Code) seeks transfer of the Complaint case No. 76\/1 dated 31-5-2002 titled as Ram Rattan v. Jeet Ram to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula. It has further been prayed that the same be tried along with Sessions case No. 17\/2 titled as State v. Ram Kishan<\/a> arising out of case FIR No. 7 dated 21-1-2002 Under Section  148\/149\/323\/325\/308\/326 IPC, P.S. Raipur Rani.\n<\/p>\n
2. The occurrence in both the cases i.e. in the complaint case as well as in the police case is the same but the version given by one party and the other differs. An application for transfer of the complaint case was filed before the Additional Sessions Judge, which was dismissed on 3-4-2003 with the observation that such a request should be made to the Magistrate in the complaint case for commitment of the accused to the Sessions Court. Thereafter, an application for transfer of the complaint was also filed but the same has also been disposed of with the observation that the accused by then had not put in appearance. Both the orders have been placed on record as Annexures P-1 and P-2. It has also been mentioned that on the basis of the police report, the accused in the police case has been committed to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula and the case is fixed for prosecution evidence. The application for deferring the trial has also been dismissed. Feeling aggrieved by the aforementioned orders, the petitioner has approached this Court.\n<\/p>\n
3. Ms. Kiran Bala Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that under Sub-section 2 of Section 210 of the Code, there is a legal obligation cast on the Court to try both the cases together i.e. the complaint case as well as the case based on the police report provided both the cases are arising out of the same occurrence. She has pointed out that it is admitted position that the complaint as well as the police report have arisen from the same occurrence.\n<\/p>\n
4. Mr. G.P.S. Nagra, learned State counsel has no serious objection to the aforementioned submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that language of Section 210(2) clearly indicates that in respect of the same offence, if complaint case is filed and the police report has also been filed then the Magistrate is under an obligation to try both the cases together. The object of Sub-section 2 of Section 210 appears to be that by filing the complaint, the private complainant may not interfere with the course of justice. In the absence of such a provision, a person accused in the FIR would always manage to file a complaint and would be able to succeed in issuance of process. Section 210 is reproduced hereunder, for the facility of reference :–\n<\/p>\n
“210. Procedure to be followed when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of the same offence.- (1) When in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report (hereinafter referred to as a complaint case), it is made to appear to the Magistrate, during the course of the inquiry or trial held by him, that an investigation by the police is in progress in relation to the offence which is the subject-matter of the inquiry or trial held by him, the Magistrate shall stay the proceedings of such inquiry or trial and call for a report on the matter from the police officer conducting the investigation.\n<\/p>\n
(2) If a report is made by the investigating police officer under Section 173 and on such report cognizance of any offence is taken by the Magistrate against any person who is an accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate shall inquire into or try together the complaint case and the case arising out of the police report as if both the cases were instituted on a police report.\n<\/p>\n
(3) If the police report does not relate to any accused in the complaint case or if the Magistrate does not take cognizance of any offence on the police report, he shall proceed with the inquiry or trial, which was stayed by him, in accordance with the provisions of this Code.\n<\/p>\n
6. A perusal of Sub-section 1 and Sub-section 2 of Section 210 of the Act, shows that the policy of the Code which aims at avoiding the conflict between the investigation to be carried by the police on the basis of an FIR or an enquiry to be initiated by the Magistrate by taking cognizance of the offences alleged to have been committed by an accused on the basis of a complaint. The proceedings in the complaint are required to be stayed by the Magistrate or he can refer the complaint under Section 156(3) to the police. However, in case the police report has been submitted and a complaint has been filed in respect of the same offence then under Sub-section 2 of Section 210 the Magistrate is under obligation to order trial of both the cases together.\n<\/p>\n
7. When the facts of the instant case are examined in the light of the mandate of Section 210 of the Code, it becomes evident that occurrence in both the cases is same and allegations are also similar. The accused have been summoned in the complaint case filed by the petitioner under Sections 148\/149\/44\/324\/325\/452\/504\/506 IPC. A cross case has been registered against the petitioner and others vide FIR No. 7 dated 21-1-2002 under Sections 308, 148 and 149 IPC at P.S. Raipur Rani and the same is pending trial in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula. It is not disputed that the occurrence in both the cases is the same. Therefore, I am of the considered view that complaint case No. 76\/1 dated 31-5-2002 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panchkula, xxxxx need to be transferred and heard along with the Sessions case No. 17\/2 titled as State v. Ram Kishan and<\/a> it is ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
8.   The petition stands allowed in the above terms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 Equivalent citations: 2004 CriLJ 3617 Author: M Kumar Bench: M Kumar JUDGMENT M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This petition filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity the Code) seeks transfer of the Complaint case No. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-241597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRam Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2003-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-22T03:21:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003\",\"datePublished\":\"2003-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T03:21:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\"},\"wordCount\":1043,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\",\"name\":\"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2003-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T03:21:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2003-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-22T03:21:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003","datePublished":"2003-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T03:21:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003"},"wordCount":1043,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003","name":"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2003-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T03:21:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ram-rattan-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors-on-28-october-2003#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ram Rattan vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 October, 2003"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241597\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}