{"id":242193,"date":"2008-11-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-11-06T21:04:55","modified_gmt":"2018-11-06T15:34:55","slug":"lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<pre>IN 11% HIGH comm\" OF KARNATAKA AT BA1*\u20acGALORE\nIBATED ms Km 7'\"! my 01? E\u20ac{}'&amp;5EEvEER, 2003\nBEFORE V\nTm HONBLE MR. JUSTICE 2~1.&gt;\u00abs. 2-:&amp;zx&lt;3m1oH;3:\u00a7;&#039;V\u00a7\ufb013_,};s f  V&#039; \nWRIT ?ETI&#039;\u00a3&#039;;{{)N No. 96a4\u00a72\u00e9&#039;o7&#039;C,&#039;g:;&#039;--\u00ab. 1 .; &#039;A  &#039;I h&#039; V\nwmr PETITION N0. 5393\/g\u00e9\u00a7j?_     ~ &#039;~ V&#039; 1&#039;\nWP. No. 9634:;\u00a7\u00a7;g;z  V\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n-uuauumc mmmm -mum...-\n\nLOKASEEZSHANA TRUST V\nN02 RESEENCY RCMD  H V. . \n\nBANGALQRE25       \n\nREP. BY ITS SECEEEV-fi&#039;A\u00a7{L&quot;  _     &#039;.&#039;.&#039;;&quot;PE&quot;I&#039;r1&quot;10N:2R\n\n(B12;-*Sri.    3\n\nAND :\n\n-Ivmmvmnwwr\n\n~s;;i. 3.1 st\u00e9m  %%%%% 14 .\n&#039;- ,Ac;e\u00a33;3 A;BO&#039;Eff 50 ms\n\n&#039;S50 ;o.M\u00a7;:.3212  . V V \nM BLOCK ;'~E:\\;;;'E\u00a73\u00bbTE*$\u00a3= LA'r'QL?'I\"\n\n  BA2~:12._;z 9\u00a7. j'..-'  R\ufb01smmam\n\n~  ; \u00ab \u00ab{ B3: Sri. \u00a31 :\u20acE}:LAKA:\u00ab:m RAG, ADV.)\n\n*    *  WRIT PEIIIIGN 13 man UNDER ARTICLES 225 AENEID\n\n'227 OF THE CO3'\u20acSTITU'TI{3N OF E'5DIA WITIiI A PRAYER TO\n\n\"  'I\"I:i\"E AWARD DT. 9.10.2066, IN REF NO. 13952036 {OLD NO.\n \" \u00a31' OF 1999} ?;~.ss~;m BY  1 ::,?:;m,,. :,:,;~,30L:\ufb02.. 5012?. 35:\"\nA  .,F\u00a7ANGALORE? 's\u00bb\"IjE}E ANX~C.' AND ETC\n\n\/%A\\}\n\n\n\nX-\"\\E \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nSri. E\\siULLAHA.LLI SURI\n\nSJC} LATE C SUBBA RAG\nAGED AB\u00a3)U'i\" SC? YEARS\nREAT NO. MP 13x'11,. 3:1 BLOCK\nNANDINI LAYOUT\n\nBA.?*~I(}AL(f)E\u00a3 560 \u00a3196.  PETiT'f\u00a3,%5E\\3\u00a7?{KA. \"  TA\n\n{By Sri. H NEELAKANTA RAD, AD\\ri\u00a7. ,,  \n\n____ ....\n\nM25 Lc)1&lt;A~sInI&lt;SH;s.:\\\u00a7.\u00bba TRUST -- _ .\n\nNO. 2, RESDDENCY ROAD   -- \n\nBANGALORE S60{}2,.5&#039;*.._    ~ \n\nBY ITS SECRETARY.   ., 2    [IRESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri. s V SHASTRI &#8216;Am-?,&#8217;j    ..  &#8216;<br \/>\n PI:*I&#8217;r\u00a7fi::\u00a5:w&#8217;~.:S&#8217;  UNIDER ARTICLES 226 AZ\\:&#8221;[)<\/p>\n<p>22? or-&#8216; &#8216;rzm* ;:0NsT1?1jUI10N*~ &#8211;._\u20ac__)F\u00ab &#8220;INDIA WITH A PRAYER TO<br \/>\nQUASH THE GB4sEE.VA1*:0N THAT &#8220;RE-INSTATEMENT IS NOT<\/p>\n<p>THE ANSWER T0 2_11s.&lt;:LA1M&quot;&quot;;=xs CONTAINED IN PARA-Li op,<br \/>\n AS1.\u00ab;ARD~ AND s3\u00a2gNrj:ss: AWARE? IN ANX-A nxz REF. NQ.<br \/>\n 13352005 A}\u20ac_E&#039;.EIC.  &quot;&quot;&quot; M&#039;<\/p>\n<p>    COMING QN FOR PRELBXJLYNARY<br \/>\n}iEARL\u20acG B &quot;G_RQf&#039;JP THIS BAY, THE = COURT zvxamz TI~H;\u20ac<\/p>\n<p> ,.,VF0LLQw1NG;.&#039;*}.&#039;:._-\n<\/p>\n<p>9.3.1<\/p>\n<p>A    = .Tf1%;se tws writ petiii\ufb01ns are directed against \ufb02u: award dated<\/p>\n<p>%  -\u00bb\u00a3}\u00a7.1c_2_.%2996 in reference N9. 129\/2005 passed by the Laban: Court ai<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01arxgaiere directing payment of iumpsurn compensatian af Rs.4~5,6$G:&#8217;-<\/p>\n<p>with interest at 6% per annum.\n<\/p>\n<p>%&#8221;&#8221;\\&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2. &#8216;&amp;\u20ac.?. No. 96845239? is \ufb02ied by the managreznent. WP. N0.<\/p>\n<p>53935298? is filed by the workrnan. In thig judgment, for G{)nV&#8217;\u20acni\u20ac\ufb02C3,f\u00a3}&#8217;i+$<\/p>\n<p>management is referred as petitiener aneti the werkman is refgrred&#8217;-:%;s;.3 ..<\/p>\n<p>respimdent.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The gaetitioner appointed the 1*esp0nd\u00a21:\u00a3&#8217;it1*the year }_V;9&#8242; 8 &#8216;?&#8217; ;.a;:; Suh\u00e9k<\/p>\n<p>editor. Tha Respondent was an have up t&lt;.\u00a7&#039;.Q8:;..i&#039;1Zi99\u00a7&#039;;&#8211; : <\/p>\n<p>reqaest cf the respaniient fer eXtensic\ufb01\u00bbef iee;\u00a7&#039;e $A*f2V&#039;l;\u00a7._&#039;i&#039;:?,_&quot;;f&#039;;\u00a3}&#039;At\u00a3i:;\u20aci5A &#039;:\u00a7.i_:zi;:&lt;:~wt3\u00a3\u00e9<br \/>\nrespondeni: rernained unautheris\ufb01dly ggtialss  &#039;c\u00a7r.3,;&#039;g\u00a7s; were<br \/>\nissued, enquiry was held and O\ufb02V1&#039;{}&#039;.&#039;V:*\ufb021(\u00a7\u00a792\u00a7&#039;\u00e9.\u00a7\ufb01?\u00a7\u00a7&#039;:@%3\ufb01f_\u00a7*\u00a33$ terminated<br \/>\n\ufb01am servicai Agg&#039;ieved_&#039;L:\u00bb:;}11is Q;&#039;de&#039;r of  f\u00e9gpondmt raised<br \/>\na dispute befefe \u00a7.fh.f2    jj\u00e9cxf&#039;; \u00e9f\u00e9f\u00e9nce under Sses:-{inn<br \/>\n1s{1;(&lt;:)  mg  gm \ufb01ne sacs for Sheri) Vida<br \/>\nG0Vemmeni\u00e9:&#039;_:i\u00a71&quot;\u00e9aIed .1 basis of pleadings, the Labour<\/p>\n<p>Caurt \ufb01*am_e&lt;:i an La\ufb01di\u00a5i\u00a7na&#039;\u00a7_ i:sf:::\u00a7e&quot;.1*\u00e91ating to domestic: enquiry. Cm the<\/p>\n<p>&quot;aci;iiti0n\u00a7:fI\u00a7&quot;:is&#039;sE\u00a31_;c:: bath thA\u00e9&quot;&#039;1&quot;;z*.-zrtixzs&#039; adduced avidence and the Labour Court<\/p>\n<p>hgfkd\u00e9  addiiio-m\u00a7.i.:s\u00e9u\u00a7 in a\ufb01izmative mtizxg that the domestic enquiry as<\/p>\n<p>fai1&quot;&#039;an:i&#039;__pt\u00a7p:\ufb01?:&#8211;\u00ab both the side and on apprsciaticm 3f the<\/p>\n<p>  n2ateri\u00a7al..\u00a7r; re.::-z=z*}&amp;L,i&#039;..-tl&#039;T1Ve Labour Court hel\u00e9 the tem\ufb01natian cf respondent<\/p>\n<p>  servica \u00e9giilegal. Sims there was \ufb01eme deiay in raising the dispute?<\/p>\n<p> V &#039; \ufb02\u00a7\u00a7:..\u00a3;7a\u00a3#@a;;&#039; C\u00e9\ufb01rt gamed Iumpsum compensation in 3316:: sf reinstatement.<\/p>\n<p>&#039;.&#039;_;&#039;~&#039;\u00a7._gg1iVe$;*e:i: by the entire award the petitianer \ufb01iad WP. N0. 96S4\u00a3?,(}O?,<\/p>\n<p> r\u00e9spandazzt iiie\ufb01 WP. No. 5393!2()O?&#039; baing aggiewd by that? deniad {if<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;  A \u00bb.  if\u00e9iief of rainstatement.\n<\/p>\n<p>&lt;f}V\/V<\/p>\n<p>4. Heard arguments en the side of petitioner and pemged the entire<\/p>\n<p>writ papers.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The LabourCo1:rt afser hoiding the domestic enquigy as f3i:fan}:1&#8242;-..<\/p>\n<p>proper examined the perversity ef the fndings of Enquiry   .<\/p>\n<p>Labour Court noticed the factth;-:1: the Enquiry Officer ve*itEmatv&#8211; <\/p>\n<p>the dacumeais pmducad by the respondent gavL3_ his:r::g;;,:ivrt. ffiii:_\u00e91Gc1:rn&#8217;\u20ac:nts  ;, .\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>produced by the rsspondent establish Vtimfact \ufb011:._1;t&#8221;&#8216;\u00a3%1e  ,Vg\u00a2.:1uifj;e <\/p>\n<p>reasons of his medical illness for his un\u00e9ii\ufb01x\ufb01iissd abfs&#8217;esx1;_1\u00a5:=;&#8221;I&#8217;i1e:\u00a7_,abou:~<br \/>\nCourt alse neticed the fact that  the_&#8217;\u00a7}isc&#8217;i;3\u00a7\u00a7.x}a1f}7&#8243;~-Authoring li\u00e9d taken<br \/>\ninto mmsiderration the finanaiai trat1s&#8217;3i;tit:\u00a7:S}:&#8217;\u20acf tkI:2. r%:3;\u00a7ot:\u00e9ient which was<\/p>\n<p>not the subject mat36f&#8221;:Qf.&#8217;&#8211;chaf &#8216;os3nsiderat\u00a3en extraneous matters<\/p>\n<p>which we Gu:si&#8217;cI\u00a7 the s\u00e9ap\u00e9 frsf  For these reasons the Labour<\/p>\n<p>_C&lt;3urt h\ufb01}ji.;1.E}u&#039;\u00a3ai\u00a7.ih\u20acfeffxkii\ufb01iviiin (if resmndent \ufb01om service as iliegal. This<\/p>\n<p> ..f1z{diz:g:\u00e9f : i.e;&quot;i3i:*1;r Cam is in accerdance with law and I fnd no<\/p>\n<p>justifiable grG!!ii}\u20aciJf:0 ii1~:e:ffsra with the same.<br \/>\n _Labi;_u:&#039; (four: wh\ufb01e ganiing the lumpsom campensatien<\/p>\n<p> _ hag taken in{0&#039;\u00ab:_e\u00e9nside1~ation the menthiy salary {sf ihe respondent, his<\/p>\n<p> I &#039;\u00a5:,)i&#039;7-._service and the illegal termination, &#039;&quot;Fh\u00a2z*ef0re the iumpson<\/p>\n<p> _ &#039;c\u00e9m\u00a7.\u00a7n$$\u00a3ion of Rs.45,6{)Gf-\u00bb&#8211; awarded by the Labour Cami cannot be said<\/p>\n<p> &#039;  &quot;&#039;a\u00a7\u00a7 Either arb:E\u00a3:ra;r&#039;y or iiiegai. The Labcur Court whiie awarding the<\/p>\n<p>&amp;f\\,<\/p>\n<p>iumpsum compensatien had rightly balanced the interest of bath the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>T2&#8242;. F01&#8242; the reasens stated above, both the writ petitions .ag&#8217;\u00a2;&#8221;ii\u00a2reb f{&#8216;~ <\/p>\n<p>rejecied.\n<\/p>\n<pre>LRSEIGIIEQGS.      \u00e9\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 Author: H N Das IN 11% HIGH comm&#8221; OF KARNATAKA AT BA1*\u20acGALORE IBATED ms Km 7&#8242;&#8221;! my 01? E\u20ac{}&#8217;&amp;5EEvEER, 2003 BEFORE V Tm HONBLE MR. JUSTICE 2~1.&gt;\u00abs. 2-:&amp;zx&lt;3m1oH;3:\u00a7;&#039;V\u00a7\ufb013_,};s f V&#039; WRIT ?ETI&#039;\u00a3&#039;;{{)N No. 96a4\u00a72\u00e9&#039;o7&#039;C,&#039;g:;&#039;&#8211;\u00ab. 1 .; &#039;A &#039;I h&#039; V wmr PETITION [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-242193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-06T15:34:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-06T15:34:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":754,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-06T15:34:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-06T15:34:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-06T15:34:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008"},"wordCount":754,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008","name":"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-06T15:34:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lokashikshana-trust-vs-sri-mullahalli-suri-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lokashikshana Trust vs Sri Mullahalli Suri on 7 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242193\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}