{"id":24260,"date":"2010-04-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010"},"modified":"2018-05-28T04:19:08","modified_gmt":"2018-05-27T22:49:08","slug":"hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1492 of 2005()\n\n\n1. HEMALATHA.M.P., W\/O.LATE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THARA.R.NAMBOOTHIRI, D\/O.LATE RAMAN\n3. SREERAJ.R.NAMBOOTHIRI (MINOR) AGED 15,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. JISHA JAYAN, W\/O.ANILKUMAR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. P.A.JACOB, S\/O.ABRAHAM, PULICHAMOOTTIL\n\n3. THE MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (THIRUVALLA)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :05\/04\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n              A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                        M.A.C.A.No.1492 OF 2005\n                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                     Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In this appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, the<\/p>\n<p>claimants in O.P.(MV)No.392\/1999 of Motor Accidents Claims<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal, Irinjalakkuda challenge the judgment and award of the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal dated March 21, 2005 awarding a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 2,53,565\/- for the loss caused to them on account of the death of<\/p>\n<p>deceased Raman Namboodir in a motor accident.<\/p>\n<p>       2.   The facts leading to this appeal in brief are these :<\/p>\n<p>       Deceased Raman Namboodiri was aged 50 at the time of the<\/p>\n<p>accident and used to earn Rs. 8,000\/- per month as an Ottanthullal<\/p>\n<p>artist. On January 1, 1999 at about 10.15 a.m., while he was walking<\/p>\n<p>along the side of Thrissur-Ernakulam National Highway at South<\/p>\n<p>Junction, Chalakkudy, he was knocked down by a lorry bearing<\/p>\n<p>Reg.No.KL-7\/E 5308. He sustained severe injuries and he succumbed<\/p>\n<p>to the injuries sustained while undergoing treatment in the hospital on<\/p>\n<p>the same day at 2 p.m. Claimants are the mother, wife and children of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1492\/2005                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>deceased Raman Namboodiri. According to the claimants, accident<\/p>\n<p>occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending lorry by<\/p>\n<p>second respondent. First respondent as the owner, second respondent<\/p>\n<p>as the driver and third respondent as the insurer of the offending lorry<\/p>\n<p>are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the claimants.<\/p>\n<p>Claimants claimed a compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p>      3.    Respondents 1 and 2, the owner and driver of the offending<\/p>\n<p>lorry remained absent and were set ex parte by the Tribunal. The third<\/p>\n<p>respondent the insurer of the offending lorry filed a written statement<\/p>\n<p>admitting the policy.\n<\/p>\n<p>       4.   PWs 1,2 and 3 were examined and Exts.A1 to A12 were<\/p>\n<p>marked on the side of the claimants. On the side of the contesting third<\/p>\n<p>respondent, copy of the Insurance Policy was marked as Ext.B1. The<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal on an appreciation of evidence found that the accident<\/p>\n<p>occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending lorry by<\/p>\n<p>second respondent and awarded a compensation of Rs. 2,53,565\/-. The<\/p>\n<p>claimants have now come up in appeal challenging the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1492\/2005                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      5.    Heard the counsel for the appellants\/claimants and the<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    The accident is not disputed. The finding of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore, the only<\/p>\n<p>question which arises for consideration is whether the claimants are<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any enhanced compensation ?\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.    The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.<\/p>\n<p>2,53,565\/-. The break up of the compensation amount awarded is as<\/p>\n<p>under :\n<\/p>\n<pre>      Loss of dependency                -Rs. 2,20,000\/-\n      Funeral expenses                  -Rs.     2,000\/-\n      Loss of estate                    -Rs.     2,500\/-\n      Loss of consortium                -Rs.    10,000\/-\n      Expenses towards transport to\n      hospital                          -Rs.     1,000\/-\n      Loss of love and affection        -Rs.    10,000\/-\n      Pain and suffering                -Rs.      5,000\/-\n      Medical expenses                  -Rs.      3,065\/-\n                                         -------------------\n                              Total     -Rs. 2,53,565\/-\n                                         ===========\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      8.    Counsel for the claimants sought enhancement of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded for the loss of dependency on the ground that<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1492\/2005                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal is not correct in taking the monthly income of the claimant<\/p>\n<p>as Rs.2,500\/- and that as an Ottanthullal artist, he used to earn<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 8,000\/- per month. There is force in the above contention. The<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal took the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 2,500\/- and<\/p>\n<p>after deducting 1\/3 for his personal expenses, adopted a multiplier of<\/p>\n<p>11 and awarded Rs. 2,20,000\/- for the loss of dependency. Ext.A10<\/p>\n<p>series shows that he was a professional Ottanthullal artist and has other<\/p>\n<p>connected cultural activities. PW1, the wife of the deceased has also<\/p>\n<p>testified to that effect. Taking into consideration all these aspects, we<\/p>\n<p>feel that the monthly income of the deceased can be reasonably fixed at<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 3,500\/- which comes to Rs. 42,000\/- per annum. After deducting<\/p>\n<p>1\/3 for his personal expenses, his annual contribution to his family<\/p>\n<p>comes to Rs. 28,000\/-. The Tribunal adopted a multiplier of 11 which<\/p>\n<p>is not seriously challenged as the deceased was aged 50 at the time of<\/p>\n<p>the accident. Thus calculated for the loss of dependency, the claimants<\/p>\n<p>are entitled to a compensation of Rs. 3,08,000\/-.   Thus, on this count,<\/p>\n<p>the claimants are entitled to an additional compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 88,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1492\/2005                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      9.    Counsel for the claimants pointed out that for the loss of<\/p>\n<p>consortium, only Rs. 10,000\/- was awarded by the Tribunal which is<\/p>\n<p>very low. In the present case, the second claimant\/appellant who is the<\/p>\n<p>widow was aged 39 at the time of the accident. Therefore, we feel that<\/p>\n<p>a compensation of Rs. 15,000\/- would be reasonable on this count.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, on this count, the claimants are entitled to an additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 5,000\/-. Regarding the compensation awarded<\/p>\n<p>under other heads, we find the same to be reasonable and therefore are<\/p>\n<p>not disturbing the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>      10.   There is another aspect in this case. The Tribunal awarded<\/p>\n<p>interest only @ 6% per annum which is very low. Claimants are<\/p>\n<p>entitled to interest @ 7.5% per annum for the compensation already<\/p>\n<p>awarded as well as for the enhanced compensation.<\/p>\n<p>      11.    Thus, the claimants are found entitled to an additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 93,000\/-. They are entitled to interest @ 9% per<\/p>\n<p>annum from the date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost.<\/p>\n<p>The third respondent being the insurer of the offending vehicle shall<\/p>\n<p>deposit the amount before the Tribunal within two months from the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1492\/2005                   6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The award of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>is modified to the above extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                      P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p>     In line 2 of paragraph 11 of the judgment dated 05\/04\/2010 in<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A.No.1492\/2005, the rate of interest shown as &#8220;9%&#8221; is<\/p>\n<p>corrected and substituted as &#8220;7.5%&#8221; vide order dated 21\/07\/2010 in<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.1694\/2010 in M.A.C.A.No.1492\/2005.<\/p>\n<p>                                                       Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               Registrar ( Judicial)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.1492\/2005    7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1492 of 2005() 1. HEMALATHA.M.P., W\/O.LATE &#8230; Petitioner 2. THARA.R.NAMBOOTHIRI, D\/O.LATE RAMAN 3. SREERAJ.R.NAMBOOTHIRI (MINOR) AGED 15, Vs 1. JISHA JAYAN, W\/O.ANILKUMAR, &#8230; Respondent 2. P.A.JACOB, S\/O.ABRAHAM, PULICHAMOOTTIL 3. THE MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-27T22:49:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-27T22:49:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":934,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-27T22:49:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-27T22:49:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-27T22:49:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010"},"wordCount":934,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010","name":"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-27T22:49:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hemalatha-m-p-vs-jisha-jayan-on-5-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hemalatha.M.P. vs Jisha Jayan on 5 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}