{"id":24261,"date":"2011-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011"},"modified":"2017-07-04T09:40:21","modified_gmt":"2017-07-04T04:10:21","slug":"pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Bench: R. M. Savant<\/div>\n
     wp2681.11.odt                           1\n\n               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR\n\n\n\n\n                                                                         \n                      WRIT PETITION NO.2681 OF 2011.\n\n\n\n\n                                                 \n     PETITIONER:              Pratap Nagarik Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd.,\n                              through its Chairman Shri Praful Gopaldas\n                              Agrawal, R\/o Deshbandhu Ward, Gondia.\n\n\n\n\n                                                \n                                        ...VERSUS...\n\n     RESPONDENTS:    1. The Collector,\n\n\n\n\n                                     \n                         Gondia.\n                      ig  2. District Deputy Registrar Cooperative\n                              Societies, Gondia, Distt.Gondia.\n                    \n                          3. Gondia District Central Cooperative Bank\n                              Ltd. through its Chairman, Gondia.\n\n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- \n      \n\n\n     Mr.A.S.Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner.\n     Mrs.Bharti Dangre, Addl.Govt.Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2.\n   \n\n\n\n     Mr.A.M.Ghare, Advocate for the respondent no.3. \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\n                                                    \n\n\n\n\n\n                      WRIT PETITION NO.2751 OF 2011.\n\n\n     PETITIONER:              Vishwakarma Berozgar Bandhkam\n\n\n\n\n\n                              Abhiyantriki Sdahakari Sanstha Ltd.\n\n                                        ...VERSUS...\n\n     RESPONDENTS:    1. District Collector,\n                         Gondia District and Returning Officer\n                         of Gondia District Central Co-operative Bank\n                         Ltd. Gondia.\n\n                          2. District Deputy Registrar,\n                              Cooperative Societies, Gondia, \n\n                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::\n      wp2681.11.odt                           2\n\n                               Distt.Gondia.\n\n                          3. Gondia District Central Cooperative Bank\n\n\n\n\n                                                                         \n                              Ltd. Gondia, head office, Gondia.\n        \n\n\n\n\n                                                 \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- \n     Mr.S.K.Tambde, Advocate for the petitioner.\n     Mrs.Bharti Dangre, Addl.Govt.Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2.\n\n\n\n\n                                                \n     Mr.A.M.Ghare, Advocate for the respondent no.3. \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\n\n\n                      WRIT PETITION NO.2747 OF 2011.\n\n\n\n\n                                     \n                     \n     PETITIONER:             Chatrapati Shivaji Gramin Bigar Sheti\n                              Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Dawwa\n                    \n                              having its Registration No.1336, Tq.Sadak\n                              Arjuni, Distt.Gondia through its President\n                              Shri Kishor Shriram Patle.\n      \n\n                                        ...VERSUS...\n   \n\n\n\n     RESPONDENTS:    1. District Collector,\n                         Gondia District and Returning Officer\n                         of Gondia District Central Co-operative Bank\n                         Ltd. Gondia, Collectorate Compound, \n\n\n\n\n\n                         Compound, Gondia, Tq. and Distt.Gondia.\n\n                          2. District Deputy Registrar,\n                              Cooperative Societies, Gondia, \n                              Tq. and Distt.Gondia.\n\n\n\n\n\n                          3. The District Central Co-Op.Bank Ltd.,\n                              Gondia, Head Office Gondia, Tq. and \n                              Distt.Gondia through its authorized officer.\n        \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- \n     Mr.U.K.Bisen and S.N.Singh, Advocates for the petitioner.\n     Mrs.Bharti Dangre, Addl.Govt.Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2.\n     Mr.A.M.Ghare, Advocate for the respondent no.3. \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\n\n\n                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::\n      wp2681.11.odt                                 3\n\n                           WRIT PETITION NO.2750 OF 2011.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                               \n     PETITIONER:             Shram Safalya Bahuddeshiya Swayam \n                             Rojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit.\n\n\n\n\n                                                       \n                                              ...VERSUS...\n\n     RESPONDENTS:    1. District Collector,\n\n\n\n\n                                                      \n                         Gondia District and Returning Officer\n                         of Gondia District Central Co-operative Bank\n                         Ltd. Gondia.\n\n\n\n\n                                           \n                               2. District Deputy Registrar,\n                           ig      Cooperative Societies, Gondia, \n                                   \n                               3. Gondia District Central Co-operative Bank\n                                   Ltd. Gondia, head office, Gondia.\n                         \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- \n     Mr.S.K.Tambde, Advocate for the petitioner.\n     Mrs.Bharti Dangre, Addl.Govt.Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2.\n      \n\n\n     Mr.A.M.Ghare, Advocate for the respondent no.3. \n     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\n   \n\n\n\n                                                    CORAM :  R.M.SAVANT, J.\n<\/pre>\n
                                                    DATED  :  29th June,  2011.\n<\/p>\n
     ORAL JUDGMENT :\n<\/p>\n
     1.              Rule,  with the consent  of the  parties,  made returnable <\/p>\n
     forthwith and heard.\n<\/p>\n
     2.              The   above   petitions   involve   a   common   question   and <\/p>\n
     therefore are heard together and disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n
     3.              The   facts   in   each   of   the   above   petitions   are   identical, <\/p>\n
     however,  for convenience sake the facts in Writ Petition No.2681 <\/p>\n
     of 2011  would be narrated.\n<\/p>\n
     4.              The   petitioner   in   the   said   petition   is   aggrieved   by   the <\/p>\n
     order dated 26\/5\/2011 passed by the Collector, Gondia by which <\/p>\n
     order   the   application   filed   by   the   petitioner   for   inclusion   of   its <\/p>\n
     name in the provisional voters’ list for elections to the respondent <\/p>\n
     no.3 – Society came to be rejected.   The said rejection is on the <\/p>\n
     ground   that   in   terms   of   Rule   4   of   the   Maharashtra   Specified <\/p>\n
     Co-operative   Societies   Election   to   Committee   Rules,   1971,   the <\/p>\n
     petitioner   does   not   qualify   for   its   name   being   included   in   the <\/p>\n
     provisional   voters’   list   as   it   has   not   completed   three   years <\/p>\n
     qualifying period prior to the cut off date. The rejection in case of <\/p>\n
     the other petitioners is also on the same ground.\n<\/p>\n
                     The   petitioner   is   a   Credit   Society   which   applied   on <\/p>\n
     2\/5\/2006   for   the   membership   to   the   respondent   no.3   and <\/p>\n
     deposited   an   amount   of   Rs.1000\/-   for   10   shares   and   Re.1\/-   for <\/p>\n
     entry   fee   for   which   respondent   no.3   has   accordingly   issued   a <\/p>\n
     receipt.  In so far as the membership is concerned, the respondent <\/p>\n
     no.3 did not take any decision within the stipulated period which <\/p>\n
                                                          ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n
     constrained the petitioner to take recourse to Section 154 of the <\/p>\n
     Maharashtra   Co-operative   Societies   Act,   1960   by   filing   an <\/p>\n
     application before the   Divisional Joint Registrar.   The Divisional <\/p>\n
     Joint   Registrar   by   his   order   dated   20th  April,   2006   directed   the <\/p>\n
     respondent no.3 – Bank to admit the petitioner as a member.  The <\/p>\n
     respondent no.3 – Bank challenged the said order before this court <\/p>\n
     vide Writ Petition No.2179\/2007, which writ petition came to be <\/p>\n
     admitted, however, no interim relief was granted.  It appears that <\/p>\n
     thereafter the respondent no.3 – Bank by passing a Resolution on <\/p>\n
     6th November, 2010 has conferred membership on the petitioner –\n<\/p>\n
     Society.\n<\/p>\n
     5.              In   view   of   the   impending   elections   to   the   respondent <\/p>\n
     no.3 – Bank, the process of preparing a provisional voters’ list was <\/p>\n
     commenced.  The petitioners applied for its inclusion on the basis <\/p>\n
     that   the   petitioner   has   invested   its   funds   in   the   shares   of   the <\/p>\n
     respondent no.3 – Bank on 2\/5\/2006.   The said application came <\/p>\n
     to be rejected, as indicated above, by the Collector, Gondia on the <\/p>\n
     ground   that   the   petitioner   did   not   have   the   requisite   period   of <\/p>\n
     membership   prior   to  the  cut   off  date.    It   is  this  order,   which   is <\/p>\n
     impugned in all the above petitions.\n<\/p>\n
                                                        ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                6<\/span><\/p>\n
     6.              The principal submission of the learned counsel for the <\/p>\n
     petitioner Shri Jaiswal is based on the fact that the petitioner has <\/p>\n
     invested its funds in the shares of the respondent no.3 – Bank on <\/p>\n
     2\/5\/2006   and   if   that   date   is   taken   into   consideration,   the <\/p>\n
     petitioner   qualifies   for   being   included   in   the   provisional   list   of <\/p>\n
     voters in terms of Section 27(3) of the Maharashtra Cooperative <\/p>\n
     Societies Act, 1960.   Reliance was placed by the learned counsel <\/p>\n
     for the petitioner on the judgment of the Apex Court reported in <\/p>\n
     2006(5)   Mh.L.J.325    in   the   matter   of  Dudhganga   Vikas   Seva <\/p>\n
     Sanstha   Maryadit     ..vs..     Distt.Collector,   Kolhapur   and   ors.\n<\/p>\n
     wherein it has been held that any  new member of a federal society <\/p>\n
     shall be eligible to vote in the affairs of the federal society only <\/p>\n
     after the completion of the period of three years from the date of <\/p>\n
     its   investing   any   part   of   its   fund   in   the   share   of   such   federal <\/p>\n
     society.  The Apex Court was seized with the issues whether there <\/p>\n
     was   any   inconsistency   between   Section   27   and   Rule   4   of   the <\/p>\n
     Maharashtra   Specified   Co-operative   Societies   Election   to <\/p>\n
     Committees   Rules,   1971.     On   an   interpretation   of   the   said <\/p>\n
     provisions,   the   Apex   Court   was   of   the   view   that   there   is   no <\/p>\n
     inconsistency as Section 27(3) operates in the field of laying down <\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                 7<\/span><\/p>\n
     the eligibility condition of a new member of a federal society to <\/p>\n
     vote in the affairs of a federal society and Rule 4 only relates to <\/p>\n
     preparation  of  a provisional voters list.    It would be  apposite  to <\/p>\n
     reproduce paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment in Dudhganga Vikas  <\/p>\n
     Seva Sanstha Maryadit (supra),  which are relevant.\n<\/p>\n
                7. A mere reading of section 27 makes it explicit <\/p>\n
                that a society, which has invested any part of its <\/p>\n
                fund   in   the   shares   of   a   federal   society,   may
\n                appoint one of its members to vote on its behalf <\/p>\n
                in   the  affairs   of   the  federal   society.     Proviso   to
\n                sub-section (3) of section 27 of the Act lays down
\n                the condition of eligibility which is to the effect <\/p>\n
                that any new member of a federal society shall be <\/p>\n
                eligible to vote in the affairs of the federal society
\n                only after the completion of the period of three <\/p>\n
                years from the date of its investment any part of
\n                its fund in the shares of such federal society. We
\n                may also note sub-section (3-A) of section 27 of <\/p>\n
                the Act which relates to an individual member of
\n                a society.  In his case it is provided that he shall
\n                not   be   eligible   for   voting   in   the   affairs   of   that
\n                society for a period of two years from the date of
\n                his   enrolment   as   member   of  such   society.     The
\n                legislature   has   consciously   employed   in   sub-
\n                sections   (3)   and   (3-A)   words   which   are   of <\/p>\n
                                                         ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                 8<\/span><\/p>\n
                significance.  In the proviso to sub-section (3) the
\n                period of 3 years is reckoned from the date of the <\/p>\n
                society investing any part of its fund in the shares
\n                of   a   federal   society,   whereas   sub-section   (3-A) <\/p>\n
                provides   that   the   period   of   2   years   shall   be
\n                computed   from   the   date   of   enrolment   of   an <\/p>\n
                individual as a member of such federal society.\n<\/p>\n
                8.       Having   regard   to   the   plain   words   used   in <\/p>\n
                section   27(3)   of   the   Act,   the   appellant   Society <\/p>\n
                having invested its fund in the shares of Kolhapur
\n                District   Central   Co-operative   Bank   Ltd., <\/p>\n
                respondent   no.2   herein   on   30\/12\/2002,   it
\n                became   eligible   to   vote   in   the   affairs   of   the
\n                federal   society   after   30\/12\/2005.     We   are <\/p>\n
                informed   that   the   date   of   investment   by   the <\/p>\n
                appellant Society and its enrolment as a member
\n                of   the   federal   society   is   the   same,   namely, <\/p>\n
                30\/12\/2002.     Ex   facie,   therefore,   in   terms   of
\n                section 27(3) of the Act, in April, 2006 when the
\n                election was due to be held, the appellant Society <\/p>\n
                was   entitled   to   appoint   one   of   its   members   to
\n                vote   on   its   behalf   in   the   affairs   of   the   federal
\n                society   respondent   no.2,   having   completed   the
\n                period of 3 yeas from the date of its investment in
\n                share of respondent 2 Society on 30\/12\/2005.\n<\/p>\n
      The learned counsel for the petitioner Shri Jaiswal submitted that <\/p>\n
                                                        ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                  9<\/span><\/p>\n
     in view of the judgment in Dudhganga Vikas Seva Sanstha (supra) <\/p>\n
     the issue is no more res integra, in so far as the right of a member <\/p>\n
     to vote on the basis of investment of its fund in the shares of the <\/p>\n
     Society is concerned.\n<\/p>\n
     7.              Per   contra,   it   is   submitted   by   Mrs.Bharti   Dangre,   the <\/p>\n
     learned   Additional   Government   Pleader   and   Shri   Ghare,   the <\/p>\n
     learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 – Society that the <\/p>\n
     receipt   on   which   much   emphasis   is   being   laid   is   not   a   share <\/p>\n
     certificate   and   it   is   merely   a   receipt   that   the   petitioner   has <\/p>\n
     deposited the said amount of Rs.1000\/- towards share and Re.1\/-\n<\/p>\n
     by way of entry fee.   The learned counsel further submitted that <\/p>\n
     the facts in the case before the Apex Court were different, in as <\/p>\n
     much as, the date of investment and date of membership was one <\/p>\n
     and the same i.e. 30\/12\/2002.    Whereas in the instant case the <\/p>\n
     date of investment is 2\/5\/2006 and the membership was granted <\/p>\n
     on 20\/7\/2009 and therefore, the said judgment would have to be <\/p>\n
     read in the context of the facts of the present case.  In my view, the <\/p>\n
     said submission of the learned counsel for the respondents cannot <\/p>\n
     be   countenanced.   The   Apex   Court   in   Dudhganga   Vikas   Seva <\/p>\n
     (supra)   has   in   terms   held   that   the   date   of   investment   is     the <\/p>\n
                                                        ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                                 10<\/span><\/p>\n
     material aspect and if period of three years is completed from the <\/p>\n
     said date then the Society which is desirous of being included in <\/p>\n
     the provisional list of voters would have to be so included.   In view <\/p>\n
     of the fact that the Apex Court has held that Section 27 lays down <\/p>\n
     the eligibility condition of a new member of a federal Society to <\/p>\n
     vote in the affairs of a federal Society whereas Rule 4 only relates <\/p>\n
     to preparation of a voters list therefore the difference in dates, in <\/p>\n
     my view would make no material difference, as Section 27(3) of <\/p>\n
     the Act lays down the eligibility condition for a new member of a <\/p>\n
     federal society to vote in the affairs of the said Society.   The fact <\/p>\n
     that the respondent no.3 – Society has chosen to pass a Resolution <\/p>\n
     conferring   membership   of   petitioner\/Society   only   on   27th  July, <\/p>\n
     2009, therefore, would be of no consequence.\n<\/p>\n
     8.              As   the   impugned   order   discloses   the   Collector,   Gondia <\/p>\n
     oblivious of Section 27(3) of the Act,  has rejected the application <\/p>\n
     of   each   of   the   petitioners   in   the   above   petitions   solely   on   the <\/p>\n
     ground that they do not have the requisite period of membership <\/p>\n
     prior   to   the   cut   off   date   for   being   qualified   for   inclusion   in   the <\/p>\n
     provisional list of voters.  In that view of the matter, the impugned <\/p>\n
     order dated 26\/5\/2011 in each of the above petitions is required to <\/p>\n
     be set aside and is accordingly set aside.   The respondent no.1 –\n<\/p>\n
                                                         ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>
\n      wp2681.11.odt                              11<\/span><\/p>\n
     Collector is directed to include the names of the petitioners in the <\/p>\n
     final  list   of   voters,   as  by   an  interim   order   dated  16\/6\/2011   the <\/p>\n
     Collector   was   already   directed   to   include   their   names   in   the <\/p>\n
     provisional list.  Rule is accordingly made absolute.  Parties to bear <\/p>\n
     their own costs.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                            JUDGE <\/p>\n
     chute<\/p>\n
                                                       ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 17:25:00 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 Bench: R. M. Savant wp2681.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2681 OF 2011. PETITIONER: Pratap Nagarik Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd., through its Chairman Shri Praful Gopaldas Agrawal, R\/o Deshbandhu Ward, Gondia. …VERSUS… RESPONDENTS: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPratap Nagarik Sahakari ... vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari ... vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-04T04:10:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-04T04:10:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1642,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari ... vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-04T04:10:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari ... vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari ... vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-04T04:10:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-04T04:10:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011"},"wordCount":1642,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011","name":"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari ... vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-04T04:10:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pratap-nagarik-sahakari-vs-the-collector-on-29-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pratap Nagarik Sahakari … vs The Collector on 29 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}